<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC update: DiDio not going anywhere</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Trackback - Cheap Internation Call &#62;&#62; How to make cheap international call</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-3752958</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-3752958</guid>
					<description>,..] pwbeat.publishersweekly.com is one another nice source of tips on this issue,..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>,..] pwbeat.publishersweekly.com is one another nice source of tips on this issue,..]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: avodartus</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-2773314</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 19:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-2773314</guid>
					<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://writing.colostate.edu/blogs/view.cfm?blogid=42558&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reduction by dutasteride of&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://writing.colostate.edu/blogs/view.cfm?blogid=42558" rel="nofollow">reduction by dutasteride of</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-2761956</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 10:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-2761956</guid>
					<description>Interesting article. I found some more information &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sourcearticle.info/?id=MzU3OCxQaWN0dXJlIFB1Ymxpc2hlciww&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I found some more information <a href="http://www.sourcearticle.info/?id=MzU3OCxQaWN0dXJlIFB1Ymxpc2hlciww" rel="nofollow">here</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: spib</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-2009356</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-2009356</guid>
					<description>&quot;Dan Says:
06/24/08 at 2:22 pm

It’s also important to separate out people in general, and those on the internet. People on the internet complain. About everything. And they are certainly not, in any way, representative of the general public.&quot;

right because internet users aren't real people at all and comic book fans especially never EVER use the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dan Says:<br />
06/24/08 at 2:22 pm</p>
<p>It’s also important to separate out people in general, and those on the internet. People on the internet complain. About everything. And they are certainly not, in any way, representative of the general public.&#8221;</p>
<p>right because internet users aren&#8217;t real people at all and comic book fans especially never EVER use the internet.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: what can i do fun this weekend in washington dc</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1940671</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1940671</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;what can i do fun this weekend in washington dc...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sounds interesting but not for every one....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>what can i do fun this weekend in washington dc&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sounds interesting but not for every one&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan DiDidio&#8230;.stickin&#8217; around &#171; King of the Nerds!!!</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1814340</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1814340</guid>
					<description>[...] Dan DiDidio&amp;#8230;.stickin&amp;#8217;&amp;#160;around The below picture, featured prominently over at the PW website from an blog entry claiming DC Editor-in-Chief Dan DiDio&amp;#8217;s contract was renewed, looked oddly familiar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dan DiDidio&#8230;.stickin&#8217;&nbsp;around The below picture, featured prominently over at the PW website from an blog entry claiming DC Editor-in-Chief Dan DiDio&#8217;s contract was renewed, looked oddly familiar. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Episode 48 - We are Hulking Out</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1811823</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1811823</guid>
					<description>[...] Morrison throws DC editorial under a bus. Dixon left DC, so we chat a little bit about him. And Pacheco&amp;#8217;s fill in art. Yeah, blerg indeed. But, according to Heidi MacDonald not only is DiDio&amp;#8217;s job safe, he&amp;#8217;s just had his contract renewed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Morrison throws DC editorial under a bus. Dixon left DC, so we chat a little bit about him. And Pacheco&#8217;s fill in art. Yeah, blerg indeed. But, according to Heidi MacDonald not only is DiDio&#8217;s job safe, he&#8217;s just had his contract renewed. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: God is tired of DC too</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1809753</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1809753</guid>
					<description>That's funny, Crisis Averted, I used Final Crisis #1 as toilet paper. To each his own...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny, Crisis Averted, I used Final Crisis #1 as toilet paper. To each his own&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Crisis Averted: On with Final Crisis</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808993</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808993</guid>
					<description>[...] If you gravitate to comic communities I participate in this is where the broken record starts - I loved Final Crisis#1 and one of the main reasons I&amp;#8217;m glad Heidi Macdonald is reporting that Dan Didio is getting an extension (after a really silly internet-spawned attempt at a Shellian neighborhood watch meeting with people a bit too much in the cups or just generally ignorant as Shelly portrayed) is that I want what looks to be a promising platform to be able to go through being a key and sanctioned part of current administration and not be something a new EIC would want to put past him or her. I&amp;#8217;m excited not because it&amp;#8217;s this superior single issue; sure I found it solid, but I like it more because for the first time major EVENT in comic book history that we have a modern writer at the helm. I don&amp;#8217;t care if a lot of it is (and it is) bastardized Moorcockian themes and ideas: Seven Soldiers, Shade, Doom Patrol, Arkham Asylum, The Invisibles - all incredible, and he wrote the X-Men the last time it was remotely readable and unlike almost every &amp;#8216;classic&amp;#8217; X-Men story it still stands up no matter how much MARVEL wants to cajole Mephisto into magiking (Marvel editorial&amp;#8217;s geek word for deus ex machina - which you know, we all love) it away. With recent event I found myself either involved in issues that were just a means to get to the discovery at the end or just full of Hollywood bullet points that lacked nuance - they were getting to a story, not telling one - a storyteller moves in multiple directions at all times, each moment; each panel leads to something more but is not just beholden to what occurs ahead, and the lack of this is why many recent events have held the status of &amp;#8220;just tell me about it when it&amp;#8217;s done&amp;#8221; (in comics called: waiting for the trade). Final Crisis has me anticipating - I don&amp;#8217;t know where it&amp;#8217;s going, and I&amp;#8217;m not a child of the Silver Age that some people say the current DC caters to, indeed I was never a DC fan as a child, I was firmly an ardent MARVEL Zombie, and I think it is this element of discovery that appeals to me. In an age where entire arcs or not much more than the publicity release we can read at Newsarama months before, Morrison at the helm is a promise of more, a promise of risk, and I hope he is able to mold it into a commercial success so we can look back on this event as when the Superhero Event can be the venue for experimentation, of creativity and not just the annual attempt at giving the coolest name to a project going back to the lowest story denominator to attract new readers. When we grew up. Let this be where Moore&amp;#8217;s Twilight should have already been. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If you gravitate to comic communities I participate in this is where the broken record starts - I loved Final Crisis#1 and one of the main reasons I&#8217;m glad Heidi Macdonald is reporting that Dan Didio is getting an extension (after a really silly internet-spawned attempt at a Shellian neighborhood watch meeting with people a bit too much in the cups or just generally ignorant as Shelly portrayed) is that I want what looks to be a promising platform to be able to go through being a key and sanctioned part of current administration and not be something a new EIC would want to put past him or her. I&#8217;m excited not because it&#8217;s this superior single issue; sure I found it solid, but I like it more because for the first time major EVENT in comic book history that we have a modern writer at the helm. I don&#8217;t care if a lot of it is (and it is) bastardized Moorcockian themes and ideas: Seven Soldiers, Shade, Doom Patrol, Arkham Asylum, The Invisibles - all incredible, and he wrote the X-Men the last time it was remotely readable and unlike almost every &#8216;classic&#8217; X-Men story it still stands up no matter how much MARVEL wants to cajole Mephisto into magiking (Marvel editorial&#8217;s geek word for deus ex machina - which you know, we all love) it away. With recent event I found myself either involved in issues that were just a means to get to the discovery at the end or just full of Hollywood bullet points that lacked nuance - they were getting to a story, not telling one - a storyteller moves in multiple directions at all times, each moment; each panel leads to something more but is not just beholden to what occurs ahead, and the lack of this is why many recent events have held the status of &#8220;just tell me about it when it&#8217;s done&#8221; (in comics called: waiting for the trade). Final Crisis has me anticipating - I don&#8217;t know where it&#8217;s going, and I&#8217;m not a child of the Silver Age that some people say the current DC caters to, indeed I was never a DC fan as a child, I was firmly an ardent MARVEL Zombie, and I think it is this element of discovery that appeals to me. In an age where entire arcs or not much more than the publicity release we can read at Newsarama months before, Morrison at the helm is a promise of more, a promise of risk, and I hope he is able to mold it into a commercial success so we can look back on this event as when the Superhero Event can be the venue for experimentation, of creativity and not just the annual attempt at giving the coolest name to a project going back to the lowest story denominator to attract new readers. When we grew up. Let this be where Moore&#8217;s Twilight should have already been. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: R. Maheras</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808862</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808862</guid>
					<description>Think about your logic from a business standpoint. 

You are in effect saying that because of the way things are now, no serialized book should realistically expect a significant amount of new readers after the first issue is published. 

If that's the case, then for the publisher, there is no reason to overprint any subsequent issues beyond the first one, because that first issue sets the readership bar for that series, and the circulation for every issue after that will have the same circulation or less. As a matter of fact, it will always be less, because, as you point out, such a serialized title is not designed to attract new readers, and there will always have readers who drop a series after initially being on board. From a retailer’s standpoint, there’s no reason to order any more copies than the previous issue of any given title, and little reason to have large amounts of rack space.   

Can't you see that this is the antithesis of good business practices, which emphasizes growth -- i.e., increasing one's customer base? 

This is why I think rampant serialization in comics is bad for business -- especially in the long term. You and some others may like it because it makes you feel part of an exclusive clique, but such exclusionary practices, if widespread, kill one's customer base.

It would be one thing if a miniseries or a six-, 12- or 18-month-long story arc were done only occasionally, but they now appear to be the norm. And this new norm, I say, is not conducive to the health and growth of the industry.

Imagine if Marvel had such an “anti-growth” philosophy in 1961 – one that eschews new readers and focuses almost exclusively on serialization and a relatively small and select readership base. If they had, the “Amazing Spider-Man” miniseries would have come and gone, and no doubt, the character would now be long-forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about your logic from a business standpoint. </p>
<p>You are in effect saying that because of the way things are now, no serialized book should realistically expect a significant amount of new readers after the first issue is published. </p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, then for the publisher, there is no reason to overprint any subsequent issues beyond the first one, because that first issue sets the readership bar for that series, and the circulation for every issue after that will have the same circulation or less. As a matter of fact, it will always be less, because, as you point out, such a serialized title is not designed to attract new readers, and there will always have readers who drop a series after initially being on board. From a retailer’s standpoint, there’s no reason to order any more copies than the previous issue of any given title, and little reason to have large amounts of rack space.   </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t you see that this is the antithesis of good business practices, which emphasizes growth &#8212; i.e., increasing one&#8217;s customer base? </p>
<p>This is why I think rampant serialization in comics is bad for business &#8212; especially in the long term. You and some others may like it because it makes you feel part of an exclusive clique, but such exclusionary practices, if widespread, kill one&#8217;s customer base.</p>
<p>It would be one thing if a miniseries or a six-, 12- or 18-month-long story arc were done only occasionally, but they now appear to be the norm. And this new norm, I say, is not conducive to the health and growth of the industry.</p>
<p>Imagine if Marvel had such an “anti-growth” philosophy in 1961 – one that eschews new readers and focuses almost exclusively on serialization and a relatively small and select readership base. If they had, the “Amazing Spider-Man” miniseries would have come and gone, and no doubt, the character would now be long-forgotten.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808746</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808746</guid>
					<description>It's also important to separate out people in general, and those on the internet.  People on the internet complain.  About everything.  And they are certainly not, in any way, representative of the general public.

I'd also add that manga--which sells exceptionally well--is exactly the same.  A new reader would be just as lost in the 40th volume of Naruto as in the 40th issue of Green Lantern.  It's the nature of sequential stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also important to separate out people in general, and those on the internet.  People on the internet complain.  About everything.  And they are certainly not, in any way, representative of the general public.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also add that manga&#8211;which sells exceptionally well&#8211;is exactly the same.  A new reader would be just as lost in the 40th volume of Naruto as in the 40th issue of Green Lantern.  It&#8217;s the nature of sequential stories.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik Scott</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808579</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808579</guid>
					<description>&quot;I should be able to buy almost any comic book on the rack and be able to take it home, read it, and enjoy it.&quot;

Not neccessarily. Comics have changed fundamentally from the time Jim Shooter was a heavy hitter. The fact that most arcs within a storyline are setup as part ___ of ___ is just one example. IF your picking up part 4 of 5 on a book that clearly states it there should be some expectation that you are maybe not going to understand all of what is going on as it is stands. Expecting anything short of this is lofty at best.

Reading and enjoying are different from being able to comprehend. I comprehend the Fountainhead but I don't enjoy it.

I know this is heresy in some circles, but the storytelling in comics has changed, good, bad or indifferent. THe days of the one in done stories, hell even the days of Levitz and his triangulkar storytelling in Legion are over becaus ethe nature of the business with trades and all has changed. This doesn't mean the story telling in these books is bad, it's just different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I should be able to buy almost any comic book on the rack and be able to take it home, read it, and enjoy it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not neccessarily. Comics have changed fundamentally from the time Jim Shooter was a heavy hitter. The fact that most arcs within a storyline are setup as part ___ of ___ is just one example. IF your picking up part 4 of 5 on a book that clearly states it there should be some expectation that you are maybe not going to understand all of what is going on as it is stands. Expecting anything short of this is lofty at best.</p>
<p>Reading and enjoying are different from being able to comprehend. I comprehend the Fountainhead but I don&#8217;t enjoy it.</p>
<p>I know this is heresy in some circles, but the storytelling in comics has changed, good, bad or indifferent. THe days of the one in done stories, hell even the days of Levitz and his triangulkar storytelling in Legion are over becaus ethe nature of the business with trades and all has changed. This doesn&#8217;t mean the story telling in these books is bad, it&#8217;s just different.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: R. Maheras</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808174</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808174</guid>
					<description>Look, it is just good basic customer service to listen -- REALLY listen -- when customers have a gripe. And any manager with any experience will tell you that while one complaint may signal only an isolated incident, many, many complaints usually signal a fundamental problem with the product.

And, as any successful business manager will also tell you, a business generally doesn't enjoy success by FORCING customers to &quot;like it or lump it.&quot;

In short, if a significant percentage of comic book customers are complaining that many of today's stories are difficult to follow, than I think it would be wise to analyze the situation further, and if true, fix the problem. Trying to point fingers at the customers (i.e., inferring they're just dumb), or rationalizing the issue away, is a recipe for failure.

I was complaining on a message board recently that the first issue of &quot;Planetary&quot; I decided to try (coincidentally, one of the final issues) was not only incomprehensible, but extremely boring. The response from one poster? &quot;You were unlucky to probably pick one of the least new-reader friendly issues of it.&quot;

Jim Shooter supposedly once said that every issue of every comic is always someone's first, and I agree with that. I should be able to buy almost any comic book on the rack and be able to take it home, read it, and enjoy it.

I'm having a hard time doing that these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, it is just good basic customer service to listen &#8212; REALLY listen &#8212; when customers have a gripe. And any manager with any experience will tell you that while one complaint may signal only an isolated incident, many, many complaints usually signal a fundamental problem with the product.</p>
<p>And, as any successful business manager will also tell you, a business generally doesn&#8217;t enjoy success by FORCING customers to &#8220;like it or lump it.&#8221;</p>
<p>In short, if a significant percentage of comic book customers are complaining that many of today&#8217;s stories are difficult to follow, than I think it would be wise to analyze the situation further, and if true, fix the problem. Trying to point fingers at the customers (i.e., inferring they&#8217;re just dumb), or rationalizing the issue away, is a recipe for failure.</p>
<p>I was complaining on a message board recently that the first issue of &#8220;Planetary&#8221; I decided to try (coincidentally, one of the final issues) was not only incomprehensible, but extremely boring. The response from one poster? &#8220;You were unlucky to probably pick one of the least new-reader friendly issues of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jim Shooter supposedly once said that every issue of every comic is always someone&#8217;s first, and I agree with that. I should be able to buy almost any comic book on the rack and be able to take it home, read it, and enjoy it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time doing that these days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Evie</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808138</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1808138</guid>
					<description>I just need to drop my two cents that mainstream comics, from both publishers, are not impenetrable. I'm a 31 year-old woman who started reading them about three years ago, and pick up new ones all the time, and now I blog and podcast about them. Yes I've had to go back and do some research and resort to Wikipedia and all the rest of it, but that's what makes it fun. If people don't find that kind of thing fun, then they wouldn't appreciate giant-universe comics anyway. 

Like everyone else I think that both Marvel and DC have had some triumphs, tragedies and everything in between in the past few years, and the industry clearly has some issues, and maybe fresh blood would fix some of them. But I'm still enjoying myself, even if I occasionally complain about the wedgies in JLA, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just need to drop my two cents that mainstream comics, from both publishers, are not impenetrable. I&#8217;m a 31 year-old woman who started reading them about three years ago, and pick up new ones all the time, and now I blog and podcast about them. Yes I&#8217;ve had to go back and do some research and resort to Wikipedia and all the rest of it, but that&#8217;s what makes it fun. If people don&#8217;t find that kind of thing fun, then they wouldn&#8217;t appreciate giant-universe comics anyway. </p>
<p>Like everyone else I think that both Marvel and DC have had some triumphs, tragedies and everything in between in the past few years, and the industry clearly has some issues, and maybe fresh blood would fix some of them. But I&#8217;m still enjoying myself, even if I occasionally complain about the wedgies in JLA, etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik Scott</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807955</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807955</guid>
					<description>&quot;But mainstream comics have become impenetrable, both Marvel and DC.&quot;

I fundamentally disagree with this statement. There's a difference between wanting to know and needing to know information to understand story. It could just be difference in comprehension of the material or understanding of history in characters, but these are sequential comics and they are going to continue ongoing stories of the characters. 

For every person who claims that &quot;The Lightning Saga&quot; or &quot;Secret Invasion&quot; or &quot;Final Crisis&quot; as indecipherable, I can tell you about people who have picked it up as their 1st comic in months, years, or ever (I work in a comic book store) and had no problem following the story based on the exposition in the piece and their basic knowledge of the characters (not to mention the fact that many of these things aren't complete stories as of yet and so of course it's not a completely story and maybe confusing because the STORY ISN'T FINISHED YET!)

There is a huge difference in basic comprehension needed to follow a story and wanting to know every detail or &quot;easter egg&quot; place dinto a story to understand how it all ties in. THey are two completely different things, and sometimes I feel like people overread things to the point of a lack of comprehension.

Again, there is a seeming need in everything today for instant gratification instead of being able to wait for things to play out. This especially ends up unfortunately in the negative kerfuffle (borrowed with thanks to Greg Rucka) that occurs over the last week. I mean, people's need for instant gratification had Jimmy Palmioti installed as the new E-I-C of DC by Friday afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But mainstream comics have become impenetrable, both Marvel and DC.&#8221;</p>
<p>I fundamentally disagree with this statement. There&#8217;s a difference between wanting to know and needing to know information to understand story. It could just be difference in comprehension of the material or understanding of history in characters, but these are sequential comics and they are going to continue ongoing stories of the characters. </p>
<p>For every person who claims that &#8220;The Lightning Saga&#8221; or &#8220;Secret Invasion&#8221; or &#8220;Final Crisis&#8221; as indecipherable, I can tell you about people who have picked it up as their 1st comic in months, years, or ever (I work in a comic book store) and had no problem following the story based on the exposition in the piece and their basic knowledge of the characters (not to mention the fact that many of these things aren&#8217;t complete stories as of yet and so of course it&#8217;s not a completely story and maybe confusing because the STORY ISN&#8217;T FINISHED YET!)</p>
<p>There is a huge difference in basic comprehension needed to follow a story and wanting to know every detail or &#8220;easter egg&#8221; place dinto a story to understand how it all ties in. THey are two completely different things, and sometimes I feel like people overread things to the point of a lack of comprehension.</p>
<p>Again, there is a seeming need in everything today for instant gratification instead of being able to wait for things to play out. This especially ends up unfortunately in the negative kerfuffle (borrowed with thanks to Greg Rucka) that occurs over the last week. I mean, people&#8217;s need for instant gratification had Jimmy Palmioti installed as the new E-I-C of DC by Friday afternoon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Capper</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807822</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807822</guid>
					<description>My guess is that DC measures Didio's performance based on past DC numbers, not comparing DC's performance to Marvel's.  Because DC is in an entirely different structure than Marvel, I think DC management would consider comparing Didio's DC to Marvel would be apples to oranges.  Also, because DC doesn't have a fluctuating stock price to measure management's performance, I believe it would take quite some time before declining numbers would be considered significant by DC management (they don't answer to stockholders, they answer to Time Warner suits who just look at spreadsheets).  So Didio has a longer leash than someone like Quesada as (and with Time Warner's other management problems, slightly lower sales at DC probably do not look all that bad).  I think it would take years of declining sales before Didio's position would be in danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that DC measures Didio&#8217;s performance based on past DC numbers, not comparing DC&#8217;s performance to Marvel&#8217;s.  Because DC is in an entirely different structure than Marvel, I think DC management would consider comparing Didio&#8217;s DC to Marvel would be apples to oranges.  Also, because DC doesn&#8217;t have a fluctuating stock price to measure management&#8217;s performance, I believe it would take quite some time before declining numbers would be considered significant by DC management (they don&#8217;t answer to stockholders, they answer to Time Warner suits who just look at spreadsheets).  So Didio has a longer leash than someone like Quesada as (and with Time Warner&#8217;s other management problems, slightly lower sales at DC probably do not look all that bad).  I think it would take years of declining sales before Didio&#8217;s position would be in danger.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AndyD</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807775</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807775</guid>
					<description>But mainstream comics have become impenetrable, both Marvel and DC. I bought a tradepaperback of Brad Meltzer´s JLA - the one where they resurrect some Flash or whatever - and had to spend half an hour on the Wikipedia because I virtually didn´t understand the story.

Of course as a reader I used to more informed on things like continuity, but I cut back drastically. It is a difference if you pay 6 USD for a story you feel disappointed with at the end or 18.

There are so many things which leeches the fun out of DC´s  or Marvels output. The ever faster revolving writers and artists, the more often than not ill-conceived editorially dictated storylines, the sheer hypocricy of today´s editors. You can´t dismiss the vocal internet critics as meaningless fanboy whining on the one hand if you hype your product across the boards nearly weekly as the best ever. Why do all that work for a few hundred idiots in the first place? If that is you idea of marketing, you really have a problem. Back before the Internet the editors didn´t give press releases at the drop of a hat. Why today? Are the Didio´s and the Quesada´s and the Millar´s that desperate for attention? 

And if you as EIC insist on doing event-driven comics only, fine. It is your call. But if you are unable to cordinate your series that the key-points of your story match - as so aptly demonstrated with the whole New God´s debacle - you are not doing a good job. It is that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But mainstream comics have become impenetrable, both Marvel and DC. I bought a tradepaperback of Brad Meltzer´s JLA - the one where they resurrect some Flash or whatever - and had to spend half an hour on the Wikipedia because I virtually didn´t understand the story.</p>
<p>Of course as a reader I used to more informed on things like continuity, but I cut back drastically. It is a difference if you pay 6 USD for a story you feel disappointed with at the end or 18.</p>
<p>There are so many things which leeches the fun out of DC´s  or Marvels output. The ever faster revolving writers and artists, the more often than not ill-conceived editorially dictated storylines, the sheer hypocricy of today´s editors. You can´t dismiss the vocal internet critics as meaningless fanboy whining on the one hand if you hype your product across the boards nearly weekly as the best ever. Why do all that work for a few hundred idiots in the first place? If that is you idea of marketing, you really have a problem. Back before the Internet the editors didn´t give press releases at the drop of a hat. Why today? Are the Didio´s and the Quesada´s and the Millar´s that desperate for attention? </p>
<p>And if you as EIC insist on doing event-driven comics only, fine. It is your call. But if you are unable to cordinate your series that the key-points of your story match - as so aptly demonstrated with the whole New God´s debacle - you are not doing a good job. It is that simple.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Erik Scott</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807773</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807773</guid>
					<description>People have been saying that Marvel has been kicking DC's but for years and this has to have put Didio's job in jeopardy, but has it occurred to anyone that the DC bottom line is not even remotely related to being beaten by Marvel aside from the minor PR it creates? I think DC's bottom line from Didio is &quot;Are we selling more books now than before you got here?&quot; Based on Marc Oliver Frich's numbers, while numbers have decreased over the last few years, DCU is still up 9.4% over five years ago, which was when Didio started. Taking into account the current economy, the lack of a major civil war like event last year, which if anything was probably their biggest mistake, I'm fairly sure that the fact that their sales are still up almost 10% (and who knows how much they are up over before that...I don't have the numbers for that anywhere that I can see...but one would imagine they are up even more than that from the years preceding Dan Didio's first years) is more than likely what fostered their extension of his concept.

People can complain about Countdown (I personally thought it was inconistent at times but was by no means unreadable), and sure it wasn't as sucessful as 52, but it still sold 70,000 a month and did conistently better than most of the rest of their books conistently coming in the top 20 that was hugely dominated by Marvel. And since 52 by all accounts over-acheived from what they expected, the &quot;Paul is dead&quot; type of announcements about Countdown being ac omplete failure are just that. The fact that people thought it was &quot;so bad&quot; and it still outsold most of their line shows me at least exactly what they buying base is compared to the extremely vocal &quot;base&quot; on the internet.

Bottom line is, in a year, when the hardcover comes out for Final Crisis, are we going to be talking about the inconcistencies between two stories that are going to mean nothing to the DCU as it stands at that point, or are we going to be talking about this brilliant story Grant Morrison has written..blah blah blah. The latter I guess remains to be seen by many of the reviews of the first issue, (I ersonally thought it was a brilliant beginning to an awesome story, and the instant gratification generation showed itself in spades in some of the reviews that came out) but still exists.

At the end of the day story is going to always win out long term over small continuity gaffes. If you can't get over the small stuff, and ejoy what's out there, well then, I really feel sorry for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have been saying that Marvel has been kicking DC&#8217;s but for years and this has to have put Didio&#8217;s job in jeopardy, but has it occurred to anyone that the DC bottom line is not even remotely related to being beaten by Marvel aside from the minor PR it creates? I think DC&#8217;s bottom line from Didio is &#8220;Are we selling more books now than before you got here?&#8221; Based on Marc Oliver Frich&#8217;s numbers, while numbers have decreased over the last few years, DCU is still up 9.4% over five years ago, which was when Didio started. Taking into account the current economy, the lack of a major civil war like event last year, which if anything was probably their biggest mistake, I&#8217;m fairly sure that the fact that their sales are still up almost 10% (and who knows how much they are up over before that&#8230;I don&#8217;t have the numbers for that anywhere that I can see&#8230;but one would imagine they are up even more than that from the years preceding Dan Didio&#8217;s first years) is more than likely what fostered their extension of his concept.</p>
<p>People can complain about Countdown (I personally thought it was inconistent at times but was by no means unreadable), and sure it wasn&#8217;t as sucessful as 52, but it still sold 70,000 a month and did conistently better than most of the rest of their books conistently coming in the top 20 that was hugely dominated by Marvel. And since 52 by all accounts over-acheived from what they expected, the &#8220;Paul is dead&#8221; type of announcements about Countdown being ac omplete failure are just that. The fact that people thought it was &#8220;so bad&#8221; and it still outsold most of their line shows me at least exactly what they buying base is compared to the extremely vocal &#8220;base&#8221; on the internet.</p>
<p>Bottom line is, in a year, when the hardcover comes out for Final Crisis, are we going to be talking about the inconcistencies between two stories that are going to mean nothing to the DCU as it stands at that point, or are we going to be talking about this brilliant story Grant Morrison has written..blah blah blah. The latter I guess remains to be seen by many of the reviews of the first issue, (I ersonally thought it was a brilliant beginning to an awesome story, and the instant gratification generation showed itself in spades in some of the reviews that came out) but still exists.</p>
<p>At the end of the day story is going to always win out long term over small continuity gaffes. If you can&#8217;t get over the small stuff, and ejoy what&#8217;s out there, well then, I really feel sorry for you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807571</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807571</guid>
					<description>I think to many folks are throwing the baby out with the bath water here. DC has made a few mistakes, the biggest and most obvious being Countdown and it's intersection with Final Crisis. But there have been others, but at the same time they are putting out some great titles right now. Action Comics, JSA, Green Lantern, Batman, Detective and Superman/Batman are really good books with solid creative teams. 

Not all their out put is bad and their are some creators that are pouring their hearts out over there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think to many folks are throwing the baby out with the bath water here. DC has made a few mistakes, the biggest and most obvious being Countdown and it&#8217;s intersection with Final Crisis. But there have been others, but at the same time they are putting out some great titles right now. Action Comics, JSA, Green Lantern, Batman, Detective and Superman/Batman are really good books with solid creative teams. </p>
<p>Not all their out put is bad and their are some creators that are pouring their hearts out over there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RJTressel</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807566</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807566</guid>
					<description>Except that sales figures in a vacuum are meaningless. Are we comparing them to Marvel's sales, or DC's sales from pre-2004? Because if we use the latter, then DiDio is doing his job, and doing it well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that sales figures in a vacuum are meaningless. Are we comparing them to Marvel&#8217;s sales, or DC&#8217;s sales from pre-2004? Because if we use the latter, then DiDio is doing his job, and doing it well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807405</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807405</guid>
					<description>People claim that readers shouldn't piss and moan about Didio, they should just vote with their wallets.

As the numbers have indicated, many people have stopped buying DC Comics and DC sales are in the toilet.

It didn't help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People claim that readers shouldn&#8217;t piss and moan about Didio, they should just vote with their wallets.</p>
<p>As the numbers have indicated, many people have stopped buying DC Comics and DC sales are in the toilet.</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t help.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas Gerhardt</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807139</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1807139</guid>
					<description>Why piss and moan? Stop buying. Exercise your choice as a customer. You want Didio gone? Stop buying the things you piss and moan about yet continue to buy... so you CAN piss and moan. 

You do that, he'll be out of a job next Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why piss and moan? Stop buying. Exercise your choice as a customer. You want Didio gone? Stop buying the things you piss and moan about yet continue to buy&#8230; so you CAN piss and moan. </p>
<p>You do that, he&#8217;ll be out of a job next Friday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mario</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1806942</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1806942</guid>
					<description>well, in sports if your team doesn't play wel and win games, it's the coach that gets the boot. 
In business if the quarterly results are going down and the company's name has a negative image, they fire the CEO

In comics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, in sports if your team doesn&#8217;t play wel and win games, it&#8217;s the coach that gets the boot.<br />
In business if the quarterly results are going down and the company&#8217;s name has a negative image, they fire the CEO</p>
<p>In comics&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nvigneaux</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1805930</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1805930</guid>
					<description>I don't read DC comics, but I like Dan DiDio.  His &quot;Sunday Conversation&quot; panel at Heroes Con was great fun.  I'm glad he has a job for a few more years.  

It's all a crap-shoot, people.  Don't just blame DiDio and call it a day.  He makes the big decisions, but he can't make people buy the books.  

The things people will choose to spend their money on are hard to predict.  If you had told me a new Mike Meyers comedy would only gross $14 mil. on opening weekend in the middle of the summer, I would have laughed.  You really can never tell until the work is out and the people vote with their wallets.  

Also, if you don't like what's going on in the DCU, buy Brave and the Bold.  From what I understand, it's not tied into anything and tells a complete story in every issue.  Stop ranting about &quot;event fatigue&quot; and take some done-in-one medicine to get you through the summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t read DC comics, but I like Dan DiDio.  His &#8220;Sunday Conversation&#8221; panel at Heroes Con was great fun.  I&#8217;m glad he has a job for a few more years.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all a crap-shoot, people.  Don&#8217;t just blame DiDio and call it a day.  He makes the big decisions, but he can&#8217;t make people buy the books.  </p>
<p>The things people will choose to spend their money on are hard to predict.  If you had told me a new Mike Meyers comedy would only gross $14 mil. on opening weekend in the middle of the summer, I would have laughed.  You really can never tell until the work is out and the people vote with their wallets.  </p>
<p>Also, if you don&#8217;t like what&#8217;s going on in the DCU, buy Brave and the Bold.  From what I understand, it&#8217;s not tied into anything and tells a complete story in every issue.  Stop ranting about &#8220;event fatigue&#8221; and take some done-in-one medicine to get you through the summer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Moonlight @ Moonlight Art Magazine</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804884</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804884</guid>
					<description>Thanks Alan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804580</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804580</guid>
					<description>Christopher Moonlight---

The emphasis goes on the second 'Di'... diDIo. dih-DEE-oh. 

Sorta like P.Diddy (who is now just Diddy), only stressed differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher Moonlight&#8212;</p>
<p>The emphasis goes on the second &#8216;Di&#8217;&#8230; diDIo. dih-DEE-oh. </p>
<p>Sorta like P.Diddy (who is now just Diddy), only stressed differently.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Xenos</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804481</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804481</guid>
					<description>Maybe I myself have been hard on DiDio.  (Though I never did call him DidIdiot, I did post pcitures of a guy from Plan 9 From Outter Space as him.) Yet maybe I'm looking at the glass as half empty. I've focused on his mistakes and ignored his successes.  I've chalked the successes up to the writers alone and the failures up to him and editorial.  Then again, from the recent Dixon bit to Bart Allen to Winick and Jason Todd to Batgirl's fiasco to damn well killing Nightwing; those are some big gripes I've had. A head honcho thinks a favorite character is useless and has his poster boy writer ready to replace him with a dead character, I may hold a bit of a grudge.

Though also some of the pitches and attitude I see in con interviews, that DC Nation bit, and even promo videos I haven't been impressed with DiDio.  Of course, &quot;if you're so smart why aren't you rich?&quot; I got complaints but no answers, no replacement for him.

Well, seems we're stuck with this commander in chief for four more years, or however long the new contract is.  

Richard Pachter (a/k/a Rockin' Rich) Says: 
&quot;I won’t believe this until I hear about it officially… from Warren Ellis.&quot;

Yes! It is not true until the prophecy of internet Jesus himself has confirmed it!  :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I myself have been hard on DiDio.  (Though I never did call him DidIdiot, I did post pcitures of a guy from Plan 9 From Outter Space as him.) Yet maybe I&#8217;m looking at the glass as half empty. I&#8217;ve focused on his mistakes and ignored his successes.  I&#8217;ve chalked the successes up to the writers alone and the failures up to him and editorial.  Then again, from the recent Dixon bit to Bart Allen to Winick and Jason Todd to Batgirl&#8217;s fiasco to damn well killing Nightwing; those are some big gripes I&#8217;ve had. A head honcho thinks a favorite character is useless and has his poster boy writer ready to replace him with a dead character, I may hold a bit of a grudge.</p>
<p>Though also some of the pitches and attitude I see in con interviews, that DC Nation bit, and even promo videos I haven&#8217;t been impressed with DiDio.  Of course, &#8220;if you&#8217;re so smart why aren&#8217;t you rich?&#8221; I got complaints but no answers, no replacement for him.</p>
<p>Well, seems we&#8217;re stuck with this commander in chief for four more years, or however long the new contract is.  </p>
<p>Richard Pachter (a/k/a Rockin&#8217; Rich) Says:<br />
&#8220;I won’t believe this until I hear about it officially… from Warren Ellis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes! It is not true until the prophecy of internet Jesus himself has confirmed it!  :p
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sphinx Magoo</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804414</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804414</guid>
					<description>You know what I'd like to see Didio do to increase sales? An across-the-board price cut. I would so increase the number of DC books I purchase every month, and most of my books are DC anyway. But dang it, it's too freakin' expensive! I'm old enough to remember when comics cost as much as a candy bar, so seeing that a new book goes for 3 or 4 bucks (or more sometimes when it's from Marvel!) really makes me second- and triple-guess my purchases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what I&#8217;d like to see Didio do to increase sales? An across-the-board price cut. I would so increase the number of DC books I purchase every month, and most of my books are DC anyway. But dang it, it&#8217;s too freakin&#8217; expensive! I&#8217;m old enough to remember when comics cost as much as a candy bar, so seeing that a new book goes for 3 or 4 bucks (or more sometimes when it&#8217;s from Marvel!) really makes me second- and triple-guess my purchases.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804385</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804385</guid>
					<description>What's sad is when sales continue to slide, i.e. more and more people stop buying DC Comics, people will blame either comics as an industry for no longer being a relevant medium or the characters for being stale and not connecting with consumers.

Characters are like puppets, they are only as stale or good as their puppeteers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s sad is when sales continue to slide, i.e. more and more people stop buying DC Comics, people will blame either comics as an industry for no longer being a relevant medium or the characters for being stale and not connecting with consumers.</p>
<p>Characters are like puppets, they are only as stale or good as their puppeteers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RJTressel</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804337</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/06/23/dc-update-didio-not-going-anywhere/#comment-1804337</guid>
					<description>Has there ever been a significant period of time over the past thirty years where Marvel wasn't number #1 and DC #2? Looking at this week's books, Marvel is putting out nearly twice the number of books that DC is. Marvel has always won with volume. 
And DC's numbers are up over the past four years, which means that DiDio, regardless of what you think about his decisions, is doing his job. So saying that Marvel's &quot;trouncing&quot; of DC is reason for Didio's dismissal is not enough. TW doesn't care whether DC is number #1 or #2 as much as it cares if it is making more money than it was--which appears is so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there ever been a significant period of time over the past thirty years where Marvel wasn&#8217;t number #1 and DC #2? Looking at this week&#8217;s books, Marvel is putting out nearly twice the number of books that DC is. Marvel has always won with volume.<br />
And DC&#8217;s numbers are up over the past four years, which means that DiDio, regardless of what you think about his decisions, is doing his job. So saying that Marvel&#8217;s &#8220;trouncing&#8221; of DC is reason for Didio&#8217;s dismissal is not enough. TW doesn&#8217;t care whether DC is number #1 or #2 as much as it cares if it is making more money than it was&#8211;which appears is so.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
