<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Night of the Feminazis!!! Part ii</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bixnood</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-189488</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-189488</guid>
					<description>Big tits are BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big tits are BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIG!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin Redmond</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-170764</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-170764</guid>
					<description>None of those guys have enough IQ to even give a shit. Check out this back up story from Classic Avengers #1
http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/AvengersClassic/AvengersClassic01pgC03.jpg

The Hulk tells the Wasp she is giving him a huge boner. What's the Wasp reaction? She just giggles like an idiot. This isn't a What The, this is a monthly series reprinting a classic brand that's the company's bread and butter. This is the back up story they farted out to add extra depth to Avengers#1.

Then again, what do you expect from 40 year olds who spend their birthday parties at the stripers? You might as well be asking the local seedy XXX cinema for &quot;respect&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of those guys have enough IQ to even give a shit. Check out this back up story from Classic Avengers #1<br />
<a href='http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/AvengersClassic/AvengersClassic01pgC03.jpg' rel='nofollow'>http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/AvengersClassic/AvengersClassic01pgC03.jpg</a></p>
<p>The Hulk tells the Wasp she is giving him a huge boner. What&#8217;s the Wasp reaction? She just giggles like an idiot. This isn&#8217;t a What The, this is a monthly series reprinting a classic brand that&#8217;s the company&#8217;s bread and butter. This is the back up story they farted out to add extra depth to Avengers#1.</p>
<p>Then again, what do you expect from 40 year olds who spend their birthday parties at the stripers? You might as well be asking the local seedy XXX cinema for &#8220;respect&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Novan Leon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-168139</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-168139</guid>
					<description>While this type of extreme sexualization of women is prevalent in comics, I think it's only a sign of our culture as a whole. For some reason the &quot;big dogs&quot; in the entertainment industry, be it music, movies, video games or comics, seem to think that all women are good for is their sexual appeal. Nine times out of ten if a girl/woman is in the entertainment media it's to provide eye candy, a sexual partner for the main protagonist or fill in the required female quota. This kind of cliche is becoming so common, I don't think they know HOW to write a good role for a female character anymore!

What was the last significant female character in a movie, tv show, video game or comic book that was actually presented in a realistic, interesting and immersive manner? I'm actually having a hard time thinking of one off-hand.

I think Buffy would be the most obvious one (TV &amp;#38; comic). Re-el from Ergo Proxy (anime) would be a personal favorite of mine (actually, some anime do a pretty good job of portraying an interestingfemale character, go figure). And of course the X-Men women are done fairly well, at least in comparison to other lines of comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this type of extreme sexualization of women is prevalent in comics, I think it&#8217;s only a sign of our culture as a whole. For some reason the &#8220;big dogs&#8221; in the entertainment industry, be it music, movies, video games or comics, seem to think that all women are good for is their sexual appeal. Nine times out of ten if a girl/woman is in the entertainment media it&#8217;s to provide eye candy, a sexual partner for the main protagonist or fill in the required female quota. This kind of cliche is becoming so common, I don&#8217;t think they know HOW to write a good role for a female character anymore!</p>
<p>What was the last significant female character in a movie, tv show, video game or comic book that was actually presented in a realistic, interesting and immersive manner? I&#8217;m actually having a hard time thinking of one off-hand.</p>
<p>I think Buffy would be the most obvious one (TV &amp; comic). Re-el from Ergo Proxy (anime) would be a personal favorite of mine (actually, some anime do a pretty good job of portraying an interestingfemale character, go figure). And of course the X-Men women are done fairly well, at least in comparison to other lines of comics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Taylor</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-167907</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-167907</guid>
					<description>The most interesting part of this dialog for me is that I had to stumble upon it on the internet/blogosphere,...or whatever the hell you wanna call it.  I am a comic shoppe habitue and haven't seen any of these products or publications in any venue or outlet that I frequent.  In the course of following this subject around the web I have yet to even see an image of the Mary Jane statue that folks are in such an uproar about.  I presume y'all are talking about the Sideshow Toys statue based on Adam Hughes art,...which I have only seen on their website.  Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most interesting part of this dialog for me is that I had to stumble upon it on the internet/blogosphere,&#8230;or whatever the hell you wanna call it.  I am a comic shoppe habitue and haven&#8217;t seen any of these products or publications in any venue or outlet that I frequent.  In the course of following this subject around the web I have yet to even see an image of the Mary Jane statue that folks are in such an uproar about.  I presume y&#8217;all are talking about the Sideshow Toys statue based on Adam Hughes art,&#8230;which I have only seen on their website.  Interesting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: notintheface</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-166030</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-166030</guid>
					<description>I agree with Sizemore about the Power Girl statue. It's actually one of the good ones. It makes Peege look like she's ACTUALLY CAPABLE of the super-feats she performs in the comics. 

If the Catwoman one had actually been zipped up like it is in the comic, it would have been accurate as well.

But why does that Supergirl statue look like she's wearing a slice of pizza on her chest? Couldn't the sculptor even bother to get the &quot;S&quot; symbol right?

Then again, maybe the less this crappy statue is associated with the Superman brand, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sizemore about the Power Girl statue. It&#8217;s actually one of the good ones. It makes Peege look like she&#8217;s ACTUALLY CAPABLE of the super-feats she performs in the comics. </p>
<p>If the Catwoman one had actually been zipped up like it is in the comic, it would have been accurate as well.</p>
<p>But why does that Supergirl statue look like she&#8217;s wearing a slice of pizza on her chest? Couldn&#8217;t the sculptor even bother to get the &#8220;S&#8221; symbol right?</p>
<p>Then again, maybe the less this crappy statue is associated with the Superman brand, the better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: notintheface</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-166005</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-166005</guid>
					<description>Hear, hear, Rich. 

That stereotyping is not only a problem in regard to superhero comics' fans, but with the merchandise itself. I'm not saying that superheroes' comics don't have too many sexist images and portrayals, but that doesn't mean we should lose complete sight of the good ones. (And, if I may be so bold, THAT'S why feminist fans like Ragnell and Kalinara stick around: because of those good ones and the hope for more). 

But it seems 1 negative portrayal seems to equal 10 positive ones in a lot of people's eyes. That's not only throwing out the baby with the bathwater, it's throwing out the baby's brothers and sisters as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear, Rich. </p>
<p>That stereotyping is not only a problem in regard to superhero comics&#8217; fans, but with the merchandise itself. I&#8217;m not saying that superheroes&#8217; comics don&#8217;t have too many sexist images and portrayals, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we should lose complete sight of the good ones. (And, if I may be so bold, THAT&#8217;S why feminist fans like Ragnell and Kalinara stick around: because of those good ones and the hope for more). </p>
<p>But it seems 1 negative portrayal seems to equal 10 positive ones in a lot of people&#8217;s eyes. That&#8217;s not only throwing out the baby with the bathwater, it&#8217;s throwing out the baby&#8217;s brothers and sisters as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165845</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165845</guid>
					<description>This was a GREAT article and I agree with everything the writer said in the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a GREAT article and I agree with everything the writer said in the article.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165730</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165730</guid>
					<description>&quot;As a guy, I like that comic shops are the insulated Batcaves of Geek Solitude — but maybe the stores themselves need to be more female friendly ... Best behavior guys, there’s REAL GIRLS in the store.&quot;

I've never cared for stereotypes too much, which is why I roll my eyes when people trot out the &quot;unwashed fanboy&quot; stock character.  ONE guy made an ass out of himself.  That doesn't necessarily make the stores the &quot;Batcaves of Geek Solitude.&quot;

Would we embrace negative stereotypes of female fans in the same manner?  I once mentioned the 300 lb women who wear tight bustierres (sp?) at SF conventions, and thought I would receive death threats.  But they're out there.

I think the reason less than 1/3 or 99% of everyone in America looks at comics is because (1) They don't read to begin with and (2) reading comics isn't &quot;cool,&quot; or not cool in the same way as playing Ninetendo and Xbox for six hours a day.

Of course, if we're so quick to denigrate fandom, I could understand why some new people might be hesitant to be seen walking into a comic book store.  You don't want to be seen leaving a comic store, as opposed to someplace respectable like a porno shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As a guy, I like that comic shops are the insulated Batcaves of Geek Solitude — but maybe the stores themselves need to be more female friendly &#8230; Best behavior guys, there’s REAL GIRLS in the store.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never cared for stereotypes too much, which is why I roll my eyes when people trot out the &#8220;unwashed fanboy&#8221; stock character.  ONE guy made an ass out of himself.  That doesn&#8217;t necessarily make the stores the &#8220;Batcaves of Geek Solitude.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would we embrace negative stereotypes of female fans in the same manner?  I once mentioned the 300 lb women who wear tight bustierres (sp?) at SF conventions, and thought I would receive death threats.  But they&#8217;re out there.</p>
<p>I think the reason less than 1/3 or 99% of everyone in America looks at comics is because (1) They don&#8217;t read to begin with and (2) reading comics isn&#8217;t &#8220;cool,&#8221; or not cool in the same way as playing Ninetendo and Xbox for six hours a day.</p>
<p>Of course, if we&#8217;re so quick to denigrate fandom, I could understand why some new people might be hesitant to be seen walking into a comic book store.  You don&#8217;t want to be seen leaving a comic store, as opposed to someplace respectable like a porno shop.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165682</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165682</guid>
					<description>Great coverage and ideas on this whole thing Heidi, keep it up! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great coverage and ideas on this whole thing Heidi, keep it up! <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kalinara</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165474</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 20:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165474</guid>
					<description>I'm part of an axis now?  Huh.  Learn something new everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m part of an axis now?  Huh.  Learn something new everyday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lisa Jonté</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165444</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165444</guid>
					<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;...I take the fact that Simone isn’t LKH as very much in her favour.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

So do I.  I eat, breath and sleep books, but if all author's were work like LKH's I'd never read again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><I>&#8220;&#8230;I take the fact that Simone isn’t LKH as very much in her favour.&#8221;</I></p>
<p>So do I.  I eat, breath and sleep books, but if all author&#8217;s were work like LKH&#8217;s I&#8217;d never read again.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robomonkey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165437</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165437</guid>
					<description>Wait a second! Are those Rat Creatures on the Heroes for Hire cover!? Damn. Stupid stupid Rat Creatures...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a second! Are those Rat Creatures on the Heroes for Hire cover!? Damn. Stupid stupid Rat Creatures&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Betty</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165416</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165416</guid>
					<description>I take your meaning about LKH's built-in fanbase, but I take the fact that Simone isn't LKH as &lt;i&gt;very much in her favour&lt;/i&gt;.  Have you read anything by that woman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take your meaning about LKH&#8217;s built-in fanbase, but I take the fact that Simone isn&#8217;t LKH as <i>very much in her favour</i>.  Have you read anything by that woman?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matthew High</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165415</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165415</guid>
					<description>Even pornography publishers are icked out.

http://doronjosama.livejournal.com/472728.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even pornography publishers are icked out.</p>
<p><a href='http://doronjosama.livejournal.com/472728.html' rel='nofollow'>http://doronjosama.livejournal.com/472728.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robomonkey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165363</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165363</guid>
					<description>There's plenty of fun mainstream properties with respect towards women, or if nothing else, no absurd sexism. These include Runaways, The Spirit (anything by Darwyn Cooke actually), Astonishing X-Men, but none of these are really the standard for the companies they represent. Indie and Dark Horse titles offer a lot of great titles and characters too, and Rose from Bone is an excellent female character in a fun children's fantasy adventure title. If fans flock to these instead of bizzare pictures and characterizations the rest of the titles will follow [like DKR causing the grim and gritty movement].

Or maybe, just maybe, two major companies who are extremely similar and share writers and artists  telling very similar stories, shouldn't be controlling most of the comic book wealth. Its really up to the audience though, but mainstream comics seem to be becoming more and more art directed anyway, with hiring famed writers to allowing more odd styles such as the afore mentioned Cooke.

Anyway, if fan outrage can retcon a Grant Morrison X-Men story, I'm sure they can do this.

Another school of thought is, why should a 50 year old character made to shut up Frederic Wertham about Batman and Robin's supposed homosexuality be used as a role model for anyone? There are other forms of entertainment out there which superhero comics should compete with. Marvel competing with DC is like beef vs. chicken, they're really both just meat, and thier competition was before [maybe now too] in its own universe.

(I should just quickly note both companies have several tasteful and fun titles. This isn't a hatred against the companies, just against thier often horrible gimmicks.)

Also, Heros for Hire #14 is scary lookin'. Like, really scary lookin. Like... wtf... like... what happened there... &amp;#62;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s plenty of fun mainstream properties with respect towards women, or if nothing else, no absurd sexism. These include Runaways, The Spirit (anything by Darwyn Cooke actually), Astonishing X-Men, but none of these are really the standard for the companies they represent. Indie and Dark Horse titles offer a lot of great titles and characters too, and Rose from Bone is an excellent female character in a fun children&#8217;s fantasy adventure title. If fans flock to these instead of bizzare pictures and characterizations the rest of the titles will follow [like DKR causing the grim and gritty movement].</p>
<p>Or maybe, just maybe, two major companies who are extremely similar and share writers and artists  telling very similar stories, shouldn&#8217;t be controlling most of the comic book wealth. Its really up to the audience though, but mainstream comics seem to be becoming more and more art directed anyway, with hiring famed writers to allowing more odd styles such as the afore mentioned Cooke.</p>
<p>Anyway, if fan outrage can retcon a Grant Morrison X-Men story, I&#8217;m sure they can do this.</p>
<p>Another school of thought is, why should a 50 year old character made to shut up Frederic Wertham about Batman and Robin&#8217;s supposed homosexuality be used as a role model for anyone? There are other forms of entertainment out there which superhero comics should compete with. Marvel competing with DC is like beef vs. chicken, they&#8217;re really both just meat, and thier competition was before [maybe now too] in its own universe.</p>
<p>(I should just quickly note both companies have several tasteful and fun titles. This isn&#8217;t a hatred against the companies, just against thier often horrible gimmicks.)</p>
<p>Also, Heros for Hire #14 is scary lookin&#8217;. Like, really scary lookin. Like&#8230; wtf&#8230; like&#8230; what happened there&#8230; &gt;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Moonlight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165360</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165360</guid>
					<description>I love women in just about every way a man can. Maybe that’s not what every woman wants to hear from a man, but… I really like Brian Michael Bendis’ take on Alies or the Beat or whatever it is they ended up having to call it. JJ, to me, seemed like a real woman. Heide, my friend Frank Kane and I are going to make a comic, I think you’ll like, were women are as the ones we know, in real life. No more… no less. I think that’s what you’re asking for. Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love women in just about every way a man can. Maybe that’s not what every woman wants to hear from a man, but… I really like Brian Michael Bendis’ take on Alies or the Beat or whatever it is they ended up having to call it. JJ, to me, seemed like a real woman. Heide, my friend Frank Kane and I are going to make a comic, I think you’ll like, were women are as the ones we know, in real life. No more… no less. I think that’s what you’re asking for. Am I right?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165301</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165301</guid>
					<description>Both DC and Marvel have several superheroine characters who, if portrayed intelligently and without sexism, could become very popular with women. The original Elasti-Girl, Rita Farr (not the version John Byrne created for the rebooted Doom Patrol) has such potential; so does She-Hulk, if Marvel ever decides how it wants to use her. Perhaps comics companies fear their base fanboy audience would feel threatened by such characters if they don't also have the veneer of (adolescent) sexuality. Nonsense. It was Xena's complexity of character, straddling between light and darkness -- not her &quot;subtext&quot; with Gabrielle -- that made her so beloved by men and women alike. Why can't women comics superheroines get similar treatment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both DC and Marvel have several superheroine characters who, if portrayed intelligently and without sexism, could become very popular with women. The original Elasti-Girl, Rita Farr (not the version John Byrne created for the rebooted Doom Patrol) has such potential; so does She-Hulk, if Marvel ever decides how it wants to use her. Perhaps comics companies fear their base fanboy audience would feel threatened by such characters if they don&#8217;t also have the veneer of (adolescent) sexuality. Nonsense. It was Xena&#8217;s complexity of character, straddling between light and darkness &#8212; not her &#8220;subtext&#8221; with Gabrielle &#8212; that made her so beloved by men and women alike. Why can&#8217;t women comics superheroines get similar treatment?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed Sizemore</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165295</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 15:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165295</guid>
					<description>Okay, I'm willing to put my head on the chopping block.  Heidi, my only disagreement with your post is the Power Girl statue at the end.   That statue is fairly accurate.  In fact, I would say the statue is probably modeled after Corey Everson.  The pose used is the exact same posed used for male statues in the Batman/Superman statue series.  I would argue this statue is an example of DC getting it right for once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m willing to put my head on the chopping block.  Heidi, my only disagreement with your post is the Power Girl statue at the end.   That statue is fairly accurate.  In fact, I would say the statue is probably modeled after Corey Everson.  The pose used is the exact same posed used for male statues in the Batman/Superman statue series.  I would argue this statue is an example of DC getting it right for once.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165205</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165205</guid>
					<description>&quot;The fact that Spider-Man is neither a “serial” nor remotely the most successful film series of all time is not especially relevant, but Heidi can certainly do better than these kinds of overbroad and factually inaccurate pronouncements.&quot;


Wait, how is Spider-Man NOT a serial?  One, two, three, that's a &quot;series&quot; is it not?  And it didn't just have the biggest opening of all-time, a record another one of the movies in the *series* previously held?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The fact that Spider-Man is neither a “serial” nor remotely the most successful film series of all time is not especially relevant, but Heidi can certainly do better than these kinds of overbroad and factually inaccurate pronouncements.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait, how is Spider-Man NOT a serial?  One, two, three, that&#8217;s a &#8220;series&#8221; is it not?  And it didn&#8217;t just have the biggest opening of all-time, a record another one of the movies in the *series* previously held?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lea</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165158</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165158</guid>
					<description>If that store owner wants to be sure his female customers return, he tells Strip-Boy to shut his face while they're still in the store.

BTW,  I have just this morning, coined a new word for the segment of the comics business that gives the market Pearl Necklace MJ statues: Manstream.

I was inspired by the cover to Heroes for Hire #13, and wrote this:

http://divalea.livejournal.com/454772.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that store owner wants to be sure his female customers return, he tells Strip-Boy to shut his face while they&#8217;re still in the store.</p>
<p>BTW,  I have just this morning, coined a new word for the segment of the comics business that gives the market Pearl Necklace MJ statues: Manstream.</p>
<p>I was inspired by the cover to Heroes for Hire #13, and wrote this:</p>
<p><a href='http://divalea.livejournal.com/454772.html' rel='nofollow'>http://divalea.livejournal.com/454772.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brad</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165067</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 12:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165067</guid>
					<description>Kids don't buy comics because they aren't for sale at the outlets they frequent.

But that isn't the point.  

But part of this too is the whole &quot;comic store mentality&quot; that also is fueled by an exaggerated (campy) sheen of falstosterone.  I went to a local comics store over the weekend with a woman.  I bought some comics, she bought Plain Janes (&quot;I don't know if it's good yet, but I can't put it down.&quot;)  Meanwhile, some 20 something comes in and starts LOUDLY regaling to the owner of the shop about his fun at the strip club last night.  We're up at the register and the clerk and owner are exchanging nervous glances as the kid (he was wearing a tucked-in polo) goes on and on about dollar bills and jewel-encrusted thongs.  My friend rolls her eyes and I say, loudly, &quot;I bet he brags about his free Cinemax next.&quot;  As we left, the owner goes out of his way to say have a great afternoon, etc. etc. but you could tell they were going to (or wanted to) lay into Strip-Boy for scaring away the girl.  As a guy, I like that comic shops are the insulated Batcaves of Geek Solitude -- but maybe the stores themselves need to be more female friendly.  The store I've seen the most women at is definitely Hanley's, and as anyone knows, on any given second there you can hear conversations at the register that could turn any state red.  So what's the solution?  More female employees?  Ties and jacket for the clerks?  Public bathrooms?  Or, as this argument is saying, just a better product?  I'm sure the MJ product will sell out in a second, but doesn't that just underline the real problem here: we obviously need more girls.  We (as a collective comic blob) wouldn't be buying MJ statues if we didn't.  But take it home, unwrap it and put it on the mantle and still it's just a statue: her green cold eyes look right through you. 


Best behavior guys, there's REAL GIRLS in the store.  


I really like your long essays Heidi and hope you keep doing them.

-Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kids don&#8217;t buy comics because they aren&#8217;t for sale at the outlets they frequent.</p>
<p>But that isn&#8217;t the point.  </p>
<p>But part of this too is the whole &#8220;comic store mentality&#8221; that also is fueled by an exaggerated (campy) sheen of falstosterone.  I went to a local comics store over the weekend with a woman.  I bought some comics, she bought Plain Janes (&#8221;I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s good yet, but I can&#8217;t put it down.&#8221;)  Meanwhile, some 20 something comes in and starts LOUDLY regaling to the owner of the shop about his fun at the strip club last night.  We&#8217;re up at the register and the clerk and owner are exchanging nervous glances as the kid (he was wearing a tucked-in polo) goes on and on about dollar bills and jewel-encrusted thongs.  My friend rolls her eyes and I say, loudly, &#8220;I bet he brags about his free Cinemax next.&#8221;  As we left, the owner goes out of his way to say have a great afternoon, etc. etc. but you could tell they were going to (or wanted to) lay into Strip-Boy for scaring away the girl.  As a guy, I like that comic shops are the insulated Batcaves of Geek Solitude &#8212; but maybe the stores themselves need to be more female friendly.  The store I&#8217;ve seen the most women at is definitely Hanley&#8217;s, and as anyone knows, on any given second there you can hear conversations at the register that could turn any state red.  So what&#8217;s the solution?  More female employees?  Ties and jacket for the clerks?  Public bathrooms?  Or, as this argument is saying, just a better product?  I&#8217;m sure the MJ product will sell out in a second, but doesn&#8217;t that just underline the real problem here: we obviously need more girls.  We (as a collective comic blob) wouldn&#8217;t be buying MJ statues if we didn&#8217;t.  But take it home, unwrap it and put it on the mantle and still it&#8217;s just a statue: her green cold eyes look right through you. </p>
<p>Best behavior guys, there&#8217;s REAL GIRLS in the store.  </p>
<p>I really like your long essays Heidi and hope you keep doing them.</p>
<p>-Brad
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Justin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165057</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165057</guid>
					<description>&quot;Batman’s not treated like this… Batman is Batman.&quot;

Batman might be Bruce Wayne... but I doubt he doesn't have his own identity problems.  The Batman in detective is far different than the one I would read just prior to Crisis.  Granted that is due to Dini's craftsmanship.  And let's not forget ASBaR with the god damn Batman.  Then there is the Batman in the JLU.  Then there is The Batman.  Some people would say Batman hasn't been &quot;Batman&quot; since a boy in green undies and a domino mask showed up.

And yes, most fans can differentiate.  But still, even I shake my head at where would be a good place to start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Batman’s not treated like this… Batman is Batman.&#8221;</p>
<p>Batman might be Bruce Wayne&#8230; but I doubt he doesn&#8217;t have his own identity problems.  The Batman in detective is far different than the one I would read just prior to Crisis.  Granted that is due to Dini&#8217;s craftsmanship.  And let&#8217;s not forget ASBaR with the god damn Batman.  Then there is the Batman in the JLU.  Then there is The Batman.  Some people would say Batman hasn&#8217;t been &#8220;Batman&#8221; since a boy in green undies and a domino mask showed up.</p>
<p>And yes, most fans can differentiate.  But still, even I shake my head at where would be a good place to start.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; May 22, 2007: Tintin forever</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165024</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-165024</guid>
					<description>[...] Heidi MacDonald attempts to explain why eroticized female imagery keeps young girls from buying tons of superhero comics. Left unanswered: why young boys &amp;#8212; or anyone else who isn&amp;#8217;t a member of the True Faith &amp;#8212; aren&amp;#8217;t buying tons of superhero comics at the moment, either. Also, what a limited-edition statue sold to hardcore collectors has to do with any of this. Perhaps the answer to these questions might be more general than what Heidi identifies as the problem? Just a thought. In completely unrelated news&amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Heidi MacDonald attempts to explain why eroticized female imagery keeps young girls from buying tons of superhero comics. Left unanswered: why young boys &#8212; or anyone else who isn&#8217;t a member of the True Faith &#8212; aren&#8217;t buying tons of superhero comics at the moment, either. Also, what a limited-edition statue sold to hardcore collectors has to do with any of this. Perhaps the answer to these questions might be more general than what Heidi identifies as the problem? Just a thought. In completely unrelated news&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sphinx Magoo</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164531</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164531</guid>
					<description>I gotta agree with Lea on Batgirl. DC is awfully schizo when it comes to Batgirl and Supergirl.

For Batgirl you've got Showcase reprints coming up of the Barbara Gordon-Batgirl stories. Then you've got Cassandra Cain running around claiming to be Batgirl. Then you've got Batgirl comics based on the Batman animated series. Batman's not treated like this... Batman is Batman. Batgirl is... I don't know what she is.

Ditto with Supergirl. Eddie Berganza says above: &quot;Sure, some of you may not be keen that we didn’t go straight into America’s Sweetheart mode with her, but, hey, we know that’s what she will eventually become. For us, it’s the hero’s journey that’s interesting. I compare this to what’s being done with Clark on SMALLVILLE. Already, we’ve seen Kara try to be normal, whether partying or in a disastrous attempt at a secret identity. She’s come up short at being a wicked bad vigilante hanging with the OUTSIDERS.&quot; This is just dumb. It's months of lazy product without direction or clear vision.

&quot;Hero's journey&quot;, my eye. Sorry, you can go on that trip without me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with Lea on Batgirl. DC is awfully schizo when it comes to Batgirl and Supergirl.</p>
<p>For Batgirl you&#8217;ve got Showcase reprints coming up of the Barbara Gordon-Batgirl stories. Then you&#8217;ve got Cassandra Cain running around claiming to be Batgirl. Then you&#8217;ve got Batgirl comics based on the Batman animated series. Batman&#8217;s not treated like this&#8230; Batman is Batman. Batgirl is&#8230; I don&#8217;t know what she is.</p>
<p>Ditto with Supergirl. Eddie Berganza says above: &#8220;Sure, some of you may not be keen that we didn’t go straight into America’s Sweetheart mode with her, but, hey, we know that’s what she will eventually become. For us, it’s the hero’s journey that’s interesting. I compare this to what’s being done with Clark on SMALLVILLE. Already, we’ve seen Kara try to be normal, whether partying or in a disastrous attempt at a secret identity. She’s come up short at being a wicked bad vigilante hanging with the OUTSIDERS.&#8221; This is just dumb. It&#8217;s months of lazy product without direction or clear vision.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hero&#8217;s journey&#8221;, my eye. Sorry, you can go on that trip without me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164530</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164530</guid>
					<description>Amethyst came back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amethyst came back?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164529</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164529</guid>
					<description>Amethyst came back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amethyst came back?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164505</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164505</guid>
					<description>Hmmm. What prevents someone from licensing CrossGen from Disney? 
And I always thought that a Lois Lane As A Teen Reporter/Investigator would make a good book series. Kinda balance those Silver Age Superboy stories.
Another idea: create a new series of teen superhero characters, publish it in black and white, and market it like Shonen Jump. Solo and teamups. 
And for the record, while Marvel and DC have great pantheons, they are not the only comics publishers with newsstand distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. What prevents someone from licensing CrossGen from Disney?<br />
And I always thought that a Lois Lane As A Teen Reporter/Investigator would make a good book series. Kinda balance those Silver Age Superboy stories.<br />
Another idea: create a new series of teen superhero characters, publish it in black and white, and market it like Shonen Jump. Solo and teamups.<br />
And for the record, while Marvel and DC have great pantheons, they are not the only comics publishers with newsstand distribution.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CBrown</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164475</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164475</guid>
					<description>&quot;Is there nothing to be said, perhaps, for the proposition that we should maybe concern ourselves with just creating good comics and worrying about the gender of the readership further down the road - perhaps at a point where more than 1/3 of 1% of the US population are actually reading comics?&quot;

Maybe -just maybe - that point will come a little sooner if publishers and creators start considering things like what does and does not appeal to the demographics of that other 99.3%?

And maybe - just maybe - some people think that exploitive and overly-sexualized portrayals of women are one of the things that makes a comic NOT &quot;good?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is there nothing to be said, perhaps, for the proposition that we should maybe concern ourselves with just creating good comics and worrying about the gender of the readership further down the road - perhaps at a point where more than 1/3 of 1% of the US population are actually reading comics?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe -just maybe - that point will come a little sooner if publishers and creators start considering things like what does and does not appeal to the demographics of that other 99.3%?</p>
<p>And maybe - just maybe - some people think that exploitive and overly-sexualized portrayals of women are one of the things that makes a comic NOT &#8220;good?&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vert</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164469</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164469</guid>
					<description>Chip-

Is that some of that Japanese tentacle porn I've heard so much about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chip-</p>
<p>Is that some of that Japanese tentacle porn I&#8217;ve heard so much about?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lea</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164456</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 02:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/05/21/2563/#comment-164456</guid>
					<description>&quot;But Lea, I and many others will challenge you on Cassandra Cain.&quot;

I loathe the CC Batgirl, she is yet another superheroine who has her origins in abuse. 
Let's agree to disagree, because you'll never change my mind, and we all have bigger fish to fry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But Lea, I and many others will challenge you on Cassandra Cain.&#8221;</p>
<p>I loathe the CC Batgirl, she is yet another superheroine who has her origins in abuse.<br />
Let&#8217;s agree to disagree, because you&#8217;ll never change my mind, and we all have bigger fish to fry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
