<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is what they want</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-81497</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-81497</guid>
					<description>DC dosen't care about its fans. Check Girl-Wonder.org, or the numerous Impulse/90's Superboy/Young Justice/Batgirl/90's Supergirl fans that are pissed at what DC is doing to their favorite characters.

Marv isn't that much better, because he's not trying to fix the bad writing that gave Nightwing his image problem-I can't care about any of the villains he introduces because no-one is going to see them as a credible threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC dosen&#8217;t care about its fans. Check Girl-Wonder.org, or the numerous Impulse/90&#8217;s Superboy/Young Justice/Batgirl/90&#8217;s Supergirl fans that are pissed at what DC is doing to their favorite characters.</p>
<p>Marv isn&#8217;t that much better, because he&#8217;s not trying to fix the bad writing that gave Nightwing his image problem-I can&#8217;t care about any of the villains he introduces because no-one is going to see them as a credible threat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tag</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80550</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80550</guid>
					<description>Thomas Gerhardt: &lt;i&gt;And, maybe like other comic book readers, I have followed, in the hope that we get an ending, a proper finish to something, but it all goes in circles, and that means: it is all meaningless. There is no real danger. There is no real fun. There is no real story.&lt;/i&gt;

I had a sit-down interview with Joe Q shortly after he took the reigns at Marvel, and my last, troublemaking question to him was, &quot;Do you suppose that after 40 years of stories about these characters, with so many writers and artists all contributing to a larger tapestry, sometimes revisiting key moments from every angle possible, watching people and events progress from A to B to C, does there ever come a moment when you can, I dunno, END the story?  So you can finally stand back and see the tapestry in its whole, appreciate it as this mad, huge narrative corpse as a story that has, as most do, a beginning, middle and end?&quot;

Joe, who'd been, I thought, a pretty straight-shooter throughout the interview, suddenly clicked into corporate officer mode, making vague platitudes about the lasting power of the characters and some sort of Joseph Campbellesque power of myth fooferaw that I'm sure is what has driven George Lucas loony.  Not a surprising answer, no, but I think I witnessed the schism between Joe Quesada the writer/artist and Joe Quesada the Marvel employee.  And perhaps I inspired those &quot;The End&quot; series which, in the case of Claremont's X-Men, never actually ends, appropriately enough.

Which is, I think, the uncomfortable truth for many adherents of most major series: they are soap operas in spandex with pyrotechnics.  All changes are sweeps stunts and are just as permanent; the literary or dramatic heights we fancy they achieve are more accidents than craftsmanship, a confluence of forces that occasionally, gloriously hit high notes, made all the more striking by the seas of dross in which they drift.  I take no pleasure in such abuse, as I have love for our wayward pulps, but the liquid imagery seems appropos: they flow on interminably, with little to distinguish one moment from the next beyond the superficial.  There's only so long you can &quot;baffle 'em with bullshit&quot; before either numbness or realization sets in, and both result in lost sales.  I suspect what little money is still in the game is inflated by desperate speculation in bulheaded denial of the basic laws of economics (you know, supply and demand?) and the long-term prospects for the market.  With all due respect to Jimmy and others, the online community may be a small portion of the overall market, but the overall market is itself also exceedingly small, and shrinking every moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Gerhardt: <i>And, maybe like other comic book readers, I have followed, in the hope that we get an ending, a proper finish to something, but it all goes in circles, and that means: it is all meaningless. There is no real danger. There is no real fun. There is no real story.</i></p>
<p>I had a sit-down interview with Joe Q shortly after he took the reigns at Marvel, and my last, troublemaking question to him was, &#8220;Do you suppose that after 40 years of stories about these characters, with so many writers and artists all contributing to a larger tapestry, sometimes revisiting key moments from every angle possible, watching people and events progress from A to B to C, does there ever come a moment when you can, I dunno, END the story?  So you can finally stand back and see the tapestry in its whole, appreciate it as this mad, huge narrative corpse as a story that has, as most do, a beginning, middle and end?&#8221;</p>
<p>Joe, who&#8217;d been, I thought, a pretty straight-shooter throughout the interview, suddenly clicked into corporate officer mode, making vague platitudes about the lasting power of the characters and some sort of Joseph Campbellesque power of myth fooferaw that I&#8217;m sure is what has driven George Lucas loony.  Not a surprising answer, no, but I think I witnessed the schism between Joe Quesada the writer/artist and Joe Quesada the Marvel employee.  And perhaps I inspired those &#8220;The End&#8221; series which, in the case of Claremont&#8217;s X-Men, never actually ends, appropriately enough.</p>
<p>Which is, I think, the uncomfortable truth for many adherents of most major series: they are soap operas in spandex with pyrotechnics.  All changes are sweeps stunts and are just as permanent; the literary or dramatic heights we fancy they achieve are more accidents than craftsmanship, a confluence of forces that occasionally, gloriously hit high notes, made all the more striking by the seas of dross in which they drift.  I take no pleasure in such abuse, as I have love for our wayward pulps, but the liquid imagery seems appropos: they flow on interminably, with little to distinguish one moment from the next beyond the superficial.  There&#8217;s only so long you can &#8220;baffle &#8216;em with bullshit&#8221; before either numbness or realization sets in, and both result in lost sales.  I suspect what little money is still in the game is inflated by desperate speculation in bulheaded denial of the basic laws of economics (you know, supply and demand?) and the long-term prospects for the market.  With all due respect to Jimmy and others, the online community may be a small portion of the overall market, but the overall market is itself also exceedingly small, and shrinking every moment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80486</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80486</guid>
					<description>I don't think dense continuity is a problem. When I was a kid, I got into comics a few years after crisis on infinite earths and I read my friend's copies. I had no 'effing idea what the hell was happening... and it was awesome.

Here's a quote from Grant Morrison that I love.

&quot;It's also an homage to Justice League of America #100 - #102, which was the comics story that turned me into a foaming teenage fanboy. That book was filled with dozens of unfamiliar characters from different Earths leaping willy-nilly through space and time while a giant cosmic hand closed around the Earth. I had 'no idea' what was going on but the thrill ride was incredible and by the end of it, I knew I wanted to dive head first into this dazzling alternate reality and find out everything I could about these characters and their world(s). Remember the first time you picked up an X-Men or Avengers book and it was stuffed to the staples with parallel universes, clones, alternate future versions of characters, and a continuity so dense you could stand a spoon in it? The chaos, confusion and excitement of being thrown without a guidebook into a new world was intoxicating to me...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think dense continuity is a problem. When I was a kid, I got into comics a few years after crisis on infinite earths and I read my friend&#8217;s copies. I had no &#8216;effing idea what the hell was happening&#8230; and it was awesome.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quote from Grant Morrison that I love.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s also an homage to Justice League of America #100 - #102, which was the comics story that turned me into a foaming teenage fanboy. That book was filled with dozens of unfamiliar characters from different Earths leaping willy-nilly through space and time while a giant cosmic hand closed around the Earth. I had &#8216;no idea&#8217; what was going on but the thrill ride was incredible and by the end of it, I knew I wanted to dive head first into this dazzling alternate reality and find out everything I could about these characters and their world(s). Remember the first time you picked up an X-Men or Avengers book and it was stuffed to the staples with parallel universes, clones, alternate future versions of characters, and a continuity so dense you could stand a spoon in it? The chaos, confusion and excitement of being thrown without a guidebook into a new world was intoxicating to me&#8230;&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matthew Cole</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80418</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80418</guid>
					<description>Last night at work, one of my coworkers saw that we had gotten the Road to Civil War trade in and was pretty excited to read it. He doesn't keep up too much with monthly comics but he knows who the characters are.

Wandering back over after he'd started it he gave me this kinda funny look and said &quot;I think I must be missing some story?&quot; I took a look at it and realized that it was kicking off with the Illuminati special. I then had to explain to him that the story was jumping around to key points in Marvel history -- this meeting took place after Kree-Skrull war, this one after Avengers Disassembled, etc etc. Then I had to explain to him what those things were. Then came the Fantastic Four issues, where I had to explain that, oh yeah, Thor is &quot;dead&quot;. At least the comic itself explained why Doom was in hell.

It hadn't actually occurred to me before that moment how completely impenetrable that sort of thing is to an irregular or new reader. I mean, I actually liked the Illuminati special and the first half or so of Civil War (crying Uatu notwithstanding), but my life has been spent reading this crap. Watching my coworker try to navigate it was just sort of painful by comparison. I know the prevailing opinion nowadays is that editor's notes and caption boxes are superfluous because of the internet and wikipedia but it sure seems lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night at work, one of my coworkers saw that we had gotten the Road to Civil War trade in and was pretty excited to read it. He doesn&#8217;t keep up too much with monthly comics but he knows who the characters are.</p>
<p>Wandering back over after he&#8217;d started it he gave me this kinda funny look and said &#8220;I think I must be missing some story?&#8221; I took a look at it and realized that it was kicking off with the Illuminati special. I then had to explain to him that the story was jumping around to key points in Marvel history &#8212; this meeting took place after Kree-Skrull war, this one after Avengers Disassembled, etc etc. Then I had to explain to him what those things were. Then came the Fantastic Four issues, where I had to explain that, oh yeah, Thor is &#8220;dead&#8221;. At least the comic itself explained why Doom was in hell.</p>
<p>It hadn&#8217;t actually occurred to me before that moment how completely impenetrable that sort of thing is to an irregular or new reader. I mean, I actually liked the Illuminati special and the first half or so of Civil War (crying Uatu notwithstanding), but my life has been spent reading this crap. Watching my coworker try to navigate it was just sort of painful by comparison. I know the prevailing opinion nowadays is that editor&#8217;s notes and caption boxes are superfluous because of the internet and wikipedia but it sure seems lazy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tales from the Longbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Quick and The Read #2: It&#8217;s my blog, I can review if I want to</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80297</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80297</guid>
					<description>[...] Justice League of America (2006) #0-5: I remember reading when the first few issues of this came out and the biggest complaint was that is was too slow. You fools, that is called character development!! Comics need more of that these days, and Brad Metzler does an excellent job with this comic.  The characters in these issues are some of the most 3-dimensional that I have seen in a while.  All the little nuances of the characters and their interaction with each other, especially between the big three, make the characters come alive.  This is truly what comics should be in my opinion.  As far as action goes, there was plenty of it in 3-5.  This is one of my favorite titles and I look forward to reading it every month. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Justice League of America (2006) #0-5: I remember reading when the first few issues of this came out and the biggest complaint was that is was too slow. You fools, that is called character development!! Comics need more of that these days, and Brad Metzler does an excellent job with this comic.  The characters in these issues are some of the most 3-dimensional that I have seen in a while.  All the little nuances of the characters and their interaction with each other, especially between the big three, make the characters come alive.  This is truly what comics should be in my opinion.  As far as action goes, there was plenty of it in 3-5.  This is one of my favorite titles and I look forward to reading it every month. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mar. 7, 2007: Nature is resilient</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80286</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80286</guid>
					<description>[...] Is this blog&amp;#8217;s nigh-apocalyptic pessimism catching? It&amp;#8217;s a horrible thought even to me, but Heidi MacDonald took a look at recent events in mainline Direct-Market breadwinners and sees little evidence that such comics are being created for anyone but the initiates, and it&amp;#8217;s got her singing the blues: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Is this blog&#8217;s nigh-apocalyptic pessimism catching? It&#8217;s a horrible thought even to me, but Heidi MacDonald took a look at recent events in mainline Direct-Market breadwinners and sees little evidence that such comics are being created for anyone but the initiates, and it&#8217;s got her singing the blues: [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Moonlight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80081</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-80081</guid>
					<description>If the big two would just treat (and promote) their monthly books, with the same care as they do their big events (Civil War = Kingdom Come in the Marvel Universe/ Infinite Crises = I don't know what the #!?!% that was suppose to be) and just have a little faith in them, then I think they would find sales rising all around. That's a big leap of faith, I know, but I do honestly believe that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the big two would just treat (and promote) their monthly books, with the same care as they do their big events (Civil War = Kingdom Come in the Marvel Universe/ Infinite Crises = I don&#8217;t know what the #!?!% that was suppose to be) and just have a little faith in them, then I think they would find sales rising all around. That&#8217;s a big leap of faith, I know, but I do honestly believe that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79876</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79876</guid>
					<description>Everyone complains about the event stuff but all of this World War Hulk, Countdown, WW III shenanigans will be top sellers. The big 2 fans have trouble keeping their money in their wallets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone complains about the event stuff but all of this World War Hulk, Countdown, WW III shenanigans will be top sellers. The big 2 fans have trouble keeping their money in their wallets.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas Gerhardt</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79517</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79517</guid>
					<description>Matt – I do own the Y series as a trade (heck, for more than 15 years I bought ALL Vertigo books, just went to my comic book store and told them, if it is Vertigo, I'll subscribe to it), but I got rid of the monthlies once the trades came out, primarily because those I can put on a shelf and re-read them without having a pile of floppies there.

I've read an an awful lot of superhero books since I was 7, good ones and very, very bad ones. I went through Crisis, Armageddon 2001, Zero Hour, God knows how many awful, stupid &quot;Insert-X-here&quot; Marvel Mutie crossovers… I know what the Red Robin reference is meant to do, I know the Kingdom Come characters, I know when, where and how Reed and Susan Richards married… heck, I loved the Byrne-revamp Superman even…

I loved and bought the Ultimate books when they came out (not anymore, the Ultimate X-Men have become even sillier than their 616 counterparts)… but they lack something now.

I think Bendis is better on POWERS than on anything he has ever written for Marvel (with the possible exception of ALIAS), I think Warren Ellis was great as a political ranter in TransMet (don't anybody come along and tell me it actually had a story... it had a backbone that only served for him to rant), I think Garth Ennis had something to SAY with Preacher… and I try to remember when there was a superhero book that did that, and all I can come up with is ELEKTRA: ASSASSIN (I don't consider Alan Moore's WATCHMEN as supehero stuff. It is SciFi in my mind... but that is a point of debate). Yes, I enjoyed THE AUTHORITY, even though I think that Ellis is a jerk, but sometimes, damn, that jerk can write..

I'm just tired of it all. It has become cynical and wasted. It serves no purpose other than to milk money from an audience that, yes I am an arrogant here, should KNOW better by now... PEOPLE WILL LIVE! PEOPLE WILL DIE! THINGS WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN!

And, maybe like other comic book readers, I have followed, in the hope that we get an ending, a proper finish to something, but it all goes in circles, and that means: it is all meaningless. There is no real danger. There is no real fun. There is no real story.

The English Pulp Fiction writer Edgar Wallace had invented something called a PLOT WHEEL in – if memory serves correctly – the 1920s. You whirled it around and it would come up with almost a CLUEDO type of plotline: X does Y in Z... and he actually used it to write his novels.

That is what &quot;mainstream&quot; superheroes have become. A plot wheel (one might say that they have always been that, but in my mind, never before this cynically).

So, this is me saying to them: I'm outta here.

And call me again when you give somebody else the freedom to do such amazing work with SHAZAM the way Jeff Smith is showing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt – I do own the Y series as a trade (heck, for more than 15 years I bought ALL Vertigo books, just went to my comic book store and told them, if it is Vertigo, I&#8217;ll subscribe to it), but I got rid of the monthlies once the trades came out, primarily because those I can put on a shelf and re-read them without having a pile of floppies there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read an an awful lot of superhero books since I was 7, good ones and very, very bad ones. I went through Crisis, Armageddon 2001, Zero Hour, God knows how many awful, stupid &#8220;Insert-X-here&#8221; Marvel Mutie crossovers… I know what the Red Robin reference is meant to do, I know the Kingdom Come characters, I know when, where and how Reed and Susan Richards married… heck, I loved the Byrne-revamp Superman even…</p>
<p>I loved and bought the Ultimate books when they came out (not anymore, the Ultimate X-Men have become even sillier than their 616 counterparts)… but they lack something now.</p>
<p>I think Bendis is better on POWERS than on anything he has ever written for Marvel (with the possible exception of ALIAS), I think Warren Ellis was great as a political ranter in TransMet (don&#8217;t anybody come along and tell me it actually had a story&#8230; it had a backbone that only served for him to rant), I think Garth Ennis had something to SAY with Preacher… and I try to remember when there was a superhero book that did that, and all I can come up with is ELEKTRA: ASSASSIN (I don&#8217;t consider Alan Moore&#8217;s WATCHMEN as supehero stuff. It is SciFi in my mind&#8230; but that is a point of debate). Yes, I enjoyed THE AUTHORITY, even though I think that Ellis is a jerk, but sometimes, damn, that jerk can write..</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just tired of it all. It has become cynical and wasted. It serves no purpose other than to milk money from an audience that, yes I am an arrogant here, should KNOW better by now&#8230; PEOPLE WILL LIVE! PEOPLE WILL DIE! THINGS WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN!</p>
<p>And, maybe like other comic book readers, I have followed, in the hope that we get an ending, a proper finish to something, but it all goes in circles, and that means: it is all meaningless. There is no real danger. There is no real fun. There is no real story.</p>
<p>The English Pulp Fiction writer Edgar Wallace had invented something called a PLOT WHEEL in – if memory serves correctly – the 1920s. You whirled it around and it would come up with almost a CLUEDO type of plotline: X does Y in Z&#8230; and he actually used it to write his novels.</p>
<p>That is what &#8220;mainstream&#8221; superheroes have become. A plot wheel (one might say that they have always been that, but in my mind, never before this cynically).</p>
<p>So, this is me saying to them: I&#8217;m outta here.</p>
<p>And call me again when you give somebody else the freedom to do such amazing work with SHAZAM the way Jeff Smith is showing it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79505</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79505</guid>
					<description>I agree that the Direct Market audience (read: comic fans) wants earth-shattering events, yeah.  It only makes sense - most of that audience grew up in the 1980s-1990s reading their Secret Wars, Crises of Varying Proportions, their Heroes Reborn, their Zero Hours, etc.

But those &quot;stories&quot; are rarely any good.  Most of them are piss-poor rationalizations of previoius stories and conflicts.  YUCK.  Would a non-comic fan want to read such clustered, cluttered stories mired in decades of continuity?  No.  Jeez, I'm a comic fan...and **I** can't stand them.

But that doesn't mean that the general public doesn't want superheroes.  Far from it.  The general public **loves** superheroes.  All the films, the TV shows, the cartoons, the merchandise, the games, etc.  Superheroes are a fantasy sub-genre, and they're heavily ingrained in our cultural DNA.

But it's NOT about &quot;realism&quot;.  Again, we love fantasy.  It's simply that people would rather watch a Spider-Man movie or play a Spider-Man game than read a Spider-Man comic.  It's more entertaining, and the dollar requirement is actually LOWER.  Which means that those people going to comic shops every week to get their superhero fix are simply addicts jonesing for old-fashioned drugs.

Before anyone flames me, I'm a big-time comic fan.  My bookshelf is filled with beautiful comics from all genres over the past few decades.  But comics need to evolve more towards the format (and value) that Manga provides.  Like a lot of other fans, I'm just beginning to see the forest through those trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Direct Market audience (read: comic fans) wants earth-shattering events, yeah.  It only makes sense - most of that audience grew up in the 1980s-1990s reading their Secret Wars, Crises of Varying Proportions, their Heroes Reborn, their Zero Hours, etc.</p>
<p>But those &#8220;stories&#8221; are rarely any good.  Most of them are piss-poor rationalizations of previoius stories and conflicts.  YUCK.  Would a non-comic fan want to read such clustered, cluttered stories mired in decades of continuity?  No.  Jeez, I&#8217;m a comic fan&#8230;and **I** can&#8217;t stand them.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t mean that the general public doesn&#8217;t want superheroes.  Far from it.  The general public **loves** superheroes.  All the films, the TV shows, the cartoons, the merchandise, the games, etc.  Superheroes are a fantasy sub-genre, and they&#8217;re heavily ingrained in our cultural DNA.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s NOT about &#8220;realism&#8221;.  Again, we love fantasy.  It&#8217;s simply that people would rather watch a Spider-Man movie or play a Spider-Man game than read a Spider-Man comic.  It&#8217;s more entertaining, and the dollar requirement is actually LOWER.  Which means that those people going to comic shops every week to get their superhero fix are simply addicts jonesing for old-fashioned drugs.</p>
<p>Before anyone flames me, I&#8217;m a big-time comic fan.  My bookshelf is filled with beautiful comics from all genres over the past few decades.  But comics need to evolve more towards the format (and value) that Manga provides.  Like a lot of other fans, I&#8217;m just beginning to see the forest through those trees.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Robins</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79484</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79484</guid>
					<description>Kids love &quot;Where's Waldo/Look &amp;#38; Find/I SPY&quot;. Big kids like Marvel and DC because they're the adult equivalent of these kinds of books.

&quot;Ooooh! I found Stilt-Man! And there's pre-Crisis Composite Superman!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids love &#8220;Where&#8217;s Waldo/Look &amp; Find/I SPY&#8221;. Big kids like Marvel and DC because they&#8217;re the adult equivalent of these kinds of books.</p>
<p>&#8220;Ooooh! I found Stilt-Man! And there&#8217;s pre-Crisis Composite Superman!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Bieser</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79479</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79479</guid>
					<description>&quot;As an observer and a sometime editor, my instincts tell me that readers want characters they can identify with and clear problems that these characters need to solve. But the real world shows no evidence whatsoever for this. Was I wrong all along?&quot;

No, you're right. It's the &quot;core market&quot; for superhero comics, this strange insular sub-culture that dominates the DM, that's ... well maybe &quot;wrong&quot; isn't the right word. But unique unto themselves.

The bigger world, that potential &quot;new mainstream&quot; as Batton Lash put it, wants real stories with real characters. We're just now figuring out how to connect up creators, publishers, and that potential market. Meanwhile, the &quot;core market&quot; will remain oblivious to all this, and continue eating itself until it dissolves away in another generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an observer and a sometime editor, my instincts tell me that readers want characters they can identify with and clear problems that these characters need to solve. But the real world shows no evidence whatsoever for this. Was I wrong all along?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, you&#8217;re right. It&#8217;s the &#8220;core market&#8221; for superhero comics, this strange insular sub-culture that dominates the DM, that&#8217;s &#8230; well maybe &#8220;wrong&#8221; isn&#8217;t the right word. But unique unto themselves.</p>
<p>The bigger world, that potential &#8220;new mainstream&#8221; as Batton Lash put it, wants real stories with real characters. We&#8217;re just now figuring out how to connect up creators, publishers, and that potential market. Meanwhile, the &#8220;core market&#8221; will remain oblivious to all this, and continue eating itself until it dissolves away in another generation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Climek</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79451</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79451</guid>
					<description>Who has the name power to put something out in super-hero land that is trade only?

How well did things like The Hiketia (Rucka) and Top Ten The 49ers (Alan Moore), or Pride of Badghdad (BKV) sell?

Were the sales of these things affected by the fact that they only came out in hardcovers first?

Could tie-in events come out as trades rather than monthlies?

Would you buy a new 88 page 52 trade very month for 10 bucks?

Didn't Cross-Gen try it but it failed miserably?
Of course i think Cross-Gen's attempts were not trades but lots of montlhies needlessly and confusingly bundled into one. 

Is the monthly community needed to give an eventul trade the buzz it needs to break into Main Stream Bookstore Land?

Comics is a weird business and I wish i had more clear cut answers.  Until then I'll keep buying monthlies and trades, and I look forward to Count Down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who has the name power to put something out in super-hero land that is trade only?</p>
<p>How well did things like The Hiketia (Rucka) and Top Ten The 49ers (Alan Moore), or Pride of Badghdad (BKV) sell?</p>
<p>Were the sales of these things affected by the fact that they only came out in hardcovers first?</p>
<p>Could tie-in events come out as trades rather than monthlies?</p>
<p>Would you buy a new 88 page 52 trade very month for 10 bucks?</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Cross-Gen try it but it failed miserably?<br />
Of course i think Cross-Gen&#8217;s attempts were not trades but lots of montlhies needlessly and confusingly bundled into one. </p>
<p>Is the monthly community needed to give an eventul trade the buzz it needs to break into Main Stream Bookstore Land?</p>
<p>Comics is a weird business and I wish i had more clear cut answers.  Until then I&#8217;ll keep buying monthlies and trades, and I look forward to Count Down.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bulent</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79419</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79419</guid>
					<description>The image of Nightwing taking a nosedive off a building; is that a metaphor for plummeting pamplet sales?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image of Nightwing taking a nosedive off a building; is that a metaphor for plummeting pamplet sales?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jimmy palmiotti</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79417</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79417</guid>
					<description>sales speak. people want event books. my answer to everything is buy more JONAH HEX, lol.

I am personally waiting for the time when only trade books come out. with the amount of titles out now...there would be at least3 to 4 a week coming out. 

Easy to look at, focus on and number.

The Europeans have a lot of things right...but in the end, people, the masses that spend money, want giant crossover event books and will always want them. I find it interesting that  people  online say after 52 they wont buy countdown. want to bet for the most part they do? again, the sales will speak .  personally, I hope they do. we are writing a kickass series .

yeah, I believe in the work I am doing and always ready to push it...and I agree with Douglas. why would i ever bother to do work that i dont believe in. 

The on-line community is a very small % of the people who buy the books...i have learned this a little at a time...same with the people who attend cons. again, a small % of the buying public. 

just some interesting things being said here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sales speak. people want event books. my answer to everything is buy more JONAH HEX, lol.</p>
<p>I am personally waiting for the time when only trade books come out. with the amount of titles out now&#8230;there would be at least3 to 4 a week coming out. </p>
<p>Easy to look at, focus on and number.</p>
<p>The Europeans have a lot of things right&#8230;but in the end, people, the masses that spend money, want giant crossover event books and will always want them. I find it interesting that  people  online say after 52 they wont buy countdown. want to bet for the most part they do? again, the sales will speak .  personally, I hope they do. we are writing a kickass series .</p>
<p>yeah, I believe in the work I am doing and always ready to push it&#8230;and I agree with Douglas. why would i ever bother to do work that i dont believe in. </p>
<p>The on-line community is a very small % of the people who buy the books&#8230;i have learned this a little at a time&#8230;same with the people who attend cons. again, a small % of the buying public. </p>
<p>just some interesting things being said here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cary_coatney</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79358</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79358</guid>
					<description>I take umbrage over that crack about Supergirl having the shingles. Having caught a case late last spring (which was the main reason why I could only attend one day of San Diego Comic Con last year). Shingles is a very painful disease and not something to be freakin' make light humor about. I want to have a sit down with whoever wrote that fluff piece and set the record straight. 

~

Coat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take umbrage over that crack about Supergirl having the shingles. Having caught a case late last spring (which was the main reason why I could only attend one day of San Diego Comic Con last year). Shingles is a very painful disease and not something to be freakin&#8217; make light humor about. I want to have a sit down with whoever wrote that fluff piece and set the record straight. </p>
<p>~</p>
<p>Coat
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79214</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79214</guid>
					<description>&quot;Unfortunately, the reliably compulsive are not as legion as once they were, and even the loyal are sufficiently matured to see that these stories are not only without end, but also without any sort of resolution or even narrative structure, just crass, cynical emotional manipulation...&quot;

But they are, despite Marvel doing everything (delays, poor structure, constant cross-overs, conflicting continuity, plain bad writing) wrong from a business stance, Civil War still sold more than 250,00 copies of each issue and at least doubled the sales of all of the cross-over titles.  So they're still being bought and bought in excess.  The only way for them to stop doing this is for sales to tank and it doesn't look like this is going to happen anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, the reliably compulsive are not as legion as once they were, and even the loyal are sufficiently matured to see that these stories are not only without end, but also without any sort of resolution or even narrative structure, just crass, cynical emotional manipulation&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>But they are, despite Marvel doing everything (delays, poor structure, constant cross-overs, conflicting continuity, plain bad writing) wrong from a business stance, Civil War still sold more than 250,00 copies of each issue and at least doubled the sales of all of the cross-over titles.  So they&#8217;re still being bought and bought in excess.  The only way for them to stop doing this is for sales to tank and it doesn&#8217;t look like this is going to happen anytime soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79196</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79196</guid>
					<description>Quirky, creator-driven, character-based, not-crossover-heavy books? You mean like (and I'm not being sarcastic here) ALL-STAR SUPERMAN and DAREDEVIL and SHAZAM: THE MONSTER SOCIETY OF EVIL? I think there's &lt;i&gt;absolutely&lt;/i&gt; a market for them--obviously some of 'em have problems finding that market (cf. Kyle Baker's PLASTIC MAN etc.), but the market exists--and maybe even more to the point they're the things that sell and sell and sell in trades.

What I'd love to see in mainstream comics is a general resolution: if you cannot convince yourself that the comic you're working on is the BEST THING EVER, please don't bother, because if it's not going to be your favorite comic it's not going to be anybody else's, and if it's not going to be anybody else's you're just wasting everybody's time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quirky, creator-driven, character-based, not-crossover-heavy books? You mean like (and I&#8217;m not being sarcastic here) ALL-STAR SUPERMAN and DAREDEVIL and SHAZAM: THE MONSTER SOCIETY OF EVIL? I think there&#8217;s <i>absolutely</i> a market for them&#8211;obviously some of &#8216;em have problems finding that market (cf. Kyle Baker&#8217;s PLASTIC MAN etc.), but the market exists&#8211;and maybe even more to the point they&#8217;re the things that sell and sell and sell in trades.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d love to see in mainstream comics is a general resolution: if you cannot convince yourself that the comic you&#8217;re working on is the BEST THING EVER, please don&#8217;t bother, because if it&#8217;s not going to be your favorite comic it&#8217;s not going to be anybody else&#8217;s, and if it&#8217;s not going to be anybody else&#8217;s you&#8217;re just wasting everybody&#8217;s time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CBrown</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79146</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79146</guid>
					<description>&quot;I think that we only see a small percentage of the voice of comics fan online in blogs, forums, etc. As long as people keep buying these big event/tie in books, Marvel and DC are going to make them. If you want to see it stop, stop buying the books. It’s hard, but you have to put up a fight if you really want to see change. &quot;

I agree with you except on one thing. It's really not hard to stop buying books you don't enjoy. Everyone should try it; they will quickly find out how easy it is to not read books they don't like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think that we only see a small percentage of the voice of comics fan online in blogs, forums, etc. As long as people keep buying these big event/tie in books, Marvel and DC are going to make them. If you want to see it stop, stop buying the books. It’s hard, but you have to put up a fight if you really want to see change. &#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with you except on one thing. It&#8217;s really not hard to stop buying books you don&#8217;t enjoy. Everyone should try it; they will quickly find out how easy it is to not read books they don&#8217;t like.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tag</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79144</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/03/06/can-comics-be-saved/#comment-79144</guid>
					<description>The really weird thing to me is that it really seemed around the turn of the millennium that the big two finally GOT what they'd been doing wrong: people didn't want to have to wade through decades of continuity (not that it didn't matter, just that it was, if anything, a tertiary concern); tell a good story that makes sense with art that fits the story (or perhaps vice versa), all right?  So we had a little Renaissance for a few years in the mainstream, for those who still cared or might once again.  It was out of this Renaissance that we got reinventions of the continuity-burdened like the Ultimate line and revivals of long-dormant or underperforming concepts such as the JSA and The Masters of Evil (as Thunderbolts).  

What has undone all this is nothing less than greed.  Despite the resuscitation of their long-term solvency, the big two missed the immediate gratification of the speculation boom, and so set out to create events in the old tradition of Crisis and Secret Wars that the reliably compulsive would shell out for.  Unfortunately, the reliably compulsive are not as legion as once they were, and even the loyal are sufficiently matured to see that these stories are not only without end, but also without any sort of resolution or even narrative structure, just crass, cynical emotional manipulation (much like country western music, imnsho).  What made crossovers work in the past was their novelty; their lack thereof now is the death knell for the mainstream's appeal to anyone other than their withering niche.  Mark my words: CIVIL WAR may have been the last best hope for regaining popular appeal, wasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The really weird thing to me is that it really seemed around the turn of the millennium that the big two finally GOT what they&#8217;d been doing wrong: people didn&#8217;t want to have to wade through decades of continuity (not that it didn&#8217;t matter, just that it was, if anything, a tertiary concern); tell a good story that makes sense with art that fits the story (or perhaps vice versa), all right?  So we had a little Renaissance for a few years in the mainstream, for those who still cared or might once again.  It was out of this Renaissance that we got reinventions of the continuity-burdened like the Ultimate line and revivals of long-dormant or underperforming concepts such as the JSA and The Masters of Evil (as Thunderbolts).  </p>
<p>What has undone all this is nothing less than greed.  Despite the resuscitation of their long-term solvency, the big two missed the immediate gratification of the speculation boom, and so set out to create events in the old tradition of Crisis and Secret Wars that the reliably compulsive would shell out for.  Unfortunately, the reliably compulsive are not as legion as once they were, and even the loyal are sufficiently matured to see that these stories are not only without end, but also without any sort of resolution or even narrative structure, just crass, cynical emotional manipulation (much like country western music, imnsho).  What made crossovers work in the past was their novelty; their lack thereof now is the death knell for the mainstream&#8217;s appeal to anyone other than their withering niche.  Mark my words: CIVIL WAR may have been the last best hope for regaining popular appeal, wasted.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
