<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8217;70s, a time of natural beauty</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Utah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-386562</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-386562</guid>
					<description>Fine!
I visited your web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine!<br />
I visited your web site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-6764</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-6764</guid>
					<description>Nudity exploitation and juvenalia is all in the eye of the beholder and the context. 

In case no one has figured this out yet, I'm a contexualist and a relativist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nudity exploitation and juvenalia is all in the eye of the beholder and the context. </p>
<p>In case no one has figured this out yet, I&#8217;m a contexualist and a relativist.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robin Bougie</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-6721</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-6721</guid>
					<description>The sight of full frontal nudity strikes you as exploitive and juvenile?

Thats kinda weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sight of full frontal nudity strikes you as exploitive and juvenile?</p>
<p>Thats kinda weird.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sal!</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-6128</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-6128</guid>
					<description>Hi, I run a website and Podcast called Around Comics. We were very interested in this story, so we contacted Gene Colan for a response to this. 

You can see it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aroundcomics.com/news/latest/essential-editing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I run a website and Podcast called Around Comics. We were very interested in this story, so we contacted Gene Colan for a response to this. </p>
<p>You can see it <a href="http://www.aroundcomics.com/news/latest/essential-editing.html" rel="nofollow">here.</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5815</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 05:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5815</guid>
					<description>I don't care that people may think that the material is immature because of the nudity and violence - that is the a given when you're dealing with exploitative material. What offends me most is that Marvel is censoring material that in the 70's was acceptable  for newsstand distribution.  I want to know who thought that they had to CENSOR a title called TOMB OF DRACULA.  

Guess what? TOD is SUPPOSED to be offensive and horrific and exploitative!  That's what made those stories so great. 

But it damn sure shouldn't be censored - especially in an archive book series marketed as &quot;Essential.&quot;

It's wrong and stupid and ultimately wasteful of the brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care that people may think that the material is immature because of the nudity and violence - that is the a given when you&#8217;re dealing with exploitative material. What offends me most is that Marvel is censoring material that in the 70&#8217;s was acceptable  for newsstand distribution.  I want to know who thought that they had to CENSOR a title called TOMB OF DRACULA.  </p>
<p>Guess what? TOD is SUPPOSED to be offensive and horrific and exploitative!  That&#8217;s what made those stories so great. </p>
<p>But it damn sure shouldn&#8217;t be censored - especially in an archive book series marketed as &#8220;Essential.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s wrong and stupid and ultimately wasteful of the brand.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5523</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5523</guid>
					<description>Apparently not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5511</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5511</guid>
					<description>Won't everyone be so entranced by the sight of her heaving bosoms that they pay no attention to the vampiric violence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t everyone be so entranced by the sight of her heaving bosoms that they pay no attention to the vampiric violence?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5499</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5499</guid>
					<description>Top of the page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top of the page?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5476</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5476</guid>
					<description>Huh? Graphic violence? Where?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? Graphic violence? Where?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terrell</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5472</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5472</guid>
					<description>it bothers me a bit that you have no problem showing graphic violence on your site but not the nudity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it bothers me a bit that you have no problem showing graphic violence on your site but not the nudity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5453</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5453</guid>
					<description>There have to be differences because there was a worldwide celebration of bemused pop culture writing on the subject of Harry Potter showing his dingle in a production of Equus, but one person's random suggestion of &quot;Hermione flashed her knockers&quot; has made me want to never read the Internet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have to be differences because there was a worldwide celebration of bemused pop culture writing on the subject of Harry Potter showing his dingle in a production of Equus, but one person&#8217;s random suggestion of &#8220;Hermione flashed her knockers&#8221; has made me want to never read the Internet again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5405</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5405</guid>
					<description>Whoa buddy, I didn't say &quot;Wrong.&quot; I just said it doesn't mean mature. I don't think the art should have been changed. Vampire comics need boobies. 

And no one, me included, said my posting all those 300 pictures was &quot;mature&quot;. 

BTW, the next person who suggests to me that men and women are objectified in the &lt;B&gt;same way&lt;/b&gt; in our society is going to get an ass whuppin'. Both are objectified, but in vastly different proportions and ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa buddy, I didn&#8217;t say &#8220;Wrong.&#8221; I just said it doesn&#8217;t mean mature. I don&#8217;t think the art should have been changed. Vampire comics need boobies. </p>
<p>And no one, me included, said my posting all those 300 pictures was &#8220;mature&#8221;. </p>
<p>BTW, the next person who suggests to me that men and women are objectified in the <B>same way</b> in our society is going to get an ass whuppin&#8217;. Both are objectified, but in vastly different proportions and ways.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matteo</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5398</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5398</guid>
					<description>Well, i feel irked by the implication that seeing a naked woman in a comic is wrong and immature. Guess what? I am straight, heterosexual, and I find the female form the most beautiful thing on this planet.

 While, say, i would get upset if Hermione flashed her knockers in a eventual &quot;Harry Potter&quot; comic book,  it's only right that in a dracula pulp comics there is blood and tits. If you don't like it , don't buy it. In the Renaissance the was a guy named &quot;il mutandaro&quot;, who's job was to paint underwear on angels and other characters on the sistine chapel, because it offended the &quot;civil&quot; sensibilities. Nice to see that things don't change.

I am appalled by  the straight-edge feminism where no matter what female nudity in the media is wrong. Because,well, it's not. Why don't we give more clothes to the &quot;300&quot; actors, eh?

Matteo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i feel irked by the implication that seeing a naked woman in a comic is wrong and immature. Guess what? I am straight, heterosexual, and I find the female form the most beautiful thing on this planet.</p>
<p> While, say, i would get upset if Hermione flashed her knockers in a eventual &#8220;Harry Potter&#8221; comic book,  it&#8217;s only right that in a dracula pulp comics there is blood and tits. If you don&#8217;t like it , don&#8217;t buy it. In the Renaissance the was a guy named &#8220;il mutandaro&#8221;, who&#8217;s job was to paint underwear on angels and other characters on the sistine chapel, because it offended the &#8220;civil&#8221; sensibilities. Nice to see that things don&#8217;t change.</p>
<p>I am appalled by  the straight-edge feminism where no matter what female nudity in the media is wrong. Because,well, it&#8217;s not. Why don&#8217;t we give more clothes to the &#8220;300&#8243; actors, eh?</p>
<p>Matteo
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5375</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5375</guid>
					<description>Dirk, I hope you enjoyed the naked man imagery at the top of my blog today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk, I hope you enjoyed the naked man imagery at the top of my blog today.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5370</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5370</guid>
					<description>Jamie: No one's arguing that the display of tits in a situation where a character is supposed to be naked is &quot;mature&quot;; I'm merely arguing that it isn't &lt;i&gt;immature&lt;/i&gt;. It's not really an either/or thing. I'm also saying that unless it's specifically part of the gag or somehow necessary to the story, &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; showing nudity in a nude scene is goofy and juveline. I mean, that's the point of a nude scene, right? 

I'm further arguing that even obviously prurient uses of nudity shouldn't be seen as morally suspect or the product of a feeble mind, and that adults like nudity as much as teenagers -- men obviously more so than women, given the way their sexuality is easily triggered by visual stimuli, but I would imagine that many women wouldn't exactly object to more displays of appealing male nudity. 

Beautiful naked people are an inherently good thing. This isn't exactly an original thought, here. Why do I even have to say this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie: No one&#8217;s arguing that the display of tits in a situation where a character is supposed to be naked is &#8220;mature&#8221;; I&#8217;m merely arguing that it isn&#8217;t <i>immature</i>. It&#8217;s not really an either/or thing. I&#8217;m also saying that unless it&#8217;s specifically part of the gag or somehow necessary to the story, <i>not</i> showing nudity in a nude scene is goofy and juveline. I mean, that&#8217;s the point of a nude scene, right? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m further arguing that even obviously prurient uses of nudity shouldn&#8217;t be seen as morally suspect or the product of a feeble mind, and that adults like nudity as much as teenagers &#8212; men obviously more so than women, given the way their sexuality is easily triggered by visual stimuli, but I would imagine that many women wouldn&#8217;t exactly object to more displays of appealing male nudity. </p>
<p>Beautiful naked people are an inherently good thing. This isn&#8217;t exactly an original thought, here. Why do I even have to say this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jamie Coville</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5366</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5366</guid>
					<description>Does showing the boobies make it more mature?

It depends on your frame of mind and how old you are. If you were a male teen ager when these came out and you were able to see/read these books without pointing and giggling at the naked women, then you might *feel*  more mature than you did when reading Hulk comics the week before.

But if a male reader sees the book and thinks &quot;HOLY SHIT THESE GOT TITS IN THEM!&quot; and make a big deal out of it to people, then no, reading the books doesn't make you more mature.

Which reader TOD was aimed at is only somewhat relevant. I'm sure Marvel wanted all the readers they could get and probably didn't care which group, just as long as it didn't get them in trouble. But that the boobies &amp;#38; naked women scenes weren't drawn in a centerfold like fashion, indicates the creative team (including the editor) were leaning more towards the mature camp. Maybe they didn't want to get in trouble and/or they knew they'd get &quot;TITS!&quot; group anyway, just by virtue of showing them when other comics did not.

But yeah, somebody at Marvel is conservative when it comes to nudity and wants the boobies covered up. I don't agree, especially in reprints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does showing the boobies make it more mature?</p>
<p>It depends on your frame of mind and how old you are. If you were a male teen ager when these came out and you were able to see/read these books without pointing and giggling at the naked women, then you might *feel*  more mature than you did when reading Hulk comics the week before.</p>
<p>But if a male reader sees the book and thinks &#8220;HOLY SHIT THESE GOT TITS IN THEM!&#8221; and make a big deal out of it to people, then no, reading the books doesn&#8217;t make you more mature.</p>
<p>Which reader TOD was aimed at is only somewhat relevant. I&#8217;m sure Marvel wanted all the readers they could get and probably didn&#8217;t care which group, just as long as it didn&#8217;t get them in trouble. But that the boobies &amp; naked women scenes weren&#8217;t drawn in a centerfold like fashion, indicates the creative team (including the editor) were leaning more towards the mature camp. Maybe they didn&#8217;t want to get in trouble and/or they knew they&#8217;d get &#8220;TITS!&#8221; group anyway, just by virtue of showing them when other comics did not.</p>
<p>But yeah, somebody at Marvel is conservative when it comes to nudity and wants the boobies covered up. I don&#8217;t agree, especially in reprints.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hector</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5344</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5344</guid>
					<description>urgh. rage makes Tarzan's bad English even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>urgh. rage makes Tarzan&#8217;s bad English even worse.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hector</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5343</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5343</guid>
					<description>what markus said.

and it's &quot;great&quot; that, while the girls boobs have been covered, nothing's been done about her body being put through a grinder [or whatever that was] and all the other scenes with blood. 

that's what impressed me more upon reading this kind of Horror story as a kid: the gore, not the boobs, which were kind of a relief to the tension and tipically &quot;Satanist&quot; imagery of the 70's. in sexually-repressed cultures, representations of violence is always so much more tolerated than representations of sex...

censoring those shots make them look all the more mature in today's light, no matter how contradictory that may sound. what good does a dogmatic rulebook things like killing a Kurd couple for a 6 minute sex video recorded on a cellphone? it makes their &quot;crime&quot; all the more special, not to say rebellious. 

and us all the more nostalgic for a time when all those cool things were OK, which sucks. there's no point in republishing those comics if not in the original way they were conceived. I could have taken digital coloring, but thisis just plain stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what markus said.</p>
<p>and it&#8217;s &#8220;great&#8221; that, while the girls boobs have been covered, nothing&#8217;s been done about her body being put through a grinder [or whatever that was] and all the other scenes with blood. </p>
<p>that&#8217;s what impressed me more upon reading this kind of Horror story as a kid: the gore, not the boobs, which were kind of a relief to the tension and tipically &#8220;Satanist&#8221; imagery of the 70&#8217;s. in sexually-repressed cultures, representations of violence is always so much more tolerated than representations of sex&#8230;</p>
<p>censoring those shots make them look all the more mature in today&#8217;s light, no matter how contradictory that may sound. what good does a dogmatic rulebook things like killing a Kurd couple for a 6 minute sex video recorded on a cellphone? it makes their &#8220;crime&#8221; all the more special, not to say rebellious. </p>
<p>and us all the more nostalgic for a time when all those cool things were OK, which sucks. there&#8217;s no point in republishing those comics if not in the original way they were conceived. I could have taken digital coloring, but thisis just plain stupid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5341</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5341</guid>
					<description>&quot;Iâ€™m pissed that there isnâ€™t more beefcake available in my entertainment, and I donâ€™t think this makes me â€œjuvenileâ€?; it makes me a typical adult male.&quot;

Make that &quot;typical adult &lt;i&gt;gay&lt;/i&gt; male.&quot; I suspect the typical adult male probably doesn't care about the beefcake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™m pissed that there isnâ€™t more beefcake available in my entertainment, and I donâ€™t think this makes me â€œjuvenileâ€?; it makes me a typical adult male.&#8221;</p>
<p>Make that &#8220;typical adult <i>gay</i> male.&#8221; I suspect the typical adult male probably doesn&#8217;t care about the beefcake.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5340</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/21/the-70s-a-time-of-natural-beauty/#comment-5340</guid>
					<description>And yet at the same point, it was all very sublimated in the original novel - while you can certainly assume that three hot chicks are giving Harker's little mister a good time, it is never explicitly stated.  Seduction and eroticism is a lot like horror - primal, and sometimes much more powerful when NOT fully shown.  Both has its uses, but I think frank use of titties in Dracula is gilding the lily.  Not that I think the comic should have then been censored in the reprint - let's show it as it was - but to say that Dracula needs the tits is to give the tale over to people that don't know the difference between a truly sensual striptease and a $5 lapdance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet at the same point, it was all very sublimated in the original novel - while you can certainly assume that three hot chicks are giving Harker&#8217;s little mister a good time, it is never explicitly stated.  Seduction and eroticism is a lot like horror - primal, and sometimes much more powerful when NOT fully shown.  Both has its uses, but I think frank use of titties in Dracula is gilding the lily.  Not that I think the comic should have then been censored in the reprint - let&#8217;s show it as it was - but to say that Dracula needs the tits is to give the tale over to people that don&#8217;t know the difference between a truly sensual striptease and a $5 lapdance.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
