<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The righteous anger of Eric Reynolds</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: companies give front line employees more power usa today</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-439002</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-439002</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;companies give front line employees more power usa today...&lt;/strong&gt;

Free Upload File Centre Www.fastuploadfiles.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>companies give front line employees more power usa today&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Free Upload File Centre <a href='http://www.fastuploadfiles.com' rel='nofollow'>www.fastuploadfiles.com</a>&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Devlin Thompson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-383345</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 03:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-383345</guid>
					<description>What's wrong with tools? Our ability to use tools is the attribute that sets us apart from (most of) the animals. And, speaking personally, my tool has given me many happy hours of entertainment. On the other hand, if you're speaking of &quot;Tool&quot;,the musical act, then &quot;unforgivable&quot; isn't NEARLY strong enough a term of opprobrium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with tools? Our ability to use tools is the attribute that sets us apart from (most of) the animals. And, speaking personally, my tool has given me many happy hours of entertainment. On the other hand, if you&#8217;re speaking of &#8220;Tool&#8221;,the musical act, then &#8220;unforgivable&#8221; isn&#8217;t NEARLY strong enough a term of opprobrium.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-382778</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-382778</guid>
					<description>It's a good thing I wasn't apologizing to you, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good thing I wasn&#8217;t apologizing to you, then.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe S. Walker</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-382556</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-382556</guid>
					<description>Since you ask, I think it's unforgivable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you ask, I think it&#8217;s unforgivable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael DeForge</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-382100</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-382100</guid>
					<description>Joe, Eric edited out the &quot;tool&quot; remark and apologized for it in this very thread. I'm not sure why you're stuck on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, Eric edited out the &#8220;tool&#8221; remark and apologized for it in this very thread. I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;re stuck on it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe S. Walker</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-381917</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-381917</guid>
					<description>Tom Spurgeon: &quot;Wait, I guess he did suggest that someone did a toolish thing...&quot;

His exact words: &quot;What a fucking tool.&quot;

Can't you read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Spurgeon: &#8220;Wait, I guess he did suggest that someone did a toolish thing&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>His exact words: &#8220;What a fucking tool.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t you read?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 4, 2007: It&#8217;s Celebrate Spanish Royalty Week!</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-381758</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-381758</guid>
					<description>[...] [Retailing] Fantagraphics&amp;#8217; Eric Reynolds visits a comic-book shop, gets depressed. Assembled funnybook fandom responds with fury in the comments section of Heidi MacDonald&amp;#8217;s blog, while Christopher Butcher offers a few words of reason. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Retailing] Fantagraphics&#8217; Eric Reynolds visits a comic-book shop, gets depressed. Assembled funnybook fandom responds with fury in the comments section of Heidi MacDonald&#8217;s blog, while Christopher Butcher offers a few words of reason. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rakarich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-380024</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-380024</guid>
					<description>As this news item fades into the sunset I want to take a moment to thank you all for a wonderful debate.  :)

Rakarich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this news item fades into the sunset I want to take a moment to thank you all for a wonderful debate.  <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Rakarich
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: comics212 - never safe for work. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On being a grown-up in the comic-book industry.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379338</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379338</guid>
					<description>[...] This all sounds reasonable, right? I mean, boring maybe, but reasonable. I had a mediocre and disappointing shopping experience, and I left really unhappy. I&amp;#8217;m talking about it here. If that&amp;#8217;s the case, then why, when someone does the same thing within the comics industry and talking about a comic book store, does the freak-parade start-up, ready to defend someone&amp;#8217;s right to run a shitty business? Look at some this response in particular: &amp;#8220;What snobbery!!! This guy can rant all he wants, but he has no right to force a retailer to carry anything — or really to be upset about it. If a retailer in any industry only wants to sell certain products, and he can do so successfully, why should he stock something he doesn’t want to sell? The shop is (I assume ) thriving by selling products it wants to sell.&amp;#8221; - Some anonymous coward. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This all sounds reasonable, right? I mean, boring maybe, but reasonable. I had a mediocre and disappointing shopping experience, and I left really unhappy. I&#8217;m talking about it here. If that&#8217;s the case, then why, when someone does the same thing within the comics industry and talking about a comic book store, does the freak-parade start-up, ready to defend someone&#8217;s right to run a shitty business? Look at some this response in particular: &#8220;What snobbery!!! This guy can rant all he wants, but he has no right to force a retailer to carry anything — or really to be upset about it. If a retailer in any industry only wants to sell certain products, and he can do so successfully, why should he stock something he doesn’t want to sell? The shop is (I assume ) thriving by selling products it wants to sell.&#8221; - Some anonymous coward. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379217</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379217</guid>
					<description>Thanks, Heidi, but I can take the heat and should have expected it. Ultimately, if my comments lead to a healthy discussion about what makes a good store, then so be it, and I can take the criticism. I opened myself up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Heidi, but I can take the heat and should have expected it. Ultimately, if my comments lead to a healthy discussion about what makes a good store, then so be it, and I can take the criticism. I opened myself up to it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy Lander</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379183</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379183</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Many direct market stores are now setting up accounts with trade-book-world wholesaler Baker &amp;#38; Taylor or Ingram to ensure better stock levels, better discount on reorders, and returnability (all plusses over Diamond at least until any changes as rumored by Rich Johnston take place at Diamond).&lt;/i&gt;

I'm not sure if the better discount is always true. B&amp;#38;T does have a better stock (especially on manga) than Diamond, but they actually order some of their stock *from* Diamond, and as a result, their discounts are usually lower even on indie books when it comes to reorders. Unless you're a smaller store, you're likely to take a discount hit on anything you order from B&amp;#38;T. It's relatively small, but it's there and it does add up. 

Which isn't to say I don't order from B&amp;#38;T every week, in fact I do, but it's not all wine and roses there either. Granted, there is some returnability, but it's not as easy as &quot;OK, round up whatever we didn't sell and decide we don't want and send it back.&quot; It's another complicated task in an already crowded workday for most retailers.

&lt;i&gt;Let me ask another question… Did Mr. Reynolds have to name 4KrazyKatz by name in his post? Did he have to put a link to the store’s website? Could he not be general and say he went to an LCS in the Washington State University area and still get his point across? Once again, bad form. This LCS owner is now getting slammed and I believe it is unfair to him.&lt;/i&gt;

For my part, if Mr. Reynolds had been in my store and had this bad an experience (and I don't believe he would, but just saying if he did) I think I'd want to be named by name. At worst, it would allow me to know to defend myself and my conduct, at best, it gives me a lesson that allows me to improve my store's service.

But then, I've never been a fan of the &quot;Somebody in this room did something bad, so I'm going to tell you all not to do it&quot; type of thing. It's OK if everyone has done it at some point, and you're wanting to make a general point, but if you want to tell one person to stop doing something, tell that person. Otherwise they're going to assume you're not talking about them. And worse, folks who didn't do anything wrong are going to worry and wonder if they screwed up, when in fact they've been doing just fine. 

I know if I read someone's blistering account of a bad experience in an &quot;Austin area store&quot; I'd be paranoid that it was mine until I found out otherwise. I'd rather be called out if I did it, and left out of it if I didn't. Generalizing in order to paint with an even wider brush (as many in the comments do, and Eric Reynolds specifically did not) seems more unfair to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Many direct market stores are now setting up accounts with trade-book-world wholesaler Baker &amp; Taylor or Ingram to ensure better stock levels, better discount on reorders, and returnability (all plusses over Diamond at least until any changes as rumored by Rich Johnston take place at Diamond).</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the better discount is always true. B&amp;T does have a better stock (especially on manga) than Diamond, but they actually order some of their stock *from* Diamond, and as a result, their discounts are usually lower even on indie books when it comes to reorders. Unless you&#8217;re a smaller store, you&#8217;re likely to take a discount hit on anything you order from B&amp;T. It&#8217;s relatively small, but it&#8217;s there and it does add up. </p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t to say I don&#8217;t order from B&amp;T every week, in fact I do, but it&#8217;s not all wine and roses there either. Granted, there is some returnability, but it&#8217;s not as easy as &#8220;OK, round up whatever we didn&#8217;t sell and decide we don&#8217;t want and send it back.&#8221; It&#8217;s another complicated task in an already crowded workday for most retailers.</p>
<p><i>Let me ask another question… Did Mr. Reynolds have to name 4KrazyKatz by name in his post? Did he have to put a link to the store’s website? Could he not be general and say he went to an LCS in the Washington State University area and still get his point across? Once again, bad form. This LCS owner is now getting slammed and I believe it is unfair to him.</i></p>
<p>For my part, if Mr. Reynolds had been in my store and had this bad an experience (and I don&#8217;t believe he would, but just saying if he did) I think I&#8217;d want to be named by name. At worst, it would allow me to know to defend myself and my conduct, at best, it gives me a lesson that allows me to improve my store&#8217;s service.</p>
<p>But then, I&#8217;ve never been a fan of the &#8220;Somebody in this room did something bad, so I&#8217;m going to tell you all not to do it&#8221; type of thing. It&#8217;s OK if everyone has done it at some point, and you&#8217;re wanting to make a general point, but if you want to tell one person to stop doing something, tell that person. Otherwise they&#8217;re going to assume you&#8217;re not talking about them. And worse, folks who didn&#8217;t do anything wrong are going to worry and wonder if they screwed up, when in fact they&#8217;ve been doing just fine. </p>
<p>I know if I read someone&#8217;s blistering account of a bad experience in an &#8220;Austin area store&#8221; I&#8217;d be paranoid that it was mine until I found out otherwise. I&#8217;d rather be called out if I did it, and left out of it if I didn&#8217;t. Generalizing in order to paint with an even wider brush (as many in the comments do, and Eric Reynolds specifically did not) seems more unfair to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379148</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379148</guid>
					<description>To respond to &quot;Rakarich&quot;:

&quot;So with your comments, I am to assume you are saying that 'respected industry member' Reynolds DOES speak for all of FANTAGRAPHICS with his comments?&quot;

No, I said pretty much the opposite of that.

&quot;Let me ask another question… Did Mr. Reynolds have to name 4KrazyKatz by name in his post? Did he have to put a link to the store’s website? Could he not be general and say he went to an LCS in the Washington State University area and still get his point across? Once again, bad form. This LCS owner is now getting slammed and I believe it is unfair to him.&quot;

Actually, I respect Eric for naming names. More people should. There's way too much loaded argumentation and dubious example-making in comics discussion for the subject to be taken seriously without specifics. The only thing that would be unfair to the shop owner is if Eric made stuff up, or if he painted all the stores in Spokane for something that struck him about one.

&quot;My I make a suggestion to Mr. Reynolds to pass along to the powers that be. Make your products returnable by LCS owners. I would bet a dollar to a donut that a bunch of LCSs would take more of a gamble on Indy books if they weren’t carrying the load by themselves. FANTAGRAPHICS could forge new ground in the Indy market if the made a bold move like this. WOuldn’t you agree?&quot;

Fantagraphics attempted multiple returnable material efforts while I was there and offers their books on a returnable basis through at least one distributor right now.  

It's more difficult than you might think. Diamond isn't really conducive to facilitating such efforts, which means a lot of stores can't/won't participate. Also, my knowledge of the modern direct market indicates that initiatives such as you describe may not be taken for their face value but are just as frequently strip-mined for advantages specific to that store. 

In other words, it's at least just as much the store culture as it is barriers to selling. You can have the greatest programs in the world, but if a store doesn't want to sell something, it won't. As we've seen from the years of abuse that Marvel and DC have inflicted on store owners, if a store wants to sell something, they will no matter how high the cost.

I'm all for stores selling whatever the heck they want -- I've had a statement saying as much up on my site for about three years now -- but I agree with Eric's sentiment that not offering a wider array of comics at this point in the market's progression could be seen as a sad thing (if someone with Eric's job didn't have that view, I'd fire them!) and that shops should be expected to have a rudimentary knowledge about their industry because of the nature of the market. That's a systemic problem, by the way, not just on the stores.

TJ, I hope you'll take Eric up on his offer. He's not offering just to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To respond to &#8220;Rakarich&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;So with your comments, I am to assume you are saying that &#8216;respected industry member&#8217; Reynolds DOES speak for all of FANTAGRAPHICS with his comments?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I said pretty much the opposite of that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let me ask another question… Did Mr. Reynolds have to name 4KrazyKatz by name in his post? Did he have to put a link to the store’s website? Could he not be general and say he went to an LCS in the Washington State University area and still get his point across? Once again, bad form. This LCS owner is now getting slammed and I believe it is unfair to him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, I respect Eric for naming names. More people should. There&#8217;s way too much loaded argumentation and dubious example-making in comics discussion for the subject to be taken seriously without specifics. The only thing that would be unfair to the shop owner is if Eric made stuff up, or if he painted all the stores in Spokane for something that struck him about one.</p>
<p>&#8220;My I make a suggestion to Mr. Reynolds to pass along to the powers that be. Make your products returnable by LCS owners. I would bet a dollar to a donut that a bunch of LCSs would take more of a gamble on Indy books if they weren’t carrying the load by themselves. FANTAGRAPHICS could forge new ground in the Indy market if the made a bold move like this. WOuldn’t you agree?&#8221;</p>
<p>Fantagraphics attempted multiple returnable material efforts while I was there and offers their books on a returnable basis through at least one distributor right now.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s more difficult than you might think. Diamond isn&#8217;t really conducive to facilitating such efforts, which means a lot of stores can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t participate. Also, my knowledge of the modern direct market indicates that initiatives such as you describe may not be taken for their face value but are just as frequently strip-mined for advantages specific to that store. </p>
<p>In other words, it&#8217;s at least just as much the store culture as it is barriers to selling. You can have the greatest programs in the world, but if a store doesn&#8217;t want to sell something, it won&#8217;t. As we&#8217;ve seen from the years of abuse that Marvel and DC have inflicted on store owners, if a store wants to sell something, they will no matter how high the cost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for stores selling whatever the heck they want &#8212; I&#8217;ve had a statement saying as much up on my site for about three years now &#8212; but I agree with Eric&#8217;s sentiment that not offering a wider array of comics at this point in the market&#8217;s progression could be seen as a sad thing (if someone with Eric&#8217;s job didn&#8217;t have that view, I&#8217;d fire them!) and that shops should be expected to have a rudimentary knowledge about their industry because of the nature of the market. That&#8217;s a systemic problem, by the way, not just on the stores.</p>
<p>TJ, I hope you&#8217;ll take Eric up on his offer. He&#8217;s not offering just to offer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379115</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379115</guid>
					<description>Just a note to everyone:

NO ONE PICK ON ERIC REYNOLDS! Pound for pound this guy has done more for comics in the last decade than almost anyone I could name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note to everyone:</p>
<p>NO ONE PICK ON ERIC REYNOLDS! Pound for pound this guy has done more for comics in the last decade than almost anyone I could name.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dagwan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379081</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379081</guid>
					<description>You folks should come to Tallahassee and take a look at my store.

Lots of diversity of titles and genres (I even carry some Fantagraphics and D&amp;#38;Q along with Top Shelf, Markosia, Avatar, IDW, Oni, Archaia, Antarctic, and many more. That's just the publishers I can see from where I'm sitting), clean, neat, well-organized, well-lit, and I am a special order whore. (I've placed several while reading this blog)

I'll bet there are many stores like mine all over the country, but no one hears about them. It makes for better reading when some store is raked over the coals for some (actual or imagined) slight, and it's not something that is unique to our hobby/ business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You folks should come to Tallahassee and take a look at my store.</p>
<p>Lots of diversity of titles and genres (I even carry some Fantagraphics and D&amp;Q along with Top Shelf, Markosia, Avatar, IDW, Oni, Archaia, Antarctic, and many more. That&#8217;s just the publishers I can see from where I&#8217;m sitting), clean, neat, well-organized, well-lit, and I am a special order whore. (I&#8217;ve placed several while reading this blog)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet there are many stores like mine all over the country, but no one hears about them. It makes for better reading when some store is raked over the coals for some (actual or imagined) slight, and it&#8217;s not something that is unique to our hobby/ business.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379077</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379077</guid>
					<description>Dear TJ, if you wanted to write me directly I would gladly help rectify any mail order problems you've had with Fantagraphics, as I would do for anyone. We take pride in our business. Was this a personal or store order?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear TJ, if you wanted to write me directly I would gladly help rectify any mail order problems you&#8217;ve had with Fantagraphics, as I would do for anyone. We take pride in our business. Was this a personal or store order?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rakarich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379040</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379040</guid>
					<description>Alex:

Thanks for the info.  I didn't know that :)

Dirk Deppey:
I know Diamond calls the shots in regards to their catalogue.  I assume your point is Diamond holds all the cards in regards to how this industry prospers more so than any one LCS.  To that point, I am in 100% agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex:</p>
<p>Thanks for the info.  I didn&#8217;t know that <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Dirk Deppey:<br />
I know Diamond calls the shots in regards to their catalogue.  I assume your point is Diamond holds all the cards in regards to how this industry prospers more so than any one LCS.  To that point, I am in 100% agreement.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379027</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379027</guid>
					<description>Rakarich: From my discussions with various publishers, I'm under the impression that the biggest stumbling block toward returnability in the Direct Market isn't a given publisher; it's Diamond, who have reluctantly agreed to facilitate experiments in risk-free orders a handful of times* but have made it abundantly clear that they don't want to deal with the hassle and paperwork involved in returnability as a continuing proposition.

* I'm not including Marvel or DC in this, by the way -- Diamond has no say in how &lt;i&gt;they&lt;/i&gt; structure their deals with retailers, since the deals they have with Steve Geppi are brokerage deals, not distribution deals. Marvel and DC can do almost whatever they want, and Diamond is basically obligated to go along with it. Non-brokered publishers don't have this luxury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rakarich: From my discussions with various publishers, I&#8217;m under the impression that the biggest stumbling block toward returnability in the Direct Market isn&#8217;t a given publisher; it&#8217;s Diamond, who have reluctantly agreed to facilitate experiments in risk-free orders a handful of times* but have made it abundantly clear that they don&#8217;t want to deal with the hassle and paperwork involved in returnability as a continuing proposition.</p>
<p>* I&#8217;m not including Marvel or DC in this, by the way &#8212; Diamond has no say in how <i>they</i> structure their deals with retailers, since the deals they have with Steve Geppi are brokerage deals, not distribution deals. Marvel and DC can do almost whatever they want, and Diamond is basically obligated to go along with it. Non-brokered publishers don&#8217;t have this luxury.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TJ</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379025</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379025</guid>
					<description>Eric Reynolds should save some of his righteous anger for his company's own fulfillment department. I know I'm  not alone in being disgusted by the condition I received comics ordered directly from Fantagraphics. Complaints were ignored and I was left paying full price + shipping for damaged comics. I won't ever order direct from Fantagraphics again. Too bad since they actually earn more money from direct sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Reynolds should save some of his righteous anger for his company&#8217;s own fulfillment department. I know I&#8217;m  not alone in being disgusted by the condition I received comics ordered directly from Fantagraphics. Complaints were ignored and I was left paying full price + shipping for damaged comics. I won&#8217;t ever order direct from Fantagraphics again. Too bad since they actually earn more money from direct sales.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alex</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379016</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379016</guid>
					<description>Fantagraphics Books ARE returnable, if purchased through Baker and Taylor.

Which many store do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantagraphics Books ARE returnable, if purchased through Baker and Taylor.</p>
<p>Which many store do.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rakarich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379003</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/09/01/the-righteous-anger-of-eric-reynolds/#comment-379003</guid>
					<description>Tom Spurgeon:

So with your comments, I am to assume you are saying that &quot;respected industry member&quot; Reynolds DOES speak for all of FANTAGRAPHICS with his comments?

Let me ask another question... Did Mr. Reynolds have to name 4KrazyKatz by name in his post?  Did he have to put a link to the store's website?  Could he not be general and say he went to an LCS in the Washington State University area and still get his point across?  Once again, bad form.  This LCS owner is now getting slammed and I believe it is unfair to him.


My I make a suggestion to Mr. Reynolds to pass along to the powers that be.   Make your products returnable by LCS owners.  I would bet a dollar to a donut that a bunch of LCSs would take more of a gamble on Indy books if they weren't carrying the load by themselves.  FANTAGRAPHICS could forge new ground in the Indy market if the made a bold move like this.  WOuldn't you agree?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Spurgeon:</p>
<p>So with your comments, I am to assume you are saying that &#8220;respected industry member&#8221; Reynolds DOES speak for all of FANTAGRAPHICS with his comments?</p>
<p>Let me ask another question&#8230; Did Mr. Reynolds have to name 4KrazyKatz by name in his post?  Did he have to put a link to the store&#8217;s website?  Could he not be general and say he went to an LCS in the Washington State University area and still get his point across?  Once again, bad form.  This LCS owner is now getting slammed and I believe it is unfair to him.</p>
<p>My I make a suggestion to Mr. Reynolds to pass along to the powers that be.   Make your products returnable by LCS owners.  I would bet a dollar to a donut that a bunch of LCSs would take more of a gamble on Indy books if they weren&#8217;t carrying the load by themselves.  FANTAGRAPHICS could forge new ground in the Indy market if the made a bold move like this.  WOuldn&#8217;t you agree?  <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
