Comments on: Ming Doyle’s Lady Gotham

by: rich

Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:49:44 +0000

Mign writes:
“Batman’s mom is basically a character that canon forgot beyond guilty flashbacks …”

This is odd … couldn’t we say the same thing about Thomas Wayne?

I agree with Jason. Bruce’s parents don’t need to be developed beyond the guilty flashbacks — unless you’re taking the Batman Begins approach and explaining EVERYTHING in excrutiating detail.

by: RichardAK

Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:51:34 +0000

Wait, Martha Wayne was originally Martha Kane? Does that mean Batman and Batwoman are cousins?

by: Kirk Taylor

Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:06:16 +0000

Crazy good…Like Nell Brinkley meets the Bronte sisters, you should really find the opportunity to expanded on this. Also looked over Ming’s site, and urge others to do the same, her drawing is wonderful, imbued with a real personality, not just dead line.

by: Dean Trippe

Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:00:14 +0000

Ming Doyle is a hypertalent. Her stuff at Project: Rooftop has been fantastical.

by: David Bird

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:59:23 +0000

Its a good story. That’s reason enough to write it.

And there is far more to the site than this. Check it out.

by: mordicai

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:10:50 +0000

I’ve followed Ming’s blog for a little while now & it is ALL gold.

by: The Beat

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:54:25 +0000

Wait, are you saying that of all the kabillions of DC characters who have been turned into Green Lanterns or shot into the future, one should be sacrosanct?

I like it!

by: JasonEdwards

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:10:16 +0000

Really not a character that needs an angst-ridden backstory.
Or really any kind of backstory at all.

by: David Bird

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:44:48 +0000

Wow! What a great site!