<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel Month-to-Month sales: July 2007</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: buy valium onli</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-2176157</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-2176157</guid>
					<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: where can i buy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-2141006</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-2141006</guid>
					<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kazelrdb</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1947116</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1947116</guid>
					<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kazelskp</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1947114</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1947114</guid>
					<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kazelaru</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1945656</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1945656</guid>
					<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: flomax</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1916763</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1916763</guid>
					<description>Hi! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petitiononline.com/flomax1/petition.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;flomax&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/flomax1/petition.html" rel="nofollow">flomax</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kazeluop</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1869347</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1869347</guid>
					<description>Hi! &lt;a href=&quot;http://xvikrghu.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bvpzc huzcn&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://twqfkjox.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uahui ruyfz&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! <a href="http://xvikrghu.com" rel="nofollow">bvpzc huzcn</a> <a href="http://twqfkjox.com" rel="nofollow">uahui ruyfz</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kazelhag</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1869344</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-1869344</guid>
					<description>Hi! &lt;a href=&quot;http://funflhgj.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uzigs mctdf&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://kjhsdjub.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wsflr svesn&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! <a href="http://funflhgj.com" rel="nofollow">uzigs mctdf</a> <a href="http://kjhsdjub.com" rel="nofollow">wsflr svesn</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-372754</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-372754</guid>
					<description>SPIDER-GIRL apparently sells well enough in digest format that the combined sales across the formats justify its continued publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPIDER-GIRL apparently sells well enough in digest format that the combined sales across the formats justify its continued publication.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carl</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-372660</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 09:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-372660</guid>
					<description>&quot;How come the Initiative T-bolts issues vastly outsold the Ms. Marvel Initiative issues, despite both books being at around the same level immediately post-Civil War?&quot;

Thunderbolts may have a more core reader base, and has been around as a title (even with all the ups and downs) for a longer time. Ms. Marvel was a backbencher at Marvel for the 80's and 90's. I also don't know how many readers were going to stay around for some of the issues that had Initiative on them...I think that whole Modok/AIM story may have dragged a little bit or been too overdetailed.

Ms. Marvel is my favorite Marvel character (and the only Marvel book I buy every month). I really hope that won't get canceled. I wish they would make some changes, namely, dumping her agent and tightening the focus. I do like the comic a lot, but between the focus on her love life, her career, and the sometime appearances of little sister figure Arana, Ms. Marvel's comic often comes across as Katy Keene with superpowers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How come the Initiative T-bolts issues vastly outsold the Ms. Marvel Initiative issues, despite both books being at around the same level immediately post-Civil War?&#8221;</p>
<p>Thunderbolts may have a more core reader base, and has been around as a title (even with all the ups and downs) for a longer time. Ms. Marvel was a backbencher at Marvel for the 80&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s. I also don&#8217;t know how many readers were going to stay around for some of the issues that had Initiative on them&#8230;I think that whole Modok/AIM story may have dragged a little bit or been too overdetailed.</p>
<p>Ms. Marvel is my favorite Marvel character (and the only Marvel book I buy every month). I really hope that won&#8217;t get canceled. I wish they would make some changes, namely, dumping her agent and tightening the focus. I do like the comic a lot, but between the focus on her love life, her career, and the sometime appearances of little sister figure Arana, Ms. Marvel&#8217;s comic often comes across as Katy Keene with superpowers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben Johnston</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-372579</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 08:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-372579</guid>
					<description>He didn't say Venom was a big enough draw to support his own comic, he said Venom was a more popular character than Machine Man.

In all likelihood, the vast majority of Nextwave's audience would have been composed of fans who were drawn by Warren Ellis, because that was the big selling point for the title. Thunderbolts is a completely different book, with more popular characters and a more significant role in the Marvel universe.

Mind you, I suppose it's always possible that Thunderbolts will plummet by 37K next month, with the Initiative banner and variant covers gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#8217;t say Venom was a big enough draw to support his own comic, he said Venom was a more popular character than Machine Man.</p>
<p>In all likelihood, the vast majority of Nextwave&#8217;s audience would have been composed of fans who were drawn by Warren Ellis, because that was the big selling point for the title. Thunderbolts is a completely different book, with more popular characters and a more significant role in the Marvel universe.</p>
<p>Mind you, I suppose it&#8217;s always possible that Thunderbolts will plummet by 37K next month, with the Initiative banner and variant covers gone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paul houston</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-371314</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-371314</guid>
					<description>I heard that Marvels best selling trade paperback in the bookstore market is and has been for a while is the Spider Girl series. I've always wondered why they let the Spider Girl monthly series hover around 20,000 units, yet cancel other titles that hover there also. Is this true, or false? Just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that Marvels best selling trade paperback in the bookstore market is and has been for a while is the Spider Girl series. I&#8217;ve always wondered why they let the Spider Girl monthly series hover around 20,000 units, yet cancel other titles that hover there also. Is this true, or false? Just wondering.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marvel Month-to-Month sales: July 2007 - The Beat &#171; The Comics Spot</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-370832</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-370832</guid>
					<description>[...] Marvel Month-to-Month sales: July 2007 - The&amp;#160;Beat  31 08 2007   Some very interesting analysis of the Marvel July 07 sales by Paul O’Brien over at The Beat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Marvel Month-to-Month sales: July 2007 - The&nbsp;Beat  31 08 2007   Some very interesting analysis of the Marvel July 07 sales by Paul O’Brien over at The Beat [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-369923</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 04:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-369923</guid>
					<description>When dealers have to order a certain number of copies of a particular issue in order to get variant covers, the orders for those issues will in MOST cases be greater then another comic that DOES NOT have a variant cover.

If Venom was such a big draw, then (a) his last solo series from a few years ago would still be around and (b) the BEYOND mini series from last year would have sold a hell of a lot better then it did (IIRC, the book sold between 25k and 30k a month).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When dealers have to order a certain number of copies of a particular issue in order to get variant covers, the orders for those issues will in MOST cases be greater then another comic that DOES NOT have a variant cover.</p>
<p>If Venom was such a big draw, then (a) his last solo series from a few years ago would still be around and (b) the BEYOND mini series from last year would have sold a hell of a lot better then it did (IIRC, the book sold between 25k and 30k a month).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Conor E</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-369607</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-369607</guid>
					<description>How come the Initiative T-bolts issues vastly outsold the Ms. Marvel Initiative issues, despite both books being at around the same level immediately post-Civil War? Ms. Marvel was even a little ahead. I don't see how a varient cover alone could account for T-bolts getting nearly 4 times the boost MM did.

As for sales compared to Nextwave... do I need to draw a diagram explaining how Venom is a bigger draw than Machine Man?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the Initiative T-bolts issues vastly outsold the Ms. Marvel Initiative issues, despite both books being at around the same level immediately post-Civil War? Ms. Marvel was even a little ahead. I don&#8217;t see how a varient cover alone could account for T-bolts getting nearly 4 times the boost MM did.</p>
<p>As for sales compared to Nextwave&#8230; do I need to draw a diagram explaining how Venom is a bigger draw than Machine Man?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dagwan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-368949</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-368949</guid>
					<description>The Thunderbolts special sold only one copy less than the &quot;regular&quot; monthly issue that came out before it here.

Thor, in only 2 issues, has become the top-susbscribed regular super-hero title in my store, beaten only by World War Hulk (a miniseries) and Buffy Season 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Thunderbolts special sold only one copy less than the &#8220;regular&#8221; monthly issue that came out before it here.</p>
<p>Thor, in only 2 issues, has become the top-susbscribed regular super-hero title in my store, beaten only by World War Hulk (a miniseries) and Buffy Season 8.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steve Lieber</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-367993</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-367993</guid>
					<description>I've done some independent research and conducted an extensive phone poll looking into why  the Thunderbolts one-shot fill-in sold twenty-four thousand fewer copies than the ongoing series, and the most likely reason is that according to my records, last year at Comic-con I was a big jerk to exactly that many people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done some independent research and conducted an extensive phone poll looking into why  the Thunderbolts one-shot fill-in sold twenty-four thousand fewer copies than the ongoing series, and the most likely reason is that according to my records, last year at Comic-con I was a big jerk to exactly that many people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-367706</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-367706</guid>
					<description>I have to wonder where all of the Ellis fans were when NEXTWAVE was being published. 

The MOST LIKELY reason why the T-bolts special sold 15k more then then Fabian's run is because dealers thought and/or hoped that the book MIGHT have picked up new readers with it's much hyped new direction.

And for what it's worth, MANY of our customers picked up Ellis and Deodato's T-bolts ONLY because the book was tying into the INITIATIVE storyline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder where all of the Ellis fans were when NEXTWAVE was being published. </p>
<p>The MOST LIKELY reason why the T-bolts special sold 15k more then then Fabian&#8217;s run is because dealers thought and/or hoped that the book MIGHT have picked up new readers with it&#8217;s much hyped new direction.</p>
<p>And for what it&#8217;s worth, MANY of our customers picked up Ellis and Deodato&#8217;s T-bolts ONLY because the book was tying into the INITIATIVE storyline.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Four Color Media Monitor</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366854</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366854</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another look at Marvel's sales...&lt;/strong&gt;

I always find analyses like this one on The Beat blog interesting to read, but depending on just badly written or how badly a book has been rendered by Marvel's PC-madness, that's why it's troubling if sales on them are actually doing well. Because ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another look at Marvel&#8217;s sales&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I always find analyses like this one on The Beat blog interesting to read, but depending on just badly written or how badly a book has been rendered by Marvel&#8217;s PC-madness, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s troubling if sales on them are actually doing well. Because &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366849</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366849</guid>
					<description>Aussiesmurf, for what it's worth, at least two titles you list as monthly (All Star Superman and Batman) are technically bimonthly. They're massively off schedule, of course, Batman much more so than Superman, but originallly, they were supposed to come out alternate months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aussiesmurf, for what it&#8217;s worth, at least two titles you list as monthly (All Star Superman and Batman) are technically bimonthly. They&#8217;re massively off schedule, of course, Batman much more so than Superman, but originallly, they were supposed to come out alternate months.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366659</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366659</guid>
					<description>No, GALACTIC BOUNTY HUNTERS is an original series based on unpublished Kirby characters.  (Interviews have described it as a six-issue miniseries, but there's no clear mention of that in the solicitations.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, GALACTIC BOUNTY HUNTERS is an original series based on unpublished Kirby characters.  (Interviews have described it as a six-issue miniseries, but there&#8217;s no clear mention of that in the solicitations.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Zeidler</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366627</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366627</guid>
					<description>How in the world is Jack Kirby's Galactic Bounty Hunters behind schedule?  Is it not just a reprint book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world is Jack Kirby&#8217;s Galactic Bounty Hunters behind schedule?  Is it not just a reprint book?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Green</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366581</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366581</guid>
					<description>Charles LePage Says: 

08/29/07 at 6:00 am 
&quot;Onslaught Reborn: is this late because of Loeb, or Liefeld? My vote would be for the latter. Why does someone who has not proven to be successful or dependable get new projects like this?&quot;

It's late because of Loeb. As was announced at Wizard World Chicago, Liefeld's drawn almost an entire Killraven miniseries waiting for Loeb to find time to finish his Onslaught Reborn scripts. J. Scott Campbell also mentioned that he is doing Wildsiderz pages as he waits for more pages from Loeb on their super-secret Spider-Man miniseries. Apparently Loeb way overcommitted himself because he wasn't expecting the TV show &quot;Heroes&quot; to take off the way it has, and now that it's this huge success it's taking far more of his time than he ever planned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles LePage Says: </p>
<p>08/29/07 at 6:00 am<br />
&#8220;Onslaught Reborn: is this late because of Loeb, or Liefeld? My vote would be for the latter. Why does someone who has not proven to be successful or dependable get new projects like this?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s late because of Loeb. As was announced at Wizard World Chicago, Liefeld&#8217;s drawn almost an entire Killraven miniseries waiting for Loeb to find time to finish his Onslaught Reborn scripts. J. Scott Campbell also mentioned that he is doing Wildsiderz pages as he waits for more pages from Loeb on their super-secret Spider-Man miniseries. Apparently Loeb way overcommitted himself because he wasn&#8217;t expecting the TV show &#8220;Heroes&#8221; to take off the way it has, and now that it&#8217;s this huge success it&#8217;s taking far more of his time than he ever planned.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366421</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366421</guid>
					<description>&amp;#62; Onslaught Reborn: is this late because of Loeb, or Liefeld? My vote would be for the latter. Why does someone who has not proven to be successful or dependable get new projects like this?

I'm pretty sure it was officially confirmed to be Loeb's problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Onslaught Reborn: is this late because of Loeb, or Liefeld? My vote would be for the latter. Why does someone who has not proven to be successful or dependable get new projects like this?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure it was officially confirmed to be Loeb&#8217;s problem&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Aug. 29, 2007: Searching the city for sci-fi wasabi</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366357</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366357</guid>
					<description>[...] [Publishing] Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien offers month-to-month comparisons for the sale of Marvel comics to Direct-Market retailers, now updated for July. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Publishing] Paul O&#8217;Brien offers month-to-month comparisons for the sale of Marvel comics to Direct-Market retailers, now updated for July. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366326</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366326</guid>
					<description>Probably shouldn't bother but...

Wraith, a half-dozen guys at the store I use dropped Thunderbolts for that month (including me) because it wasn't by Ellis and Deodato.  None of us picked up the book before that creative team came on (well okay, 1 guy did during CW).  And I imagine we'll be outta there once they leave.  Because we follow those creators (Ellis, mainly) around to see what they're doing in much the same way some people went over to that Baron Zemo miniseries with Nicieza.  Only there's more of us and we're all out of our faces on whisky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably shouldn&#8217;t bother but&#8230;</p>
<p>Wraith, a half-dozen guys at the store I use dropped Thunderbolts for that month (including me) because it wasn&#8217;t by Ellis and Deodato.  None of us picked up the book before that creative team came on (well okay, 1 guy did during CW).  And I imagine we&#8217;ll be outta there once they leave.  Because we follow those creators (Ellis, mainly) around to see what they&#8217;re doing in much the same way some people went over to that Baron Zemo miniseries with Nicieza.  Only there&#8217;s more of us and we&#8217;re all out of our faces on whisky.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366283</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366283</guid>
					<description>Oh, and one other point, just for clarification: AVENGERS CLASSIC is the lowest selling MU title on the *July* chart.  SPIDER-MAN FAMILY is actually doing worse by several thousand, but it's a bimonthly and it didn't ship in July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and one other point, just for clarification: AVENGERS CLASSIC is the lowest selling MU title on the *July* chart.  SPIDER-MAN FAMILY is actually doing worse by several thousand, but it&#8217;s a bimonthly and it didn&#8217;t ship in July.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366280</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366280</guid>
					<description>Perhaps they're just very committed to capturing the essence of the Heroes Reborn era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they&#8217;re just very committed to capturing the essence of the Heroes Reborn era.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles LePage</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366258</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-366258</guid>
					<description>Onslaught Reborn: is this late because of Loeb, or Liefeld?  My vote would be for the latter.  Why does someone who has not proven to be successful or dependable get new projects like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Onslaught Reborn: is this late because of Loeb, or Liefeld?  My vote would be for the latter.  Why does someone who has not proven to be successful or dependable get new projects like this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Grobbel</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-365863</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/08/28/marvel-month-to-month-sales-july-2007/#comment-365863</guid>
					<description>Wraith,

So why does this non-Initiative, non-variant cover one-shot still sell 15k more than it did when Nicieza was still writing it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wraith,</p>
<p>So why does this non-Initiative, non-variant cover one-shot still sell 15k more than it did when Nicieza was still writing it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
