Comments on: Dept. of Scandal I http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/ The News Blog of Comics Culture Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:38:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: amateur sex make http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-620150 Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:06:31 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-620150 sex san amateur <a href="http://www.freespaces.com/buba12/ll.html" rel="nofollow">made sex amateur</a> sex san amateur made sex amateur

]]> by: link http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-522982 Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:53:56 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-522982 <strong>hello...</strong> will read it later... hello…

will read it later…

]]> by: Crowley http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-528 Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:06:54 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-528 that's crap. Heidi is being fair here. Is thing shit any of our business? certainly not... and neither was the Taki Soma incident... but Heidi is just presenting us with what's been broadcast around the comics commniy already anyway... that’s crap.

Heidi is being fair here.
Is thing shit any of our business? certainly not… and neither was the Taki Soma incident… but Heidi is just presenting us with what’s been broadcast around the comics commniy already anyway…

]]> by: Hector Lima http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-509 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:49:39 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-509 let's not pretend most of us haven't heard about this at LYING IN THE GUTTERS or the original blogs in the first place... online journals have changed the way privacy is perceived. and hypocrisy can make everybody look ugly. so relax, folks, and let's enjoy some more Butlercakes and Whomeverbabecake. the blog IS Heidi, no matter where it's hosted, otherwise I suppose PW wouldn't bother having you here. let’s not pretend most of us haven’t heard about this at LYING IN THE GUTTERS or the original blogs in the first place…

online journals have changed the way privacy is perceived. and hypocrisy can make everybody look ugly.

so relax, folks, and let’s enjoy some more Butlercakes and Whomeverbabecake.

the blog IS Heidi, no matter where it’s hosted, otherwise I suppose PW wouldn’t bother having you here.

]]> by: Anun http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-462 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:00:28 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-462 Funny, I seem to recall a lot more people taking Matt Busch's side when this came out originally. But now it's dismissed as "he said/she said". Perhaps people should've taken that stance originally. (Not the Beat. The Beat is being fair here) Funny, I seem to recall a lot more people taking Matt Busch’s side when this came out originally. But now it’s dismissed as “he said/she said”. Perhaps people should’ve taken that stance originally.

(Not the Beat. The Beat is being fair here)

]]> by: alexis http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-451 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:30:05 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-451 Low brow... just like comics books them selves. Is this the same woman that dated Paul Smith that is posting this stuff? I do not recall the full story but it involved bikers and Dave Sim. I love the dirt under the surface of the funnies but I find your choice of platform lacking in tact. This post belong in "the gutters." NOT in Publishers Weekly. Keep your chin up. Alexis Low brow… just like comics books them selves.
Is this the same woman that dated Paul Smith that is posting this stuff? I do not recall the full story but it involved bikers and Dave Sim. I love the dirt under the surface of the funnies but I find your choice of platform lacking in tact.

This post belong in “the gutters.” NOT in Publishers Weekly.

Keep your chin up.

Alexis

]]> by: Dan Wickline http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-443 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:07:49 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-443 Where I disapprove of the thing being a story in the first place... I think it's only fair (and balanced) to present the other side with the same amount of coverage. Where I disapprove of the thing being a story in the first place… I think it’s only fair (and balanced) to present the other side with the same amount of coverage.

]]> by: Augie De Blieck Jr. http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-440 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:50:22 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-440 So is this our cue to bring back up the whole Soma/Brownstein debacle, speaking of fairness and journalistic integrity? So is this our cue to bring back up the whole Soma/Brownstein debacle, speaking of fairness and journalistic integrity?

]]> by: The Beat http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-434 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:30:08 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-434 I do call linking to both sides without taking sides fairness. Crazy, huh? I do call linking to both sides without taking sides fairness. Crazy, huh?

]]> by: Abe http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-433 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:13:44 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-433 And this is a good example of WHY this sort of crap should stay private: because the other party can say anything in response. And since it's all just a big he said/she said tangle with no way to tell what the truth is, they both come off looking bad. Those Steve Nile tapes are still pretty funny, though. And this is a good example of WHY this sort of crap should stay private: because the other party can say anything in response. And since it’s all just a big he said/she said tangle with no way to tell what the truth is, they both come off looking bad. Those Steve Nile tapes are still pretty funny, though.

]]> by: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-431 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:31:04 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/07/17/dept-of-scandal-i/#comment-431 <i>but in the interests of fairness...</i> Bwa-ha-ha-ha! Is that what you call this? That's a good one. Guess you haven't known any of the people involved since they were 15 years old, huh? And a "gossip" section on a PW-sponsored blog isn't doing anything to raise the bar on comics journalism. Of course, that's not really your goal, now is it? but in the interests of fairness…

Bwa-ha-ha-ha! Is that what you call this? That’s a good one. Guess you haven’t known any of the people involved since they were 15 years old, huh?

And a “gossip” section on a PW-sponsored blog isn’t doing anything to raise the bar on comics journalism. Of course, that’s not really your goal, now is it?

]]>