<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Month-to-Month Sales: March 2008</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 14:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Twatslolz</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1536057</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1536057</guid>
					<description>Worhtless brainless Marvel Zombies wouldn't know quality from crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worhtless brainless Marvel Zombies wouldn&#8217;t know quality from crap.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foot2Mouth - A Mouth Kicking Comics and Gaming News Source &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Modest Proposal for ‘In-Trouble’ Books and Their Fans</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1477148</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1477148</guid>
					<description>[...] Its sales figures however, do not reflect this. It still lags behind books that are not as strong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Its sales figures however, do not reflect this. It still lags behind books that are not as strong. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Foot2Mouth - A Mouth Kicking Comics and Gaming News Source &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Modest Proposal for ‘In-Trouble’ Books and Their Fans</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1477140</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1477140</guid>
					<description>[...] Its sales figures however, do not reflect this. It still lags behind books that are not as strong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Its sales figures however, do not reflect this. It still lags behind books that are not as strong. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DeTroyes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1462334</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 03:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1462334</guid>
					<description>&amp;#62;79 - DC SPECIAL: RAVEN
&amp;#62;03/2008: Raven #1 of 5 — 24,535
&amp;#62;
&amp;#62;That’s a predictably poor number for a Teen Titans spin-off, given that 
&amp;#62;the mother title itself has been in a rather stiff decline over the past year. 
&amp;#62;Nonetheless, a second ongoing title debuted in April, with two more 
&amp;#62;spin-off limited series following in May and September. Someone at DC 
&amp;#62;thinks we need more Teen Titans comics.

A couple of things to point out.

1) This title came out more than 1 1/2 years late.  It was originally announced for a fall of 2006 release (when it may actually have been able to capitlize on TT's then popularity), but due to &quot;artistic delays&quot;, it didn't come out until this spring.  This delay along with the title's horrible art (clearly not worth the extra time spent getting it out) have meant that this mini series was practically scuttled before the first issue was even released.

2) Nevertheless, sales on Teen Titans, while not what they once were, still place it toward the top of DC's roster.  And sales on Teen Titans Year One are still much better than most mini series.  (Still too early to know what sales are for Titans, but anecdotal evidence suggests the first issue didn't too badly at the stores).  Therefore, I wouldn't say its completely without merit that DC thinks that there is a demand for Titans related spinoffs.  While the Raven mini's numbers are pretty bad, there are reasons why it may not be a good indicator of demand (or lack thereof) for Titans-related books.  It'll be more interesting to see how Cyborg and Terror Titans do; I suspect they'll be much better received than Raven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;79 - DC SPECIAL: RAVEN<br />
&gt;03/2008: Raven #1 of 5 — 24,535<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;That’s a predictably poor number for a Teen Titans spin-off, given that<br />
&gt;the mother title itself has been in a rather stiff decline over the past year.<br />
&gt;Nonetheless, a second ongoing title debuted in April, with two more<br />
&gt;spin-off limited series following in May and September. Someone at DC<br />
&gt;thinks we need more Teen Titans comics.</p>
<p>A couple of things to point out.</p>
<p>1) This title came out more than 1 1/2 years late.  It was originally announced for a fall of 2006 release (when it may actually have been able to capitlize on TT&#8217;s then popularity), but due to &#8220;artistic delays&#8221;, it didn&#8217;t come out until this spring.  This delay along with the title&#8217;s horrible art (clearly not worth the extra time spent getting it out) have meant that this mini series was practically scuttled before the first issue was even released.</p>
<p>2) Nevertheless, sales on Teen Titans, while not what they once were, still place it toward the top of DC&#8217;s roster.  And sales on Teen Titans Year One are still much better than most mini series.  (Still too early to know what sales are for Titans, but anecdotal evidence suggests the first issue didn&#8217;t too badly at the stores).  Therefore, I wouldn&#8217;t say its completely without merit that DC thinks that there is a demand for Titans related spinoffs.  While the Raven mini&#8217;s numbers are pretty bad, there are reasons why it may not be a good indicator of demand (or lack thereof) for Titans-related books.  It&#8217;ll be more interesting to see how Cyborg and Terror Titans do; I suspect they&#8217;ll be much better received than Raven.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dru</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1461400</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1461400</guid>
					<description>If you liked those Booster Gold crossovers, get ready for Booster Gold #1,000,000, coming in July!

On mass-market sales, I happened to be in a couple of different grocery stores this week, and curiosity led me to check out their comics. Between the three stores I was at, you could get Superman Confidential, Superman, and Action Comics, as well as a smattering of Star Wars and Spider-Man titles. On the DC side, I saw nothing but Superman. I just wonder if anyone else has seen what's for sale in their areas. I know Borders, Barnes and Noble, etc. have better selections than that.
And I should note I'm not in the Southwest; maybe Blue Beetle is on sale in every 7-11 and Winn-Dixie from Fort Worth to Phoenix. I have heard people say Blue Beetle's getting its sales from the mass market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you liked those Booster Gold crossovers, get ready for Booster Gold #1,000,000, coming in July!</p>
<p>On mass-market sales, I happened to be in a couple of different grocery stores this week, and curiosity led me to check out their comics. Between the three stores I was at, you could get Superman Confidential, Superman, and Action Comics, as well as a smattering of Star Wars and Spider-Man titles. On the DC side, I saw nothing but Superman. I just wonder if anyone else has seen what&#8217;s for sale in their areas. I know Borders, Barnes and Noble, etc. have better selections than that.<br />
And I should note I&#8217;m not in the Southwest; maybe Blue Beetle is on sale in every 7-11 and Winn-Dixie from Fort Worth to Phoenix. I have heard people say Blue Beetle&#8217;s getting its sales from the mass market.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Moore</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1448586</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1448586</guid>
					<description>Will a Catwoman title EVER reach #100?

This is the second time that DC has cancelled it with it being SO CLOSE.

And yet stuff below it keeps going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will a Catwoman title EVER reach #100?</p>
<p>This is the second time that DC has cancelled it with it being SO CLOSE.</p>
<p>And yet stuff below it keeps going.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1448101</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1448101</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m looking for the new movie and the RIP storyline to be a real shot in the arm for DC this summer.&lt;/i&gt;

Did Batman Begins have the effect on comic sales you're expecting from The Dark Knight?  I'd bet not.  DC just needs to make sure Final Crisis and its tie-ins keep them on a high through the summer.  If it disappoints the way Countdown did, although I doubt that will be the case, they could face some tough months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m looking for the new movie and the RIP storyline to be a real shot in the arm for DC this summer.</i></p>
<p>Did Batman Begins have the effect on comic sales you&#8217;re expecting from The Dark Knight?  I&#8217;d bet not.  DC just needs to make sure Final Crisis and its tie-ins keep them on a high through the summer.  If it disappoints the way Countdown did, although I doubt that will be the case, they could face some tough months.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SocraticBass</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1445992</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1445992</guid>
					<description>It seems like GA/BC is a bit more than just a &quot;shaky&quot; relaunch given the hype of the wedding issues (fake-out) and the idea behind immortalizing a legendary comic book relationship into a joint title. It's selling at or below the pre-relaunch numbers, in spite of adding BC. The title's not benefiting from the incredible exposure the character is getting from Smallville, nor from the massive advertising heaped on it's arrival last summer.

I wouldn't catergorize it as &quot;dismal failure&quot; just yet, but it certainly would fit in the failure category in that it was one of many horses that got backed last year which didn't finish where it should have. The aimlessness of April's issue will likely further impact sales next month.

While none of that was surprising, I was surprised to see Wonder Woman decline with a Green Lantern tie-in plot point, and coming off a really nice preceeding arc. Reviews of Nightwing have also been very positive of late, it was also interesting to see a small decline there.

I'm looking for the new movie and the RIP storyline to be a real shot in the arm for DC this summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like GA/BC is a bit more than just a &#8220;shaky&#8221; relaunch given the hype of the wedding issues (fake-out) and the idea behind immortalizing a legendary comic book relationship into a joint title. It&#8217;s selling at or below the pre-relaunch numbers, in spite of adding BC. The title&#8217;s not benefiting from the incredible exposure the character is getting from Smallville, nor from the massive advertising heaped on it&#8217;s arrival last summer.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t catergorize it as &#8220;dismal failure&#8221; just yet, but it certainly would fit in the failure category in that it was one of many horses that got backed last year which didn&#8217;t finish where it should have. The aimlessness of April&#8217;s issue will likely further impact sales next month.</p>
<p>While none of that was surprising, I was surprised to see Wonder Woman decline with a Green Lantern tie-in plot point, and coming off a really nice preceeding arc. Reviews of Nightwing have also been very positive of late, it was also interesting to see a small decline there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for the new movie and the RIP storyline to be a real shot in the arm for DC this summer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1441756</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1441756</guid>
					<description>Thok: &quot;Have you made any attempt to try to estimate what Booster Gold’s numbers would be like without the crossover effects?&quot;

Well, I suppose those particular issues would have sold a few copies less. I don't think the book would have ended up anywhere else than it is right now, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thok: &#8220;Have you made any attempt to try to estimate what Booster Gold’s numbers would be like without the crossover effects?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I suppose those particular issues would have sold a few copies less. I don&#8217;t think the book would have ended up anywhere else than it is right now, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heinz Hochkoepper</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1439173</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 10:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1439173</guid>
					<description>&quot;The average periodical sales of [Vertigo] display massive losses in the neighborhood of 30 percent over the past five years. In response, Vertigo appears to be focusing more strongly on original graphic novels in the future, [...]&quot;

With that &quot;In response&quot; you are implying a connection that Karen Berger explicitly denied here

 http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154470

&quot;One concerned fan wondered if Vertigo’s focus on original graphic novels meant they will be moving away from publishing monthly titles. “Not at all,” Berger said. Comparing it to television and feature films, she explained that some stories are best told episodically, month to month, and then collected. Other stories work as a great big graphic novel. Vertigo is still “very committed to the monthly form,” and will continue to publish collected editions that reach audiences in bookstores and comic shops.&quot;

At an earlier panel, she said this 
http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154243

&quot;The final question was if the panelists see the audience for Vertigo comics, or comics in general, growing. Berger replied that Vertigo’s “backlist has become our frontlist,” as collections generate most of their sales. “Some monthlies sell well, some don’t,” but she confirmed that Vertigo is committed to monthly comics.&quot;

I found this quite interesting, as it pretty much confirms what has been suggested to you by me and others in the last months: The fact that &quot;the average periodical sales of [Vertigo] display massive losses in the neighborhood of 30 percent over the past five years&quot; is made up for by growing collection sales and thus no reason to assume Vertigo sales as a whole are diminishing. Sure, a lot of books are getting cancelled right now, but that's just because many of these books lasted much longer than expected, as there actually were very few cancellations in the last two years. Besides, many new monthlies have already been announced, so that commitment to monthly comics is certainly evident.

Please stop misrepresenting the truth so that it better fits this weird idea you so stubbornly cling to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The average periodical sales of [Vertigo] display massive losses in the neighborhood of 30 percent over the past five years. In response, Vertigo appears to be focusing more strongly on original graphic novels in the future, [&#8230;]&#8221;</p>
<p>With that &#8220;In response&#8221; you are implying a connection that Karen Berger explicitly denied here</p>
<p> <a href='http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154470' rel='nofollow'>http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154470</a></p>
<p>&#8220;One concerned fan wondered if Vertigo’s focus on original graphic novels meant they will be moving away from publishing monthly titles. “Not at all,” Berger said. Comparing it to television and feature films, she explained that some stories are best told episodically, month to month, and then collected. Other stories work as a great big graphic novel. Vertigo is still “very committed to the monthly form,” and will continue to publish collected editions that reach audiences in bookstores and comic shops.&#8221;</p>
<p>At an earlier panel, she said this<br />
<a href='http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154243' rel='nofollow'>http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=154243</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The final question was if the panelists see the audience for Vertigo comics, or comics in general, growing. Berger replied that Vertigo’s “backlist has become our frontlist,” as collections generate most of their sales. “Some monthlies sell well, some don’t,” but she confirmed that Vertigo is committed to monthly comics.&#8221;</p>
<p>I found this quite interesting, as it pretty much confirms what has been suggested to you by me and others in the last months: The fact that &#8220;the average periodical sales of [Vertigo] display massive losses in the neighborhood of 30 percent over the past five years&#8221; is made up for by growing collection sales and thus no reason to assume Vertigo sales as a whole are diminishing. Sure, a lot of books are getting cancelled right now, but that&#8217;s just because many of these books lasted much longer than expected, as there actually were very few cancellations in the last two years. Besides, many new monthlies have already been announced, so that commitment to monthly comics is certainly evident.</p>
<p>Please stop misrepresenting the truth so that it better fits this weird idea you so stubbornly cling to.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1435965</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 04:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1435965</guid>
					<description>Teen Titans Go might be Johnny DC, but its been axed with issue #55</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teen Titans Go might be Johnny DC, but its been axed with issue #55
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1434920</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1434920</guid>
					<description>Thanks, John Jackson Miller.

John Jackson Miller---The Goddamn Statsmaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John Jackson Miller.</p>
<p>John Jackson Miller&#8212;The Goddamn Statsmaster.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AERose</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1433930</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1433930</guid>
					<description>&quot;Does anybody know how many issues were sold of the #300 book? I know the number is available somewhere online, but my internet fu is weak.&quot;

http://icv2.com/articles/news/1850.html

For all your sales-chart researching needs~ (Well, I mean, not ALL of them, but a lot of them at least.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does anybody know how many issues were sold of the #300 book? I know the number is available somewhere online, but my internet fu is weak.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href='http://icv2.com/articles/news/1850.html' rel='nofollow'>http://icv2.com/articles/news/1850.html</a></p>
<p>For all your sales-chart researching needs~ (Well, I mean, not ALL of them, but a lot of them at least.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1433778</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1433778</guid>
					<description>&quot;Does anybody know how many issues were sold of the #300 book? &quot;

I have 2,110. 100 more than in February, and 750 or so more than last March. 

That last bit notes something hidden in the numbers -- the extent to which the same month last year was top-heavy with the big events. This month, the sales curve fell off much more gradually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does anybody know how many issues were sold of the #300 book? &#8221;</p>
<p>I have 2,110. 100 more than in February, and 750 or so more than last March. </p>
<p>That last bit notes something hidden in the numbers &#8212; the extent to which the same month last year was top-heavy with the big events. This month, the sales curve fell off much more gradually.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1433573</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1433573</guid>
					<description>Does anybody know how many issues were sold of the #300 book? I know the number is available somewhere online, but my internet fu is weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody know how many issues were sold of the #300 book? I know the number is available somewhere online, but my internet fu is weak.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin HInes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432848</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432848</guid>
					<description>&quot;I’m always a bit wary of the stuff that’s playing out below the 5,000 mark,&quot;

That makes sense. I was just curious because Dynamo 5 has some decent buzz. I was hoping to see some sort of Invincible like climb (rather then standard attrition) and am even more curious if Noble Causes relaunch has worked in bringing some Dynamo 5 readers over.

So I am glad I did the research, even if it apparently won't represent re-orders at all (which I didn't even look for).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m always a bit wary of the stuff that’s playing out below the 5,000 mark,&#8221;</p>
<p>That makes sense. I was just curious because Dynamo 5 has some decent buzz. I was hoping to see some sort of Invincible like climb (rather then standard attrition) and am even more curious if Noble Causes relaunch has worked in bringing some Dynamo 5 readers over.</p>
<p>So I am glad I did the research, even if it apparently won&#8217;t represent re-orders at all (which I didn&#8217;t even look for).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thok</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432803</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432803</guid>
					<description>Have you made any attempt to try to estimate what Booster Gold's numbers would be like without the crossover effects?  Clearly issues 2, 5, and 0 are higher then they would be if they were a &quot;typical&quot; issue (2 was the pseudo Sinestro War crossover, 5 is a Killing Joke crossover, and 0 is a Zero Hour crossover.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you made any attempt to try to estimate what Booster Gold&#8217;s numbers would be like without the crossover effects?  Clearly issues 2, 5, and 0 are higher then they would be if they were a &#8220;typical&#8221; issue (2 was the pseudo Sinestro War crossover, 5 is a Killing Joke crossover, and 0 is a Zero Hour crossover.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432635</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432635</guid>
					<description>&quot;Ah, so that message DID go through, after all. Sorry.&quot;

And just so nobody gets the wrong idea: I was referring to my double-post, not to the message directly above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ah, so that message DID go through, after all. Sorry.&#8221;</p>
<p>And just so nobody gets the wrong idea: I was referring to my double-post, not to the message directly above.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432602</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432602</guid>
					<description>Torsten: &quot;Any reason that #282-300 were not included in this report?&quot;

There were no DC titles among them.

&quot;Or why you stopped the “other publishers” listing at #94?&quot;

Well, unless something in particular catches my eye, that section is usually limited to the Top 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torsten: &#8220;Any reason that #282-300 were not included in this report?&#8221;</p>
<p>There were no DC titles among them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Or why you stopped the “other publishers” listing at #94?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, unless something in particular catches my eye, that section is usually limited to the Top 100.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432534</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432534</guid>
					<description>Ah, so that message DID go through, after all. Sorry.

Mark: &quot;Didn’t the first Shooter LSH issue have two covers? Would that partially explain the jump in orders?&quot;

Partially, sure. Compared to other books supported through that gimmick, I'd be surprised if it accounted for more than 25% of those extra 20,000 units for Shooter's debut issue, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so that message DID go through, after all. Sorry.</p>
<p>Mark: &#8220;Didn’t the first Shooter LSH issue have two covers? Would that partially explain the jump in orders?&#8221;</p>
<p>Partially, sure. Compared to other books supported through that gimmick, I&#8217;d be surprised if it accounted for more than 25% of those extra 20,000 units for Shooter&#8217;s debut issue, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Samy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432455</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432455</guid>
					<description>It's frightening to see a list where DC only has four series above 50k, and two of them are limited series ending soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s frightening to see a list where DC only has four series above 50k, and two of them are limited series ending soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432453</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432453</guid>
					<description>Any reason that #282-300 were not included in this report?  Or why you stopped the &quot;other publishers&quot; listing at #94?  

I'm not asking for commentary on each and every title, but historical listings would be nice.

(And thank you for the analysis you do supply!  Fascinating reading!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any reason that #282-300 were not included in this report?  Or why you stopped the &#8220;other publishers&#8221; listing at #94?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not asking for commentary on each and every title, but historical listings would be nice.</p>
<p>(And thank you for the analysis you do supply!  Fascinating reading!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432381</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432381</guid>
					<description>Kevin: I tend to be wary of the stuff that's playing out below the 5,000 mark. The percentage of sales on those titles that we're not seeing (reorders shipped after the initial month of release) is likely much higher than for the better-selling books. Not to speak of the vastly different business models between, say, DC and Image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin: I tend to be wary of the stuff that&#8217;s playing out below the 5,000 mark. The percentage of sales on those titles that we&#8217;re not seeing (reorders shipped after the initial month of release) is likely much higher than for the better-selling books. Not to speak of the vastly different business models between, say, DC and Image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432372</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432372</guid>
					<description>Kevin: I'm always a bit wary of the stuff that's playing out below the 5,000 mark, because the percentage of sales on those titles that we're not seeing (reorders shipped after the initial month of release) is likely much higher than for the better-selling books - not to speak of the vastly different business models between, say, DC and Image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin: I&#8217;m always a bit wary of the stuff that&#8217;s playing out below the 5,000 mark, because the percentage of sales on those titles that we&#8217;re not seeing (reorders shipped after the initial month of release) is likely much higher than for the better-selling books - not to speak of the vastly different business models between, say, DC and Image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432363</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432363</guid>
					<description>Didn't the first Shooter LSH issue have two covers? Would that partially explain the jump in orders?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the first Shooter LSH issue have two covers? Would that partially explain the jump in orders?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432333</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432333</guid>
					<description>Well, I'm certainly delighted he's posting in other threads, too. He's not on my conscience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m certainly delighted he&#8217;s posting in other threads, too. He&#8217;s not on my conscience!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432267</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432267</guid>
					<description>ElScabro---Publisher's Weekly isn't producing this write up. They are merely putting it online for you to...PICK...at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ElScabro&#8212;Publisher&#8217;s Weekly isn&#8217;t producing this write up. They are merely putting it online for you to&#8230;PICK&#8230;at.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432072</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1432072</guid>
					<description>El Scabro, YOU ARE CRACKING ME UP! Normally I would ban such a troll, since it is the CUSTOM AT EVIL PUBLISHERS WEEKLY to silence all those who dare oppose our plans for global unification and socialized bingo. But I think I may just let this play out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Scabro, YOU ARE CRACKING ME UP! Normally I would ban such a troll, since it is the CUSTOM AT EVIL PUBLISHERS WEEKLY to silence all those who dare oppose our plans for global unification and socialized bingo. But I think I may just let this play out!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin HInes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1431966</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1431966</guid>
					<description>Here is the last 9 issues of Noble Causes. I wasn't reading the book before the 'relaunch' so I don't know why 24,25 and 26 jumped up in sales. Or why 23 was so low (maybe). 30 also had a little jump. I guess this book was pretty stable.

The next issue will be interesting to see if the 5 years later relaunch, with a focus on similar Dynamo 5 storyline styles, and cheap phonebook style collections to allow one to cheaply read all the backstory.

Noble Causes
-----------
Date    #
-----------
9/2006	23	3365	
10/2006	24	3752	(11.50%)
11/2006	25	3982	(6.13%)
12/2006			
1/2007	26	3596	(-9.69%)
2/2007	27	3443	(-4.25%)
3/2007	28	3405	(-1.10%)
4/2007			
5/2007	29	3365	(-1.17%)
6/2007	30	3371	(0.18%)
7/2007			
8/2007			
9/2007	31	3365	(-0.18%)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the last 9 issues of Noble Causes. I wasn&#8217;t reading the book before the &#8216;relaunch&#8217; so I don&#8217;t know why 24,25 and 26 jumped up in sales. Or why 23 was so low (maybe). 30 also had a little jump. I guess this book was pretty stable.</p>
<p>The next issue will be interesting to see if the 5 years later relaunch, with a focus on similar Dynamo 5 storyline styles, and cheap phonebook style collections to allow one to cheaply read all the backstory.</p>
<p>Noble Causes<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Date    #<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
9/2006	23	3365<br />
10/2006	24	3752	(11.50%)<br />
11/2006	25	3982	(6.13%)<br />
12/2006<br />
1/2007	26	3596	(-9.69%)<br />
2/2007	27	3443	(-4.25%)<br />
3/2007	28	3405	(-1.10%)<br />
4/2007<br />
5/2007	29	3365	(-1.17%)<br />
6/2007	30	3371	(0.18%)<br />
7/2007<br />
8/2007<br />
9/2007	31	3365	(-0.18%)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin HInes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1431933</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/05/02/dc-month-to-month-sales-march-2008/#comment-1431933</guid>
					<description>So instead of being lazy and asking Marc-Oliver to compiles the numbers I grabbed them quickly myself (from icv2 just like does).

Here is Dynamo 5 - which is mostly intersting due to the price change. I wonder if the quick cheap trade helped the sales bump for issue 8, or if it was due to the price change. I want to see more growth on this book.

Dynamo 5
-----------
Date    # 
-----------  
3/2007	1	6842		
4/2007	2	4947	(-27.70%)	
5/2007	3	6185	(25.03%)	
6/2007	4	6146	(-0.63%)	
7/2007	5	5957	(-3.08%)	
8/2007	6	5818	(-2.33%)	
9/2007	7	5679	(-2.39%)	
10/2007				
11/2007	8	5709	(0.53%)	price drops to 2.99
12/2007	9	5816	(1.87%)	
1/2008	10	5684	(-2.27%)	
2/2008				
3/2008	11	5625	(-1.04%) price back up to 3.50</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So instead of being lazy and asking Marc-Oliver to compiles the numbers I grabbed them quickly myself (from icv2 just like does).</p>
<p>Here is Dynamo 5 - which is mostly intersting due to the price change. I wonder if the quick cheap trade helped the sales bump for issue 8, or if it was due to the price change. I want to see more growth on this book.</p>
<p>Dynamo 5<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Date    #<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
3/2007	1	6842<br />
4/2007	2	4947	(-27.70%)<br />
5/2007	3	6185	(25.03%)<br />
6/2007	4	6146	(-0.63%)<br />
7/2007	5	5957	(-3.08%)<br />
8/2007	6	5818	(-2.33%)<br />
9/2007	7	5679	(-2.39%)<br />
10/2007<br />
11/2007	8	5709	(0.53%)	price drops to 2.99<br />
12/2007	9	5816	(1.87%)<br />
1/2008	10	5684	(-2.27%)<br />
2/2008<br />
3/2008	11	5625	(-1.04%) price back up to 3.50
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
