<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Marvels new Indie Anthology</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/#comment-183665</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/#comment-183665</guid>
					<description>I think they published an &quot;underground&quot; X-Men comic in the 90s.  It was cute ... but little more.  The problem with publishing an &quot;indie&quot; Marvel comic is that the brass at Marvel probably don't understand &quot;indie&quot; publishing.  They have expense accounts, licensing deals, and they have &quot;people.&quot;  An &quot;indie&quot; Marvel comic will basically resemble an issue of NOT BRAND ECH, with the creators poking fun at marvel properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they published an &#8220;underground&#8221; X-Men comic in the 90s.  It was cute &#8230; but little more.  The problem with publishing an &#8220;indie&#8221; Marvel comic is that the brass at Marvel probably don&#8217;t understand &#8220;indie&#8221; publishing.  They have expense accounts, licensing deals, and they have &#8220;people.&#8221;  An &#8220;indie&#8221; Marvel comic will basically resemble an issue of NOT BRAND ECH, with the creators poking fun at marvel properties.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CBrown</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/#comment-183091</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/#comment-183091</guid>
					<description>Ha ha! Even if Marvel hasn't decided on all their artists, I really doubt there's an open invitation for every cartoonist out there to submit something!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha! Even if Marvel hasn&#8217;t decided on all their artists, I really doubt there&#8217;s an open invitation for every cartoonist out there to submit something!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/#comment-182993</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/04/newsaramacom-new-fridays-week-49-a-weekly-qa-with-joe-quesada/#comment-182993</guid>
					<description>Has Marvel already decided what independent artists are taking part, or does this mean there is an open invitation for creators to submit proposals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Marvel already decided what independent artists are taking part, or does this mean there is an open invitation for creators to submit proposals?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
