<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The SHOCKING TRUTH!!! &#8212; Updated</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tomer S</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1231500</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1231500</guid>
					<description>Surprisingly, &quot;Marvel_b0y&quot; disappeared the day before April Fool's Day (I thought he/she at least will be uncovered that day, by Marvel as they catch the &quot;mole&quot; or revealed as a failed marketing ploy) AND his/her last post wasn't about Marvel or comics at all. I think it was Michael Ian Black.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, &#8220;Marvel_b0y&#8221; disappeared the day before April Fool&#8217;s Day (I thought he/she at least will be uncovered that day, by Marvel as they catch the &#8220;mole&#8221; or revealed as a failed marketing ploy) AND his/her last post wasn&#8217;t about Marvel or comics at all. I think it was Michael Ian Black.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave Hudson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1179095</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1179095</guid>
					<description>“Marvel_b0y has been dealt with.&quot;

Dealt with like the Sopranos would deal with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Marvel_b0y has been dealt with.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dealt with like the Sopranos would deal with?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1176426</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1176426</guid>
					<description>I can believe it, especially since Rich Johnston spoiled it on Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can believe it, especially since Rich Johnston spoiled it on Monday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: groonk</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173506</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173506</guid>
					<description>who now?

i obviously lifted my finger from the pulse of myspace.

and i don't feel bad for it. not one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who now?</p>
<p>i obviously lifted my finger from the pulse of myspace.</p>
<p>and i don&#8217;t feel bad for it. not one bit.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul McEnery</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173284</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173284</guid>
					<description>So by &quot;teamed up with&quot; you mean &quot;bribed to subvert the whole social networking thing and waste everyone's time&quot;, I suppose. ;-)

Lovely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So by &#8220;teamed up with&#8221; you mean &#8220;bribed to subvert the whole social networking thing and waste everyone&#8217;s time&#8221;, I suppose. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Lovely.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kiel Phegley</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173163</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173163</guid>
					<description>Well, look at that! Jim McCann commenting on a blog! Will wonders never cease?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, look at that! Jim McCann commenting on a blog! Will wonders never cease?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Huxford</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173069</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1173069</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;But that lives Marvel_b0y out in the cold. A Marvel insider, speaking on conditions of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of fanboy panties, said that “Marvel_b0y has been dealt with. He’s not Kinsey’s brother.” Evidently a viral campaign that didn’t go quite as well as planned, this one can be chalked up to as flinging stuff against the wall. Some of it sticks, some doesn’t.&lt;/i&gt;

Wait...&quot;dealt with&quot; means they realized it was a shite marketing campaign or it means that it was a real transgressor that was caught and dealt with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But that lives Marvel_b0y out in the cold. A Marvel insider, speaking on conditions of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of fanboy panties, said that “Marvel_b0y has been dealt with. He’s not Kinsey’s brother.” Evidently a viral campaign that didn’t go quite as well as planned, this one can be chalked up to as flinging stuff against the wall. Some of it sticks, some doesn’t.</i></p>
<p>Wait&#8230;&#8221;dealt with&#8221; means they realized it was a shite marketing campaign or it means that it was a real transgressor that was caught and dealt with?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim McCann</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1172958</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1172958</guid>
					<description>&quot;Perhaps I’m misremembering — I seem to recall a Kevin Smith-written Daredevil issue 0. &quot;

While we have had some single comics on the web, this is our first orginal webcomic serialization that will run thru SECRET INVASION, not just a one-off issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Perhaps I’m misremembering — I seem to recall a Kevin Smith-written Daredevil issue 0. &#8221;</p>
<p>While we have had some single comics on the web, this is our first orginal webcomic serialization that will run thru SECRET INVASION, not just a one-off issue.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nat Gertler</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1172874</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1172874</guid>
					<description>&quot;Marvel’s first original webcomic&quot;

Perhaps I'm misremembering -- I seem to recall a Kevin Smith-written Daredevil issue 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Marvel’s first original webcomic&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m misremembering &#8212; I seem to recall a Kevin Smith-written Daredevil issue 0.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Moonlight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1172665</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/02/the-shocking-truth/#comment-1172665</guid>
					<description>&quot;speaking on conditions of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of fanboy panties&quot;

I love that. Did you coin it? We should all start using it... chanting it at conventions, when people are being to uptight. This makes me happy. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;speaking on conditions of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of fanboy panties&#8221;</p>
<p>I love that. Did you coin it? We should all start using it&#8230; chanting it at conventions, when people are being to uptight. This makes me happy. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
