<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel Month-to-Month Sales: August 2006</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 28, 2006: If you&#8217;re not with us, you&#8217;re with the Marxist Feminist Homosexualist Axis</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6510</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6510</guid>
					<description>[...] Over at The Beat, Marc-Oliver Frisch uses the latest ICv2 numbers to analyze DC Comics&amp;#8217; month-to-month sales through August. (As previously noted, Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien did the same for Marvel&amp;#8217;s sales figures a couple of days ago.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Over at The Beat, Marc-Oliver Frisch uses the latest ICv2 numbers to analyze DC Comics&#8217; month-to-month sales through August. (As previously noted, Paul O&#8217;Brien did the same for Marvel&#8217;s sales figures a couple of days ago.) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6472</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6472</guid>
					<description>Mark: Marc-Oliver Frisch's DC Sales column on this web site has some coverage of Image Comics sales in the &quot;other publishers&quot; section near the end of the column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Marc-Oliver Frisch&#8217;s DC Sales column on this web site has some coverage of Image Comics sales in the &#8220;other publishers&#8221; section near the end of the column.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Billy OMalley</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6468</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6468</guid>
					<description>Wow...She-Hulk is already close to pre-CW tie in levels.
Good...hopefully it will be cancelled soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;She-Hulk is already close to pre-CW tie in levels.<br />
Good&#8230;hopefully it will be cancelled soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian Lachut</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6466</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6466</guid>
					<description>&quot;Many of the Civil War books have variant covers which greatly inflate the number of issues sold.&quot;

Are you counting the reprint covers?  I know the main book has had some, like the McGuinnes one, but I can't think of any others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many of the Civil War books have variant covers which greatly inflate the number of issues sold.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you counting the reprint covers?  I know the main book has had some, like the McGuinnes one, but I can&#8217;t think of any others.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6297</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6297</guid>
					<description>I also find this very exciting to read.  I am hoping we can see an Image sales someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also find this very exciting to read.  I am hoping we can see an Image sales someday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ComicList: New Comic Book Releases List</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6271</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6271</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;NEWS: Marvel Sales For  August 2006...&lt;/strong&gt;

Paul O'Brien writes &quot;Even with the parent title running late, CIVIL WAR dominated Marvels output again in August, with a raft of crossover titles including the newly launched HEROES FOR HIRE. The Ultimate titles ship their second annuals, and the c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NEWS: Marvel Sales For  August 2006&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Paul O&#8217;Brien writes &#8220;Even with the parent title running late, CIVIL WAR dominated Marvels output again in August, with a raft of crossover titles including the newly launched HEROES FOR HIRE. The Ultimate titles ship their second annuals, and the c&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6248</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6248</guid>
					<description>Meanwhile Niceza apparently posted on a Deadpool message board that Cable/Deadpool is &quot;good to go for another year (at least)&quot; after #36 [the previous last confirmed renewal point]

http://deadpoolica.proboards13.com/index.cgi?board=cabledpboard&amp;#38;action=display&amp;#38;thread=1158624006#1159191847

Backed up by Quesada saying that the &quot;decision [on a new ongoing penciller for the book] is being finalized as we speak&quot; last week in his Newsarama column

http://www.newsarama.com/NewJoeFridays/NewJoeFridays14.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile Niceza apparently posted on a Deadpool message board that Cable/Deadpool is &#8220;good to go for another year (at least)&#8221; after #36 [the previous last confirmed renewal point]</p>
<p><a href='http://deadpoolica.proboards13.com/index.cgi?board=cabledpboard&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1158624006#1159191847' rel='nofollow'>http://deadpoolica.proboards13.com/index.cgi?board=cabledpboard&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1158624006#1159191847</a></p>
<p>Backed up by Quesada saying that the &#8220;decision [on a new ongoing penciller for the book] is being finalized as we speak&#8221; last week in his Newsarama column</p>
<p><a href='http://www.newsarama.com/NewJoeFridays/NewJoeFridays14.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.newsarama.com/NewJoeFridays/NewJoeFridays14.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Messinger</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6234</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6234</guid>
					<description>Big fan of these articles - wondering if you think there's a reason behind Wolverine: Origins, given how much most reasonable people and comics critics hate the comic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big fan of these articles - wondering if you think there&#8217;s a reason behind Wolverine: Origins, given how much most reasonable people and comics critics hate the comic?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6206</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6206</guid>
					<description>Many of the Civil War books have variant covers which greatly inflate the number of issues sold.

My LCS buys 75 copies, even though they don't sell all of them,  so that they can sell the 1-in-75 variant for big bucks. I am sure this is going on all across the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the Civil War books have variant covers which greatly inflate the number of issues sold.</p>
<p>My LCS buys 75 copies, even though they don&#8217;t sell all of them,  so that they can sell the 1-in-75 variant for big bucks. I am sure this is going on all across the country.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean W</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6193</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6193</guid>
					<description>Actually, Paul, I think the series will be going beyond #12.

#12 reaches &quot;Z&quot; so I'm guessing #13 will go back to &quot;A&quot; and cover characters not done at the beginning of this series (Lord knows there are certainly enough of them!).

And maybe when it's done they'll bring back that &quot;of 12&quot; (like Marvel's TRANSFORMERS did with #80 (of 4))

Like you've reported before, it's a higher priced book whose sales have been consistantly good and the series itself doesn't cost a lot to produce in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Paul, I think the series will be going beyond #12.</p>
<p>#12 reaches &#8220;Z&#8221; so I&#8217;m guessing #13 will go back to &#8220;A&#8221; and cover characters not done at the beginning of this series (Lord knows there are certainly enough of them!).</p>
<p>And maybe when it&#8217;s done they&#8217;ll bring back that &#8220;of 12&#8243; (like Marvel&#8217;s TRANSFORMERS did with #80 (of 4))</p>
<p>Like you&#8217;ve reported before, it&#8217;s a higher priced book whose sales have been consistantly good and the series itself doesn&#8217;t cost a lot to produce in the first place.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles Knight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6183</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6183</guid>
					<description>Ah.. it's a RSS feed issue - I use RSS Bandit to check the feed and then use it's inbuilt browser to read the page. The colour to the left merge with the white middle panel...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.. it&#8217;s a RSS feed issue - I use RSS Bandit to check the feed and then use it&#8217;s inbuilt browser to read the page. The colour to the left merge with the white middle panel&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6182</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6182</guid>
					<description>Uh what horrible background? It should read as plain white. There night be a browser issue. WHat are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh what horrible background? It should read as plain white. There night be a browser issue. WHat are you using?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles knight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6180</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6180</guid>
					<description>Can you get rid of that horrible background - it does nothing at all for readability....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you get rid of that horrible background - it does nothing at all for readability&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 26, 2006: The late edition</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6155</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6155</guid>
					<description>[...] While we&amp;#8217;re mentioning The Beat: Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien examines the month-to-month sales of Marvel&amp;#8217;s Direct-Market comics sales, using the latest figures from ICv2 as a guide. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] While we&#8217;re mentioning The Beat: Paul O&#8217;Brien examines the month-to-month sales of Marvel&#8217;s Direct-Market comics sales, using the latest figures from ICv2 as a guide. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: stanicus</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6147</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6147</guid>
					<description>i concur with Chad.  these articles are great reads (the beancounters at marvel probably do the same analysis).  i still miss Article 10 though. 

the numbers on CW related books are amazing.  the funny thing is that i personally do not know anyone buying any of it.  also, i am curious if the Infinite Crisis related books got the same boast as the CW related books do. gonna have to look that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i concur with Chad.  these articles are great reads (the beancounters at marvel probably do the same analysis).  i still miss Article 10 though. </p>
<p>the numbers on CW related books are amazing.  the funny thing is that i personally do not know anyone buying any of it.  also, i am curious if the Infinite Crisis related books got the same boast as the CW related books do. gonna have to look that up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6145</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6145</guid>
					<description>Well, the &quot;of 12&quot; bit is still accurate, because that refers to the current A TO Z series.  Unless they've discovered some additional letters after Z, I would assume that whatever they do in 2007 will not be labelled as issue #13.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the &#8220;of 12&#8243; bit is still accurate, because that refers to the current A TO Z series.  Unless they&#8217;ve discovered some additional letters after Z, I would assume that whatever they do in 2007 will not be labelled as issue #13.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean W</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6138</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6138</guid>
					<description>THUNDERBOLTS is apparently getting a new creative team and being tied more closely to the post-CW Marvel Universe early next year, so I suspect its sale will return to these current levels whenever Nicieza and Grummett leave...

And the OFFICIAL HANDBOOK series has dropped the (of 12) bit and is now ongoing thru 2007 - according to the head writers at their ComiX-Fan forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THUNDERBOLTS is apparently getting a new creative team and being tied more closely to the post-CW Marvel Universe early next year, so I suspect its sale will return to these current levels whenever Nicieza and Grummett leave&#8230;</p>
<p>And the OFFICIAL HANDBOOK series has dropped the (of 12) bit and is now ongoing thru 2007 - according to the head writers at their ComiX-Fan forum.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chad</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6131</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/09/26/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2006/#comment-6131</guid>
					<description>I just want to say i LOVE these articles. I find this stuff to be fascinating and great way to see through all the crap on the 'net and gauge peoples REAL reactions to titles.

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to say i LOVE these articles. I find this stuff to be fascinating and great way to see through all the crap on the &#8216;net and gauge peoples REAL reactions to titles.</p>
<p>Thanks again!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
