<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOUSE OF SUGAR rejected by Diamond</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Marketing Monday: No-Brainer Marketing Efforts, Pt. II &#187; loudpoet</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-669886</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 04:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-669886</guid>
					<description>[...] Having covered the basics of developing a marketing plan and the no-brainer efforts every publisher and/or creator should be willing and able to implement before soliciting their first (or next) publication, it&amp;#8217;s time to delve a little deeper into the specifics of the Simple Marketing Plan. Whether initiated by a publisher (ideally) or a creator (sadly, the norm in comics), every single title needs a marketing plan of its own in order to be profitable. Amazon.com is littered with books no one&amp;#8217;s ever heard of because they lacked an effective marketing plan, and there are numerous examples of Diamond rejecting certain titles because of a legitimate or perceived lack of saleability. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Having covered the basics of developing a marketing plan and the no-brainer efforts every publisher and/or creator should be willing and able to implement before soliciting their first (or next) publication, it&#8217;s time to delve a little deeper into the specifics of the Simple Marketing Plan. Whether initiated by a publisher (ideally) or a creator (sadly, the norm in comics), every single title needs a marketing plan of its own in order to be profitable. Amazon.com is littered with books no one&#8217;s ever heard of because they lacked an effective marketing plan, and there are numerous examples of Diamond rejecting certain titles because of a legitimate or perceived lack of saleability. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason A. Quest</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3954</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 13:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3954</guid>
					<description>The rejection form-letter is interesting.  As someone who'll be submitting to Diamond soon (and for whom their market &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a fairly important part of my publishing plans), it offers a few red flags of things to avoid that would make it easier for them to turn down the book (e.g. non-standard format).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rejection form-letter is interesting.  As someone who&#8217;ll be submitting to Diamond soon (and for whom their market <i>is</i> a fairly important part of my publishing plans), it offers a few red flags of things to avoid that would make it easier for them to turn down the book (e.g. non-standard format).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 8, 2006: Dullsville</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3863</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3863</guid>
					<description>[...] House of Sugar, a sweet little comic by Rebecca Kraatz, has been rejected by Diamond for distribution. By and of itself, this wouldn&amp;#8217;t necessarily be news &amp;#8212; we all know what Diamond does and doesn&amp;#8217;t sell, and it&amp;#8217;s why much of the action is taking place outside of most comics shops these days &amp;#8212; but publisher Hope Larson has reprinted the rejection letter Diamond issues on such occasions, something I hadn&amp;#8217;t seen before. Bonus comedy: &amp;#8220;The writing is not up to the comic industry standards,&amp;#8221; a statement that&amp;#8217;s hilarious on any number of levels, not the least of which being that it&amp;#8217;s grammatically incorrect. (Link via Heidi MacDonald.) While we&amp;#8217;re on the subject, this thread on The Engine offers a good examination of the issues involved in this incident. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] House of Sugar, a sweet little comic by Rebecca Kraatz, has been rejected by Diamond for distribution. By and of itself, this wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be news &#8212; we all know what Diamond does and doesn&#8217;t sell, and it&#8217;s why much of the action is taking place outside of most comics shops these days &#8212; but publisher Hope Larson has reprinted the rejection letter Diamond issues on such occasions, something I hadn&#8217;t seen before. Bonus comedy: &#8220;The writing is not up to the comic industry standards,&#8221; a statement that&#8217;s hilarious on any number of levels, not the least of which being that it&#8217;s grammatically incorrect. (Link via Heidi MacDonald.) While we&#8217;re on the subject, this thread on The Engine offers a good examination of the issues involved in this incident. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pete Bangs</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3843</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3843</guid>
					<description>Thanks for pointing me towards this wonderful strip.  I tend to rely on blogs to point me towards webstrips rather than relying on some of the feed sites as so much is relatively worthless.

This is a beautiful strip and I've book marked the site so I can keep track of when the book is published.  I'll hopefully get it through Page 45.

And Marz is so right, Diamond will need these sorts of books very soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing me towards this wonderful strip.  I tend to rely on blogs to point me towards webstrips rather than relying on some of the feed sites as so much is relatively worthless.</p>
<p>This is a beautiful strip and I&#8217;ve book marked the site so I can keep track of when the book is published.  I&#8217;ll hopefully get it through Page 45.</p>
<p>And Marz is so right, Diamond will need these sorts of books very soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marz Richards</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3729</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 22:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/07/house-of-sugar-rejected-by-diamond/#comment-3729</guid>
					<description>It is interesting to see how books of note such as House of Sugar and Paper Rad find a way to the market (and usually great success as well) even without Diamond's distribution.  I'm betting Diamond will eventually need books like House of Sugar a lot more than independent comics will need Diamond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to see how books of note such as House of Sugar and Paper Rad find a way to the market (and usually great success as well) even without Diamond&#8217;s distribution.  I&#8217;m betting Diamond will eventually need books like House of Sugar a lot more than independent comics will need Diamond.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
