<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harry Potter&#8217;s wild ride</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cary_Coatney</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/#comment-133775</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/#comment-133775</guid>
					<description>I'm going to boycott this like a bad habit. Especially if they're going to planning to build this in my backyard - which is the SF Valley.

~

Coat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to boycott this like a bad habit. Especially if they&#8217;re going to planning to build this in my backyard - which is the SF Valley.</p>
<p>~</p>
<p>Coat
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/#comment-132689</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/#comment-132689</guid>
					<description>Perhaps it could have been infeasible too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it could have been infeasible too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Theme Parks! Theme Parks for Everyone! &#171; Love Uncle Sean</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/#comment-132376</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/21/harry-potters-wild-ride/#comment-132376</guid>
					<description>[...] Then, this morning I find this article about a Harry Potter Theme Park. I suppose with the last book out this summer and only two movies after the one this year, they&amp;#8217;ll have to keep people interested in Harry Potter somehow. It sounds like Rowling is so concerned about the individual guest experience that she&amp;#8217;s ignoring what it would mean for 100+ people to show up at the Theme Park at once. Fanatics will love that she stays true, the rest of us will just get annoyed and leave. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Then, this morning I find this article about a Harry Potter Theme Park. I suppose with the last book out this summer and only two movies after the one this year, they&#8217;ll have to keep people interested in Harry Potter somehow. It sounds like Rowling is so concerned about the individual guest experience that she&#8217;s ignoring what it would mean for 100+ people to show up at the Theme Park at once. Fanatics will love that she stays true, the rest of us will just get annoyed and leave. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
