<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING: WORK FOR HIRE IS BAD!!!</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mark</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-591602</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-591602</guid>
					<description>In this instance, it doesn't sound like Mr. Stang's situation falls completely under the work-for-hire definition...or at the very least, there's some wiggle room.

I suggest he go ahead and register his creations and characters with the copyright office. Couldn't hurt and might help.

An FYI

For you published or aspiring novelists out there who are doing or considering writing media tie-ins...

Work-for-hire does NOT cover novels. They are outside the criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this instance, it doesn&#8217;t sound like Mr. Stang&#8217;s situation falls completely under the work-for-hire definition&#8230;or at the very least, there&#8217;s some wiggle room.</p>
<p>I suggest he go ahead and register his creations and characters with the copyright office. Couldn&#8217;t hurt and might help.</p>
<p>An FYI</p>
<p>For you published or aspiring novelists out there who are doing or considering writing media tie-ins&#8230;</p>
<p>Work-for-hire does NOT cover novels. They are outside the criteria.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-444753</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-444753</guid>
					<description>Platinum's shenanigans continue I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Platinum&#8217;s shenanigans continue I guess.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eddie J</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-215486</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-215486</guid>
					<description>What I want to know is, does Platinum still have the rocks to go on with the book without strand? It sounds like an invitation for worse press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is, does Platinum still have the rocks to go on with the book without strand? It sounds like an invitation for worse press.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ASH</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-215420</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-215420</guid>
					<description>Look, if you want to work in the &quot;comics business&quot;, then you have to accept both words as being equal. If you want to do &quot;comics&quot;, then hey--knock yourself out. Write 'em in your spare time, draw 'em in your basement, and show 'em to your friends. 

But if you want to work in the comics &quot;business&quot;, then you've got to know the business, and not complain about it when you don't. This guy acts like he didn't know what a work-for-hire contract was, thinks that Platinum Studios is the only one who uses them, didn't read his own contract that he signed and then complains that he didn't get the deal he wanted. (Of course, he had no complaints when he took their money.)

Would you expect that Platinum would had over money to you without reading your pitch or seeing your artwork? Then why would you hand over your creation to them without reading their contract?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, if you want to work in the &#8220;comics business&#8221;, then you have to accept both words as being equal. If you want to do &#8220;comics&#8221;, then hey&#8211;knock yourself out. Write &#8216;em in your spare time, draw &#8216;em in your basement, and show &#8216;em to your friends. </p>
<p>But if you want to work in the comics &#8220;business&#8221;, then you&#8217;ve got to know the business, and not complain about it when you don&#8217;t. This guy acts like he didn&#8217;t know what a work-for-hire contract was, thinks that Platinum Studios is the only one who uses them, didn&#8217;t read his own contract that he signed and then complains that he didn&#8217;t get the deal he wanted. (Of course, he had no complaints when he took their money.)</p>
<p>Would you expect that Platinum would had over money to you without reading your pitch or seeing your artwork? Then why would you hand over your creation to them without reading their contract?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: NeilM</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-215270</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-215270</guid>
					<description>It sounds like all Strang was trying to do was vent his frustration with being bent over by a large corporation.  His blog is a long story/cautionary tale for new and upcoming artists/writer/creators, it sounded like he was just trying to get the word out there that people can get screwed.  I mean the poor guy signed a contract, in which he was under the assumption that he would oversee his creation till the day it was published.  It's over and done with.  He vented about his anger and now hes going in another direction.  Don't pick on him for wanting to let his anger out on blogging website.  I'm sure many of you have had your dreams crushed at one point, and did you not have to retreat to your corner to build your spirits back up?  This probably isn't the last we will see of him.  And look at some publicity he has now!  Just try to look on the bright side... and maybe get a plug in or two. Maybe this blog will be stumbled upon by another novice creator and it will save them some headache.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like all Strang was trying to do was vent his frustration with being bent over by a large corporation.  His blog is a long story/cautionary tale for new and upcoming artists/writer/creators, it sounded like he was just trying to get the word out there that people can get screwed.  I mean the poor guy signed a contract, in which he was under the assumption that he would oversee his creation till the day it was published.  It&#8217;s over and done with.  He vented about his anger and now hes going in another direction.  Don&#8217;t pick on him for wanting to let his anger out on blogging website.  I&#8217;m sure many of you have had your dreams crushed at one point, and did you not have to retreat to your corner to build your spirits back up?  This probably isn&#8217;t the last we will see of him.  And look at some publicity he has now!  Just try to look on the bright side&#8230; and maybe get a plug in or two. Maybe this blog will be stumbled upon by another novice creator and it will save them some headache.</p>
<p>Cheers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Big Day for Comic Movie News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-213154</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-213154</guid>
					<description>[...] In news that no one should really care about, Cowboys vs. Aliens has been picked up by DreamWorks and Universal. I still remember that whole debacle about Platinum Studios paying comic shops to order the graphic novel in bulk just so they could claim it was a &amp;#8220;best-selling&amp;#8221; book. Which is even funnier considering the bad press Platinum got lately about not paying anyone else. And really, cowboys versus aliens? How is that even a fair fight? Who would actually pay to see this? And why am I still writing about it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In news that no one should really care about, Cowboys vs. Aliens has been picked up by DreamWorks and Universal. I still remember that whole debacle about Platinum Studios paying comic shops to order the graphic novel in bulk just so they could claim it was a &#8220;best-selling&#8221; book. Which is even funnier considering the bad press Platinum got lately about not paying anyone else. And really, cowboys versus aliens? How is that even a fair fight? Who would actually pay to see this? And why am I still writing about it? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-212820</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-212820</guid>
					<description>Raff, unless you have inside knowledge of Strang's contract...

Contracts can be changed from one creator to another. Maybe Platinum simplified their contract since then, maybe not. No accusation here, just comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raff, unless you have inside knowledge of Strang&#8217;s contract&#8230;</p>
<p>Contracts can be changed from one creator to another. Maybe Platinum simplified their contract since then, maybe not. No accusation here, just comment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Koblish</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-212479</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-212479</guid>
					<description>I work for Platinum and I have nothing but good things to say about them - We all just put out the first issue of The Weapon, and it was a great experience-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for Platinum and I have nothing but good things to say about them - We all just put out the first issue of The Weapon, and it was a great experience-
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MangaBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thursday early news</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-212119</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-212119</guid>
					<description>[...] Curious about copyright? The Library of Congress sums up the basis in a manga-styled, slighly animated comic. It&amp;#8217;s surprisingly cute and well done. If you want to take it to the next level, Heidi MacDonald has some advice for creators. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Curious about copyright? The Library of Congress sums up the basis in a manga-styled, slighly animated comic. It&#8217;s surprisingly cute and well done. If you want to take it to the next level, Heidi MacDonald has some advice for creators. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Frank</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211614</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211614</guid>
					<description>Free Mike Strang!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free Mike Strang!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Raff</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211608</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211608</guid>
					<description>You don't need a lawyer to understand the Platinum contract.  It's written in plain enough english.  He just didn't bother to read the thing.  The part about being replaced as the writer of your own creation was clear as day -shocking but clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need a lawyer to understand the Platinum contract.  It&#8217;s written in plain enough english.  He just didn&#8217;t bother to read the thing.  The part about being replaced as the writer of your own creation was clear as day -shocking but clear.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dave roman</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211564</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211564</guid>
					<description>You can’t help but get attached if you put any love or effort into it.

Telling a creator not to get attached to a project because of what the contract says is like promoting abstinence to teenagers.  

Sometimes art is made with your heart not your head.

But you should still read contracts and wear condoms!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can’t help but get attached if you put any love or effort into it.</p>
<p>Telling a creator not to get attached to a project because of what the contract says is like promoting abstinence to teenagers.  </p>
<p>Sometimes art is made with your heart not your head.</p>
<p>But you should still read contracts and wear condoms!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CBrown</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211562</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211562</guid>
					<description>It seems like the collective comics blogosphere is kicking this guy Strang while he's down I think it's because even though he himself admits he was a naive rube, it's still a bit jaw-dropping to see people signing away their creations without knowing what that means.

If you want to sign away your creation knowing the ramifications, that's your biz. But, you know, I first read about what happened to Siegel and Shuster when I was, like, 11 years old (I'm 35 now). Then there was the fight over Kirby getting his artwork returned, Alan Moore disowning Watchmen over his deal with DC, Marv Wolfman's unsuccessful lawsuit over Blade, and so on and so on. It's hard to believe that anyone who's serious about comics doesn't have a rudimentary understanding of this stuff, even if all they've read was The Adventures of Kavalier and Klay! Even if you're not a lawyer, this history should make you aware enough to know what to look out for. It's NOT an iron-clad rule that you get shafted in your first contract! It does happen a lot because young artists' enthusiasm and inexperience often outweighs their business sense, but there's nothing that makes getting screwed (or LETTING yourself GET screwed) inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the collective comics blogosphere is kicking this guy Strang while he&#8217;s down I think it&#8217;s because even though he himself admits he was a naive rube, it&#8217;s still a bit jaw-dropping to see people signing away their creations without knowing what that means.</p>
<p>If you want to sign away your creation knowing the ramifications, that&#8217;s your biz. But, you know, I first read about what happened to Siegel and Shuster when I was, like, 11 years old (I&#8217;m 35 now). Then there was the fight over Kirby getting his artwork returned, Alan Moore disowning Watchmen over his deal with DC, Marv Wolfman&#8217;s unsuccessful lawsuit over Blade, and so on and so on. It&#8217;s hard to believe that anyone who&#8217;s serious about comics doesn&#8217;t have a rudimentary understanding of this stuff, even if all they&#8217;ve read was The Adventures of Kavalier and Klay! Even if you&#8217;re not a lawyer, this history should make you aware enough to know what to look out for. It&#8217;s NOT an iron-clad rule that you get shafted in your first contract! It does happen a lot because young artists&#8217; enthusiasm and inexperience often outweighs their business sense, but there&#8217;s nothing that makes getting screwed (or LETTING yourself GET screwed) inevitable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211248</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-211248</guid>
					<description>Heidi, you rock!

Thanks for the thoughtful outline I no doubt will save as a nice resource. I am so sad to hear this happen time and again and really the comic community owes itself to better protect their artistic voyage and rep. With POD readily available, there's little reason for suspect publisher's to get away with this kind of crap in the numbers they have. Have at thee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi, you rock!</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughtful outline I no doubt will save as a nice resource. I am so sad to hear this happen time and again and really the comic community owes itself to better protect their artistic voyage and rep. With POD readily available, there&#8217;s little reason for suspect publisher&#8217;s to get away with this kind of crap in the numbers they have. Have at thee.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Coyoty ;D. Wright</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210994</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210994</guid>
					<description>On &quot;shilling&quot;...  There's nothing wrong with defending someone you feel has been unjustly characterized, and setting the record straight.  It's actually commendable, especially when you risk your own reputation by being accused of being put up to it, but you do it anyway because you know it's right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On &#8220;shilling&#8221;&#8230;  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with defending someone you feel has been unjustly characterized, and setting the record straight.  It&#8217;s actually commendable, especially when you risk your own reputation by being accused of being put up to it, but you do it anyway because you know it&#8217;s right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210967</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210967</guid>
					<description>DJ Coffman said:
&quot;Ok, I just want to say, I don’t run around defending them.&quot;
-----
It seems you do. You just can't stop defending them. Even when you said to Strang that you would only discuss any further in email, you returned to comment gain. And you continue to comment here. Let me ask you a direct question:

Does Platinum have you on salary as a part of editorial?
-----
If I were a creator, I would never work for a company that is constantly under public scrutiny. Where there's smoke, there's often fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJ Coffman said:<br />
&#8220;Ok, I just want to say, I don’t run around defending them.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
It seems you do. You just can&#8217;t stop defending them. Even when you said to Strang that you would only discuss any further in email, you returned to comment gain. And you continue to comment here. Let me ask you a direct question:</p>
<p>Does Platinum have you on salary as a part of editorial?<br />
&#8212;&#8211;<br />
If I were a creator, I would never work for a company that is constantly under public scrutiny. Where there&#8217;s smoke, there&#8217;s often fire.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210890</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210890</guid>
					<description>As writer of comics who cannot draw, I know how hard it as to get noticed.  I thought about Platinum when they started, and knew enough not to sell my Great Idea to them. 
As creator, it is your responsibility to learn everything you can about any business you plan to work in.  Your choice is either the easy way (research by reading and listening from those who have done similar things) or the hard way (first hand experience and learning from your mistakes). 
So... go to the Library of Congress website and read their circulars about copyright.  Go to your library or bookstore and read all you can about the art business (and maybe the music business, too).  Then, since you are self-employed, read some books about business plans, visit the IRS website to learn about paying taxes correctly, and find an accountant who can help with the quarterly paperwork. 
Finally, study the history of comics.  Everyone should know the story of Siegel and Schuster, and how they lost control of Superman, but not Superboy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As writer of comics who cannot draw, I know how hard it as to get noticed.  I thought about Platinum when they started, and knew enough not to sell my Great Idea to them.<br />
As creator, it is your responsibility to learn everything you can about any business you plan to work in.  Your choice is either the easy way (research by reading and listening from those who have done similar things) or the hard way (first hand experience and learning from your mistakes).<br />
So&#8230; go to the Library of Congress website and read their circulars about copyright.  Go to your library or bookstore and read all you can about the art business (and maybe the music business, too).  Then, since you are self-employed, read some books about business plans, visit the IRS website to learn about paying taxes correctly, and find an accountant who can help with the quarterly paperwork.<br />
Finally, study the history of comics.  Everyone should know the story of Siegel and Schuster, and how they lost control of Superman, but not Superboy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cary Coatney</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210807</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210807</guid>
					<description>I share Strang's pain. Believe me, this is the reason why I self-publish nowadays (when I can afford to). Heidi, I should e-mail you one day of all the discrepancies I faced with a certain self proclaimed inker/publisher with the initials SG and the hell he and his company Death Comics put me through in trying to get my first issue of Deposit Man out. 

~

Coat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share Strang&#8217;s pain. Believe me, this is the reason why I self-publish nowadays (when I can afford to). Heidi, I should e-mail you one day of all the discrepancies I faced with a certain self proclaimed inker/publisher with the initials SG and the hell he and his company Death Comics put me through in trying to get my first issue of Deposit Man out. </p>
<p>~</p>
<p>Coat
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DJ Coffman</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210772</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210772</guid>
					<description>Platinum has printed other books now besides mine. But the Comic Challenge contract did say a certain time they wanted to have a book out by, afterall what good would having another contest be if they couldn't show results of the first one, that's my guess.

Here's a small thought about the &quot;selling your car&quot; or selling your baby or rights away. It's different because as I  understand it, if I sell &quot;my car&quot; -- it's not like that at all. Say they took your old car to a car show and won prizes with it, you wouldn't get a cut. But under Platinum's standard contracts, you'd get a cut of that, and or if they sold the car again to someone else all along the way. I'm sure different contracts are different, but they're not outright taking your idea and not keeping you included.

On the other hand, I think its the same for Marvel and DC, they might give some royalties now? But for years they didnt. When you worked for them, you didnt get anything but the paycheck, and they didnt cut you in on things you created while working there. At least Platinum has been doing that over the years i've heard. I dont see how thats bad at all, and it was a draw for me for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Platinum has printed other books now besides mine. But the Comic Challenge contract did say a certain time they wanted to have a book out by, afterall what good would having another contest be if they couldn&#8217;t show results of the first one, that&#8217;s my guess.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a small thought about the &#8220;selling your car&#8221; or selling your baby or rights away. It&#8217;s different because as I  understand it, if I sell &#8220;my car&#8221; &#8212; it&#8217;s not like that at all. Say they took your old car to a car show and won prizes with it, you wouldn&#8217;t get a cut. But under Platinum&#8217;s standard contracts, you&#8217;d get a cut of that, and or if they sold the car again to someone else all along the way. I&#8217;m sure different contracts are different, but they&#8217;re not outright taking your idea and not keeping you included.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I think its the same for Marvel and DC, they might give some royalties now? But for years they didnt. When you worked for them, you didnt get anything but the paycheck, and they didnt cut you in on things you created while working there. At least Platinum has been doing that over the years i&#8217;ve heard. I dont see how thats bad at all, and it was a draw for me for sure.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh Elder</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210764</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/06/20/breaking-work-for-hire-is-bad/#comment-210764</guid>
					<description>I know I was happy as a clam to work for Platinum back in the day. I learned a whole lot about the businesss under the tutelage of Lee Nordling, one of the menschiest guys in the biz.

And everything I worked on was something that Platinum already owned. It was work-for-hire and I knew that going in. I just fell in love with the project, and when it got lost in the editorial shuffle I decided that I would move heaven and earth to get it out there. It's not like Platinum was trying to screw me or anyone else over. Things just didn't work out. That happens.

The guys at Platinum are really quite reasonable, and they spend a lot of time and money developing people who no one else would touch -- like me four years ago. I felt lucky to work with them then, and I feel the same way now. It's not all peaches 'n cream over there, but then it's not really that way anywhere. Platinum is what it is, and they've never pretended otherwise. 

And no matter what kind of treatment Strand did or didn't get from Platinum, his &quot;take my ball and go home&quot; attitude only makes things worse. 

Everyone gets screwed on their first contract. It's one of the ironclad rules of the entertainment industry. The goal is to just get out there and prove you have what it takes and with every subsequent contract you gain more and more leverage until you're the one dictating terms to The Man rather than the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I was happy as a clam to work for Platinum back in the day. I learned a whole lot about the businesss under the tutelage of Lee Nordling, one of the menschiest guys in the biz.</p>
<p>And everything I worked on was something that Platinum already owned. It was work-for-hire and I knew that going in. I just fell in love with the project, and when it got lost in the editorial shuffle I decided that I would move heaven and earth to get it out there. It&#8217;s not like Platinum was trying to screw me or anyone else over. Things just didn&#8217;t work out. That happens.</p>
<p>The guys at Platinum are really quite reasonable, and they spend a lot of time and money developing people who no one else would touch &#8212; like me four years ago. I felt lucky to work with them then, and I feel the same way now. It&#8217;s not all peaches &#8216;n cream over there, but then it&#8217;s not really that way anywhere. Platinum is what it is, and they&#8217;ve never pretended otherwise. </p>
<p>And no matter what kind of treatment Strand did or didn&#8217;t get from Platinum, his &#8220;take my ball and go home&#8221; attitude only makes things worse. </p>
<p>Everyone gets screwed on their first contract. It&#8217;s one of the ironclad rules of the entertainment industry. The goal is to just get out there and prove you have what it takes and with every subsequent contract you gain more and more leverage until you&#8217;re the one dictating terms to The Man rather than the other way around.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
