Comments on: Peter’s Peter http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/ The News Blog of Comics Culture Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:36:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: new backseat bangers clips http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-1772656 Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:33:56 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-1772656 <strong>new backseat bangers clips...</strong> new backseat bangers clips... new backseat bangers clips…

new backseat bangers clips…

]]> by: Jack http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-242065 Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:33:17 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-242065 <strong>Jack...</strong> Good article here.... Jack…

Good article here….

]]> by: Caleb T http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-142553 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:34:04 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-142553 Nobody wants to see a man's dick. We want breast and ass, breast and ass. Nobody wants to see a man’s dick. We want breast and ass, breast and ass.

]]> by: Caleb T http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-142549 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:31:27 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-142549 You dirty bastard! You don't put a fucking naked man in a comic it's so fucking nasty! God damn who taught you how to make a comic! Nasty motherfucker. You dirty bastard! You don’t put a fucking naked man in a comic it’s so fucking nasty! God damn who taught you how to make a comic! Nasty motherfucker.

]]> by: Tag http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23227 Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:50:55 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23227 Good, so I'm not quite so much a judgmental jerk. "Miller Janson," indeed... Good, so I’m not quite so much a judgmental jerk. “Miller Janson,” indeed…

]]> by: James http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23053 Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:17:55 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23053 The reference to DKR is so explicit that a (DKR-esque) news anchor is named "Miller Janson." The reference to DKR is so explicit that a (DKR-esque) news anchor is named “Miller Janson.”

]]> by: Scott Bieser http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23027 Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:06:38 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23027 Sheesh. Everone wants to be an editor these days... Sheesh. Everone wants to be an editor these days…

]]> by: Justin http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23013 Sun, 10 Dec 2006 21:22:09 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-23013 "posed a pic" would have been better “posed a pic” would have been better

]]> by: Scott Bieser http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22703 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:56:12 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22703 Peter Parker packed a peck of pickled peckers. Peter Parker packed a peck of pickled peckers.

]]> by: Tag http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22417 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 05:41:26 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22417 Seeing as this REIGN jazz seems to be a watered-down version of DARK KNIGHT RETURNS (I say this without having seen more than the preview, so perhaps that's unfair), and that book itself had its share of bare tits and non-descript genitalia, this should really not have come as a surprise to anyone who'd be likely to buy this book. But yeah, poor choice, since DARK KNIGHT came out before Batman was revived as a major property, whereas Spidey is presently ascendant. I just hope Marvel doesn't choose to take its misstep out on poor Kaare. Seeing as this REIGN jazz seems to be a watered-down version of DARK KNIGHT RETURNS (I say this without having seen more than the preview, so perhaps that’s unfair), and that book itself had its share of bare tits and non-descript genitalia, this should really not have come as a surprise to anyone who’d be likely to buy this book. But yeah, poor choice, since DARK KNIGHT came out before Batman was revived as a major property, whereas Spidey is presently ascendant. I just hope Marvel doesn’t choose to take its misstep out on poor Kaare.

]]> by: matteo http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22253 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:12:16 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22253 well...it always amazes me oh north-american masses are offended by brief nudity. After reading the issue, the penis was really the less insulting thing really. Andrews, an artist that I have previously quite admired, resorts to make a weak imitation of Miller's dark knight, both in art and writing. THAT we should get up in arms about. well…it always amazes me oh north-american masses are offended by brief nudity. After reading the issue, the penis was really the less insulting thing really. Andrews, an artist that I have previously quite admired, resorts to make a weak imitation of Miller’s dark knight, both in art and writing. THAT we should get up in arms about.

]]> by: Cary Coatney http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22246 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:52:18 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22246 Does it spin its' own web? ~ Coat Does it spin its’ own web?

~

Coat

]]> by: Stephen http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22218 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:29:06 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22218 Maybe he had just gone swimming and there was "shrinkage". Maybe he had just gone swimming and there was “shrinkage”.

]]> by: Dagwan http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22202 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:04:17 +0000 http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2006/12/08/peters-peter/#comment-22202 I prefer to call it "The Other" rather than the obvious "Peter's peter"... I prefer to call it “The Other” rather than the obvious “Peter’s peter”…

]]>