Comments on: Daniel Radcliffe: Not a Boy, Not Yet a Man

by: justin bender

Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:31:10 +0000

daniel is turning down his hool carer i mean everybody knows him fas harry potter

by: kelsey

Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:01:29 +0000

i agree with austin!He is right!!!

by: Eva Christeu

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:21:08 +0000

Oh My God!!! He’s absoluteLLy fuckin HOT! I think he’s gRow up bUt i dont tHink i Love iT,,,,

by: zithromax z pack

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:55:08 +0000

zithromax z pack…

news…

by: Austin

Wed, 07 Feb 2007 05:23:57 +0000

I think Daniel has become a proud idiot of now. This nude act of this ‘used to be ‘ children’s hero will make children more vulnernable to sexual abuses and children will also be encouraged to experiment with sex at more early ages leading to more sexual traps for them. All because of his act for money.. He is surely not a hero of the society but an enemy of the society.

by: Christine

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:27:30 +0000

Man! He’s got more than D’Angelo! I might faint.

by: dude

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:46:37 +0000

I’m sure this will have some sort of group in the good ol’ US of A up in arms.

by: Matthew Bernier

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:54:01 +0000

And a whole new category of penis euphamisms comes into being: his “wand,” his “little Harry,” his “Potter,” not to mention related euphamisms, like his “hairy path to a secret English school for wizards,” and come on’s like “Have you ever held a magic wand? Do you want to?”

Especially as his fans are mostly right about middle school age now, look for a good solod year of fainting girls and filthy jokes.

by: Jenn Moore

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:41:54 +0000

…I feel dirty.

by: Jason A. Quest

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:21:24 +0000

I must buy a ticket to London immediately.