<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wallace and Gromit return!</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Regresa el duo dinámico (No el que ustedes piensan) &#171; Enki, re-evolución</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-450750</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-450750</guid>
					<description>[...] Fuente: The Beat    &amp;#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Fuente: The Beat    &nbsp; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Edward Liu</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-449450</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-449450</guid>
					<description>From what I understand, &quot;Flushed Away&quot; was CGI at DreamWorks' insistence. Aardman and DreamWorks split earlier this year, and all of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=17611&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aardman's new projects&lt;/A&gt; may be CGI-assisted, but will be stop-motion at heart.

Still, there's a certain Aardman-ness that can't be repressed if they're done right. I believe &quot;The Presentators&quot; was all CGI, but designed to look and feel like stop-motion. They were hilarious, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand, &#8220;Flushed Away&#8221; was CGI at DreamWorks&#8217; insistence. Aardman and DreamWorks split earlier this year, and all of <a HREF="http://news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=17611" rel="nofollow">Aardman&#8217;s new projects</A> may be CGI-assisted, but will be stop-motion at heart.</p>
<p>Still, there&#8217;s a certain Aardman-ness that can&#8217;t be repressed if they&#8217;re done right. I believe &#8220;The Presentators&#8221; was all CGI, but designed to look and feel like stop-motion. They were hilarious, too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mike.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-449426</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-449426</guid>
					<description>I hope that they go back to stop motion and away from CGI, but I suppose CGI is just a sign-of-the-times thing that I should learn to deal with (plus that comment about new directions &quot;technically&quot; is not very encouraging in this regard). Still, love the idea of new adventures, and I wish Grommy was MY dog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that they go back to stop motion and away from CGI, but I suppose CGI is just a sign-of-the-times thing that I should learn to deal with (plus that comment about new directions &#8220;technically&#8221; is not very encouraging in this regard). Still, love the idea of new adventures, and I wish Grommy was MY dog!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jimmie Robinson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-449359</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2007/10/05/wallace-and-gromit-return/#comment-449359</guid>
					<description>This is BRILLIANT news!  There is a god after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is BRILLIANT news!  There is a god after all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
