<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gagnon responds</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Gagnon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-67772</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-67772</guid>
					<description>Please note that the &quot;proof&quot; you are mentioning applied to all the books listed, and that the website contains an entry from two days before the one you are referring to that contains postings of several documents which disprove the claims by Mr. Noel. Sales records, contracts, and private e-mails have all been made public and directly disprove the claims made in Mr. McLelland's article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that the &#8220;proof&#8221; you are mentioning applied to all the books listed, and that the website contains an entry from two days before the one you are referring to that contains postings of several documents which disprove the claims by Mr. Noel. Sales records, contracts, and private e-mails have all been made public and directly disprove the claims made in Mr. McLelland&#8217;s article.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Huxford</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-35969</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-35969</guid>
					<description>Your &quot;proof&quot; shows a form rejection letter from Diamond that seems to speak for 3 different products (only one of which being Mr. Scootles). Don't know that you've proven anything with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;proof&#8221; shows a form rejection letter from Diamond that seems to speak for 3 different products (only one of which being Mr. Scootles). Don&#8217;t know that you&#8217;ve proven anything with that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Gagnon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-35171</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-35171</guid>
					<description>Please note that the web address where documents disproving these claims should have read http://lightning.motime.com and can be found there. 

Regarding the Sequart comment, I have discussed the error with both Mike Phillips and Julian Darius. They have both stated that the mistake was no big deal and does not concern them, but I do acknowldge that I did mistakenly refer to Phillips as owner instead of Editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that the web address where documents disproving these claims should have read <a href='http://lightning.motime.com' rel='nofollow'>http://lightning.motime.com</a> and can be found there. </p>
<p>Regarding the Sequart comment, I have discussed the error with both Mike Phillips and Julian Darius. They have both stated that the mistake was no big deal and does not concern them, but I do acknowldge that I did mistakenly refer to Phillips as owner instead of Editor.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jan. 10, 2007: Cowboys &#38; Alibis</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-35138</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-35138</guid>
					<description>[...] And after that one, do I really have to mention the latest volley in the Mr. Scootles War? Is it me, or are publishing mudfights getting more petty and picayune by the day? Ten lords a-leapin&amp;#8217;, do I ever hate the funnybook industry&amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And after that one, do I really have to mention the latest volley in the Mr. Scootles War? Is it me, or are publishing mudfights getting more petty and picayune by the day? Ten lords a-leapin&#8217;, do I ever hate the funnybook industry&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-34966</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-34966</guid>
					<description>[...] Former publisher Mike Gagnon sent an over-long defense to Heidi MacDonald basically saying &amp;#8220;it&amp;#8217;s not true&amp;#8221;. He also shows up to argue his case in Newsarama comments, which makes him look desperate. He would have seemed more compelling if he&amp;#8217;d bother to respond to inquiries while the article was being written. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Former publisher Mike Gagnon sent an over-long defense to Heidi MacDonald basically saying &#8220;it&#8217;s not true&#8221;. He also shows up to argue his case in Newsarama comments, which makes him look desperate. He would have seemed more compelling if he&#8217;d bother to respond to inquiries while the article was being written. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Thompson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-34764</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/01/09/gagnon-responds/#comment-34764</guid>
					<description>&quot;In response to the general attacks on me personally, Mike Phillips, owner of comics site Sequart.com, a client of mine, has said: “Don’t worry about that, Mike. I’ll judge your relationship with Sequart.com based on your dealings with Sequart.com…You’ve been nothing but helpful to my company, so that’s how I’m basing our relationship.”&quot;

I don't believe Mike Phillips owns Sequart. While he is the Editor in Chief, Julian Darius is the publisher and I think owner and founder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In response to the general attacks on me personally, Mike Phillips, owner of comics site Sequart.com, a client of mine, has said: “Don’t worry about that, Mike. I’ll judge your relationship with Sequart.com based on your dealings with Sequart.com…You’ve been nothing but helpful to my company, so that’s how I’m basing our relationship.”&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe Mike Phillips owns Sequart. While he is the Editor in Chief, Julian Darius is the publisher and I think owner and founder.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
