<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Month-to-Month sales June 2007</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-305123</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-305123</guid>
					<description>Sinestro Corp may have only sold 60,000 but it was $4.99, not $2.99.  If it had been at the lower price then the calculated volume would have been 100,000.

I'm majorly disappointed with DC right now.  Countdown flat out bores me to tears.  Amazons Attack seemed to come out of nowhere and is still murky, both in concept and execution.  Why the heck hasn't anyone attacked Hypolita directly? And what the heck is she doing back anyway?

Then there's the normal series.  Superman/Action Comics are all over the map with some great stories interrupted by shite like this Jimmy Olson snorefest.  I dropped Batman/Detective Comics for the first time in 9 years because they got boring, and normally I like Morrison and thot I'd like Dini.  Wonder Woman got back on schedule just in time to get tied up with the craptacular AA crossover. Flash was a disaster from Day 1.   Outsiders just slid into oblivion with an unnecessary and poorly executed crossover with Checkmate, another book that seems to be loosing it's way.  And JLA is still dull - who the frell approved a two-character spotlight where they spend the ENTIRE ISSUE MOTIONLESS AND TRAPPED UNDER A BUILDING?!!!!!  I did like art tho.

A few bright spots remain for me tho - 
Blue Beetle is one of my favorites (yes, I know I'm 1 of only 4 people who like this book)
Justice Society and JSA: Classified still rock
Birds of Prey is still strong tho with Gail gone I'm a bit worried 
GL (now that Sinestro Corp has started) and GL Corps are very solid
Brave and the Bold is pretty decent (tho #5 was the weakest so far)
Teen Titans isn't bad but the last several issues have been sub par

Course I don't think Marvel is all that great either.  I dropped my Spider titles cuz they got all soap-opery again.  Astonishing X is dragging now that it's in space.  She-Hulk, my fav usually, hasn't been fun or funny in a while, Runaways is now in the 19th Century (I HATE OLD TIMEY ANYTHING!!!!) and Ms. Marvel has turned into The Astoundingly Uninteresting Adventures of the Amazing Avenger's Aimless Leader.

Fell and Elephantmen are the only titles I can rely on to deliver a great story with great art each and every issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinestro Corp may have only sold 60,000 but it was $4.99, not $2.99.  If it had been at the lower price then the calculated volume would have been 100,000.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m majorly disappointed with DC right now.  Countdown flat out bores me to tears.  Amazons Attack seemed to come out of nowhere and is still murky, both in concept and execution.  Why the heck hasn&#8217;t anyone attacked Hypolita directly? And what the heck is she doing back anyway?</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the normal series.  Superman/Action Comics are all over the map with some great stories interrupted by shite like this Jimmy Olson snorefest.  I dropped Batman/Detective Comics for the first time in 9 years because they got boring, and normally I like Morrison and thot I&#8217;d like Dini.  Wonder Woman got back on schedule just in time to get tied up with the craptacular AA crossover. Flash was a disaster from Day 1.   Outsiders just slid into oblivion with an unnecessary and poorly executed crossover with Checkmate, another book that seems to be loosing it&#8217;s way.  And JLA is still dull - who the frell approved a two-character spotlight where they spend the ENTIRE ISSUE MOTIONLESS AND TRAPPED UNDER A BUILDING?!!!!!  I did like art tho.</p>
<p>A few bright spots remain for me tho -<br />
Blue Beetle is one of my favorites (yes, I know I&#8217;m 1 of only 4 people who like this book)<br />
Justice Society and JSA: Classified still rock<br />
Birds of Prey is still strong tho with Gail gone I&#8217;m a bit worried<br />
GL (now that Sinestro Corp has started) and GL Corps are very solid<br />
Brave and the Bold is pretty decent (tho #5 was the weakest so far)<br />
Teen Titans isn&#8217;t bad but the last several issues have been sub par</p>
<p>Course I don&#8217;t think Marvel is all that great either.  I dropped my Spider titles cuz they got all soap-opery again.  Astonishing X is dragging now that it&#8217;s in space.  She-Hulk, my fav usually, hasn&#8217;t been fun or funny in a while, Runaways is now in the 19th Century (I HATE OLD TIMEY ANYTHING!!!!) and Ms. Marvel has turned into The Astoundingly Uninteresting Adventures of the Amazing Avenger&#8217;s Aimless Leader.</p>
<p>Fell and Elephantmen are the only titles I can rely on to deliver a great story with great art each and every issue.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shawn Hill</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-276843</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-276843</guid>
					<description>Sinestro Corps Special isn't really the same team as the main book, is it? It had van Sciver instead of Reis; that's why I bought it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinestro Corps Special isn&#8217;t really the same team as the main book, is it? It had van Sciver instead of Reis; that&#8217;s why I bought it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; July 23, 2007: Surviving the Plastic Age</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-276387</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-276387</guid>
					<description>[...] ICv2 has released its look at June 2007 sales through Diamond Distributors to Direct-Market retailers; here&amp;#8217;s the overview, market analysis, top-300 bestselling comics and top-100 bestselling graphic novels. It&amp;#8217;s much the same as last month: The Usual Suspects are getting what they want, Marvel&amp;#8217;s still wailing on DC, et cetera. Over at The Beat, Graeme McMillan has the month-to-month Marvel sales comparisons, while Marc-Oliver Frisch has the comparisons for DC, both now updated through June. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ICv2 has released its look at June 2007 sales through Diamond Distributors to Direct-Market retailers; here&#8217;s the overview, market analysis, top-300 bestselling comics and top-100 bestselling graphic novels. It&#8217;s much the same as last month: The Usual Suspects are getting what they want, Marvel&#8217;s still wailing on DC, et cetera. Over at The Beat, Graeme McMillan has the month-to-month Marvel sales comparisons, while Marc-Oliver Frisch has the comparisons for DC, both now updated through June. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-276115</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-276115</guid>
					<description>&quot;Basically, sales are down from 2006, but are in keeping with where they were in 2005. Considering that 2006 was a huge year for them - Infinite Crisis, One Year Later, 52, Alex Ross’ Justice, etc.&quot;

I agree.  The long-term numbers clearly show that overall sales of the DC Universe line have vastly improved since Didio took over back in 2002.  That's an achievement.  So calling for the man's head seems premature.

Still, the company's numbers have started to decline again over the past year, with a long chain of spectacular failures, bizarre creative decisions and lapsing sales juggernauts and nothing on the horizon to turn things around.  At some point, the excuse that they're still doing better than five years ago won't work anymore - because so's Marvel, and they're still knocking it out of the park.

Maybe San Diego is going to change the perception, as Paul suggests, but I'm not holding my breath.  DC seem to be stuck with their current direction for at least another year, and it's unclear whether FINAL CRISIS is the end of the tunnel for them or the train.

&quot;The DC books I read - Superman, Detective, Brave and the Bold, All-Star Superman, Green Lantern, the Spirit - are pretty self-contained, focusing on telling stories about the titular characters.&quot;

I think DC would do well to use some of those books as models for their line. At present, though, they're exceptions rather than the rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Basically, sales are down from 2006, but are in keeping with where they were in 2005. Considering that 2006 was a huge year for them - Infinite Crisis, One Year Later, 52, Alex Ross’ Justice, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree.  The long-term numbers clearly show that overall sales of the DC Universe line have vastly improved since Didio took over back in 2002.  That&#8217;s an achievement.  So calling for the man&#8217;s head seems premature.</p>
<p>Still, the company&#8217;s numbers have started to decline again over the past year, with a long chain of spectacular failures, bizarre creative decisions and lapsing sales juggernauts and nothing on the horizon to turn things around.  At some point, the excuse that they&#8217;re still doing better than five years ago won&#8217;t work anymore - because so&#8217;s Marvel, and they&#8217;re still knocking it out of the park.</p>
<p>Maybe San Diego is going to change the perception, as Paul suggests, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath.  DC seem to be stuck with their current direction for at least another year, and it&#8217;s unclear whether FINAL CRISIS is the end of the tunnel for them or the train.</p>
<p>&#8220;The DC books I read - Superman, Detective, Brave and the Bold, All-Star Superman, Green Lantern, the Spirit - are pretty self-contained, focusing on telling stories about the titular characters.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think DC would do well to use some of those books as models for their line. At present, though, they&#8217;re exceptions rather than the rule.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-275867</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-275867</guid>
					<description>Umm...I think a lot of you doom-and-gloomers suggesting DiDio should lay his head in shame are missing the big picture.  Let's look at DC's sales since DiDio took over:

&lt;b&gt;DC UNIVERSE&lt;/b&gt;
06/2003: 29,489
06/2004: 35,815
06/2005: 39,888
06/2006: 51,088 (-10.3%)
06/2007: 45,313 (- 4.2%)

Basically, sales are down from 2006, but are in keeping with where they were in 2005.  Considering that 2006 was a huge year for them - Infinite Crisis, One Year Later, 52, Alex Ross' Justice, etc.

Still, DC's strategy is out of step:  They're cancelling solid performers like Green Arrow to reboot is as something very few ever wanted.  And Countdown has been met with a wary &quot;meh&quot; by the market, deservedly so.  Time to rethink some of these strategies for sure.

Oh, and Mr. Frisch - I love these columns, but felt this was a tad unfair:

&lt;i&gt;Marvel’s recent big event books (and their tie-ins) work as self-contained reads and are built around simple concepts (”Captain America and Iron Man clash over civil liberties,” “Spider-Man unmasks,” “Captain America is shot,” “Hulk smashes everyone”).

DC’s line, in contrast, looks like a big, neverending crossover that’s about nothing but other comics and addresses no one but the hardcore fans. I imagine that’s what’s making the difference currently. 
&lt;/i&gt;

I think this applies to aspects of their line - Countdown, Amazons Attack, etc. (otherwise to be referred to as, &quot;DC books I avoid&quot;).  But it's simply not their whole line.  The DC books I read - Superman, Detective, Brave and the Bold, All-Star Superman, Green Lantern, the Spirit - are pretty self-contained, focusing on telling stories about the titular characters.  So it's not line-wide.  Not yet, anyways.

Anyway, keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;I think a lot of you doom-and-gloomers suggesting DiDio should lay his head in shame are missing the big picture.  Let&#8217;s look at DC&#8217;s sales since DiDio took over:</p>
<p><b>DC UNIVERSE</b><br />
06/2003: 29,489<br />
06/2004: 35,815<br />
06/2005: 39,888<br />
06/2006: 51,088 (-10.3%)<br />
06/2007: 45,313 (- 4.2%)</p>
<p>Basically, sales are down from 2006, but are in keeping with where they were in 2005.  Considering that 2006 was a huge year for them - Infinite Crisis, One Year Later, 52, Alex Ross&#8217; Justice, etc.</p>
<p>Still, DC&#8217;s strategy is out of step:  They&#8217;re cancelling solid performers like Green Arrow to reboot is as something very few ever wanted.  And Countdown has been met with a wary &#8220;meh&#8221; by the market, deservedly so.  Time to rethink some of these strategies for sure.</p>
<p>Oh, and Mr. Frisch - I love these columns, but felt this was a tad unfair:</p>
<p><i>Marvel’s recent big event books (and their tie-ins) work as self-contained reads and are built around simple concepts (”Captain America and Iron Man clash over civil liberties,” “Spider-Man unmasks,” “Captain America is shot,” “Hulk smashes everyone”).</p>
<p>DC’s line, in contrast, looks like a big, neverending crossover that’s about nothing but other comics and addresses no one but the hardcore fans. I imagine that’s what’s making the difference currently.<br />
</i></p>
<p>I think this applies to aspects of their line - Countdown, Amazons Attack, etc. (otherwise to be referred to as, &#8220;DC books I avoid&#8221;).  But it&#8217;s simply not their whole line.  The DC books I read - Superman, Detective, Brave and the Bold, All-Star Superman, Green Lantern, the Spirit - are pretty self-contained, focusing on telling stories about the titular characters.  So it&#8217;s not line-wide.  Not yet, anyways.</p>
<p>Anyway, keep up the great work!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Querty Poiu</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-275065</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-275065</guid>
					<description>&quot;“Maybe DC should not have published the book in the comic booklet format, hmm… ”

You could look it another way, though. Suppose CROSSING MIDNIGHT is able to survive on the strength of its trade paperback sales. Does it do any harm to shove out a low-selling monthly version as well? It’s a bit of extra money, it helps the cashflow on the project, and it means that when the trade paperback hits the shelves you can (hopefully) point to lots of positive reviews.

The downside is that publishing a serial version has certain consequences for pacing and chapter length, and if the monthly sales are going to be trivial in comparison with the trade paperback sales, it might not be worth making that compromise. But that’s about it. &quot;

From a creative standpoint, it sounds like a pretty big downside - pigeonholing the creators into making creative choices that may or may not be ideal for the story.

Also, so many publishers are still stuck in the mindset that if the comic booklets don't sell, there might not be a paperback and that's a mindset that shouldn't be supported or encouraged.  If it's about getting positive reviews, put it online with zuda or send out advances like real publishers do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“Maybe DC should not have published the book in the comic booklet format, hmm… ”</p>
<p>You could look it another way, though. Suppose CROSSING MIDNIGHT is able to survive on the strength of its trade paperback sales. Does it do any harm to shove out a low-selling monthly version as well? It’s a bit of extra money, it helps the cashflow on the project, and it means that when the trade paperback hits the shelves you can (hopefully) point to lots of positive reviews.</p>
<p>The downside is that publishing a serial version has certain consequences for pacing and chapter length, and if the monthly sales are going to be trivial in comparison with the trade paperback sales, it might not be worth making that compromise. But that’s about it. &#8221;</p>
<p>From a creative standpoint, it sounds like a pretty big downside - pigeonholing the creators into making creative choices that may or may not be ideal for the story.</p>
<p>Also, so many publishers are still stuck in the mindset that if the comic booklets don&#8217;t sell, there might not be a paperback and that&#8217;s a mindset that shouldn&#8217;t be supported or encouraged.  If it&#8217;s about getting positive reviews, put it online with zuda or send out advances like real publishers do.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: V. Smith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-275040</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-275040</guid>
					<description>DC's got Amazons Attack, Sinestro Corps and Countdown going while Marvel's got Endangered Species (which is more or less standalone) and World War Hulk.

While both these companies have big problems juggling their continuity and keeping it in line, DC's Countdown is a weak link I don't like. It's supposed to be the &quot;backbone of the DC universe&quot; but first off, not a lot of people are digging it, and secondly it's confusing people and giving readers a tie-in headache that 52 did not.

As for Amazons Attack, I don't think that a lot of people care about it, and the Wonder Woman series was behind, causing trouble for that event.

It's just a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC&#8217;s got Amazons Attack, Sinestro Corps and Countdown going while Marvel&#8217;s got Endangered Species (which is more or less standalone) and World War Hulk.</p>
<p>While both these companies have big problems juggling their continuity and keeping it in line, DC&#8217;s Countdown is a weak link I don&#8217;t like. It&#8217;s supposed to be the &#8220;backbone of the DC universe&#8221; but first off, not a lot of people are digging it, and secondly it&#8217;s confusing people and giving readers a tie-in headache that 52 did not.</p>
<p>As for Amazons Attack, I don&#8217;t think that a lot of people care about it, and the Wonder Woman series was behind, causing trouble for that event.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a mess.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274612</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274612</guid>
					<description>&quot;Maybe DC should not have published the book in the comic booklet format, hmm… &quot;

You could look it another way, though.  Suppose CROSSING MIDNIGHT is able to survive on the strength of its trade paperback sales.  Does it do any harm to shove out a low-selling monthly version as well?  It's a bit of extra money, it helps the cashflow on the project, and it means that when the trade paperback hits the shelves you can (hopefully) point to lots of positive reviews.

The downside is that publishing a serial version has certain consequences for pacing and chapter length, and if the monthly sales are going to be trivial in comparison with the trade paperback sales, it might not be worth making that compromise.  But that's about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe DC should not have published the book in the comic booklet format, hmm… &#8221;</p>
<p>You could look it another way, though.  Suppose CROSSING MIDNIGHT is able to survive on the strength of its trade paperback sales.  Does it do any harm to shove out a low-selling monthly version as well?  It&#8217;s a bit of extra money, it helps the cashflow on the project, and it means that when the trade paperback hits the shelves you can (hopefully) point to lots of positive reviews.</p>
<p>The downside is that publishing a serial version has certain consequences for pacing and chapter length, and if the monthly sales are going to be trivial in comparison with the trade paperback sales, it might not be worth making that compromise.  But that&#8217;s about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274571</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274571</guid>
					<description>Oh, and yeah, quality has something to do with it -- say what you will about Nu Marvel, but at the end of the day they've got the Hulk whaling on every hero in the universe, drawn by John Romita Jr. There's got to be &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt; to be said for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and yeah, quality has something to do with it &#8212; say what you will about Nu Marvel, but at the end of the day they&#8217;ve got the Hulk whaling on every hero in the universe, drawn by John Romita Jr. There&#8217;s got to be <i>something</i> to be said for that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274570</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274570</guid>
					<description>I think -- as Marc notes -- it really has to do with the nature of Marvel's current crossovers versus the nature of DC's. Marvel's are simple, easy-to-grasp high concepts, whereas while DC is in all-crossover mode right now I have no idea what the crossover's even about.

&lt;i&gt;Amazons Attack&lt;/i&gt; is easy enough to sum up and understand, but the uber-crossover is a bunch of multiverse stuff that all feels clinical and unengaging. And whereas &lt;i&gt;52&lt;/i&gt; had a clearly delineated point and a number of character arcs, I really have no idea where &lt;i&gt;Countdown&lt;/i&gt; is going or is supposed to go, modestly entertaining Jimmy Olsen bits aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8212; as Marc notes &#8212; it really has to do with the nature of Marvel&#8217;s current crossovers versus the nature of DC&#8217;s. Marvel&#8217;s are simple, easy-to-grasp high concepts, whereas while DC is in all-crossover mode right now I have no idea what the crossover&#8217;s even about.</p>
<p><i>Amazons Attack</i> is easy enough to sum up and understand, but the uber-crossover is a bunch of multiverse stuff that all feels clinical and unengaging. And whereas <i>52</i> had a clearly delineated point and a number of character arcs, I really have no idea where <i>Countdown</i> is going or is supposed to go, modestly entertaining Jimmy Olsen bits aside.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: News and commentary about comics &#187; Stark differences between Marvel/DC sales again</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274526</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274526</guid>
					<description>[...] Once again, there&amp;#8217;s an amazing difference on display in sales, about how Marvel continues, no matter the low-ranking quality of any of their books now, to maintain [relatively] big sales, World War Hulk being the main example of the moment, whereas DC is falling way behind with a lot of their stuff just now. As Amazons Attack has shown, crossovers, at least at DC, may be starting to backfire (via Newsarama blog). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Once again, there&#8217;s an amazing difference on display in sales, about how Marvel continues, no matter the low-ranking quality of any of their books now, to maintain [relatively] big sales, World War Hulk being the main example of the moment, whereas DC is falling way behind with a lot of their stuff just now. As Amazons Attack has shown, crossovers, at least at DC, may be starting to backfire (via Newsarama blog). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Four Color Media Monitor</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274078</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 02:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-274078</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stark differences between Marvel/DC sales again...&lt;/strong&gt;

Once again, there's an amazing difference on display in sales, about how Marvel continues, no matter the low-ranking quality of any of their books now, to maintain [relatively] big sales, World War Hulk being the main example of the moment, whereas D....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stark differences between Marvel/DC sales again&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Once again, there&#8217;s an amazing difference on display in sales, about how Marvel continues, no matter the low-ranking quality of any of their books now, to maintain [relatively] big sales, World War Hulk being the main example of the moment, whereas D&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Querty Poiu</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273588</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273588</guid>
					<description>&quot;Ugh, the sales for “Crossing Midnight” are depressing me. I’m really enjoying that book, but if “Testament” is any example, it’s not going to be around for much longer.&quot;

Maybe DC should not have published the book in the comic booklet format, hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ugh, the sales for “Crossing Midnight” are depressing me. I’m really enjoying that book, but if “Testament” is any example, it’s not going to be around for much longer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe DC should not have published the book in the comic booklet format, hmm&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Neil MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273217</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273217</guid>
					<description>I think Sinestro Corps is a perfect example of where DC goes right and wrong at the same time.

This is easily the most exciting story to happen since Infinite Crisis, with the possibility of massive impact on the entire DC Universe. In one issue they managed to set the scale and seriousness of the storyline. Yet they only sold about 60,000 issues. 

People often complain about Marvel's marketing tactics, but if this comic had been published by Marvel they would have had retailers and fans terrified of missing out on the issue and orders would have been significantly higher, possibly tens of thousands higher. Instead DC gets a modest hit and now readers who missed it have to wait 2 weeks for the reprint. While re-orders and reprint numbers will be big, the momentum of the initial release is weakened considerably.

Add in DC's insistence on having several major events at once, such as Amazons Attack and Countdown, and the fan doesn't know where his eye is supposed to be drawn. When I read the Sinsetro Corps special and got to the final pages I knew this storyline was big enough to be an event on its own. You knew what the event was about in one issue. Adding to what  Marc said previously, I don't think fans have the answers yet as to what Amazons Attack and Countdown are about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Sinestro Corps is a perfect example of where DC goes right and wrong at the same time.</p>
<p>This is easily the most exciting story to happen since Infinite Crisis, with the possibility of massive impact on the entire DC Universe. In one issue they managed to set the scale and seriousness of the storyline. Yet they only sold about 60,000 issues. </p>
<p>People often complain about Marvel&#8217;s marketing tactics, but if this comic had been published by Marvel they would have had retailers and fans terrified of missing out on the issue and orders would have been significantly higher, possibly tens of thousands higher. Instead DC gets a modest hit and now readers who missed it have to wait 2 weeks for the reprint. While re-orders and reprint numbers will be big, the momentum of the initial release is weakened considerably.</p>
<p>Add in DC&#8217;s insistence on having several major events at once, such as Amazons Attack and Countdown, and the fan doesn&#8217;t know where his eye is supposed to be drawn. When I read the Sinsetro Corps special and got to the final pages I knew this storyline was big enough to be an event on its own. You knew what the event was about in one issue. Adding to what  Marc said previously, I don&#8217;t think fans have the answers yet as to what Amazons Attack and Countdown are about.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: V. Smith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273207</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273207</guid>
					<description>It's great that titles like The Walking Dead and The Boys are holding stong. 

I'd also like to laugh at all those liars who said &quot;no I'm dropping JLA. I don't like Meltzer's writing.&quot; Really, do you? Basically everyone stuck with it, and only people in double digits really dropped it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that titles like The Walking Dead and The Boys are holding stong. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to laugh at all those liars who said &#8220;no I&#8217;m dropping JLA. I don&#8217;t like Meltzer&#8217;s writing.&#8221; Really, do you? Basically everyone stuck with it, and only people in double digits really dropped it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273104</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273104</guid>
					<description>&quot;Shouldn’t there be a whole mess of re-orders hitting the charts next month since the book was widely reported as a sell-out and shipped in the last week of June?&quot;

The fact alone that the book &quot;sold out&quot; at the publisher is meaningless in most cases, since publishers tend to set their print runs pretty close to what retailers order.  There's been a second printing of SINESTRO CORPS SPECIAL, though, which will presumably show up on the chart at some point.  I'll comment on that when it happens.

&quot;DC does a bunch of crossovers and people whine.
Marvel does continuous crossovers and people rejoice.&quot;

Marvel's recent big event books (and their tie-ins) work as self-contained reads and are built around simple concepts (&quot;Captain America and Iron Man clash over civil liberties,&quot; &quot;Spider-Man unmasks,&quot; &quot;Captain America is shot,&quot; &quot;Hulk smashes everyone&quot;).

DC's line, in contrast, looks like a big, neverending crossover that's about nothing but other comics and addresses no one but the hardcore fans.  I imagine that's what's making the difference currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Shouldn’t there be a whole mess of re-orders hitting the charts next month since the book was widely reported as a sell-out and shipped in the last week of June?&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact alone that the book &#8220;sold out&#8221; at the publisher is meaningless in most cases, since publishers tend to set their print runs pretty close to what retailers order.  There&#8217;s been a second printing of SINESTRO CORPS SPECIAL, though, which will presumably show up on the chart at some point.  I&#8217;ll comment on that when it happens.</p>
<p>&#8220;DC does a bunch of crossovers and people whine.<br />
Marvel does continuous crossovers and people rejoice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Marvel&#8217;s recent big event books (and their tie-ins) work as self-contained reads and are built around simple concepts (&#8221;Captain America and Iron Man clash over civil liberties,&#8221; &#8220;Spider-Man unmasks,&#8221; &#8220;Captain America is shot,&#8221; &#8220;Hulk smashes everyone&#8221;).</p>
<p>DC&#8217;s line, in contrast, looks like a big, neverending crossover that&#8217;s about nothing but other comics and addresses no one but the hardcore fans.  I imagine that&#8217;s what&#8217;s making the difference currently.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273102</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-273102</guid>
					<description>&quot;What the frak is wrong with people?&quot;

Well, Alan, logically the obvious answer is that readers don't object to crossovers as such.  They just don't like the particular crossovers that DC are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What the frak is wrong with people?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, Alan, logically the obvious answer is that readers don&#8217;t object to crossovers as such.  They just don&#8217;t like the particular crossovers that DC are doing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Diana Kingston-Gabai</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272878</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272878</guid>
					<description>Alan: I think the difference is that Marvel offers alternatives where DC doesn't. Looking at the most recent example, &quot;Civil War&quot; - ostensibly a universe-spanning event - didn't actually spill over into every single book set in the MU. &quot;Daredevil&quot; avoided it; the X-Men books avoided it; &quot;Runaways&quot; avoided it, and so on. So if you didn't enjoy &quot;Civil War&quot;, you at least had other books to read in the meantime. The situation at DC is markedly different: it's simply impossible to get away from all the Crises and Countdowns. There's not a single DCU book being published that isn't, to some extent or another, wrapped up in the crossover du jour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan: I think the difference is that Marvel offers alternatives where DC doesn&#8217;t. Looking at the most recent example, &#8220;Civil War&#8221; - ostensibly a universe-spanning event - didn&#8217;t actually spill over into every single book set in the MU. &#8220;Daredevil&#8221; avoided it; the X-Men books avoided it; &#8220;Runaways&#8221; avoided it, and so on. So if you didn&#8217;t enjoy &#8220;Civil War&#8221;, you at least had other books to read in the meantime. The situation at DC is markedly different: it&#8217;s simply impossible to get away from all the Crises and Countdowns. There&#8217;s not a single DCU book being published that isn&#8217;t, to some extent or another, wrapped up in the crossover du jour.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Diana Kingston-Gabai</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272875</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 06:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272875</guid>
					<description>Ugh, the sales for &quot;Crossing Midnight&quot; are depressing me. I'm really enjoying that book, but if &quot;Testament&quot; is any example, it's not going to be around for much longer. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, the sales for &#8220;Crossing Midnight&#8221; are depressing me. I&#8217;m really enjoying that book, but if &#8220;Testament&#8221; is any example, it&#8217;s not going to be around for much longer. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonnynyc</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272475</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272475</guid>
					<description>At least Didio will get the maximum unemployment benefits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Didio will get the maximum unemployment benefits
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Reed</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272385</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272385</guid>
					<description>Wow. This does look like a disaster zone, and I'm a comics optimist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This does look like a disaster zone, and I&#8217;m a comics optimist.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Querty Poiu</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272374</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272374</guid>
					<description>&quot;In a rather unusual move, DC offered retailers a special sales incentive on The Highwaymen a while back, shortly after the initial orders had been placed: To any retailer doubling their initial sales before the so-called “final order cut-off date,” the publisher promised full returnability on all ordered copies.

And now we see the reason. Despite the desperate scheme, sales numbers for The Highwaymen don’t even crack 10,000 units, which means the book is dead on arrival by the standards of a major publisher. And presuming that at least some retailers took DC up on their scheme, initial orders must have been worse.

The Highwaymen continues the trend which Crossing Midnight, Scalped, Army@Love, as well as WildStorm’s recent lines of science fiction, fantasy and horror titles have fallen victim to: Both Vertigo and WildStorm are proving utterly incapable of launching new properties into the direct market, unless creators with a significant sales draw are involved.

It’s a worrying trend. To reverse it, I suspect more resources than the publisher seems currently willing to invest in either imprint will be required.&quot;

Or, the publishers could wise up and try a new business model.  Modern audiences just aren't interested in the comic booklet format anymore.  Moreover, serializing Graphic Novels is just a poor publishing decision that constrains the creators and apparently doesn't even sell.  The audiences for these types of books are not the kidults who drool over the latest empty spandex event.

The best selling prose novels may have multiple chapters, but those chapters aren't sold as collect 'em all serials.  Why is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a rather unusual move, DC offered retailers a special sales incentive on The Highwaymen a while back, shortly after the initial orders had been placed: To any retailer doubling their initial sales before the so-called “final order cut-off date,” the publisher promised full returnability on all ordered copies.</p>
<p>And now we see the reason. Despite the desperate scheme, sales numbers for The Highwaymen don’t even crack 10,000 units, which means the book is dead on arrival by the standards of a major publisher. And presuming that at least some retailers took DC up on their scheme, initial orders must have been worse.</p>
<p>The Highwaymen continues the trend which Crossing Midnight, Scalped, Army@Love, as well as WildStorm’s recent lines of science fiction, fantasy and horror titles have fallen victim to: Both Vertigo and WildStorm are proving utterly incapable of launching new properties into the direct market, unless creators with a significant sales draw are involved.</p>
<p>It’s a worrying trend. To reverse it, I suspect more resources than the publisher seems currently willing to invest in either imprint will be required.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or, the publishers could wise up and try a new business model.  Modern audiences just aren&#8217;t interested in the comic booklet format anymore.  Moreover, serializing Graphic Novels is just a poor publishing decision that constrains the creators and apparently doesn&#8217;t even sell.  The audiences for these types of books are not the kidults who drool over the latest empty spandex event.</p>
<p>The best selling prose novels may have multiple chapters, but those chapters aren&#8217;t sold as collect &#8216;em all serials.  Why is that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272360</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272360</guid>
					<description>DC does a bunch of crossovers and people whine.
Marvel does continuous crossovers and people rejoice.

What the frak is wrong with people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC does a bunch of crossovers and people whine.<br />
Marvel does continuous crossovers and people rejoice.</p>
<p>What the frak is wrong with people?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: adistantsoil.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Adventures of Sweet Sophia: Girl Interrupted</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272279</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272279</guid>
					<description>[...] Unfortunately, in the world of Big Time Publishing, 100,000 copies is nothing to write home about, which would come as a great surprise to the folks at DC and Marvel Comics who - judging from their latest numbers - would sacrifice a goat to the retail gods if all their comics sold so poorly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Unfortunately, in the world of Big Time Publishing, 100,000 copies is nothing to write home about, which would come as a great surprise to the folks at DC and Marvel Comics who - judging from their latest numbers - would sacrifice a goat to the retail gods if all their comics sold so poorly. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272276</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272276</guid>
					<description>&quot;Interesting to note that Flash and Wonder Woman, widely considered to be horribly failed relaunches, sold well ahead of their numbers two years ago. &quot;
The important part to look at is the nose dive the numbers took after the very succesful relaunches that took place about a year ago. When the Flash has dropped about 40-50% of its readership (thank goodness for issue 13) and Wonder Woman has lost 60% of its readership, the picture becomes much more clear and dire.

As for one posters mention of the 'comparison' to indie titles.  Its not a comparision its just because they are shown at the same time.  There is no implicit comparison being made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Interesting to note that Flash and Wonder Woman, widely considered to be horribly failed relaunches, sold well ahead of their numbers two years ago. &#8221;<br />
The important part to look at is the nose dive the numbers took after the very succesful relaunches that took place about a year ago. When the Flash has dropped about 40-50% of its readership (thank goodness for issue 13) and Wonder Woman has lost 60% of its readership, the picture becomes much more clear and dire.</p>
<p>As for one posters mention of the &#8216;comparison&#8217; to indie titles.  Its not a comparision its just because they are shown at the same time.  There is no implicit comparison being made.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AERose</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272268</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272268</guid>
					<description>&quot;38 - GREEN LANTERN: SINESTRO CORPS SPECIAL
06/2007: Sinestro Corps Special #1 — 56,820

This $ 4.99 special yields solid numbers, selling not far below the mother title (which was on a scheduled skip month in June). Then again, it’s by the same creative team, and it’s the start of a new crossover storyline running through Green Lantern, Green Lantern Corps and a bunch of other titles, so the good performance doesn’t entirely come as a surprise.

DC can certainly use a modest hit, at any rate.&quot;

Shouldn't there be a whole mess of re-orders hitting the charts next month since the book was widely reported as a sell-out and shipped in the last week of June?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;38 - GREEN LANTERN: SINESTRO CORPS SPECIAL<br />
06/2007: Sinestro Corps Special #1 — 56,820</p>
<p>This $ 4.99 special yields solid numbers, selling not far below the mother title (which was on a scheduled skip month in June). Then again, it’s by the same creative team, and it’s the start of a new crossover storyline running through Green Lantern, Green Lantern Corps and a bunch of other titles, so the good performance doesn’t entirely come as a surprise.</p>
<p>DC can certainly use a modest hit, at any rate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t there be a whole mess of re-orders hitting the charts next month since the book was widely reported as a sell-out and shipped in the last week of June?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett tolino</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272221</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272221</guid>
					<description>DC does censor themselves.

They ceased publishing The Boys, those geniuses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC does censor themselves.</p>
<p>They ceased publishing The Boys, those geniuses!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Thompson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272214</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272214</guid>
					<description>I hope Didio does get hit with tomatoes. Final Crisis...jeebus christmas. This mentality of crossovers and events is killing them. One every few years is interesting, but one right after the other, ridiculous. The OYL idea was terribly planned. I seriously hope DC continues to lose share, pares down their titles, and focuses on strategies that work: self-contained titles, no decompressed storytelling, and superior artwork. The artists on Countdown and 52 were lackluster, as is the current work on Detective Comics, Justice League, and a host of others.

I also think that using Grant Morrison's fabled notebooks is not exactly the best plan. Nor so I think DC should be placing there bets with a limited group of writers (Waid, Morrison, Johns, Winnick). There are equally as creative folk out there that could bring a new perspective to the DC universe.

And why is no one commenting on the gross misuse of profanity in ASB&amp;#38;R (14 swear words in only a 9 page preview), and nudity in Batman 666? Batman is an ICON, and appeals to mass audiences, kids, adults, geriatrics. As long as there are food stuffs and clothing lines aimed at children with this character, I think DC editorial should censor its line much better. Retailers beware, you could face charges like Gordan Lee if you sell this stuff to minors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Didio does get hit with tomatoes. Final Crisis&#8230;jeebus christmas. This mentality of crossovers and events is killing them. One every few years is interesting, but one right after the other, ridiculous. The OYL idea was terribly planned. I seriously hope DC continues to lose share, pares down their titles, and focuses on strategies that work: self-contained titles, no decompressed storytelling, and superior artwork. The artists on Countdown and 52 were lackluster, as is the current work on Detective Comics, Justice League, and a host of others.</p>
<p>I also think that using Grant Morrison&#8217;s fabled notebooks is not exactly the best plan. Nor so I think DC should be placing there bets with a limited group of writers (Waid, Morrison, Johns, Winnick). There are equally as creative folk out there that could bring a new perspective to the DC universe.</p>
<p>And why is no one commenting on the gross misuse of profanity in ASB&amp;R (14 swear words in only a 9 page preview), and nudity in Batman 666? Batman is an ICON, and appeals to mass audiences, kids, adults, geriatrics. As long as there are food stuffs and clothing lines aimed at children with this character, I think DC editorial should censor its line much better. Retailers beware, you could face charges like Gordan Lee if you sell this stuff to minors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Thompson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272215</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272215</guid>
					<description>I hope Didio does get hit with tomatoes. Final Crisis...jeebus christmas. This mentality of crossovers and events is killing them. One every few years is interesting, but one right after the other, ridiculous. The OYL idea was terribly planned. I seriously hope DC continues to lose share, pares down their titles, and focuses on strategies that work: self-contained titles, no decompressed storytelling, and superior artwork. The artists on Countdown and 52 were lackluster, as is the current work on Detective Comics, Justice League, and a host of others.

I also think that using Grant Morrison's fabled notebooks is not exactly the best plan. Nor so I think DC should be placing there bets with a limited group of writers (Waid, Morrison, Johns, Winnick). There are equally as creative folk out there that could bring a new perspective to the DC universe.

And why is no one commenting on the gross misuse of profanity in ASB&amp;#38;R (14 swear words in only a 9 page preview), and nudity in Batman 666? Batman is an ICON, and appeals to mass audiences, kids, adults, geriatrics. As long as there are food stuffs and clothing lines aimed at children with this character, I think DC editorial should censor its line much better. Retailers beware, you could face charges like Gordan Lee if you sell this stuff to minors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Didio does get hit with tomatoes. Final Crisis&#8230;jeebus christmas. This mentality of crossovers and events is killing them. One every few years is interesting, but one right after the other, ridiculous. The OYL idea was terribly planned. I seriously hope DC continues to lose share, pares down their titles, and focuses on strategies that work: self-contained titles, no decompressed storytelling, and superior artwork. The artists on Countdown and 52 were lackluster, as is the current work on Detective Comics, Justice League, and a host of others.</p>
<p>I also think that using Grant Morrison&#8217;s fabled notebooks is not exactly the best plan. Nor so I think DC should be placing there bets with a limited group of writers (Waid, Morrison, Johns, Winnick). There are equally as creative folk out there that could bring a new perspective to the DC universe.</p>
<p>And why is no one commenting on the gross misuse of profanity in ASB&amp;R (14 swear words in only a 9 page preview), and nudity in Batman 666? Batman is an ICON, and appeals to mass audiences, kids, adults, geriatrics. As long as there are food stuffs and clothing lines aimed at children with this character, I think DC editorial should censor its line much better. Retailers beware, you could face charges like Gordan Lee if you sell this stuff to minors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Thompson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272213</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/07/20/dc-month-to-month-sales-june-2007/#comment-272213</guid>
					<description>I hope Didio does get hit with tomatoes. Final Crisis...jeebus christmas. This mentality of crossovers and events is killing them. One every few years is interesting, but one right after the other, ridiculous. The OYL idea was terribly planned. I seriously hope DC continues to lose share, pares down their titles, and focuses on strategies that work: self-contained titles, no decompressed storytelling, and superior artwork. The artists on Countdown and 52 were lackluster, as is the current work on Detective Comics, Justice League, and a host of others.

I also think that using Grant Morrison's fabled notebooks is not exactly the best plan. Nor so I think DC should be placing there bets with a limited group of writers (Waid, Morrison, Johns, Winnick). There are equally as creative folk out there that could bring a new perspective to the DC universe.

And why is no one commenting on the gross misuse of profanity in ASB&amp;#38;R (14 swear words in only a 9 page preview), and nudity in Batman 666? Batman is an ICON, and appeals to mass audiences, kids, adults, geriatrics. As long as there are food stuffs and clothing lines aimed at children with this character, I think DC editorial should censor itself much better. Retailers beware, you could face charges like Gordan Lee if you sell this stuff to minors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Didio does get hit with tomatoes. Final Crisis&#8230;jeebus christmas. This mentality of crossovers and events is killing them. One every few years is interesting, but one right after the other, ridiculous. The OYL idea was terribly planned. I seriously hope DC continues to lose share, pares down their titles, and focuses on strategies that work: self-contained titles, no decompressed storytelling, and superior artwork. The artists on Countdown and 52 were lackluster, as is the current work on Detective Comics, Justice League, and a host of others.</p>
<p>I also think that using Grant Morrison&#8217;s fabled notebooks is not exactly the best plan. Nor so I think DC should be placing there bets with a limited group of writers (Waid, Morrison, Johns, Winnick). There are equally as creative folk out there that could bring a new perspective to the DC universe.</p>
<p>And why is no one commenting on the gross misuse of profanity in ASB&amp;R (14 swear words in only a 9 page preview), and nudity in Batman 666? Batman is an ICON, and appeals to mass audiences, kids, adults, geriatrics. As long as there are food stuffs and clothing lines aimed at children with this character, I think DC editorial should censor itself much better. Retailers beware, you could face charges like Gordan Lee if you sell this stuff to minors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
