<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New hot topic: TITANS #1</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: e-haldex</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-2054813</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-2054813</guid>
					<description>Hi. New site to search. Pls help me test it. 
Thanks. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://e-haldex.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Search tramadol&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. New site to search. Pls help me test it.<br />
Thanks.<br />
<a href="http://e-haldex.com" rel="nofollow">Search tramadol</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: darvenginzks</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-2037594</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-2037594</guid>
					<description>I've recently joined and wanted to introduce myself :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently joined and wanted to introduce myself <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: neksFeeldinna</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1964211</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1964211</guid>
					<description>http://www.hairstylestop.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/angelina-jolie-hairstyle.jpg 
Even Angelina Jolie can have a bad hair day! Angelina Jolie is seen here attending the 23rd Annual Independent Spirit awards in Feb 2008, her hair is completely all over the place, there is no style to it and literally looks like she just woke up! With 4 kids and 2 more on the way who can blame her! 
 
Welcome to the Hairstyles Top. Here you will find the latest top hair style pictures, and advice for new hairstyles: curly hairstyles, teen hairstyles, short hairstyles and formal hairstyles, etc. Lots of celebrity haircuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.hairstylestop.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/angelina-jolie-hairstyle.jpg' rel='nofollow'>http://www.hairstylestop.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/angelina-jolie-hairstyle.jpg</a><br />
Even Angelina Jolie can have a bad hair day! Angelina Jolie is seen here attending the 23rd Annual Independent Spirit awards in Feb 2008, her hair is completely all over the place, there is no style to it and literally looks like she just woke up! With 4 kids and 2 more on the way who can blame her! </p>
<p>Welcome to the Hairstyles Top. Here you will find the latest top hair style pictures, and advice for new hairstyles: curly hairstyles, teen hairstyles, short hairstyles and formal hairstyles, etc. Lots of celebrity haircuts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CanoSpinach</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1931452</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1931452</guid>
					<description>New poster here!

Great site.

I am just now poking around and looking at everything.

I have to say i appreciate the opportunity to share and post feedback here.

Thanks, best of luck moving forward.

CanoSpinach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New poster here!</p>
<p>Great site.</p>
<p>I am just now poking around and looking at everything.</p>
<p>I have to say i appreciate the opportunity to share and post feedback here.</p>
<p>Thanks, best of luck moving forward.</p>
<p>CanoSpinach
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Neopresent-new</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1919263</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1919263</guid>
					<description>Good day to all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day to all
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kityethipsy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1849941</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1849941</guid>
					<description>Bring out yer dead. Mark your calendars of doom in ominous blood-red scrawl, for today is the day that American software beast Microsoft Corp. chopped the retail head off its stalwart XP operating system and held aloft (the still unpopular) Windows Vista as its now unavoidable successor. 
If the post made in the wrong section, please move</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring out yer dead. Mark your calendars of doom in ominous blood-red scrawl, for today is the day that American software beast Microsoft Corp. chopped the retail head off its stalwart XP operating system and held aloft (the still unpopular) Windows Vista as its now unavoidable successor.<br />
If the post made in the wrong section, please move
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marionette</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1302903</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1302903</guid>
					<description>Two Titans books?

Try four.  You are forgetting Teen Titans Go! and Tiny Titans.  And Teen Titans Year One.  So maybe four and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Titans books?</p>
<p>Try four.  You are forgetting Teen Titans Go! and Tiny Titans.  And Teen Titans Year One.  So maybe four and a half.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fanboy Menace</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1272250</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1272250</guid>
					<description>Why are there two titans books?  First its Titans and Young Justice, then Teen Titans, and now Titans and Teen Titans?  I don't think DC knows what to do with these books and characters.  They had a really strong potential audience from the very popular cartoon series, but I think they pretty much squandered the opportunity to tap into it because they were trying to keep the traditional fans happy too.  It's a bit of a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are there two titans books?  First its Titans and Young Justice, then Teen Titans, and now Titans and Teen Titans?  I don&#8217;t think DC knows what to do with these books and characters.  They had a really strong potential audience from the very popular cartoon series, but I think they pretty much squandered the opportunity to tap into it because they were trying to keep the traditional fans happy too.  It&#8217;s a bit of a mess.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270920</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270920</guid>
					<description>morale of the story: if you read the boards over there, you get what you deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>morale of the story: if you read the boards over there, you get what you deserve.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270421</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270421</guid>
					<description>Still, name calling isn't very nice... whether you are an individual posting on a message board or someone revealing their thoughts on their own personal blog.

So be careful... what you condemn, you may one day become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, name calling isn&#8217;t very nice&#8230; whether you are an individual posting on a message board or someone revealing their thoughts on their own personal blog.</p>
<p>So be careful&#8230; what you condemn, you may one day become.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270269</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270269</guid>
					<description>Val is pretty! :)


OMG!  Rachel's blog and all the poster comments for it is one of the funniest things I've ever read!! lol! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Val is pretty! <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>OMG!  Rachel&#8217;s blog and all the poster comments for it is one of the funniest things I&#8217;ve ever read!! lol! <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270170</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270170</guid>
					<description>I read the Titans thread on Newsarama and I believe the comments criticizing Mr Brady were misunderstood. 

We all know some people can be rude and abrasive, especially those who passionately post on message boards so no one is questioning his right to warn people or ban them. 

The implication was that it might be more appropriate to do so through private messages -- to avoid drama -- but Mr Brady does so on the thread itself, often engaging in lengthy, theatrical-ensuing spats with the antagonist which makes a spectacle of both.

It becomes entertainment for everyone else reading the thread, derailing it further from the topic. It gets quite petty and dirty: the antagonist becomes more nasty and defensive and the moderator, without realizing it, stoops down to their level, making himself look unprofessional by fighting with someone on a public forum who probably isn't worth the effort. It makes everyone look 'silly'.

Warn people and/or ban them but do so privately to spare everyone the drama, unless of course, drama is the intent.

On a side, I found it kind of ironic that the dispute occured over possible name calling yet on someone else's blog, in defense of Mr Brady, the blogger continuously refers to rude message board people as trolls -- last I remember, calling someone a troll is exactly name calling. Whether right or wrong, calling someone -- anyone a troll doesn't exactly make the person shouting it appear any prettier.


So does that mean calling someone a troll is ok but only when justified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the Titans thread on Newsarama and I believe the comments criticizing Mr Brady were misunderstood. </p>
<p>We all know some people can be rude and abrasive, especially those who passionately post on message boards so no one is questioning his right to warn people or ban them. </p>
<p>The implication was that it might be more appropriate to do so through private messages &#8212; to avoid drama &#8212; but Mr Brady does so on the thread itself, often engaging in lengthy, theatrical-ensuing spats with the antagonist which makes a spectacle of both.</p>
<p>It becomes entertainment for everyone else reading the thread, derailing it further from the topic. It gets quite petty and dirty: the antagonist becomes more nasty and defensive and the moderator, without realizing it, stoops down to their level, making himself look unprofessional by fighting with someone on a public forum who probably isn&#8217;t worth the effort. It makes everyone look &#8217;silly&#8217;.</p>
<p>Warn people and/or ban them but do so privately to spare everyone the drama, unless of course, drama is the intent.</p>
<p>On a side, I found it kind of ironic that the dispute occured over possible name calling yet on someone else&#8217;s blog, in defense of Mr Brady, the blogger continuously refers to rude message board people as trolls &#8212; last I remember, calling someone a troll is exactly name calling. Whether right or wrong, calling someone &#8212; anyone a troll doesn&#8217;t exactly make the person shouting it appear any prettier.</p>
<p>So does that mean calling someone a troll is ok but only when justified?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270167</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1270167</guid>
					<description>I read the Titans thread on Newsarama and I believe the comments criticizing Mr Brady were misunderstood. 

We all know some people can be rude and abrasive, especially those who passionately post on message boards so no one is questioning his right to warn people or ban them. 

The implication was that it might be more appropriate to do so through private messages -- to avoid drama -- but Mr Brady does so on the thread itself, often engaging in lengthy, theatrical-ensuing spats with the antagonist which makes a spectacle of both.

It becomes entertainment for everyone else reading the thread, derailing it further from the topic. It gets quite petty and dirty: the antagonist becomes more nasty and defensive and the moderator, without realizing it, stoops down to their level, making himself look unprofessional by fighting with someone on a public forum who probably isn't worth the effort. It makes everyone look 'silly'.

Warn people and/or ban them but do so privately to spare everyone the drama, unless of course, drama is the intent.

On a side, I found it kind of ironic that the dispute occured over possible name calling yet on someone else's blog, in defense of Mr Brady, the blogger continuously refers to rude message board people as trolls -- last I remember, calling someone a troll is exactly name calling. Whether right or wrong, calling someone -- anyone a troll doesn't exactly make the person shouting it appear any prettier.


So does that mean calling someone a troll is ok but only when justified?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the Titans thread on Newsarama and I believe the comments criticizing Mr Brady were misunderstood. </p>
<p>We all know some people can be rude and abrasive, especially those who passionately post on message boards so no one is questioning his right to warn people or ban them. </p>
<p>The implication was that it might be more appropriate to do so through private messages &#8212; to avoid drama &#8212; but Mr Brady does so on the thread itself, often engaging in lengthy, theatrical-ensuing spats with the antagonist which makes a spectacle of both.</p>
<p>It becomes entertainment for everyone else reading the thread, derailing it further from the topic. It gets quite petty and dirty: the antagonist becomes more nasty and defensive and the moderator, without realizing it, stoops down to their level, making himself look unprofessional by fighting with someone on a public forum who probably isn&#8217;t worth the effort. It makes everyone look &#8217;silly&#8217;.</p>
<p>Warn people and/or ban them but do so privately to spare everyone the drama, unless of course, drama is the intent.</p>
<p>On a side, I found it kind of ironic that the dispute occured over possible name calling yet on someone else&#8217;s blog, in defense of Mr Brady, the blogger continuously refers to rude message board people as trolls &#8212; last I remember, calling someone a troll is exactly name calling. Whether right or wrong, calling someone &#8212; anyone a troll doesn&#8217;t exactly make the person shouting it appear any prettier.</p>
<p>So does that mean calling someone a troll is ok but only when justified?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BradyDale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1269107</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1269107</guid>
					<description>WILD DOG was one of the formative comics of my young years. I remember worrying that my mom would catch me reading it. It was my first really violent comic. Man. Every time I see WILD DOG in my collection, it gives me this charge of nostalgia. It really did hit at just that moment for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WILD DOG was one of the formative comics of my young years. I remember worrying that my mom would catch me reading it. It was my first really violent comic. Man. Every time I see WILD DOG in my collection, it gives me this charge of nostalgia. It really did hit at just that moment for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Don MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1267358</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1267358</guid>
					<description>Mozzocco forgets that Wild Dog was a regular feature in &lt;I&gt;Action Comics Weekly&lt;/I&gt; during its relatively short run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mozzocco forgets that Wild Dog was a regular feature in <I>Action Comics Weekly</I> during its relatively short run.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1267270</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/new-hot-topic-titans1/#comment-1267270</guid>
					<description>I kinda liked the cover of Titans #1.  Does that count?

As for Booster Gold, I never thought it'd be on my pull list but now it's usually one of the first couple books I read.  I just hope it stays consistent after the creative team changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda liked the cover of Titans #1.  Does that count?</p>
<p>As for Booster Gold, I never thought it&#8217;d be on my pull list but now it&#8217;s usually one of the first couple books I read.  I just hope it stays consistent after the creative team changes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
