<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORPHAN WORKS dos and don&#8217;ts</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Orphan works overkill?</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1618930</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1618930</guid>
					<description>[...] Since this is a pressing IP issue that has engaged both the animation and comics communities, let&amp;#8217;s set aside our Siegel series for a moment to determine whether artists concerned about this issue are indeed over-reacting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Since this is a pressing IP issue that has engaged both the animation and comics communities, let&#8217;s set aside our Siegel series for a moment to determine whether artists concerned about this issue are indeed over-reacting. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mitch Berger</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1344679</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1344679</guid>
					<description>Whenever a copyright law is to be made or altered, then the idiots assemble.
- Mark Twain's Notebook, 1902-1903

As a lawyer who has worked on some copyright issues over the years (I am by no means an expert) I think anyone who is concerned about copyright protection in the U.S. should read the report by the Registrar of Copyrights @

 http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report.pdf

There is a summary of the report here:

http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html

You can see the video transcript of the most recent hearing (March 13) in the House of Representatives here:

http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=427

You can see what the American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP) has to say about it here:

http://www.asmp.org/news/spec2006/orphan_update.php

While the law has a legitimate purpose (to free up the use of untraceable historic works) the protections afforded authors (it denies them the right to attorney’s fees otherwise provided in every other instance of copyright infringement) is insufficient.  It has been my experience, that the fact the copyright law has a mandatory attorney fee component, often hastens settlement of an infringed upon author’s claim.  

I am also concerned about how “diligent” a copyright user has to be in searching for an author of a work.  See the link below about the millions in unpaid royalties that record companies did not pay because they “could not find” such “unknowns” as David Bowie, Dolly Parton, Harry Belafonte, Liza Minnelli, Dave Matthews, Sean Combs and Gloria Estefan:

http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/may/may4a_04.html


Mitch Berger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever a copyright law is to be made or altered, then the idiots assemble.<br />
- Mark Twain&#8217;s Notebook, 1902-1903</p>
<p>As a lawyer who has worked on some copyright issues over the years (I am by no means an expert) I think anyone who is concerned about copyright protection in the U.S. should read the report by the Registrar of Copyrights @</p>
<p> <a href='http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report.pdf' rel='nofollow'>http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report.pdf</a></p>
<p>There is a summary of the report here:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html</a></p>
<p>You can see the video transcript of the most recent hearing (March 13) in the House of Representatives here:</p>
<p><a href='http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=427' rel='nofollow'>http://judiciary.house.gov/oversight.aspx?ID=427</a></p>
<p>You can see what the American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP) has to say about it here:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.asmp.org/news/spec2006/orphan_update.php' rel='nofollow'>http://www.asmp.org/news/spec2006/orphan_update.php</a></p>
<p>While the law has a legitimate purpose (to free up the use of untraceable historic works) the protections afforded authors (it denies them the right to attorney’s fees otherwise provided in every other instance of copyright infringement) is insufficient.  It has been my experience, that the fact the copyright law has a mandatory attorney fee component, often hastens settlement of an infringed upon author’s claim.  </p>
<p>I am also concerned about how “diligent” a copyright user has to be in searching for an author of a work.  See the link below about the millions in unpaid royalties that record companies did not pay because they “could not find” such “unknowns” as David Bowie, Dolly Parton, Harry Belafonte, Liza Minnelli, Dave Matthews, Sean Combs and Gloria Estefan:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/may/may4a_04.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/may/may4a_04.html</a></p>
<p>Mitch Berger
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: orange</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1311789</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1311789</guid>
					<description>That's interesting, in regard to the Crystal Castles manager denying they used the art on the cd when the artist demanded money for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, in regard to the Crystal Castles manager denying they used the art on the cd when the artist demanded money for it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: orange</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1311784</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1311784</guid>
					<description>That's interesting, in regard to the Crystal Castles manager denying they used the art on the cd when the artist demanded money for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, in regard to the Crystal Castles manager denying they used the art on the cd when the artist demanded money for it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1301910</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1301910</guid>
					<description>Oh, and the black -eyed Madonna image is used in the artwork inside the CD and credited to Trevor Brown.  Another violation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the black -eyed Madonna image is used in the artwork inside the CD and credited to Trevor Brown.  Another violation?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293853</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293853</guid>
					<description>...no such thing as bad publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;no such thing as bad publicity.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Orphan Copyrights &#124; Briefs on the Outside</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293839</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293839</guid>
					<description>[...] For a further reading and a few other perspectives on this: The Beat Radio Free Meredith Blog@Newsarama Copyright Office study about orphan works Public Knowlege (including a copy of the bill) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For a further reading and a few other perspectives on this: The Beat Radio Free Meredith Blog@Newsarama Copyright Office study about orphan works Public Knowlege (including a copy of the bill) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293606</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293606</guid>
					<description>Well, I bought the Crystal Castles CD yesterday.  So... there ya go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I bought the Crystal Castles CD yesterday.  So&#8230; there ya go.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1285611</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1285611</guid>
					<description>Where was it written that the artist gave permission? It was found on a flyer and then used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was it written that the artist gave permission? It was found on a flyer and then used.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1279702</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1279702</guid>
					<description>it sure looks the band's real myspace page... and they're still using the image, for the song Alice Practice

http://www.myspace.com/crystalcastles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it sure looks the band&#8217;s real myspace page&#8230; and they&#8217;re still using the image, for the song Alice Practice</p>
<p><a href='http://www.myspace.com/crystalcastles' rel='nofollow'>http://www.myspace.com/crystalcastles</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1279538</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1279538</guid>
					<description>(unless the myspace page isn't really theirs, of course.  There's several James Kochalkas on myspace that aren't really me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(unless the myspace page isn&#8217;t really theirs, of course.  There&#8217;s several James Kochalkas on myspace that aren&#8217;t really me).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1279529</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1279529</guid>
					<description>&quot;It seems to be the band’s manager who is being more of an ass, not the band members themselves.&quot;

Well, a manager works for the band.  If he's an ass, that means they're paying him to be an ass on their behalf.  Wouldn't that make them asses too?

&quot;The band stopped using the image when the artist asked them to.&quot;  

Simply not true!  I checked their myspace page yesterday, they're still using the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems to be the band’s manager who is being more of an ass, not the band members themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, a manager works for the band.  If he&#8217;s an ass, that means they&#8217;re paying him to be an ass on their behalf.  Wouldn&#8217;t that make them asses too?</p>
<p>&#8220;The band stopped using the image when the artist asked them to.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Simply not true!  I checked their myspace page yesterday, they&#8217;re still using the image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: !!!</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1278980</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1278980</guid>
					<description>The band had the artist's permission in 2006. The band stopped using the image when the artist asked them to.

The band was ripped off by Timbaland and I don't see them complaining.

Look up &quot;Crystal Castles 50 Cent&quot; on youtube for more on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The band had the artist&#8217;s permission in 2006. The band stopped using the image when the artist asked them to.</p>
<p>The band was ripped off by Timbaland and I don&#8217;t see them complaining.</p>
<p>Look up &#8220;Crystal Castles 50 Cent&#8221; on youtube for more on this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277698</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277698</guid>
					<description>Reading the various accounts, what seems to have happened is  that they found the image on a flyer, had no idea where it was from and decided to use it. Now that was not good, but considering the &quot;found&quot; nature of the original image, sort of in the same spirit. When the image's creator WAS found that's when everyone shoud have sat down and been grown ups. It seems to be the band's manager who is being more of an ass, not the band members themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the various accounts, what seems to have happened is  that they found the image on a flyer, had no idea where it was from and decided to use it. Now that was not good, but considering the &#8220;found&#8221; nature of the original image, sort of in the same spirit. When the image&#8217;s creator WAS found that&#8217;s when everyone shoud have sat down and been grown ups. It seems to be the band&#8217;s manager who is being more of an ass, not the band members themselves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277524</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277524</guid>
					<description>In the &quot;other side of the story&quot; did they still use the image without first getting permission?  Because they need to ask permission before using it, not after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the &#8220;other side of the story&#8221; did they still use the image without first getting permission?  Because they need to ask permission before using it, not after.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277536</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277536</guid>
					<description>It doesn't matter that he's a raving pedophile lunatic. They took his work without permission (album cover and shirts) and did not pay him. What would be the other side of the story? They should have sought him out and asked permission first. If he had said no then they would have had to move on. It's quite simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter that he&#8217;s a raving pedophile lunatic. They took his work without permission (album cover and shirts) and did not pay him. What would be the other side of the story? They should have sought him out and asked permission first. If he had said no then they would have had to move on. It&#8217;s quite simple.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: peach</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277337</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277337</guid>
					<description>Doy! Why would you believe the rantings of Trevor Brown who is a raving pedophile lunatic? But thanks. Have you ever heard of a thing called the other side of the story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doy! Why would you believe the rantings of Trevor Brown who is a raving pedophile lunatic? But thanks. Have you ever heard of a thing called the other side of the story?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277072</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1277072</guid>
					<description>&quot;peach&quot; read this and then read into the story a little more: http://comics212.net/2008/04/13/long-story-short-band-steals-from-illustrator-doesnt-seem-to-care/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;peach&#8221; read this and then read into the story a little more: <a href='http://comics212.net/2008/04/13/long-story-short-band-steals-from-illustrator-doesnt-seem-to-care/' rel='nofollow'>http://comics212.net/2008/04/13/long-story-short-band-steals-from-illustrator-doesnt-seem-to-care/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Kochalka</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1272439</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1272439</guid>
					<description>Man, Crystal Castles are either jerks or idiots.  Why would they possibly think they could use another artists' work without permission?  Either they're just completely ignorant of the law, or they're incredibly arrogant and self centered.  Probably both.

Music critics praise them as some kind of incredibly innovative geniuses... but those music critics simply must be unaware of the chiptunes scene.  I think they're pretty good, but literally hundreds of musicians have been making this kind of music for about a decade already!

http://the-inbetween.com/2008/03/16/crystal-castles-vs-chiptunes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, Crystal Castles are either jerks or idiots.  Why would they possibly think they could use another artists&#8217; work without permission?  Either they&#8217;re just completely ignorant of the law, or they&#8217;re incredibly arrogant and self centered.  Probably both.</p>
<p>Music critics praise them as some kind of incredibly innovative geniuses&#8230; but those music critics simply must be unaware of the chiptunes scene.  I think they&#8217;re pretty good, but literally hundreds of musicians have been making this kind of music for about a decade already!</p>
<p><a href='http://the-inbetween.com/2008/03/16/crystal-castles-vs-chiptunes/' rel='nofollow'>http://the-inbetween.com/2008/03/16/crystal-castles-vs-chiptunes/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: peach</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1271804</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/04/14/orphan-works-dos-and-donts/#comment-1271804</guid>
					<description>Read into the story a little more, &quot;Peter.&quot;
Trevor Brown had his chance to get paid but he's a stubborn little child pornographer.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read into the story a little more, &#8220;Peter.&#8221;<br />
Trevor Brown had his chance to get paid but he&#8217;s a stubborn little child pornographer&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
