<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The damage is irreversible</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 11:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tag</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1089453</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1089453</guid>
					<description>Neat.  Haven't taken a trip to B'more in months; looks like it's getting nigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat.  Haven&#8217;t taken a trip to B&#8217;more in months; looks like it&#8217;s getting nigh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blair Marnell</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1085071</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1085071</guid>
					<description>Barks is the uncrowned king of comics, in my opinion.

I have the Carl Barks Library hardcovers that Another Rainbow put out years ago. They feature Barks' artwork in crisp black and white which made his pages even more impressive.

Mario, you may not like Barks' style, but he was far from a pedestrian artist. Occasionally Barks would get a chance to really cut loose (especially in his Uncle Scrooge stories) with half splash illustrations of lost cities of gold, stunning mountain ranges and even a spectacular shot of a dam bursting from water mixed with gold coins. Those are just the ones off the top of my head...

Barks abilities as a writer are also overlooked at times. His adventure stories were top notch. And as I recall, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg  
both cited Barks' work as influence for the boulder chase in Raiders of the Lost Ark.

I think the closest thing we have to a modern day Barks is Jeff Smith. I've always suspected that his unseen Boneville would greatly resemble Duckburg, money bin and all.

Though as far as Duck artists go, Don Rosa is pretty good too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barks is the uncrowned king of comics, in my opinion.</p>
<p>I have the Carl Barks Library hardcovers that Another Rainbow put out years ago. They feature Barks&#8217; artwork in crisp black and white which made his pages even more impressive.</p>
<p>Mario, you may not like Barks&#8217; style, but he was far from a pedestrian artist. Occasionally Barks would get a chance to really cut loose (especially in his Uncle Scrooge stories) with half splash illustrations of lost cities of gold, stunning mountain ranges and even a spectacular shot of a dam bursting from water mixed with gold coins. Those are just the ones off the top of my head&#8230;</p>
<p>Barks abilities as a writer are also overlooked at times. His adventure stories were top notch. And as I recall, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg<br />
both cited Barks&#8217; work as influence for the boulder chase in Raiders of the Lost Ark.</p>
<p>I think the closest thing we have to a modern day Barks is Jeff Smith. I&#8217;ve always suspected that his unseen Boneville would greatly resemble Duckburg, money bin and all.</p>
<p>Though as far as Duck artists go, Don Rosa is pretty good too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Pope</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084291</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084291</guid>
					<description>Glad Rich stayed on topic.  That's Magica De Spell's grandniece, by the way (if she was human, natch.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad Rich stayed on topic.  That&#8217;s Magica De Spell&#8217;s grandniece, by the way (if she was human, natch.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084265</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084265</guid>
					<description>Barks was terrific.

In the photo, whose the cutie in the green suspenders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barks was terrific.</p>
<p>In the photo, whose the cutie in the green suspenders?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Patrick McEvoy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084244</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084244</guid>
					<description>Wow - I've seen a lot of those oils in person, and I couldn't disagree more.  They are spectacular!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - I&#8217;ve seen a lot of those oils in person, and I couldn&#8217;t disagree more.  They are spectacular!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mario boon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084221</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084221</guid>
					<description>Well, I too never understood the perceived genius of Carl Barks' art. It's competently done but nothing spectacular. Has Barks ever drawn something not in the Disney style?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I too never understood the perceived genius of Carl Barks&#8217; art. It&#8217;s competently done but nothing spectacular. Has Barks ever drawn something not in the Disney style?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Pope</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084150</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1084150</guid>
					<description>The reviewer has the gall to say &quot;His stories aren't that different in tone or execution than most children's comics, and while he was an effective artist, he wasn't a great or distinctive draftsman.&quot;  Has this bozo ever READ any other children's comics?  Barks not a great draftsman?  What a moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviewer has the gall to say &#8220;His stories aren&#8217;t that different in tone or execution than most children&#8217;s comics, and while he was an effective artist, he wasn&#8217;t a great or distinctive draftsman.&#8221;  Has this bozo ever READ any other children&#8217;s comics?  Barks not a great draftsman?  What a moron.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chuck Fiala</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1083782</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/03/19/the-damage-is-irreversible/#comment-1083782</guid>
					<description>This is a very sad review. For the largest exhibition of Barks' work in the U.S.A. or perhaps anywhere after so many years of neglect, to get such a negative review, seems culturally criminal. 
The paintings in fact, are reflective of Barks' earlier style of the 40's and early 50's era. If they were painted in something closer to the Disney animation style, then they would look more like a Disney studio creation. That his eccentricities are present in his paintings, is certainly what we treasure about these works. How could the master's work, looking like the master's work be a bad thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very sad review. For the largest exhibition of Barks&#8217; work in the U.S.A. or perhaps anywhere after so many years of neglect, to get such a negative review, seems culturally criminal.<br />
The paintings in fact, are reflective of Barks&#8217; earlier style of the 40&#8217;s and early 50&#8217;s era. If they were painted in something closer to the Disney animation style, then they would look more like a Disney studio creation. That his eccentricities are present in his paintings, is certainly what we treasure about these works. How could the master&#8217;s work, looking like the master&#8217;s work be a bad thing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
