<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Comics Month-to-Month Sales: March 2007</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: 8 Comic Series that should be collected/reprinted long before Monolith. &#124; Funnybook Babylon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-287453</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-287453</guid>
					<description>[...] Are you fucking mental? Don&amp;#8217;t you realize there is a ton of material out there that has sold better or has a higher cult status than Graymiotti&amp;#8217;s insanely obscure pet character? It started at 16,640 issues and the last issue sold 7,753. That&amp;#8217;s horrible. For gawd sakes, Omega Man did better than that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Are you fucking mental? Don&#8217;t you realize there is a ton of material out there that has sold better or has a higher cult status than Graymiotti&#8217;s insanely obscure pet character? It started at 16,640 issues and the last issue sold 7,753. That&#8217;s horrible. For gawd sakes, Omega Man did better than that. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett tolino</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-156001</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-156001</guid>
					<description>As a former die hard DC fan, these sales figures are not only saddening, they're pathetic. Only in comics, can a company get away with publishing titles with such low circ figures.

As for the comments, as a former diehard DC fan -- not just 'eh -- I don't think they're biased at all, they're real and sometimes, the truth hurts.

But, this is what happens when you have a group leader who does not listen or care about their audience. Sadly, while Dan Didio may have plenty of ideas about DC's characters, readers are obviously not sharing in the enthusiasm and neither are their creators. DC hyped high profile creator launches and failed at each and every one of them. None of these creators are delivering on a consistent basis and I don't buy the 'quality takes time' excuse. These are creators who not only appear to be lacking in drive (as seen by their lack of delivery) but they have the attention spans of a mexican jumping bean. No sooner than a creator is announced, they're then announced as absent or leaving the same title in 6 months. If your creators don't care, readers won't and its evident in sales.

As for Dan Didio's revamps, his relentless sociopathetic bloodbath of DC's characters continues and as long as it does, readers will flee in droves. Death in comics is a quick sales jump but it says something to readers: our characters suck -- if they didn't, we wouldn't need to kill them. People aren't liking the replacements and Dan Didio's sense of judgement is off, way off. 

As for George Perez and the Brave and the Bold? Yes, its Perez and its fun but its also the Brave and The Bold. Team up titles are notorious for being slow sellers so expecting B&amp;#38;B to be a top hit is as believable as Jason Rush was for a sucessful Firestorm. George Perez is an MVP. You don't take your MVP and put him on a 2nd class book. And as much as I like B&amp;#38;B to think of it as anything more is living in a delusion. You have Supergirl, a character people hate and Blue Beetle in the 3rd issue -- a character, while done well in the issue, is a character with a fan base of less than 20K/ George Perez belongs on a book like JLA, Legion or even Nightwing, a character HE created and brought to high profile way back when. EVen having George complete the Titans graphic novel would have been more profitable -- he completed more than half the book and DC paid for it already. But ah, Didio knows best.

Yeah, he launched a successful weekly comic but at what price? The quality, integrity and respectability of the entire DC line, which is now a failure in the eyes of many. So really, was it a success after all?

How this guy keeps his job is beyond me. Ah, only in comics and only by a publisher who can get away with such shameful, pathetic figures. Remember the good old days, when books said 'BECAUSE YOU DEMANDED IT!' Now, every book should be slugged, 'BECAUSE DIDIO DEMANDED IT!'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former die hard DC fan, these sales figures are not only saddening, they&#8217;re pathetic. Only in comics, can a company get away with publishing titles with such low circ figures.</p>
<p>As for the comments, as a former diehard DC fan &#8212; not just &#8216;eh &#8212; I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re biased at all, they&#8217;re real and sometimes, the truth hurts.</p>
<p>But, this is what happens when you have a group leader who does not listen or care about their audience. Sadly, while Dan Didio may have plenty of ideas about DC&#8217;s characters, readers are obviously not sharing in the enthusiasm and neither are their creators. DC hyped high profile creator launches and failed at each and every one of them. None of these creators are delivering on a consistent basis and I don&#8217;t buy the &#8216;quality takes time&#8217; excuse. These are creators who not only appear to be lacking in drive (as seen by their lack of delivery) but they have the attention spans of a mexican jumping bean. No sooner than a creator is announced, they&#8217;re then announced as absent or leaving the same title in 6 months. If your creators don&#8217;t care, readers won&#8217;t and its evident in sales.</p>
<p>As for Dan Didio&#8217;s revamps, his relentless sociopathetic bloodbath of DC&#8217;s characters continues and as long as it does, readers will flee in droves. Death in comics is a quick sales jump but it says something to readers: our characters suck &#8212; if they didn&#8217;t, we wouldn&#8217;t need to kill them. People aren&#8217;t liking the replacements and Dan Didio&#8217;s sense of judgement is off, way off. </p>
<p>As for George Perez and the Brave and the Bold? Yes, its Perez and its fun but its also the Brave and The Bold. Team up titles are notorious for being slow sellers so expecting B&amp;B to be a top hit is as believable as Jason Rush was for a sucessful Firestorm. George Perez is an MVP. You don&#8217;t take your MVP and put him on a 2nd class book. And as much as I like B&amp;B to think of it as anything more is living in a delusion. You have Supergirl, a character people hate and Blue Beetle in the 3rd issue &#8212; a character, while done well in the issue, is a character with a fan base of less than 20K/ George Perez belongs on a book like JLA, Legion or even Nightwing, a character HE created and brought to high profile way back when. EVen having George complete the Titans graphic novel would have been more profitable &#8212; he completed more than half the book and DC paid for it already. But ah, Didio knows best.</p>
<p>Yeah, he launched a successful weekly comic but at what price? The quality, integrity and respectability of the entire DC line, which is now a failure in the eyes of many. So really, was it a success after all?</p>
<p>How this guy keeps his job is beyond me. Ah, only in comics and only by a publisher who can get away with such shameful, pathetic figures. Remember the good old days, when books said &#8216;BECAUSE YOU DEMANDED IT!&#8217; Now, every book should be slugged, &#8216;BECAUSE DIDIO DEMANDED IT!&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-148972</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-148972</guid>
					<description>Quote: &quot;My understanding is that no comics company or creator is ready to change over to the system used by prose novels, which I believe is an advance payment based on anticipated sales, followed by more payment when the piece is finished. DC can’t up-front the money, and the writers and artists can’t wait till it’s done to get paid.&quot;

The publishers will have to start doing this eventually when they switch over to TPBs exclusively, especially since TPBs are now outselling floppies.  Of course it'll be initially painful for everyone (except maybe the creators because they'll have some money upfront), but in the long-term it'll be better sales and exposure once more titles show up in Barnes &amp;#38; Noble and Chapters, sitting next to the 1/2 dozen huge shelves of manga.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;My understanding is that no comics company or creator is ready to change over to the system used by prose novels, which I believe is an advance payment based on anticipated sales, followed by more payment when the piece is finished. DC can’t up-front the money, and the writers and artists can’t wait till it’s done to get paid.&#8221;</p>
<p>The publishers will have to start doing this eventually when they switch over to TPBs exclusively, especially since TPBs are now outselling floppies.  Of course it&#8217;ll be initially painful for everyone (except maybe the creators because they&#8217;ll have some money upfront), but in the long-term it&#8217;ll be better sales and exposure once more titles show up in Barnes &amp; Noble and Chapters, sitting next to the 1/2 dozen huge shelves of manga.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-145352</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 05:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-145352</guid>
					<description>29 - THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD
02/2007: The Brave and the Bold #1  — 92,091          [96,510]
03/2007: The Brave and the Bold #2  — 64,357 (-30.1%)
Mixed signals: The book started out with excellent numbers, but this is a very steep second-issue drop. In part, to be fair, that’s because issue #1 came with a 1-in-10 variant cover edition and #2 didn’t; 

-- Actually, issue #1 didn't have a 1:10 variant, but it did have 2 covers and could be ordered individually.  Issue #2 featured only one cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>29 - THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD<br />
02/2007: The Brave and the Bold #1  — 92,091          [96,510]<br />
03/2007: The Brave and the Bold #2  — 64,357 (-30.1%)<br />
Mixed signals: The book started out with excellent numbers, but this is a very steep second-issue drop. In part, to be fair, that’s because issue #1 came with a 1-in-10 variant cover edition and #2 didn’t; </p>
<p>&#8211; Actually, issue #1 didn&#8217;t have a 1:10 variant, but it did have 2 covers and could be ordered individually.  Issue #2 featured only one cover.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: the4thpip</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-143871</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 09:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-143871</guid>
					<description>Dale Eaglesham only did one fill-in issue of the old JSA series, so it's not quite correct to say Justice Society has the &quot;same creative team&quot; as JSA did. Same writer, new regular artist. And I think best regular artist since Sadowski left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale Eaglesham only did one fill-in issue of the old JSA series, so it&#8217;s not quite correct to say Justice Society has the &#8220;same creative team&#8221; as JSA did. Same writer, new regular artist. And I think best regular artist since Sadowski left.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Juanin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-143702</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-143702</guid>
					<description>Bring back Adventure Comics with a feature story (Ray Palmer, please) and a backup (say, Carter Hall?) and rescue two franchises in free fall.  Hey, two more trade paperbacks waiting in the wings, Didio.  Make it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back Adventure Comics with a feature story (Ray Palmer, please) and a backup (say, Carter Hall?) and rescue two franchises in free fall.  Hey, two more trade paperbacks waiting in the wings, Didio.  Make it happen.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: YouStayClassy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-143478</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 21:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-143478</guid>
					<description>Quote:  &quot;but why does DC/Vertigo think that anyone wants to buy comic booklets filled with ads breaking up the stories, especially since the stories are largely Graphic Novels being broken down into artificially structured chunks that more often than not hurt the stories being told...&quot;

Gee, I sure enjoy buying a monthly story and having it continued the next month.  I'm kind of crazy that way, as I've been enjoying that format for a good two decades now.  And I can't recall a ad page ever once denying my enjoyment of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:  &#8220;but why does DC/Vertigo think that anyone wants to buy comic booklets filled with ads breaking up the stories, especially since the stories are largely Graphic Novels being broken down into artificially structured chunks that more often than not hurt the stories being told&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Gee, I sure enjoy buying a monthly story and having it continued the next month.  I&#8217;m kind of crazy that way, as I&#8217;ve been enjoying that format for a good two decades now.  And I can&#8217;t recall a ad page ever once denying my enjoyment of that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-142780</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-142780</guid>
					<description>*sigh*

Please read All-New Atom. I know it's not Ray, but it's still good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*</p>
<p>Please read All-New Atom. I know it&#8217;s not Ray, but it&#8217;s still good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-142530</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-142530</guid>
					<description>Sometimes people who &quot;know what they're talking about&quot; don't actually &quot;know what they're talking about.&quot;  They may also be speaking from bias or disinformation.  Publishers like the fact that the serial publishing model puts all the financial risk on the direct market retailers.  Creators believe publishers' claims that they can't get paid on the front-end for bookform.  Retailers don't know another system and have built up their businesses around a model which puts all kinds of financial risk on them (unsold back issues that they've already bought and paid for) and are don't realize they can compete with big box stores on a bookform model because no big boxes can carry the variety of a good local retailer.  In none of these cases does anyone ever present the numbers though.  How about you - do you have any solid numbers to back up your assertions?  Is your guess simply just as good as mine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes people who &#8220;know what they&#8217;re talking about&#8221; don&#8217;t actually &#8220;know what they&#8217;re talking about.&#8221;  They may also be speaking from bias or disinformation.  Publishers like the fact that the serial publishing model puts all the financial risk on the direct market retailers.  Creators believe publishers&#8217; claims that they can&#8217;t get paid on the front-end for bookform.  Retailers don&#8217;t know another system and have built up their businesses around a model which puts all kinds of financial risk on them (unsold back issues that they&#8217;ve already bought and paid for) and are don&#8217;t realize they can compete with big box stores on a bookform model because no big boxes can carry the variety of a good local retailer.  In none of these cases does anyone ever present the numbers though.  How about you - do you have any solid numbers to back up your assertions?  Is your guess simply just as good as mine?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-142063</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-142063</guid>
					<description>&quot;And on what are you basing your understanding?&quot;

On comments from people who know what they're talking about.  This isn't the first time the topic comes up, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And on what are you basing your understanding?&#8221;</p>
<p>On comments from people who know what they&#8217;re talking about.  This isn&#8217;t the first time the topic comes up, after all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141924</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141924</guid>
					<description>&quot;“Is Vertigo finally shifting its focus to the collected edition market in the same way Johnny DC does?”

The single issues are still quite necessary for Vertigo, be it only as loss-leaders. Without them, the imprint wouldn’t be workable at this time, as I understand it.&quot;

Reaaaly...  And on what are you basing your understanding?  With the serial sales sinking, I would think it's time to try a new model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“Is Vertigo finally shifting its focus to the collected edition market in the same way Johnny DC does?”</p>
<p>The single issues are still quite necessary for Vertigo, be it only as loss-leaders. Without them, the imprint wouldn’t be workable at this time, as I understand it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reaaaly&#8230;  And on what are you basing your understanding?  With the serial sales sinking, I would think it&#8217;s time to try a new model.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141146</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141146</guid>
					<description>&quot;The average of DC Universe titles in march is 42,634.  Without 52 the average is 26,427.&quot;

Erm, not quite.  Without 52, the average for the March '07 DC Universe titles would be 38,101.  There's not much of a point to these sort of numbers games, though.

And, of course, as Paul correctly says, averages are just averages.  They don't tell us anything about total unit or dollar sales, because they don't include factors such as cover price or the number of titles released in a given month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The average of DC Universe titles in march is 42,634.  Without 52 the average is 26,427.&#8221;</p>
<p>Erm, not quite.  Without 52, the average for the March &#8216;07 DC Universe titles would be 38,101.  There&#8217;s not much of a point to these sort of numbers games, though.</p>
<p>And, of course, as Paul correctly says, averages are just averages.  They don&#8217;t tell us anything about total unit or dollar sales, because they don&#8217;t include factors such as cover price or the number of titles released in a given month.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141143</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141143</guid>
					<description>&quot;What happened to Supergirl and the Legion?&quot;

Missed its shipping date by one week and slipped into April.  So did AMERICAN VIRGIN and JACK OF FABLES, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What happened to Supergirl and the Legion?&#8221;</p>
<p>Missed its shipping date by one week and slipped into April.  So did AMERICAN VIRGIN and JACK OF FABLES, by the way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141138</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141138</guid>
					<description>&quot;Any chance of getting some comparison numbers for trades/collections? I’d like to see the trends in that regard.&quot;

Well, everybody would.  The general consensus is that you need to subscribe to Bookscan in order to get a remotely meaningful picture.  Over here, we only have access to the direct market numbers, which excludes bookstores and anything else that's not the direct market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any chance of getting some comparison numbers for trades/collections? I’d like to see the trends in that regard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, everybody would.  The general consensus is that you need to subscribe to Bookscan in order to get a remotely meaningful picture.  Over here, we only have access to the direct market numbers, which excludes bookstores and anything else that&#8217;s not the direct market.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141137</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-141137</guid>
					<description>&quot;Is Vertigo finally shifting its focus to the collected edition market in the same way Johnny DC does?&quot;

The single issues are still quite necessary for Vertigo, be it only as loss-leaders.  Without them, the imprint wouldn't be workable at this time, as I understand it.

It's also worth pointing out that collections seem less significant for the Johnny DC books than mass-market chains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is Vertigo finally shifting its focus to the collected edition market in the same way Johnny DC does?&#8221;</p>
<p>The single issues are still quite necessary for Vertigo, be it only as loss-leaders.  Without them, the imprint wouldn&#8217;t be workable at this time, as I understand it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth pointing out that collections seem less significant for the Johnny DC books than mass-market chains.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luigi Siviero</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-140405</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-140405</guid>
					<description>The average of DC Universe titles in march is 42,634.

Without 52 the average is 26,427.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average of DC Universe titles in march is 42,634.</p>
<p>Without 52 the average is 26,427.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-140259</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-140259</guid>
					<description>&quot;If you’re going to naysay… oh, to hell with it. Twit&quot;

Volume alone counts for the majority of that increase.  Additionally, the rest of us are looking at where DC is going, not just at where they are now.  They just used up their 'once every 20 years' magic bullet, and it didn't help them much more than 1300 units, with big winners being a book that didn't even change teams, one that everyone proclaims to hate, and a mini-series the sales of which we will never see again. 
When you look at the fall-out of that, you see what the rest of us are trying to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you’re going to naysay… oh, to hell with it. Twit&#8221;</p>
<p>Volume alone counts for the majority of that increase.  Additionally, the rest of us are looking at where DC is going, not just at where they are now.  They just used up their &#8216;once every 20 years&#8217; magic bullet, and it didn&#8217;t help them much more than 1300 units, with big winners being a book that didn&#8217;t even change teams, one that everyone proclaims to hate, and a mini-series the sales of which we will never see again.<br />
When you look at the fall-out of that, you see what the rest of us are trying to say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139830</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139830</guid>
					<description>&quot;As I understand it:

Comic book writers and artists, in general, want to get paid every month. So in order to be able to pay these writers and artists, DC has to sell something every month. Thus what could otherwise just wait to be a graphic novel has to get chopped up into monthly bites so that some money can come in to pay the writers and artists along the way.

My understanding is that no comics company or creator is ready to change over to the system used by prose novels, which I believe is an advance payment based on anticipated sales, followed by more payment when the piece is finished. DC can’t up-front the money, and the writers and artists can’t wait till it’s done to get paid.&quot;

Yeah, sure - DC can't afford to front the money.  Where are you getting that information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I understand it:</p>
<p>Comic book writers and artists, in general, want to get paid every month. So in order to be able to pay these writers and artists, DC has to sell something every month. Thus what could otherwise just wait to be a graphic novel has to get chopped up into monthly bites so that some money can come in to pay the writers and artists along the way.</p>
<p>My understanding is that no comics company or creator is ready to change over to the system used by prose novels, which I believe is an advance payment based on anticipated sales, followed by more payment when the piece is finished. DC can’t up-front the money, and the writers and artists can’t wait till it’s done to get paid.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, sure - DC can&#8217;t afford to front the money.  Where are you getting that information?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael G</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139824</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139824</guid>
					<description>What happened to Supergirl and the Legion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Supergirl and the Legion?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139819</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139819</guid>
					<description>&quot;02/2007: 31,051 (+ 4.5%)
03/2007: 32,398 (+ 4.3%)

If you’re going to naysay… oh, to hell with it. Twit. &quot;

Er, not so fast there.  Those numbers don't prove your point at all.  It's entirely possible for the average sales per title to go up, but the total sales to go down.  If DC cancelled some low-selling titles then the average would go up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;02/2007: 31,051 (+ 4.5%)<br />
03/2007: 32,398 (+ 4.3%)</p>
<p>If you’re going to naysay… oh, to hell with it. Twit. &#8221;</p>
<p>Er, not so fast there.  Those numbers don&#8217;t prove your point at all.  It&#8217;s entirely possible for the average sales per title to go up, but the total sales to go down.  If DC cancelled some low-selling titles then the average would go up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Moonlight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139733</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 06:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139733</guid>
					<description>&quot;DC publishes Darwyn Cooke drawing The Spirit and none of your art students care about *that* book? Seriously? Seems a bit surprising to me. (Also, you’d think that art students would have some kind of an interest in the Kuberts, for good or for ill…)&quot;

No. They really don't care, or care to know. These are kids. The next in line to write, draw, or buy the comics of years to come, The girls draw stories about pretty girls looking for love... and riding horses. The boy's do stories of robots and dragons. Who's doing it means nothing to them; only what it is and if it's cool. They know only the possibilities in their imagination, with no limitations, and I'll continue to encourage that. Isn't that always how change comes about?. Stop fighting it and let it happen. That's why we're not getting any where, because we're not letting change happen. Telling my students about the Kuberts is like trying to explain to them why the Beatles were so important to all the music that came after them, all the way up until today. They only want to hear the music of today. They'll start liking stuff by old guys when they have their own kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;DC publishes Darwyn Cooke drawing The Spirit and none of your art students care about *that* book? Seriously? Seems a bit surprising to me. (Also, you’d think that art students would have some kind of an interest in the Kuberts, for good or for ill…)&#8221;</p>
<p>No. They really don&#8217;t care, or care to know. These are kids. The next in line to write, draw, or buy the comics of years to come, The girls draw stories about pretty girls looking for love&#8230; and riding horses. The boy&#8217;s do stories of robots and dragons. Who&#8217;s doing it means nothing to them; only what it is and if it&#8217;s cool. They know only the possibilities in their imagination, with no limitations, and I&#8217;ll continue to encourage that. Isn&#8217;t that always how change comes about?. Stop fighting it and let it happen. That&#8217;s why we&#8217;re not getting any where, because we&#8217;re not letting change happen. Telling my students about the Kuberts is like trying to explain to them why the Beatles were so important to all the music that came after them, all the way up until today. They only want to hear the music of today. They&#8217;ll start liking stuff by old guys when they have their own kids.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stealthwise</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139563</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139563</guid>
					<description>Any chance of getting some comparison numbers for trades/collections?  I'd like to see the trends in that regard.

Otherwise, I really enjoy these, keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any chance of getting some comparison numbers for trades/collections?  I&#8217;d like to see the trends in that regard.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I really enjoy these, keep up the good work.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139395</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139395</guid>
					<description>Well as someone who just started buying DC trades again, I have to say that they have good entertaining stories. Fans are too event driven, they just buy whatever book has an event tag slapped onto it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as someone who just started buying DC trades again, I have to say that they have good entertaining stories. Fans are too event driven, they just buy whatever book has an event tag slapped onto it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: T. Martin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139293</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139293</guid>
					<description>Well, it looks like the emergency measures to fix the scheduling are stemming at least the worst of the bleeding.

The low numbers of the Vertigo books interest me too. Is Vertigo finally shifting its focus to the collected edition market in the same way Johnny DC does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks like the emergency measures to fix the scheduling are stemming at least the worst of the bleeding.</p>
<p>The low numbers of the Vertigo books interest me too. Is Vertigo finally shifting its focus to the collected edition market in the same way Johnny DC does?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AERose</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139239</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139239</guid>
					<description>&quot;Wow. I’ll state now that i’ve never been nor will i ever be a DC fan. But declining sales hurts the industry as a whole, and it looks horrible on DC’s end.&quot;

DC COMICS
03/2003: 24,279
03/2004: 32,148
03/2005: 27,349
—————
&lt;b&gt;02/2007: 31,051 (+ 4.5%)
03/2007: 32,398 (+ 4.3%)&lt;/b&gt;

If you're going to naysay... oh, to hell with it. Twit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wow. I’ll state now that i’ve never been nor will i ever be a DC fan. But declining sales hurts the industry as a whole, and it looks horrible on DC’s end.&#8221;</p>
<p>DC COMICS<br />
03/2003: 24,279<br />
03/2004: 32,148<br />
03/2005: 27,349<br />
—————<br />
<b>02/2007: 31,051 (+ 4.5%)<br />
03/2007: 32,398 (+ 4.3%)</b></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to naysay&#8230; oh, to hell with it. Twit.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139193</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139193</guid>
					<description>&lt;b&gt;And a 38.3% second-issue drop is extraordinarily steep by any standard, despite the variant cover edition for issue #1.&lt;/b&gt;

From what I've seen, a 25% drop is pretty normal, 30% is a little high.  Is that a fair statement in your estimation?

If so, compare MIS to a comparable mini-series, such as say Omega Men - the 2nd-issue drop was more standard there...but then...the first issue didn't have a variant by Neal Adams.  When you consider that the 2nd issues are ordered sight unseen, it's likely that retailers simply wanted the Neal Adams cover.

&lt;b&gt;I’m pointing out that it lost more than half of its readership. The 18% drop after issue #4, as I said in the February column, was due to the fact that it was the first without a variant cover edition. The subsequent 4.8% drop in March is the smallest one yet for ANY of the WildStorm Universe titles in ANY month, hence my suggestion that it seems to be finding its level.

So I don’t quite see your point, all told.&lt;/b&gt;
I was unaware that the 18% drop on Gen13 was due to the loss of a variant cover.  Going purely by the numbers presented, your analysis of Gen13's is inconsistent with your analysis of similarly-performing titles.

That was my point - but the data you presented in your response makes sense.  Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>And a 38.3% second-issue drop is extraordinarily steep by any standard, despite the variant cover edition for issue #1.</b></p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve seen, a 25% drop is pretty normal, 30% is a little high.  Is that a fair statement in your estimation?</p>
<p>If so, compare MIS to a comparable mini-series, such as say Omega Men - the 2nd-issue drop was more standard there&#8230;but then&#8230;the first issue didn&#8217;t have a variant by Neal Adams.  When you consider that the 2nd issues are ordered sight unseen, it&#8217;s likely that retailers simply wanted the Neal Adams cover.</p>
<p><b>I’m pointing out that it lost more than half of its readership. The 18% drop after issue #4, as I said in the February column, was due to the fact that it was the first without a variant cover edition. The subsequent 4.8% drop in March is the smallest one yet for ANY of the WildStorm Universe titles in ANY month, hence my suggestion that it seems to be finding its level.</p>
<p>So I don’t quite see your point, all told.</b><br />
I was unaware that the 18% drop on Gen13 was due to the loss of a variant cover.  Going purely by the numbers presented, your analysis of Gen13&#8217;s is inconsistent with your analysis of similarly-performing titles.</p>
<p>That was my point - but the data you presented in your response makes sense.  Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hector Lima</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139188</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139188</guid>
					<description>the situation with the movie horror books is interesting: all of those properties were taken by their owner[s] from Avatar to Wildstorm only to get cancelled after 6 months.

I suppose they did now better business than they did at Avatar, but wouldn't they have survived longer if still being published by the latter?

the movie studios tried to better expose their properties for a while but then they will probably go back to limbo again after this.

I may be wrong and I'm not a numbers expert, but I'd like to see an analysis on this sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the situation with the movie horror books is interesting: all of those properties were taken by their owner[s] from Avatar to Wildstorm only to get cancelled after 6 months.</p>
<p>I suppose they did now better business than they did at Avatar, but wouldn&#8217;t they have survived longer if still being published by the latter?</p>
<p>the movie studios tried to better expose their properties for a while but then they will probably go back to limbo again after this.</p>
<p>I may be wrong and I&#8217;m not a numbers expert, but I&#8217;d like to see an analysis on this sometime.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glenn Simpson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139161</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-139161</guid>
					<description>As I understand it:

Comic book writers and artists, in general, want to get paid every month.  So in order to be able to pay these writers and artists, DC has to sell something every month.  Thus what could otherwise just wait to be a graphic novel has to get chopped up into monthly bites so that some money can come in to pay the writers and artists along the way.

My understanding is that no comics company or creator is ready to change over to the system used by prose novels, which I believe is an advance payment based on anticipated sales, followed by more payment when the piece is finished.  DC can't up-front the money, and the writers and artists can't wait till it's done to get paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it:</p>
<p>Comic book writers and artists, in general, want to get paid every month.  So in order to be able to pay these writers and artists, DC has to sell something every month.  Thus what could otherwise just wait to be a graphic novel has to get chopped up into monthly bites so that some money can come in to pay the writers and artists along the way.</p>
<p>My understanding is that no comics company or creator is ready to change over to the system used by prose novels, which I believe is an advance payment based on anticipated sales, followed by more payment when the piece is finished.  DC can&#8217;t up-front the money, and the writers and artists can&#8217;t wait till it&#8217;s done to get paid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles Skaggs</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-138952</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-138952</guid>
					<description>You would think that with all of these &quot;declines,&quot; &quot;disasters&quot; and &quot;fiascoes,&quot; editorial heads would be rolling at DC.  At the moment, their only successful series seem to be JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA, 52 and JUSTICE SOCIETY OF AMERICA.  Everything else seems to be outright tanking, dropping or barely holding its level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that with all of these &#8220;declines,&#8221; &#8220;disasters&#8221; and &#8220;fiascoes,&#8221; editorial heads would be rolling at DC.  At the moment, their only successful series seem to be JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA, 52 and JUSTICE SOCIETY OF AMERICA.  Everything else seems to be outright tanking, dropping or barely holding its level.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luigi Siviero</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-138950</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/04/26/dc-comics-month-to-month-sales-march-2007/#comment-138950</guid>
					<description>&quot;What’s more interesting to me is how “poorly” the Vertigo launches are doing. (...)I hope the paperbacks of books like Scalped, DMZ, Exterminators and Testament do very well in their first months of distrubution.&quot;


The paperback of DMZ has sold better than the comic book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What’s more interesting to me is how “poorly” the Vertigo launches are doing. (&#8230;)I hope the paperbacks of books like Scalped, DMZ, Exterminators and Testament do very well in their first months of distrubution.&#8221;</p>
<p>The paperback of DMZ has sold better than the comic book.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
