<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: February sales slump</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Peter David</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1089198</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1089198</guid>
					<description>Back when I was in sales, January was always a lousy month, and February was always worse.  There was always a post-holidays slump.  Every year, same thing.  Then sales would typically start to turn around in the spring and go up and up through the summer, then drop in September, climb in October-December, and then begin the same cycle.  

So if sales are still dropping in March or April, that's a matter of concern or comment.  Otherwise it's pretty much the sales cycle that I remember.

PAD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when I was in sales, January was always a lousy month, and February was always worse.  There was always a post-holidays slump.  Every year, same thing.  Then sales would typically start to turn around in the spring and go up and up through the summer, then drop in September, climb in October-December, and then begin the same cycle.  </p>
<p>So if sales are still dropping in March or April, that&#8217;s a matter of concern or comment.  Otherwise it&#8217;s pretty much the sales cycle that I remember.</p>
<p>PAD
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1088941</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1088941</guid>
					<description>Being the arrogant braggart that I am, I will loudly and proudly say ITOLD YOU GUYS SO. I have been saying for the last few years on various message boards that the &quot;huge&quot; comic sales were MAINLY due to gimmicks and that the industry was heading for a crash. While the industry hasn't quite crashed yet, it is in a big slump.

I'm going to keep it real and tell you guys why comics from the Big 2 are falling in sales.

1. They are aiming their superhero books at 2 very narrow groups of readers, the existing and SHRINKING older teen/adult readers and the virtually non existent (and dare I say MYTHICAL) NEW older teen/adult readers. I said it before, and I'll say it again, the Big 2 should aim their interconnected DCU and MU titles at kids/all ages.

2. They are giving paying customers LESS for their $3 bucks. It's a damn shame that comics today are more expensive, but take less time to read or have less things happening in them then comics from 20-40 years ago.

3. The Big 2 are more concerned with selling and/or promoting/hyping up the creators of their comics then the actual characters they are writing.

4. They have a lack of racial diversity in their comics. They tend to either kill off,depower,cripple,toss into limbo,or turn them into villains many of the FEW non-white heroic characters they have.

5. They over expose and rely to much on their most POPULAR and well known characters by featuring them in multiple ongoing monthly series and mini series.

6. They hire writers and editors who rather see superhero comics be written as prime time dramas then superhero comics.

7. Natural attrition/sales decline. NUFF SAID.

8. The single issue format has to go and be replaced with a monthly magazine size anthology format that CONSISTENTLY features the same series in a line of monthly anthology magazines.  For example, ALL of the current monthly X-Books would be featured REGULARLY in a monthly X-MEN MAGAZINE.

9. Sad to say, but I think that the comic book company's may have to cease being comic book company's and reinvent themselves as animation company's and start putting out a line of monthly animated series on DVD. After all, animation is the next logical evolution for comics. Remember, comics replaced the pulp magazines, so it shouldn't come as a surprise if animation actually ends up replacing comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the arrogant braggart that I am, I will loudly and proudly say ITOLD YOU GUYS SO. I have been saying for the last few years on various message boards that the &#8220;huge&#8221; comic sales were MAINLY due to gimmicks and that the industry was heading for a crash. While the industry hasn&#8217;t quite crashed yet, it is in a big slump.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to keep it real and tell you guys why comics from the Big 2 are falling in sales.</p>
<p>1. They are aiming their superhero books at 2 very narrow groups of readers, the existing and SHRINKING older teen/adult readers and the virtually non existent (and dare I say MYTHICAL) NEW older teen/adult readers. I said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again, the Big 2 should aim their interconnected DCU and MU titles at kids/all ages.</p>
<p>2. They are giving paying customers LESS for their $3 bucks. It&#8217;s a damn shame that comics today are more expensive, but take less time to read or have less things happening in them then comics from 20-40 years ago.</p>
<p>3. The Big 2 are more concerned with selling and/or promoting/hyping up the creators of their comics then the actual characters they are writing.</p>
<p>4. They have a lack of racial diversity in their comics. They tend to either kill off,depower,cripple,toss into limbo,or turn them into villains many of the FEW non-white heroic characters they have.</p>
<p>5. They over expose and rely to much on their most POPULAR and well known characters by featuring them in multiple ongoing monthly series and mini series.</p>
<p>6. They hire writers and editors who rather see superhero comics be written as prime time dramas then superhero comics.</p>
<p>7. Natural attrition/sales decline. NUFF SAID.</p>
<p>8. The single issue format has to go and be replaced with a monthly magazine size anthology format that CONSISTENTLY features the same series in a line of monthly anthology magazines.  For example, ALL of the current monthly X-Books would be featured REGULARLY in a monthly X-MEN MAGAZINE.</p>
<p>9. Sad to say, but I think that the comic book company&#8217;s may have to cease being comic book company&#8217;s and reinvent themselves as animation company&#8217;s and start putting out a line of monthly animated series on DVD. After all, animation is the next logical evolution for comics. Remember, comics replaced the pulp magazines, so it shouldn&#8217;t come as a surprise if animation actually ends up replacing comics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086902</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086902</guid>
					<description>Why isn't this tagged &quot;Sales Charts&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t this tagged &#8220;Sales Charts&#8221;?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mar. 20, 2008: The etiquettes of dispute and fighting</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086822</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086822</guid>
					<description>[...] &amp;#8220;Which begs the question: Why?&amp;#8221; - Russ Maheras [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;Which begs the question: Why?&#8221; - Russ Maheras [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AERose</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086452</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086452</guid>
					<description>&quot;Interesting. We actually had a *fantastic* February at my shop, as compared to a merely very good one last year. Granted we carry games as well, but it was in periodical comics that we saw the most growth, with graphic novels and manga close behind.&quot;

Ah, but that speaks to how well you sold what you ordered, whereas the charts refer to how much you ordered. Not necessarily the same.

I choose to believe (because it amuses me to do so) that retailers are temporarily cutting back orders to conserve shelf space in preparation for the perfect storm of having to order a gazillion copies of Secret Invasion, Final Crisis, and all the tie ins at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Interesting. We actually had a *fantastic* February at my shop, as compared to a merely very good one last year. Granted we carry games as well, but it was in periodical comics that we saw the most growth, with graphic novels and manga close behind.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, but that speaks to how well you sold what you ordered, whereas the charts refer to how much you ordered. Not necessarily the same.</p>
<p>I choose to believe (because it amuses me to do so) that retailers are temporarily cutting back orders to conserve shelf space in preparation for the perfect storm of having to order a gazillion copies of Secret Invasion, Final Crisis, and all the tie ins at once.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Huxford</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086076</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1086076</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;To be fair, the “every event just blurs into the next” thing is more true of DC. Marvel have been doing event after event for years, but Civil War, World War Hulk and Secret Invasion can sensibly claim to be separate stories.&lt;/i&gt;

The Illuminati brought on Civil War, sent Hulk off the planet, and are responsible for the actions that appear to have brought the wrath of the Skrulls. All three are inextricably tied together. Not saying that is a bad thing, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To be fair, the “every event just blurs into the next” thing is more true of DC. Marvel have been doing event after event for years, but Civil War, World War Hulk and Secret Invasion can sensibly claim to be separate stories.</i></p>
<p>The Illuminati brought on Civil War, sent Hulk off the planet, and are responsible for the actions that appear to have brought the wrath of the Skrulls. All three are inextricably tied together. Not saying that is a bad thing, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randy Lander</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1085699</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1085699</guid>
					<description>Interesting. We actually had a *fantastic* February at my shop, as compared to a merely very good one last year. Granted we carry games as well, but it was in periodical comics that we saw the most growth, with graphic novels and manga close behind.

Maybe Austin hasn't been hit by the recession yet? Or maybe it's because we sell less DC Universe and more Marvel/Vertigo/Image/Dark Horse and indies to most of my customers, and thus the sad state of DC's affairs doesn't have as much impact on us.

One thing's for sure... Final Crisis better be %#%-king impressive, because DC readers have begun voting with their wallets since Countdown began.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. We actually had a *fantastic* February at my shop, as compared to a merely very good one last year. Granted we carry games as well, but it was in periodical comics that we saw the most growth, with graphic novels and manga close behind.</p>
<p>Maybe Austin hasn&#8217;t been hit by the recession yet? Or maybe it&#8217;s because we sell less DC Universe and more Marvel/Vertigo/Image/Dark Horse and indies to most of my customers, and thus the sad state of DC&#8217;s affairs doesn&#8217;t have as much impact on us.</p>
<p>One thing&#8217;s for sure&#8230; Final Crisis better be %#%-king impressive, because DC readers have begun voting with their wallets since Countdown began.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jake</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1085508</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1085508</guid>
					<description>DC's mistake was that they made a bad decision, and that decision turned out to be a HUGE committment. A year long one, in fact. And they tried to remedy it by adding tie-ins, but that worsened it. They tried to have ongoings make it better, but it worsened the ongoings. When the pieces they wanted in place, were, well, in place, it was too late to do anything. The mini (maxi?) was already bad.

I don't think it's DC saying FU to the newer fans. I don't think it's DC forgetting about its old time fans (c'mon, a series about Jimmy Olsen? Who else are they catering to?). I think DC made a mistake, and it was a costly (pun intended) one.

What do they do next? Right the ship, obviously. Let the ongoings rebuild a bit by letting nothing touch them. And that's done by making FC and Trinity separate beings.

Next, don't make the whole Universe streamlined into one storyline. That's done by getting a few other minis like Reign in Hell and the Rann/Thanagar one in there at the same time. Also, Trinity. And really, DiDio, make your promise (that this will be the last Crisis) stand.

Finally, do something about the delays. The rumor about DC and it's new art policy from LitG has yet to be confirmed, but we haven't seen any big delays recently. (Although, I guess I should still count the Action Annual.)

I think things will turn around, and Final Crisis might be the turning point. Don't get me wrong, I doubt DC catches Marvel. Marvel seems to have just too much going on, and I don't see DC's stuff generating as much buzz. And plus, Marvel marketing is sooooo much better. When was the last time a celeb endorsed a DC product?

Still, this next year should theoretically be better for DC. And in turn, better for the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC&#8217;s mistake was that they made a bad decision, and that decision turned out to be a HUGE committment. A year long one, in fact. And they tried to remedy it by adding tie-ins, but that worsened it. They tried to have ongoings make it better, but it worsened the ongoings. When the pieces they wanted in place, were, well, in place, it was too late to do anything. The mini (maxi?) was already bad.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s DC saying FU to the newer fans. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s DC forgetting about its old time fans (c&#8217;mon, a series about Jimmy Olsen? Who else are they catering to?). I think DC made a mistake, and it was a costly (pun intended) one.</p>
<p>What do they do next? Right the ship, obviously. Let the ongoings rebuild a bit by letting nothing touch them. And that&#8217;s done by making FC and Trinity separate beings.</p>
<p>Next, don&#8217;t make the whole Universe streamlined into one storyline. That&#8217;s done by getting a few other minis like Reign in Hell and the Rann/Thanagar one in there at the same time. Also, Trinity. And really, DiDio, make your promise (that this will be the last Crisis) stand.</p>
<p>Finally, do something about the delays. The rumor about DC and it&#8217;s new art policy from LitG has yet to be confirmed, but we haven&#8217;t seen any big delays recently. (Although, I guess I should still count the Action Annual.)</p>
<p>I think things will turn around, and Final Crisis might be the turning point. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I doubt DC catches Marvel. Marvel seems to have just too much going on, and I don&#8217;t see DC&#8217;s stuff generating as much buzz. And plus, Marvel marketing is sooooo much better. When was the last time a celeb endorsed a DC product?</p>
<p>Still, this next year should theoretically be better for DC. And in turn, better for the industry.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: R. Maheras</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1085328</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1085328</guid>
					<description>If the &quot;mega-event&quot; is supposedly the reason sales are not at a respectable levels right now, then I think it indicates that the basic readership pool for comics is too small. 

But if that isn't the case, then what it means is that the average story in the average comic book is not worth $3 to the average customer. 

Which begs the question: Why?

If my livelihood depended on comics, I'd sure be real nervous until I had the answer to that little conundrum. Because face it, what it seems to indicate is either, a.) Your comics are overpriced, or, b.) The average quality of the product is below customer expectations. 

But if the regular comic book readership pool is, in fact, too small (which I think it is), that might be an even tougher nut to crack -- especially under the current comics distribution system that is built upon two very fragile pillars: Comic book shops, and the non-returnability system.

The problem inherent with the first pillar is a Business 101 no-brainer: If the number of comic shops (distribution nodes) stops growing, or declines, it will negatively impact readership levels.

The second pillar also has an inherent problem. It only works in a market experiencing real, or perceived, growth. If growth stalls (or, more importantly, if it APPEARS to have stalled to the retailer ordering product each month), then the non-returnability system actually starts destroying itself through a vicious cycle of under-ordering.

Then again, the downturn in sales may be due entirely to the current economic recession. After all, whenever the economy tanks, luxury spending is one of the first things to suffer.

Regardless of what’s causing the sales slump, it doesn’t bode well for the comics industry if it continues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the &#8220;mega-event&#8221; is supposedly the reason sales are not at a respectable levels right now, then I think it indicates that the basic readership pool for comics is too small. </p>
<p>But if that isn&#8217;t the case, then what it means is that the average story in the average comic book is not worth $3 to the average customer. </p>
<p>Which begs the question: Why?</p>
<p>If my livelihood depended on comics, I&#8217;d sure be real nervous until I had the answer to that little conundrum. Because face it, what it seems to indicate is either, a.) Your comics are overpriced, or, b.) The average quality of the product is below customer expectations. </p>
<p>But if the regular comic book readership pool is, in fact, too small (which I think it is), that might be an even tougher nut to crack &#8212; especially under the current comics distribution system that is built upon two very fragile pillars: Comic book shops, and the non-returnability system.</p>
<p>The problem inherent with the first pillar is a Business 101 no-brainer: If the number of comic shops (distribution nodes) stops growing, or declines, it will negatively impact readership levels.</p>
<p>The second pillar also has an inherent problem. It only works in a market experiencing real, or perceived, growth. If growth stalls (or, more importantly, if it APPEARS to have stalled to the retailer ordering product each month), then the non-returnability system actually starts destroying itself through a vicious cycle of under-ordering.</p>
<p>Then again, the downturn in sales may be due entirely to the current economic recession. After all, whenever the economy tanks, luxury spending is one of the first things to suffer.</p>
<p>Regardless of what’s causing the sales slump, it doesn’t bode well for the comics industry if it continues.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Brisbois</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084866</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084866</guid>
					<description>I blame Reverend Jeremiah Wright.  As a pastor, he instructed God to stop blessing America and to start damning America.  And lo, America went into an instant nosedive.  That minister abused his terribly power over God, and now we all pay the price.  Comics slumping. Bridges cracking.  Levees busting.  Raisinets vanishing.  It's outrageous.  Imagine how nice life would be if not for that guy and his evil, God-steering powers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame Reverend Jeremiah Wright.  As a pastor, he instructed God to stop blessing America and to start damning America.  And lo, America went into an instant nosedive.  That minister abused his terribly power over God, and now we all pay the price.  Comics slumping. Bridges cracking.  Levees busting.  Raisinets vanishing.  It&#8217;s outrageous.  Imagine how nice life would be if not for that guy and his evil, God-steering powers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084735</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084735</guid>
					<description>To be fair, the &quot;every event just blurs into the next&quot; thing is more true of DC.  Marvel have been doing event after event for years, but Civil War, World War Hulk and Secret Invasion can sensibly claim to be separate stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, the &#8220;every event just blurs into the next&#8221; thing is more true of DC.  Marvel have been doing event after event for years, but Civil War, World War Hulk and Secret Invasion can sensibly claim to be separate stories.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: phil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084551</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084551</guid>
					<description>Hey I'm not going to buy either.  Like someone said above,  I'm worn out on the big event.  I kinda liked 52, but at that price point you can't 'kinda like' something.   Infinite Crisis and Countdown were utter crap (I dropped Countdown after 4 issues, realizing it just relied on  20 years of continuity.) and I the ending of Civil War left me with a 'why bother.'

I may pick these up if the buzz is really, really, really strong.  I'm not going to go by Patton Oswalt either.  All that comes to mind whenever he talks comics is that scene in 'The Comedians of Comedy'' where he kept on mispronouncing 'Ex Machina.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I&#8217;m not going to buy either.  Like someone said above,  I&#8217;m worn out on the big event.  I kinda liked 52, but at that price point you can&#8217;t &#8216;kinda like&#8217; something.   Infinite Crisis and Countdown were utter crap (I dropped Countdown after 4 issues, realizing it just relied on  20 years of continuity.) and I the ending of Civil War left me with a &#8216;why bother.&#8217;</p>
<p>I may pick these up if the buzz is really, really, really strong.  I&#8217;m not going to go by Patton Oswalt either.  All that comes to mind whenever he talks comics is that scene in &#8216;The Comedians of Comedy'&#8217; where he kept on mispronouncing &#8216;Ex Machina.&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084545</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084545</guid>
					<description>More importantly, all the events are just a *lead-in* to the next mega-event.  Now, it was cool when Marvel used to spin their multi-issue epic storylines (which they did until the crash), but they didn't try and sell any of those as THE MOST IMPORTANT THING SINCE SLICED BREAD.  Okay, they did a little, but in the age of the graphic novel, readers are expecting stories with satisfactory conclusions, and not just a bleed into another plotline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More importantly, all the events are just a *lead-in* to the next mega-event.  Now, it was cool when Marvel used to spin their multi-issue epic storylines (which they did until the crash), but they didn&#8217;t try and sell any of those as THE MOST IMPORTANT THING SINCE SLICED BREAD.  Okay, they did a little, but in the age of the graphic novel, readers are expecting stories with satisfactory conclusions, and not just a bleed into another plotline.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084309</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084309</guid>
					<description>The odd thing is, these mega-events no longer have a clearly defined conclusion.  It seems they just sort of blend and segue with the NEXT mega event.  And I'll second the yawn above ... More people are going to die and the Whatever Universe will never be the same.  Does anyone actually become excited anymore by these claims?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The odd thing is, these mega-events no longer have a clearly defined conclusion.  It seems they just sort of blend and segue with the NEXT mega event.  And I&#8217;ll second the yawn above &#8230; More people are going to die and the Whatever Universe will never be the same.  Does anyone actually become excited anymore by these claims?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roman Baggie</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084061</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084061</guid>
					<description>So it looks like DC should not bother putting out Final Crisis at all because  mega celebrity Patton Oswalt prefers Secret Invasion.

I should also not be worried about Marvel's sales in 2008.  If 2008 is not as good as 2007 for Marvel,  it will be the fault of DC because they are dragging the whole industry down with their shitty books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it looks like DC should not bother putting out Final Crisis at all because  mega celebrity Patton Oswalt prefers Secret Invasion.</p>
<p>I should also not be worried about Marvel&#8217;s sales in 2008.  If 2008 is not as good as 2007 for Marvel,  it will be the fault of DC because they are dragging the whole industry down with their shitty books.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084046</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1084046</guid>
					<description>Hmm, not quite what I was trying to say, Heidi...!  But it doesn't really make much sense to blame event fatigue for low sales in a month which was unusually light on &quot;events.&quot;

Occam's razor says that if you have unusually low sales in an unusually quiet month, that's probably the explanation right there.  Of course, there COULD be all sorts of other issues about the collapse of the economy and event fatigue and so forth, and if this becomes a general trend - in other words, if FINAL CRISIS and SECRET INVASION both tank - then we start looking at factors like that.

But for now, there's no reason to treat this as anything other than a blip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, not quite what I was trying to say, Heidi&#8230;!  But it doesn&#8217;t really make much sense to blame event fatigue for low sales in a month which was unusually light on &#8220;events.&#8221;</p>
<p>Occam&#8217;s razor says that if you have unusually low sales in an unusually quiet month, that&#8217;s probably the explanation right there.  Of course, there COULD be all sorts of other issues about the collapse of the economy and event fatigue and so forth, and if this becomes a general trend - in other words, if FINAL CRISIS and SECRET INVASION both tank - then we start looking at factors like that.</p>
<p>But for now, there&#8217;s no reason to treat this as anything other than a blip.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tone</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083938</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083938</guid>
					<description>The graphic novel is to blame for the dip, and will continue to do so...

The death of the graphic novel? Have you noticed as of late the sheer volume of new graphic novels and reprints of old newspaper strips collected in book form. Seems anybody who can get a hold of a printer can put out anything old reprint property out there. Alternative comics are one thing, but some of the sluggish stories or lack of stories just don’t cut it. Some alternative companies are gambling with some real bad choices of reprinted material. There was a time when there was very little to pick from when graphic novels came out.  Sure they are making oodles of money on them right now, for every good book coming out there will be another four that will gather dust on the shelves and the numbers will grow. Bargain bin anybody?

Manga, don’t get me going about that, there is so much rubbish out there and nobody says anything and why should they these books have replaced Harlequin books for young girls and many parents are not even aware of the content inside. Why ring the death knell?  This fast growing part in the book industry has shades of the comic boom in the 90’s. Case example, many collectors pay top buck for the Peanuts anthologies from Fantagraphics and a few months later they end up at Costco at bargain prices. Now everybody is flooding the market and these publishers don’t have a clue what’s going on. I am scared for the graphic novel, it is starting to lose a luster in my opinion. It will peak in two years and from there the numbers will dwindle, how many anthologies will commit to all the volumes they promise to print.

The graphic novel has saved the alternative imprints and exposed their stable of talent to the masses and given them also new venues for their artists for new freelance work. I see the signs already, there are books in the graphic novel section that are not moving. Many of these volumes start at a price of 20.00 and over 100.00, that is a fair chunk of change. Recession, that word will frighten many people from buying books such as these. Remains to be seen, but there are already graphic novels in bargain bins at the big box stores already. A rare site in the past. The more that end up there, the less stores will order in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graphic novel is to blame for the dip, and will continue to do so&#8230;</p>
<p>The death of the graphic novel? Have you noticed as of late the sheer volume of new graphic novels and reprints of old newspaper strips collected in book form. Seems anybody who can get a hold of a printer can put out anything old reprint property out there. Alternative comics are one thing, but some of the sluggish stories or lack of stories just don’t cut it. Some alternative companies are gambling with some real bad choices of reprinted material. There was a time when there was very little to pick from when graphic novels came out.  Sure they are making oodles of money on them right now, for every good book coming out there will be another four that will gather dust on the shelves and the numbers will grow. Bargain bin anybody?</p>
<p>Manga, don’t get me going about that, there is so much rubbish out there and nobody says anything and why should they these books have replaced Harlequin books for young girls and many parents are not even aware of the content inside. Why ring the death knell?  This fast growing part in the book industry has shades of the comic boom in the 90’s. Case example, many collectors pay top buck for the Peanuts anthologies from Fantagraphics and a few months later they end up at Costco at bargain prices. Now everybody is flooding the market and these publishers don’t have a clue what’s going on. I am scared for the graphic novel, it is starting to lose a luster in my opinion. It will peak in two years and from there the numbers will dwindle, how many anthologies will commit to all the volumes they promise to print.</p>
<p>The graphic novel has saved the alternative imprints and exposed their stable of talent to the masses and given them also new venues for their artists for new freelance work. I see the signs already, there are books in the graphic novel section that are not moving. Many of these volumes start at a price of 20.00 and over 100.00, that is a fair chunk of change. Recession, that word will frighten many people from buying books such as these. Remains to be seen, but there are already graphic novels in bargain bins at the big box stores already. A rare site in the past. The more that end up there, the less stores will order in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marcus Lusk</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083931</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083931</guid>
					<description>Just crossing my fingers once more that Quesada and Bendis turn out to be Skrulls...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just crossing my fingers once more that Quesada and Bendis turn out to be Skrulls&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083922</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083922</guid>
					<description>Ah and along comes Paul to point out that the problems is TOO FEW MEGA EVENTS, not too many!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah and along comes Paul to point out that the problems is TOO FEW MEGA EVENTS, not too many!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083908</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/february-sales-slump/#comment-1083908</guid>
					<description>Y'know, no matter how much they say it, I just don't believe that Secret Invasion is the big plan that's been set up for years. Maybe I'm just cynical, but I don't see the current Marvel regime as that forward-looking.

Oh, and more &quot;lots of deaths, tearing down the Marvel Universe, nothing will ever be the same.&quot; Yawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, no matter how much they say it, I just don&#8217;t believe that Secret Invasion is the big plan that&#8217;s been set up for years. Maybe I&#8217;m just cynical, but I don&#8217;t see the current Marvel regime as that forward-looking.</p>
<p>Oh, and more &#8220;lots of deaths, tearing down the Marvel Universe, nothing will ever be the same.&#8221; Yawn.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
