<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norton smash!</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tag</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1763404</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1763404</guid>
					<description>I think it's fair to say that the only real reason THE INCREDIBLE HULK was PG-13 was that cigar and Liv Tyler calling a cabbie an asshole.  Seriously, was there something else I've forgotten that warranted that rating?

Non sequitur: TIH might not have technically been a sequel, but come on.  The Ang Lee version was, what, five years ago?  INDY 4 comes 18 years after 3 and it counts.  And SUPERMAN RETURNS, despite a completely different cast and crew 16 years after the last one, was considered more or less a sequel.  Nice try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that the only real reason THE INCREDIBLE HULK was PG-13 was that cigar and Liv Tyler calling a cabbie an asshole.  Seriously, was there something else I&#8217;ve forgotten that warranted that rating?</p>
<p>Non sequitur: TIH might not have technically been a sequel, but come on.  The Ang Lee version was, what, five years ago?  INDY 4 comes 18 years after 3 and it counts.  And SUPERMAN RETURNS, despite a completely different cast and crew 16 years after the last one, was considered more or less a sequel.  Nice try.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1758592</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1758592</guid>
					<description>the lesson here, anger control issues are nothing compared to the horror of smoking! Go ahead, beat someone up, but don't smoke while you do it!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the lesson here, anger control issues are nothing compared to the horror of smoking! Go ahead, beat someone up, but don&#8217;t smoke while you do it!  <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1758512</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1758512</guid>
					<description>Perhaps I never took up smoking because the least likable characters -- Mr. Jameson, General Ross, The Kingpin -- were its biggest advocates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I never took up smoking because the least likable characters &#8212; Mr. Jameson, General Ross, The Kingpin &#8212; were its biggest advocates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Franklin Harris</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1757790</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1757790</guid>
					<description>A disclaimer? Somewhere there's a wimp who needs a kick to the groin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A disclaimer? Somewhere there&#8217;s a wimp who needs a kick to the groin.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Van Hise</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1757652</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1757652</guid>
					<description>If you stick around for the last of the end credits there's actually a disclaimer about smoking at the end claiming that the film in no way endorses smoking just because a character in the film smokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you stick around for the last of the end credits there&#8217;s actually a disclaimer about smoking at the end claiming that the film in no way endorses smoking just because a character in the film smokes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1756838</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/16/norton-smash/#comment-1756838</guid>
					<description>So apparently by Ms. Fenyk's logic the moviemakers were also promoting gamma radiation exposure, violence against innocent cars, and the wearing of purple pants.  I'm so tired of the anti-smoking crusade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So apparently by Ms. Fenyk&#8217;s logic the moviemakers were also promoting gamma radiation exposure, violence against innocent cars, and the wearing of purple pants.  I&#8217;m so tired of the anti-smoking crusade.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
