<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lovable &#8216;toon penguins defeat James Bond</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rivkah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17809</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17809</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;By the way â€” I thought â€œCasino Royaleâ€? was pretty darn good, and easily the best Bond film Iâ€™ve seen in 30 years or so.&lt;/i&gt;

I really enjoyed the new Bond film, as well. In spite of the fact that the Blonde Bond is freakin' SEXY, there was a lot of creative license done in this film that I hadn't seen in earlier films. I admit, I was kind of disappointed at the lack of hot dancing women in the opening sequence and girl toys throughout the movie *sniff* but the creative license with the characters was refreshing. There was a lot of miss but also a lot of hit in this film. GEORGEOUS settings. The Love Interest was actually very fascinating as a person rather than being just a sex object (not that I object to the later, either, seeing as this IS double-O-seven). However, I wish the director hadn't taken such creative leeway with the script, cut a bit on the action, and given the characters more dialog. I'm used to the witty tete at tete with the original Bond films, and that's something I'd like to see more of from this particular brand of Bond in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>By the way â€” I thought â€œCasino Royaleâ€? was pretty darn good, and easily the best Bond film Iâ€™ve seen in 30 years or so.</i></p>
<p>I really enjoyed the new Bond film, as well. In spite of the fact that the Blonde Bond is freakin&#8217; SEXY, there was a lot of creative license done in this film that I hadn&#8217;t seen in earlier films. I admit, I was kind of disappointed at the lack of hot dancing women in the opening sequence and girl toys throughout the movie *sniff* but the creative license with the characters was refreshing. There was a lot of miss but also a lot of hit in this film. GEORGEOUS settings. The Love Interest was actually very fascinating as a person rather than being just a sex object (not that I object to the later, either, seeing as this IS double-O-seven). However, I wish the director hadn&#8217;t taken such creative leeway with the script, cut a bit on the action, and given the characters more dialog. I&#8217;m used to the witty tete at tete with the original Bond films, and that&#8217;s something I&#8217;d like to see more of from this particular brand of Bond in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Doug</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17522</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17522</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;In all the years Iâ€™ve been regularly going to the movies, this is the only time I can remember a case where two films were switched.&lt;/i&gt;

Almost 20 years ago, I sat down in the theater to see &lt;i&gt;Wings of Desire,&lt;/i&gt; and they started showing &lt;i&gt;Platoon Leader&lt;/i&gt; instead. I went to tell them about the problem, but it's amazing how many people sat in the theater and kept watching the screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In all the years Iâ€™ve been regularly going to the movies, this is the only time I can remember a case where two films were switched.</i></p>
<p>Almost 20 years ago, I sat down in the theater to see <i>Wings of Desire,</i> and they started showing <i>Platoon Leader</i> instead. I went to tell them about the problem, but it&#8217;s amazing how many people sat in the theater and kept watching the screen.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17488</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 23:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17488</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;What I find more interesting is this strong showing by a CGI-animal movie after a long string of box-office disappointments.

Was it that olâ€™ Robin Williams magic? Was it the music? Or could it be, as the movieâ€™s theme suggests, that humans really do respond better to dancing?&lt;/i&gt;

I think the answer to this one is rather simple, unlike movies like The Wild and Flushed Away, the ads made Happy Feet look like a good movie. CGI's nice and all but a good story trumps pretty after we've seen a half-dozen pretty films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What I find more interesting is this strong showing by a CGI-animal movie after a long string of box-office disappointments.</p>
<p>Was it that olâ€™ Robin Williams magic? Was it the music? Or could it be, as the movieâ€™s theme suggests, that humans really do respond better to dancing?</i></p>
<p>I think the answer to this one is rather simple, unlike movies like The Wild and Flushed Away, the ads made Happy Feet look like a good movie. CGI&#8217;s nice and all but a good story trumps pretty after we&#8217;ve seen a half-dozen pretty films.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: R. Maheras</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17336</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17336</guid>
					<description>On Sunday, my wife and I sat down in a fairly full cineplex theater to watch &quot;Casino Royale,&quot; and the next thing we know, &quot;Happy Feet&quot; starts showing on the screen. Everyone in the theater started yelling, and after about five minutes, some theater rep came running in saying that the films had been switched somehow, and that the Bond film was playing in the &quot;Happy Feet&quot; theater. After about 20 minutes they got it all sorted out, and we all got to watch &quot;Casino Royale.&quot; As we left after the film was over, everyone was given free passes for their trouble.

(Spoiler alert) If you think about it, if those kids in the other theater saw the first five minutes or so of &quot;Casino Royale,&quot; they saw some pretty graphic violence, murder and mayhem. (End of spoiler alert)

In all the years I've been regularly going to the movies, this is the only time I can remember a case where two films were switched. How nutty is that?

By the way -- I thought &quot;Casino Royale&quot; was pretty darn good, and easily the best Bond film I've seen in 30 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday, my wife and I sat down in a fairly full cineplex theater to watch &#8220;Casino Royale,&#8221; and the next thing we know, &#8220;Happy Feet&#8221; starts showing on the screen. Everyone in the theater started yelling, and after about five minutes, some theater rep came running in saying that the films had been switched somehow, and that the Bond film was playing in the &#8220;Happy Feet&#8221; theater. After about 20 minutes they got it all sorted out, and we all got to watch &#8220;Casino Royale.&#8221; As we left after the film was over, everyone was given free passes for their trouble.</p>
<p>(Spoiler alert) If you think about it, if those kids in the other theater saw the first five minutes or so of &#8220;Casino Royale,&#8221; they saw some pretty graphic violence, murder and mayhem. (End of spoiler alert)</p>
<p>In all the years I&#8217;ve been regularly going to the movies, this is the only time I can remember a case where two films were switched. How nutty is that?</p>
<p>By the way &#8212; I thought &#8220;Casino Royale&#8221; was pretty darn good, and easily the best Bond film I&#8217;ve seen in 30 years or so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tim McEwen</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17272</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17272</guid>
					<description>For those that know their 90s Australian comics, one of the co-creators of Bug &amp;#38; Stump, Mark Sexton, was production designer and storyboard artist on this movie and was an enormous influence of how it looks. Other Aust comics luminaries who worked on this were Matthew Hatton (CyberSwine and Zero Assassin) and Chew Chan (Lyrebird).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that know their 90s Australian comics, one of the co-creators of Bug &amp; Stump, Mark Sexton, was production designer and storyboard artist on this movie and was an enormous influence of how it looks. Other Aust comics luminaries who worked on this were Matthew Hatton (CyberSwine and Zero Assassin) and Chew Chan (Lyrebird).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Bieser</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17208</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17208</guid>
					<description>The Bond flick did debut in somewhat fewer theatres, and I think if they'd been on an equal number of screens then Bond might have edged out Mumble. What I find more interesting is this strong showing by a CGI-animal movie after a long string of box-office disappointments.

Was it that ol' Robin Williams magic? Was it the music? Or could it be, as the movie's theme suggests, that humans really do respond better to dancing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bond flick did debut in somewhat fewer theatres, and I think if they&#8217;d been on an equal number of screens then Bond might have edged out Mumble. What I find more interesting is this strong showing by a CGI-animal movie after a long string of box-office disappointments.</p>
<p>Was it that ol&#8217; Robin Williams magic? Was it the music? Or could it be, as the movie&#8217;s theme suggests, that humans really do respond better to dancing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mainja</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17172</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/11/20/lovable-toon-penguins-defeat-james-bond/#comment-17172</guid>
					<description>it did debut on fewer screens than happy feet, though. that must've been a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it did debut on fewer screens than happy feet, though. that must&#8217;ve been a factor.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
