<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bookscan revisited</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Allen</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-1033915</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-1033915</guid>
					<description>I always knew Alan David Doane was a certain breed, hence the equation ADD=ACB. Whether POB=FOS is arguable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always knew Alan David Doane was a certain breed, hence the equation ADD=ACB. Whether POB=FOS is arguable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jamie Coville</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-960013</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-960013</guid>
					<description>Then we need to have a debate because Tom going bugnuts would be worth the price admission alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then we need to have a debate because Tom going bugnuts would be worth the price admission alone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-958442</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-958442</guid>
					<description>I'll debate anyone on the original subject, but if there's anyone who wants to debate whether or not Bone is mainstream/indy/alt or the role of bedsheets in defining mainstream status or who's stronger, Chris Ware or Mark Millar, I probably couldn't do that without risk of going bugnuts insane right up there on the podium and smashing my head into the plastic water pitcher until I bled to death.

Just sayin'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll debate anyone on the original subject, but if there&#8217;s anyone who wants to debate whether or not Bone is mainstream/indy/alt or the role of bedsheets in defining mainstream status or who&#8217;s stronger, Chris Ware or Mark Millar, I probably couldn&#8217;t do that without risk of going bugnuts insane right up there on the podium and smashing my head into the plastic water pitcher until I bled to death.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-955900</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-955900</guid>
					<description>We really need a debate at San Diego, don't we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really need a debate at San Diego, don&#8217;t we?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-955755</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-955755</guid>
					<description>So wait, Heidi: I say that the future of comics in bookstores belongs to Jeff Smith and Scholastic and you chastise me for thinking that it belongs to &lt;i&gt;Love and Rockets&lt;/i&gt;? I'd love to know how you reached that conclusion. I bet it would've been a fascinating process to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wait, Heidi: I say that the future of comics in bookstores belongs to Jeff Smith and Scholastic and you chastise me for thinking that it belongs to <i>Love and Rockets</i>? I&#8217;d love to know how you reached that conclusion. I bet it would&#8217;ve been a fascinating process to watch.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: caleb</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-955131</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-955131</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;. I would say that SPIDERMAN and BATMAN are mainstream characters given the fact you can buy sheets and towels with their pictures on them. &lt;/i&gt;

Spider-Man can't be considered a mainstream character until mainstream media learn to spell his name with the hyphen, let alone professional comics bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>. I would say that SPIDERMAN and BATMAN are mainstream characters given the fact you can buy sheets and towels with their pictures on them. </i></p>
<p>Spider-Man can&#8217;t be considered a mainstream character until mainstream media learn to spell his name with the hyphen, let alone professional comics bloggers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-954085</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-954085</guid>
					<description>I miss spinner racks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss spinner racks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953667</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953667</guid>
					<description>Paul, to Alan: &quot;You’re assuming that sales through bookstores must necessarily be to a mainstream audience.&quot;

Nor, I think, is it safe to assume anymore that the direct market exclusively serves typical comics fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, to Alan: &#8220;You’re assuming that sales through bookstores must necessarily be to a mainstream audience.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nor, I think, is it safe to assume anymore that the direct market exclusively serves typical comics fans.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Hibbs</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953427</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953427</guid>
					<description>Dick: DEATH NOTE took a HUGE jump once the anime starting being broadcast (like, from total memory, by more than a third), but that's definitely a piece of comics material still likely to be charting 10 years from now, because it is SUPER AWESOME.

-B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick: DEATH NOTE took a HUGE jump once the anime starting being broadcast (like, from total memory, by more than a third), but that&#8217;s definitely a piece of comics material still likely to be charting 10 years from now, because it is SUPER AWESOME.</p>
<p>-B
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dick Hyacinth</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953381</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953381</guid>
					<description>I also think it might be a little unfair to lump in Death Note with the anime tie-ins--it was doing pretty well even before that show appeared on Cartoon Network, wasn't it?

And there's a Batman cartoon on TV right now, isn't there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it might be a little unfair to lump in Death Note with the anime tie-ins&#8211;it was doing pretty well even before that show appeared on Cartoon Network, wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>And there&#8217;s a Batman cartoon on TV right now, isn&#8217;t there?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953361</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953361</guid>
					<description>Oops! I stand corrected! I momentarily confused Vampire Knight with some other manga about vampires that has a video game tie-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I stand corrected! I momentarily confused Vampire Knight with some other manga about vampires that has a video game tie-in.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Hibbs</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953334</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953334</guid>
					<description>Heidi: VAMPIRE KNIGHT also doesn't seem to be broadcasting on TV yet (unless I missed something).

-B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi: VAMPIRE KNIGHT also doesn&#8217;t seem to be broadcasting on TV yet (unless I missed something).</p>
<p>-B
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953160</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953160</guid>
					<description>We can avoid them. 

Well, maybe not Naruto so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can avoid them. </p>
<p>Well, maybe not Naruto so much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953121</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953121</guid>
					<description>Alan, I already looked at all the non-manga books in the top 100 above.  Out of the top books you list in your analysis, only FRUITS BASKET is not based on a show that's airing on TV, hence, effectively a TV tie-in. I have no doubt that Naruto would sell well if the anime wasn't being aired here, but the fact that 5 of the non-manga books are superhero shows they have the same level of  mainstream penetration. 

To put it bluntly....Stephen King, Naruto and Heroes are all mainstream...&lt;B&gt;and there's not a thing we can do about it!&lt;/b&gt;


EDIT: I've just read all of your analysis in the post referenced above, and using my metaphor of a horse race, you have just uncovered the biggest pile of road apples I have yet seen in this derby. BONE is artcommix? Really? I guess E. Nesbit is Jean Rhys, too.  I would like to see both you AND Dirk try to define what the terms of mainstream and literary/art are. 

People are using these numbers to bolster whatever they want to prove. And it's ludicrous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, I already looked at all the non-manga books in the top 100 above.  Out of the top books you list in your analysis, only FRUITS BASKET is not based on a show that&#8217;s airing on TV, hence, effectively a TV tie-in. I have no doubt that Naruto would sell well if the anime wasn&#8217;t being aired here, but the fact that 5 of the non-manga books are superhero shows they have the same level of  mainstream penetration. </p>
<p>To put it bluntly&#8230;.Stephen King, Naruto and Heroes are all mainstream&#8230;<B>and there&#8217;s not a thing we can do about it!</b></p>
<p>EDIT: I&#8217;ve just read all of your analysis in the post referenced above, and using my metaphor of a horse race, you have just uncovered the biggest pile of road apples I have yet seen in this derby. BONE is artcommix? Really? I guess E. Nesbit is Jean Rhys, too.  I would like to see both you AND Dirk try to define what the terms of mainstream and literary/art are. </p>
<p>People are using these numbers to bolster whatever they want to prove. And it&#8217;s ludicrous.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953101</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-953101</guid>
					<description>Overly simplistic, Alan.  You're assuming that sales through bookstores must necessarily be to a mainstream audience.  Manga sells through bookstores, therefore it's selling to the mainstream.  

That doesn't follow at all.  There are plenty of cult, niche and specialist publications in mainstream bookstores.  You're ignoring the possibility that manga also has a niche audience, but happens to sell through a more conventional distribution route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overly simplistic, Alan.  You&#8217;re assuming that sales through bookstores must necessarily be to a mainstream audience.  Manga sells through bookstores, therefore it&#8217;s selling to the mainstream.  </p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t follow at all.  There are plenty of cult, niche and specialist publications in mainstream bookstores.  You&#8217;re ignoring the possibility that manga also has a niche audience, but happens to sell through a more conventional distribution route.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ADD</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-952814</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-952814</guid>
					<description>Which of course anyone would, if comparing and contrasting mainstream vs. direct market trends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which of course anyone would, if comparing and contrasting mainstream vs. direct market trends.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-952707</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-952707</guid>
					<description>Of course, Alan, that only works if you ignore the direct market entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Alan, that only works if you ignore the direct market entirely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ADD</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-951928</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-951928</guid>
					<description>Here's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comicbookgalaxy.com/blog/2008/02/far-more-distant-third-superheroes-as.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more on the idea of what is and isn't mainstream&lt;/a&gt;, backed up with numbers provided by Rich Johnston (thanks, Rich!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.comicbookgalaxy.com/blog/2008/02/far-more-distant-third-superheroes-as.html" rel="nofollow">more on the idea of what is and isn&#8217;t mainstream</a>, backed up with numbers provided by Rich Johnston (thanks, Rich!).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich Johnston</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-951680</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-951680</guid>
					<description>&quot;Just as your average British drawing-room comedy broadcast on PBS is not going to pull down the same kind of ratings as Lost&quot;

It gets much better ratings than Lost. 

Here at least. 8-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just as your average British drawing-room comedy broadcast on PBS is not going to pull down the same kind of ratings as Lost&#8221;</p>
<p>It gets much better ratings than Lost. </p>
<p>Here at least. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-950100</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-950100</guid>
					<description>I'm pretty sure Chris Ware's mainstream, but only because there seems to be a cartoon show on Sunday nights after The Simpsons starring Jimmy Corrigan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Chris Ware&#8217;s mainstream, but only because there seems to be a cartoon show on Sunday nights after The Simpsons starring Jimmy Corrigan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jamie Coville</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-950014</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-950014</guid>
					<description>Heidi, I think you meant to say low sales or orders. Low returns is a great thing in the bookstore market. 

And yeah, there is a local manga group in my town. Filled with kids in their mid-late teens for the most part. If you even say the word &quot;comics&quot; to them they immediately tell you they don't read comic books. They are very much into the Manga/Anime &quot;style&quot; and don't read much else. 

Although a couple of them knew who Neil Gaiman was and read Sandman and Stardust which surprised me but probably shouldn't have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi, I think you meant to say low sales or orders. Low returns is a great thing in the bookstore market. </p>
<p>And yeah, there is a local manga group in my town. Filled with kids in their mid-late teens for the most part. If you even say the word &#8220;comics&#8221; to them they immediately tell you they don&#8217;t read comic books. They are very much into the Manga/Anime &#8220;style&#8221; and don&#8217;t read much else. </p>
<p>Although a couple of them knew who Neil Gaiman was and read Sandman and Stardust which surprised me but probably shouldn&#8217;t have.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949728</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949728</guid>
					<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;I think the manga market will mature, as the readership gets older and a wider variety of age-appropriate material becomes more saleable.

well, this is the $640,000 question. As it stands now, publishers who support more challenging, adult manga material get very low returns. Dark Horse couldn't sell Umezu. Gaijin went tits up immediately, Tezuka sells steadily but not in vast amounts, and most of the stuff in the Viz Signature line sells at the lower end of the Viz spectrum.  I've talked about this with many manga publishers and everyone hopes it will happen, but we'll see. 

As for the average Naruto reader suddenly glomming onto Love &amp; Rockets...I think that's about as likely as the average Hulk reader doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>>I think the manga market will mature, as the readership gets older and a wider variety of age-appropriate material becomes more saleable.</p>
<p>well, this is the $640,000 question. As it stands now, publishers who support more challenging, adult manga material get very low returns. Dark Horse couldn&#8217;t sell Umezu. Gaijin went tits up immediately, Tezuka sells steadily but not in vast amounts, and most of the stuff in the Viz Signature line sells at the lower end of the Viz spectrum.  I&#8217;ve talked about this with many manga publishers and everyone hopes it will happen, but we&#8217;ll see. </p>
<p>As for the average Naruto reader suddenly glomming onto Love &#038; Rockets&#8230;I think that&#8217;s about as likely as the average Hulk reader doing so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949630</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949630</guid>
					<description>Heidi: You're correct about &lt;i&gt;Crumb&lt;/i&gt;. I misremembered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtv.com/movies/movie/92092/moviemain.jhtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the controversy&lt;/a&gt; over the fact that neither it nor &lt;i&gt;Hoop Dreams&lt;/i&gt; were nominated in 1994.

I think the manga market will mature, as the readership gets older and a wider variety of age-appropriate material becomes more saleable. Manga fans aren't wedded to One True Genre, and therefore the publishers catering to them won't have to step around the sort of Tiny Nerd Culture War that has hamstrung the North American model. Likewise, I think there's already plenty of evidence that the same will probably be true of homegrown comics -- but only because prose publishers, not encumbered by the podunk, goofy provinciality of said Tiny Nerd Culture War, will be doing most of the heavy lifting. In the end, Jeff Smith and Scholastic will bury us all, and they'll have God on their side when it happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi: You&#8217;re correct about <i>Crumb</i>. I misremembered <a href="http://www.mtv.com/movies/movie/92092/moviemain.jhtml" rel="nofollow">the controversy</a> over the fact that neither it nor <i>Hoop Dreams</i> were nominated in 1994.</p>
<p>I think the manga market will mature, as the readership gets older and a wider variety of age-appropriate material becomes more saleable. Manga fans aren&#8217;t wedded to One True Genre, and therefore the publishers catering to them won&#8217;t have to step around the sort of Tiny Nerd Culture War that has hamstrung the North American model. Likewise, I think there&#8217;s already plenty of evidence that the same will probably be true of homegrown comics &#8212; but only because prose publishers, not encumbered by the podunk, goofy provinciality of said Tiny Nerd Culture War, will be doing most of the heavy lifting. In the end, Jeff Smith and Scholastic will bury us all, and they&#8217;ll have God on their side when it happens.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949566</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949566</guid>
					<description>One of those recovered posts is a double post, but oh well.

This has got &quot;completely unproductive argument&quot; written all over it, so I'll make a few final comments and (hopefully) leave it there.

I think it's reasonably clear from the links above what school of thought I had in mind.  You can decide for yourself whether I was caricaturing it unfairly.  And I fully agree that the rise of manga has pretty much stamped on the debate by steamrolling both sides.

Otherwise, I basically agree with Heidi's reply to Dirk.  Besides, if Chris Ware is &quot;inarguably mainstream&quot; because he's achieved a six-figure audience, why not Mark Millar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of those recovered posts is a double post, but oh well.</p>
<p>This has got &#8220;completely unproductive argument&#8221; written all over it, so I&#8217;ll make a few final comments and (hopefully) leave it there.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s reasonably clear from the links above what school of thought I had in mind.  You can decide for yourself whether I was caricaturing it unfairly.  And I fully agree that the rise of manga has pretty much stamped on the debate by steamrolling both sides.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I basically agree with Heidi&#8217;s reply to Dirk.  Besides, if Chris Ware is &#8220;inarguably mainstream&#8221; because he&#8217;s achieved a six-figure audience, why not Mark Millar?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949227</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949227</guid>
					<description>Paul Pope blew our minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Pope blew our minds.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949207</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949207</guid>
					<description>I have no idea what anyone after Paul Pope's post is trying to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what anyone after Paul Pope&#8217;s post is trying to say.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949176</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949176</guid>
					<description>Just to save confusion, I've just rescued posts by Paul O Brien and ADD from moderation, and they appear where Dirk most likely hasn't seen them even though he seems to be responding. 

All posts with more than two links (including the one I just posted) go into automatic moderation. I've relaxed that a bit just for today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to save confusion, I&#8217;ve just rescued posts by Paul O Brien and ADD from moderation, and they appear where Dirk most likely hasn&#8217;t seen them even though he seems to be responding. </p>
<p>All posts with more than two links (including the one I just posted) go into automatic moderation. I&#8217;ve relaxed that a bit just for today.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949153</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-949153</guid>
					<description>Dirk, you seem to be claiming that the Spirit Awards (GHOST WORLD won two), PBS and film documentaries are &quot;mainstream.&quot; Is that right? 

BTW, CRUMB did not, sad to say, win an Oscar. It was not even NOMINATED for an Oscar, which is even sadder to say. It did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109508/awards&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;win a lot of awards, &lt;/a&gt; however, including mainstream arbiters of taste like the New York Film Society awards.  Oh and it won an award at Sundance, which, as I'm sure you're aware, is vaunted every year as the number one showcase of mainstream American films. 

GHOST WORLD was nominated for an Oscar but didn't win. 

Okay let me turn off the sarcasm. Look, I don't think superheroes are necessarily mainstream, and I don't think art/indie/alt comix are necessarily mainstream. I would say that SPIDERMAN and BATMAN are mainstream characters given the fact you can buy sheets and towels with their pictures on them. PBS, film documentaries that are given theatrical release and the Spirit Awards are more &quot;mainstream&quot; in the larger cultural sense than SLAVE LABOR GRAPHICS and ADHOUSE BOOKS, that is for sure, but the average American is blissfully unbothered by thoughts of them, and good old GWB is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117980147.html?categoryid=18&amp;#38;cs=1&amp;#38;nid=2562&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;trying to defund PBS again, &lt;/a&gt; as he has for 8 years because it isn't unbiased enough. 

PERSEPOLIS has broken through to a huge audience but it is not mainstream in exactly the same way. Likewise, GHOST WORLD and the others works of Terry Zwigoff. Or even Michel Gondry. 

Comics really have never developed the &quot;new mainstream&quot; that I predicted many years ago. Unless it's manga, much of which, truth to tell, is no more accessible to the &quot;mainstream&quot; than the average issue of CIVIL WAR. 

I would much rather live in a world of PERSEPOLIS and GHOST WORLD than GREEN LANTERN and AVENGERS INITIATIVE, for sure, but they both pale besides Terry Brooks and George R. R. Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirk, you seem to be claiming that the Spirit Awards (GHOST WORLD won two), PBS and film documentaries are &#8220;mainstream.&#8221; Is that right? </p>
<p>BTW, CRUMB did not, sad to say, win an Oscar. It was not even NOMINATED for an Oscar, which is even sadder to say. It did <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109508/awards" rel="nofollow">win a lot of awards, </a> however, including mainstream arbiters of taste like the New York Film Society awards.  Oh and it won an award at Sundance, which, as I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware, is vaunted every year as the number one showcase of mainstream American films. </p>
<p>GHOST WORLD was nominated for an Oscar but didn&#8217;t win. </p>
<p>Okay let me turn off the sarcasm. Look, I don&#8217;t think superheroes are necessarily mainstream, and I don&#8217;t think art/indie/alt comix are necessarily mainstream. I would say that SPIDERMAN and BATMAN are mainstream characters given the fact you can buy sheets and towels with their pictures on them. PBS, film documentaries that are given theatrical release and the Spirit Awards are more &#8220;mainstream&#8221; in the larger cultural sense than SLAVE LABOR GRAPHICS and ADHOUSE BOOKS, that is for sure, but the average American is blissfully unbothered by thoughts of them, and good old GWB is <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117980147.html?categoryid=18&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562" rel="nofollow">trying to defund PBS again, </a> as he has for 8 years because it isn&#8217;t unbiased enough. </p>
<p>PERSEPOLIS has broken through to a huge audience but it is not mainstream in exactly the same way. Likewise, GHOST WORLD and the others works of Terry Zwigoff. Or even Michel Gondry. </p>
<p>Comics really have never developed the &#8220;new mainstream&#8221; that I predicted many years ago. Unless it&#8217;s manga, much of which, truth to tell, is no more accessible to the &#8220;mainstream&#8221; than the average issue of CIVIL WAR. </p>
<p>I would much rather live in a world of PERSEPOLIS and GHOST WORLD than GREEN LANTERN and AVENGERS INITIATIVE, for sure, but they both pale besides Terry Brooks and George R. R. Martin.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-948810</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-948810</guid>
					<description>(Whoops! That bit about Frisch should've gone below the following paragraph, not above it. Do excuse me.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Whoops! That bit about Frisch should&#8217;ve gone below the following paragraph, not above it. Do excuse me.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dirk Deppey</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-948790</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/02/22/bookscan-revisited/#comment-948790</guid>
					<description>Jamie - No, I don't regularly see Fantagraphics sales numbers. On the other hand, I trust Eric Reynolds not to lie about such things.

Incidentally, I realize that I was insufficiently dismissive of Paul O'Brien in an above post. In the link he cites, Doane claims that Crumb, Ware, Clowes and the Hernandez Bros are mainstream, and while I suppose that a case could be made against the Hernandez Brothers -- I'm not sure enough of their sales to say one way or the other -- the other three artists named are inarguably mainstream artists. All have seen work sold in six-figure numbers (in the case of some of Crumb's comics, seven-figure numbers). A documentary based upon Crumb's life won an Oscar. Clowes' &lt;i&gt;Ghost World&lt;/i&gt; was made into a well-received feature film that remains a staple in grocery-store rental kiosks, to say nothing of your local Blockbuster. If you know what &lt;i&gt;This American Life&lt;/i&gt; is, you likely know who Chris Ware is, as well. (Going outside the lit set, I'd also include Jeff Smith, Frank Miller, Fred Gallagher and perhaps Stan Sakai as mainstream artists in the larger American sense.)

What &lt;i&gt;doesn't&lt;/i&gt; Doane say in the above-linked piece? That &quot;literary/arthouse/indie comics are 'the real mainstream'&quot; &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt;. Just as your average British drawing-room comedy broadcast on PBS is not going to pull down the same kind of ratings as &lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt;, so to is your average literary-comics offering going to appeal to a smaller audience as well. If Doane seriously argues otherwise, he's wrong -- but I don't recall offhand ever hearing him make such an argument.

As for the first part of the strawman argument that O'Brien places in Doane's mouth, that one &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; strike me as true. As evidence, allow me to cite a source already linked on this page: Brian Hibbs.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;It might also be worth noting that the combined volume of publishers #3-9 doesn’t even come close to matching the volume of Tokyopop alone. Viz and Tokyopop combined represent 486 of the 575 (85%) of all manga titles listed -- that’s up from 84% last year, and 83% from the year before. And if you look at it in terms of pieces it is even worse: 2 publishers represent 6.2 million pieces of 6.6 million for the category -- that’s 95%! And people say the Direct Market is lopsided!! Seriously folks, Marvel &amp;#38; DC have nothing on Viz and Tokyopop!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Finally, Marc-Oliver Frisch's point is well taken.
Which is to say: Superhero comics sell in regular bookstores the way that art comics sell in the Direct Market. Mainstream? I don't think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie - No, I don&#8217;t regularly see Fantagraphics sales numbers. On the other hand, I trust Eric Reynolds not to lie about such things.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I realize that I was insufficiently dismissive of Paul O&#8217;Brien in an above post. In the link he cites, Doane claims that Crumb, Ware, Clowes and the Hernandez Bros are mainstream, and while I suppose that a case could be made against the Hernandez Brothers &#8212; I&#8217;m not sure enough of their sales to say one way or the other &#8212; the other three artists named are inarguably mainstream artists. All have seen work sold in six-figure numbers (in the case of some of Crumb&#8217;s comics, seven-figure numbers). A documentary based upon Crumb&#8217;s life won an Oscar. Clowes&#8217; <i>Ghost World</i> was made into a well-received feature film that remains a staple in grocery-store rental kiosks, to say nothing of your local Blockbuster. If you know what <i>This American Life</i> is, you likely know who Chris Ware is, as well. (Going outside the lit set, I&#8217;d also include Jeff Smith, Frank Miller, Fred Gallagher and perhaps Stan Sakai as mainstream artists in the larger American sense.)</p>
<p>What <i>doesn&#8217;t</i> Doane say in the above-linked piece? That &#8220;literary/arthouse/indie comics are &#8216;the real mainstream&#8217;&#8221; <i>per se</i>. Just as your average British drawing-room comedy broadcast on PBS is not going to pull down the same kind of ratings as <i>Lost</i>, so to is your average literary-comics offering going to appeal to a smaller audience as well. If Doane seriously argues otherwise, he&#8217;s wrong &#8212; but I don&#8217;t recall offhand ever hearing him make such an argument.</p>
<p>As for the first part of the strawman argument that O&#8217;Brien places in Doane&#8217;s mouth, that one <i>does</i> strike me as true. As evidence, allow me to cite a source already linked on this page: Brian Hibbs.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;It might also be worth noting that the combined volume of publishers #3-9 doesn’t even come close to matching the volume of Tokyopop alone. Viz and Tokyopop combined represent 486 of the 575 (85%) of all manga titles listed &#8212; that’s up from 84% last year, and 83% from the year before. And if you look at it in terms of pieces it is even worse: 2 publishers represent 6.2 million pieces of 6.6 million for the category &#8212; that’s 95%! And people say the Direct Market is lopsided!! Seriously folks, Marvel &amp; DC have nothing on Viz and Tokyopop!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Finally, Marc-Oliver Frisch&#8217;s point is well taken.<br />
Which is to say: Superhero comics sell in regular bookstores the way that art comics sell in the Direct Market. Mainstream? I don&#8217;t think so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
