<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel Month-to-Month Sales April 2008</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ty</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-2655894</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-2655894</guid>
					<description>I feel like a complete blank, but what can I say?,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like a complete blank, but what can I say?,
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Smith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1799736</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1799736</guid>
					<description>Jesus Christ...Those JQ theories are one of the most moronic things I've ever read. 

You dont live vicariously through Spider-man, you dont NEED Spider-man. Its a book...read something else and get on with your life already. Get a god damn grip people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ&#8230;Those JQ theories are one of the most moronic things I&#8217;ve ever read. </p>
<p>You dont live vicariously through Spider-man, you dont NEED Spider-man. Its a book&#8230;read something else and get on with your life already. Get a god damn grip people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shawn Hill</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1739576</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1739576</guid>
					<description>Re: Anita Blake #10 A huge drop. The preceding issues had variant covers, but I find it hard to believe that variants were making quite such a contribution to the sales of a book on the fringes of the Top 100. On the other hand, I don’t see any other obvious explanation.

Maybe Ron Lim isn't as popular as Brett Booth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Anita Blake #10 A huge drop. The preceding issues had variant covers, but I find it hard to believe that variants were making quite such a contribution to the sales of a book on the fringes of the Top 100. On the other hand, I don’t see any other obvious explanation.</p>
<p>Maybe Ron Lim isn&#8217;t as popular as Brett Booth?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1726141</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1726141</guid>
					<description>Coming tomorrow...apologies for the delays, just scheduling problems all around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming tomorrow&#8230;apologies for the delays, just scheduling problems all around.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Warren</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1726088</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1726088</guid>
					<description>Anyone know if the corresponding DC article is forthcoming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know if the corresponding DC article is forthcoming?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dreamer</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1724979</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1724979</guid>
					<description>To those people who go &quot;wow, being able to get something free, you think that's cool, eh? but that's stealing, shame on you, woo, where is your morals&quot; over Kenny's comment need to realize that yeah, stealing is really cool! i mean, what are you some warped religious puritans who believe laws of capitalist ownership are in fact god's will and people who steal will get punished in the afterlife? of course it is cool if you can get away with it, and yeah i mean stealing candy and picking up your neighbor's stuff too (though i doubt you can get away with that easily if they visit your place. maybe you can, if  you don't socialize with them much.. i know i did..)

Anyways, the argument against obtaining stuff without paying its &quot;price&quot; in dollars should be based within context and considered together with its consequences. I should mention that i am extremely against comics pirating and i have never done it. [well, i did download the formerly know as justice league, but i bought the following volume and i am going to buy that in a trade too whenever i find it; just that i have been putting it off for years, choosing something other instead and i know its a disgrace. Man, i should really buy that :( ]. So does this contradict what i just say and how can i argue against such a practice if i am heavily pro-stealing?

I think that the strongest argument against comics pirating is the fragile economics of comic book publishing. Sure the big two ought to make a hell of a profit but the companies still need to be sound economically so that they can continue to publish these adventures i so enjoy. I mean even its the top sellers like civil war or crisis du jour, i need to pay them so they can be around to publish blue beetle or spider-girl, do you know what i mean? Besides, i need to support my local comics shop so that it does not go down and stop providing a new opportunity for a chance new blood coming in through door.

I don't know, if i just download latest madonna album, or indy movie or the lost episode, do we really think they will suffer? the pop stars and celebrities make hell of a money in concerts, commercials, film offers, etc. And people still go to movies for the big screen experience and pop corn and just for a day out.. lost, well, i don't know, i still watch it on tv too, so i do get the ratings up, if that counts for anything.. they should just broadcast it on the net with lots of compulsory advertisement, rather than pushing dvds, in my opinion. 

Anyways, when the economy is hard for me, i just pick up groceries and what not from the chain store and steal a couple of book from the book chain, and keep on paying comics instead. do you really thing these conglomerates will hurt over couple of lost material? and even if they do, should i really care? do you know how great share of the profit the chains eat up? (like the coffee producers get like a couple of cents of every 10 dollar pack, and the workers in the processing, transportation and retail get around a dollar in total with another dollar at most for the expenses like energy, packaging material etc. the retail gets 80% of the price you pay..)

Anyways, sorry for the rant. I just wanna say yay for stealing, support your comics, pay nasty Marvel and DC every cent of your pocket money and lets crush this dumb system of profit maximizing conglomerates so that everybody can develop their free comics with their favorite heroes and distribute over the net :) how about that, than?

oh and brett, just get over it, geez.. it's only a fictional character, leave quesada alone, man.. he deserves to be happy like any of us. :) you can stick with spider-girl if your &quot;not life's mission&quot; but &quot;observation&quot; non-obsession with the marriage ret-con annoys you this much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those people who go &#8220;wow, being able to get something free, you think that&#8217;s cool, eh? but that&#8217;s stealing, shame on you, woo, where is your morals&#8221; over Kenny&#8217;s comment need to realize that yeah, stealing is really cool! i mean, what are you some warped religious puritans who believe laws of capitalist ownership are in fact god&#8217;s will and people who steal will get punished in the afterlife? of course it is cool if you can get away with it, and yeah i mean stealing candy and picking up your neighbor&#8217;s stuff too (though i doubt you can get away with that easily if they visit your place. maybe you can, if  you don&#8217;t socialize with them much.. i know i did..)</p>
<p>Anyways, the argument against obtaining stuff without paying its &#8220;price&#8221; in dollars should be based within context and considered together with its consequences. I should mention that i am extremely against comics pirating and i have never done it. [well, i did download the formerly know as justice league, but i bought the following volume and i am going to buy that in a trade too whenever i find it; just that i have been putting it off for years, choosing something other instead and i know its a disgrace. Man, i should really buy that <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  ]. So does this contradict what i just say and how can i argue against such a practice if i am heavily pro-stealing?</p>
<p>I think that the strongest argument against comics pirating is the fragile economics of comic book publishing. Sure the big two ought to make a hell of a profit but the companies still need to be sound economically so that they can continue to publish these adventures i so enjoy. I mean even its the top sellers like civil war or crisis du jour, i need to pay them so they can be around to publish blue beetle or spider-girl, do you know what i mean? Besides, i need to support my local comics shop so that it does not go down and stop providing a new opportunity for a chance new blood coming in through door.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, if i just download latest madonna album, or indy movie or the lost episode, do we really think they will suffer? the pop stars and celebrities make hell of a money in concerts, commercials, film offers, etc. And people still go to movies for the big screen experience and pop corn and just for a day out.. lost, well, i don&#8217;t know, i still watch it on tv too, so i do get the ratings up, if that counts for anything.. they should just broadcast it on the net with lots of compulsory advertisement, rather than pushing dvds, in my opinion. </p>
<p>Anyways, when the economy is hard for me, i just pick up groceries and what not from the chain store and steal a couple of book from the book chain, and keep on paying comics instead. do you really thing these conglomerates will hurt over couple of lost material? and even if they do, should i really care? do you know how great share of the profit the chains eat up? (like the coffee producers get like a couple of cents of every 10 dollar pack, and the workers in the processing, transportation and retail get around a dollar in total with another dollar at most for the expenses like energy, packaging material etc. the retail gets 80% of the price you pay..)</p>
<p>Anyways, sorry for the rant. I just wanna say yay for stealing, support your comics, pay nasty Marvel and DC every cent of your pocket money and lets crush this dumb system of profit maximizing conglomerates so that everybody can develop their free comics with their favorite heroes and distribute over the net <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  how about that, than?</p>
<p>oh and brett, just get over it, geez.. it&#8217;s only a fictional character, leave quesada alone, man.. he deserves to be happy like any of us. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  you can stick with spider-girl if your &#8220;not life&#8217;s mission&#8221; but &#8220;observation&#8221; non-obsession with the marriage ret-con annoys you this much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Four Color Media Monitor</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1722183</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1722183</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Older issues of BND were tacked onto latest sales...&lt;/strong&gt;

On The Beat blog's latest sales analysis of Marvel's monthly sales, they tell something interesting about what's being done with unsold copies of Spider-Man's Brand New Day:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Older issues of BND were tacked onto latest sales&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>On The Beat blog&#8217;s latest sales analysis of Marvel&#8217;s monthly sales, they tell something interesting about what&#8217;s being done with unsold copies of Spider-Man&#8217;s Brand New Day:&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RJTressel</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1721980</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1721980</guid>
					<description>I have never been the biggest fan of Joe Quesada, to be certain, but arguing that his single career goal was to become an artist in order to start a relatively successful studio, which Marvel would then hire out to revitalize a few of their b-list characters, leading him to ascend to be editor-in-chief just so he could undo the Spiderman-MJ marriage is a seriously warped theory of human behavior. I understand people don't like the decision to undo the marriage, and I'm not even telling you to get over it...but you're never going to be taken seriously if you espouse such crazy conspiracy theories, and that makes it easier for people like JQ to simple ignore your grievances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never been the biggest fan of Joe Quesada, to be certain, but arguing that his single career goal was to become an artist in order to start a relatively successful studio, which Marvel would then hire out to revitalize a few of their b-list characters, leading him to ascend to be editor-in-chief just so he could undo the Spiderman-MJ marriage is a seriously warped theory of human behavior. I understand people don&#8217;t like the decision to undo the marriage, and I&#8217;m not even telling you to get over it&#8230;but you&#8217;re never going to be taken seriously if you espouse such crazy conspiracy theories, and that makes it easier for people like JQ to simple ignore your grievances.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1719938</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1719938</guid>
					<description>BTW 'Peter's Parker', you've come here quite often to harp on the numbers and state how people should just get over it already.

Maybe you should stop preaching to others and start listening to your voice and... 

'Get over it already.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8216;Peter&#8217;s Parker&#8217;, you&#8217;ve come here quite often to harp on the numbers and state how people should just get over it already.</p>
<p>Maybe you should stop preaching to others and start listening to your voice and&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8216;Get over it already.&#8217;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1719781</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1719781</guid>
					<description>&quot;Joe Q doesn’t care what anyone thinks.&quot;

Agreed. He has attained the ultimate level of corporate-dom.
.
.
Parker only seems to be here to attack anybody who says anything bad about Marvel.

Hey, Parker, Marvel smells of old man. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Joe Q doesn’t care what anyone thinks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed. He has attained the ultimate level of corporate-dom.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
Parker only seems to be here to attack anybody who says anything bad about Marvel.</p>
<p>Hey, Parker, Marvel smells of old man. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1719447</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1719447</guid>
					<description>No Peter, I'm not obsessed. 

I haven't made it my life's work to get a job in comics to correct anything I perceived as wrong about the direction of these imaginary characters.

I'm just a reader and as a reader, we're entitled to make observations, then comment about it and this one's as clear as day. 

Many of us have been listening to Joe Q rant and rave in public about the marriage for a very, very long time, long before he got the job as EIC. It only got worse when he became EIC.

And yes, Stan Lee is also cool with the reversal. It doesn't change the fact that Joe Q was so obsessed that he made it a full time day job to undo that decision, because in his arrogance, he thought he knew better than Spidey's own creator. 

Being able to see the irony and point out how art imitates life doesn't make one obsessed, it makes them observent.

And just because you can't see the sky as blue doesn't make the sky any less blue either. 

I'm just pointing out, to all the many people obsessed with watching the numbers to prove whether or not Joe made a good decision is that you're all wasting your time because Joe Q doesn't care what anyone thinks. He does what he wants so all of YOU, get over it and stop harping on the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Peter, I&#8217;m not obsessed. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t made it my life&#8217;s work to get a job in comics to correct anything I perceived as wrong about the direction of these imaginary characters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just a reader and as a reader, we&#8217;re entitled to make observations, then comment about it and this one&#8217;s as clear as day. </p>
<p>Many of us have been listening to Joe Q rant and rave in public about the marriage for a very, very long time, long before he got the job as EIC. It only got worse when he became EIC.</p>
<p>And yes, Stan Lee is also cool with the reversal. It doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Joe Q was so obsessed that he made it a full time day job to undo that decision, because in his arrogance, he thought he knew better than Spidey&#8217;s own creator. </p>
<p>Being able to see the irony and point out how art imitates life doesn&#8217;t make one obsessed, it makes them observent.</p>
<p>And just because you can&#8217;t see the sky as blue doesn&#8217;t make the sky any less blue either. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just pointing out, to all the many people obsessed with watching the numbers to prove whether or not Joe made a good decision is that you&#8217;re all wasting your time because Joe Q doesn&#8217;t care what anyone thinks. He does what he wants so all of YOU, get over it and stop harping on the numbers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1717576</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1717576</guid>
					<description>MARVEL SPOTLIGHT: I am given to understand that it does rather well through venues such as Borders.  It appears to have more appeal to casual readers, which is admittedly counterintuitive, but perhaps reflects them being less aware of the free online competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARVEL SPOTLIGHT: I am given to understand that it does rather well through venues such as Borders.  It appears to have more appeal to casual readers, which is admittedly counterintuitive, but perhaps reflects them being less aware of the free online competition.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kris</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1716266</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1716266</guid>
					<description>jesus christ........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jesus christ&#8230;&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter's Parker</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1716257</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1716257</guid>
					<description>Wow, Brett, you might want to think about getting some therapy yourself. Obsessed much? 

And all you cats whining and moaning about OMD/BND...get over it already, sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Brett, you might want to think about getting some therapy yourself. Obsessed much? </p>
<p>And all you cats whining and moaning about OMD/BND&#8230;get over it already, sheesh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1715740</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1715740</guid>
					<description>Comment not posting properly

No, it's definately an obsession.

And yes, it is his job... today. It wasn't his job before he became EIC. 

What defines it as an obsession is that for 10 years before it became his official job, he was so put off by the character getting married that he made it his life mission, his current life work -- to correct what he perceived to be a terrible wrong about an imaginary character, something he's been trying to do in his position as EIC since day one.

There's a saying -- the answer's been right there all along and I never saw it. Well it is, all there in full glorious HALLELUJAH Marvel color:

The story of creation goes something like this, 'God created the heavens and the angels and all was well. But when God wanted to create Man different, with free will, Lucifer got angry and told the creator it was a big mistake. Lucifer said Man would turn on him, betray the beloved creator. 

He thought he knew better than the Creator about a decision he made, then made it his life's work to prove the Creator wrong. Of course, he was doing this in the Creator's best interests because he loved him and wanted only to protect him. Standing beside him, many others believed like Lucifer, making it their full time job to prove the creator wrong.

The road to hell was paved with good intentions.  

Fast forward to 1987 when Spider Man's creator decided, for better or worse (no pun intended) that he wanted to marry the character. I don't know, the character flourished after the marriage, reaching sales that touched the heavens so a married PP didn't appear to turn off many...

But the issue of whether or not it was a good long term decision could be debated until the end of time, kind of like the Creator's decision to give Man free will.

There was of course, one person so outraged by the creator's decision to marry this character, openly debating the issue at any available platform, that he made it his life work to prove the creator wrong, to undo what he perceived to be grave and harmful mistake. Of course, he meant the creator no harm for he truly loved the creator. He was only acting in the best interests of.

Mephisto told Peter a dumb, unbelievable story (a lie) to undo the marriage, kind of the way Joey Q told the audience a dumb, unbelievable story to undo the marriage. Because, for better or worse, he believed the creator was wrong in his decision all those years ago.

So yes, now its Joe Q's full day time job.

Thankfully though, unlike Man, Peter Parker isn't a real person. He's imaginary.

And now we conclude with a quote from The Great Creator...

'Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment not posting properly</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s definately an obsession.</p>
<p>And yes, it is his job&#8230; today. It wasn&#8217;t his job before he became EIC. </p>
<p>What defines it as an obsession is that for 10 years before it became his official job, he was so put off by the character getting married that he made it his life mission, his current life work &#8212; to correct what he perceived to be a terrible wrong about an imaginary character, something he&#8217;s been trying to do in his position as EIC since day one.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a saying &#8212; the answer&#8217;s been right there all along and I never saw it. Well it is, all there in full glorious HALLELUJAH Marvel color:</p>
<p>The story of creation goes something like this, &#8216;God created the heavens and the angels and all was well. But when God wanted to create Man different, with free will, Lucifer got angry and told the creator it was a big mistake. Lucifer said Man would turn on him, betray the beloved creator. </p>
<p>He thought he knew better than the Creator about a decision he made, then made it his life&#8217;s work to prove the Creator wrong. Of course, he was doing this in the Creator&#8217;s best interests because he loved him and wanted only to protect him. Standing beside him, many others believed like Lucifer, making it their full time job to prove the creator wrong.</p>
<p>The road to hell was paved with good intentions.  </p>
<p>Fast forward to 1987 when Spider Man&#8217;s creator decided, for better or worse (no pun intended) that he wanted to marry the character. I don&#8217;t know, the character flourished after the marriage, reaching sales that touched the heavens so a married PP didn&#8217;t appear to turn off many&#8230;</p>
<p>But the issue of whether or not it was a good long term decision could be debated until the end of time, kind of like the Creator&#8217;s decision to give Man free will.</p>
<p>There was of course, one person so outraged by the creator&#8217;s decision to marry this character, openly debating the issue at any available platform, that he made it his life work to prove the creator wrong, to undo what he perceived to be grave and harmful mistake. Of course, he meant the creator no harm for he truly loved the creator. He was only acting in the best interests of.</p>
<p>Mephisto told Peter a dumb, unbelievable story (a lie) to undo the marriage, kind of the way Joey Q told the audience a dumb, unbelievable story to undo the marriage. Because, for better or worse, he believed the creator was wrong in his decision all those years ago.</p>
<p>So yes, now its Joe Q&#8217;s full day time job.</p>
<p>Thankfully though, unlike Man, Peter Parker isn&#8217;t a real person. He&#8217;s imaginary.</p>
<p>And now we conclude with a quote from The Great Creator&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;Nuff said.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1715723</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1715723</guid>
					<description>Well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1714161</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1714161</guid>
					<description>&quot;I buy comics now because when times were hard for me a few years ago, I got back into reading comics through pirating them. Also, I mostly buy comics now that are independent or Image published and I know those books need each sale to stay alive. If times get hard for me again, I’ll probably go back to pirating without much care. When times are hard, financially, it’s silly to keep paying for something that’s easily available for essentially free. &quot;
Yeah, it would be silly if it wasn't stealing.  Oh well, at least you get what you want so it's all cool.

I'd also like to comment about Joe's &quot;obsession&quot; with Spider-Man being married.  It's not really an &quot;obsession&quot; its him, you know, doing his job and doing what he thinks is best for the character.  I hardly think he is obsessed or has worried about it all that much over the past 20 years.  Unlike us (yes me included) this stuff isn't his life, this stuff is his job)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I buy comics now because when times were hard for me a few years ago, I got back into reading comics through pirating them. Also, I mostly buy comics now that are independent or Image published and I know those books need each sale to stay alive. If times get hard for me again, I’ll probably go back to pirating without much care. When times are hard, financially, it’s silly to keep paying for something that’s easily available for essentially free. &#8221;<br />
Yeah, it would be silly if it wasn&#8217;t stealing.  Oh well, at least you get what you want so it&#8217;s all cool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to comment about Joe&#8217;s &#8220;obsession&#8221; with Spider-Man being married.  It&#8217;s not really an &#8220;obsession&#8221; its him, you know, doing his job and doing what he thinks is best for the character.  I hardly think he is obsessed or has worried about it all that much over the past 20 years.  Unlike us (yes me included) this stuff isn&#8217;t his life, this stuff is his job)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1713665</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1713665</guid>
					<description>&quot;It’s also stated that Marvel Spotlight sells in other areas- WHERE? This is surely a book made exclusively for the direct market. If you have evidence that it sells in other markets please state what the evidence is and where those sales are occurring since I just can’t believe that book sells to anyone outside of Marvel fan boys.&quot;

The only new comics I bought since returning to comics in early 2006 (after stopping in 1991) were &quot;Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane&quot; and Brubaker's DD run from his first issue up to DD 100. Otherwise, I solely buy back issues from the 1980s a few times a year to fill gaps in my collection. That in mind, I wouldn't consider myself a fanboy by any stretch, but I did pick up the &quot;Captain America&quot; and &quot;Fantastic Four&quot; Marvel Spotlight issues at the magazine/snack shop* in the building I worked at last year (at $5.00+ to boot because they weren't the direct market printings), just because I wanted something to read at lunchtime, and interviews with older creators interests me. It works as an impulse buy.

* The only other comics that they ever seemed to carry were other books that don't burn up these charts, such as &quot;Spider-Girl&quot;, &quot;She Hulk&quot; and the &quot;Civil War&quot; reprint comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s also stated that Marvel Spotlight sells in other areas- WHERE? This is surely a book made exclusively for the direct market. If you have evidence that it sells in other markets please state what the evidence is and where those sales are occurring since I just can’t believe that book sells to anyone outside of Marvel fan boys.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only new comics I bought since returning to comics in early 2006 (after stopping in 1991) were &#8220;Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane&#8221; and Brubaker&#8217;s DD run from his first issue up to DD 100. Otherwise, I solely buy back issues from the 1980s a few times a year to fill gaps in my collection. That in mind, I wouldn&#8217;t consider myself a fanboy by any stretch, but I did pick up the &#8220;Captain America&#8221; and &#8220;Fantastic Four&#8221; Marvel Spotlight issues at the magazine/snack shop* in the building I worked at last year (at $5.00+ to boot because they weren&#8217;t the direct market printings), just because I wanted something to read at lunchtime, and interviews with older creators interests me. It works as an impulse buy.</p>
<p>* The only other comics that they ever seemed to carry were other books that don&#8217;t burn up these charts, such as &#8220;Spider-Girl&#8221;, &#8220;She Hulk&#8221; and the &#8220;Civil War&#8221; reprint comics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1712709</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1712709</guid>
					<description>Thanks... some may say Joe Q is in an enviable position.

Here was a guy tortured for 20 years over an imaginary character getting married -- kind of like being haunted by the invisible March Hare, taunting his every waking moment. 

But I'm not 'outing' anyone -- his troubling little obsession is no secret to anyone -- he's used any open forum available to advertise his disdain of the imaginary character's marriage since he got into the industry, lo all those many years ago.

Even if none of those next generation readers (you know, the one's Joe say he did this for) decide to buy Accessible Spiderman, I'd say reversing the marriage was a success -- for Joe -- better than 2 decades of therapy.

Compare Joe Q pictures before and after OMD: Not quite the picture of perfect health for 20 yrs before but now, Joe Q is like the all smiles, like the happy divorcee - the weight (of marriage) is gone and he's happy as a clam, all courtesy of those MARVELous Mental Health benefits.

That's some health plan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; some may say Joe Q is in an enviable position.</p>
<p>Here was a guy tortured for 20 years over an imaginary character getting married &#8212; kind of like being haunted by the invisible March Hare, taunting his every waking moment. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not &#8216;outing&#8217; anyone &#8212; his troubling little obsession is no secret to anyone &#8212; he&#8217;s used any open forum available to advertise his disdain of the imaginary character&#8217;s marriage since he got into the industry, lo all those many years ago.</p>
<p>Even if none of those next generation readers (you know, the one&#8217;s Joe say he did this for) decide to buy Accessible Spiderman, I&#8217;d say reversing the marriage was a success &#8212; for Joe &#8212; better than 2 decades of therapy.</p>
<p>Compare Joe Q pictures before and after OMD: Not quite the picture of perfect health for 20 yrs before but now, Joe Q is like the all smiles, like the happy divorcee - the weight (of marriage) is gone and he&#8217;s happy as a clam, all courtesy of those MARVELous Mental Health benefits.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s some health plan!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kentucky Fried Horse</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1708235</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/05/marvel-month-to-month-sales-april-2008/#comment-1708235</guid>
					<description>I thoroughly enjoy your take on Joe Quesada Brett!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thoroughly enjoy your take on Joe Quesada Brett!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
