<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Minx</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 12:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Traci 13 - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2449203</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2449203</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Traci 13 - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2449202</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2449202</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mickle</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2436134</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2436134</guid>
					<description>&quot;My 12 year old daughter loved “The Plain Janes.”

This is what I keep hearing, and it completely misses the point.

It sounds like  the books were popular among 11 and 12 year olds but not among 15 and 16 year olds they were intended for, and so instead of shifting their focus, DC scrapped the entire project.

This makes the whole shelving issue even more complicated, too.  Because the teen manga section at B&amp;#38;N veers younger than the teen fiction section.  There is a bigger crossover between Young Readers and Teen Manga, and Teen Fiction and Adult Graphic Novels,  than there is between Teen Fiction and Teen Manga - at least at B&amp;#38;N anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My 12 year old daughter loved “The Plain Janes.”</p>
<p>This is what I keep hearing, and it completely misses the point.</p>
<p>It sounds like  the books were popular among 11 and 12 year olds but not among 15 and 16 year olds they were intended for, and so instead of shifting their focus, DC scrapped the entire project.</p>
<p>This makes the whole shelving issue even more complicated, too.  Because the teen manga section at B&amp;N veers younger than the teen fiction section.  There is a bigger crossover between Young Readers and Teen Manga, and Teen Fiction and Adult Graphic Novels,  than there is between Teen Fiction and Teen Manga - at least at B&amp;N anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Minx at Fantastic Fangirls: Comics and Culture</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2434289</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2434289</guid>
					<description>[...] The Minx line of graphic novels recently ceased publication. Heidi MacDonald has an excellent comprehensive post about the end, here. I&amp;#8217;m not going to replicate that. I am interested in something slightly different &amp;#8212; did DC, in fact, publish what they meant to? Did they publish &amp;#8220;smart, original stories about real girls in the real world &amp;#8230; resulting in unexpected adventures&amp;#8221;? I own and have read all the Minx titles. And I think the answer is yes, DC did publish exactly what they said they would. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Minx line of graphic novels recently ceased publication. Heidi MacDonald has an excellent comprehensive post about the end, here. I&#8217;m not going to replicate that. I am interested in something slightly different &#8212; did DC, in fact, publish what they meant to? Did they publish &#8220;smart, original stories about real girls in the real world &#8230; resulting in unexpected adventures&#8221;? I own and have read all the Minx titles. And I think the answer is yes, DC did publish exactly what they said they would. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hawk as Holly Granger and Sasha Martens - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2429304</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2429304</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hawk as Holly Granger and Sasha Martens - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2429305</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2429305</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Superwoman - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2428739</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2428739</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Superwoman - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2428738</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2428738</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Supergirl - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2422188</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2422188</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Supergirl - DC Female Superheroes</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2422189</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2422189</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joy Kim &#8212; Farewell to Minx</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2400419</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2400419</guid>
					<description>[...] More Minx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] More Minx [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Farewell to Minx &#171; Fumbling with Fiction</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2386105</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2386105</guid>
					<description>[...] Publishers Weekly The Beat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Publishers Weekly The Beat [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Minx, Manga, and Disappointment &#171; Bookslide III</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2380349</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2380349</guid>
					<description>[...] Do these same readers [adult males who have commented on the end of the Minx line] check out GOSSIP GIRLS and TWILIGHT? OrNANA or SHOJO BEAT or HONEY AND CLOVER? The idea of adult men liking the same things as teenage girls is a vaguely disturbing one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Do these same readers [adult males who have commented on the end of the Minx line] check out GOSSIP GIRLS and TWILIGHT? OrNANA or SHOJO BEAT or HONEY AND CLOVER? The idea of adult men liking the same things as teenage girls is a vaguely disturbing one. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: D.K.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2379087</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2379087</guid>
					<description>Sorry about that.
I wonder how much marketing budget they usually spend. The comic book market is small and narrow, though, so $125,000 seems to be quite small amount of money. Do publishers advertise their books to unspecified mass, not to genre fans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that.<br />
I wonder how much marketing budget they usually spend. The comic book market is small and narrow, though, so $125,000 seems to be quite small amount of money. Do publishers advertise their books to unspecified mass, not to genre fans?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ted stearn</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2379042</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 06:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2379042</guid>
					<description>My 12 year old daughter loved &quot;The Plain Janes.&quot; But she got it from the library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 12 year old daughter loved &#8220;The Plain Janes.&#8221; But she got it from the library.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Poison Ivy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2378791</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2378791</guid>
					<description>May I talk about reverse prejudice for a sec? I don't buy books about girls and women that are written and drawn by men. Cecil may be a woman, but a girl looking for a girl's book (you've got how many seconds to hook a reader with your cover art and copy?) is not likely to know this. And that is enough reason to pass it by. Good as Lily, another excellent story, again has two male names on the cover. Duh. 

Rod, I think you have the right idea. Although the art was interesting in the two Minx titles I read, it wasn't pretty. So it would not appeal to the manga audience that is used to beautiful, meticulously detailed artwork. I also noted that there was a comical aspect to the Hamm artwork--grotesqueness especially in the male characters who might be presumed to be attractive to a female reader but were not drawn as attractive, and a deliberate awkwardness to the Rugg artwork as well despite a smooth ink line. So on strictly visual terms, these Minx books did not deliver the subtext of sexual beauty that manga artwork does. (I could go on, and will on my own blog at a later date.)

But Minx could have made it on its own terms, given less ambitious sales expectations. Sincere writing, which it had, always finds an audience. It might not be a huge audience, though, and comics are mass products as books often are not. And it takes time to find the readers and for the readers to be willing to try what for them would be a new medium. As others have pointed out, to hook the teenage crowd, you have to hang around for a while. Too bad they pulled the plug so soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I talk about reverse prejudice for a sec? I don&#8217;t buy books about girls and women that are written and drawn by men. Cecil may be a woman, but a girl looking for a girl&#8217;s book (you&#8217;ve got how many seconds to hook a reader with your cover art and copy?) is not likely to know this. And that is enough reason to pass it by. Good as Lily, another excellent story, again has two male names on the cover. Duh. </p>
<p>Rod, I think you have the right idea. Although the art was interesting in the two Minx titles I read, it wasn&#8217;t pretty. So it would not appeal to the manga audience that is used to beautiful, meticulously detailed artwork. I also noted that there was a comical aspect to the Hamm artwork&#8211;grotesqueness especially in the male characters who might be presumed to be attractive to a female reader but were not drawn as attractive, and a deliberate awkwardness to the Rugg artwork as well despite a smooth ink line. So on strictly visual terms, these Minx books did not deliver the subtext of sexual beauty that manga artwork does. (I could go on, and will on my own blog at a later date.)</p>
<p>But Minx could have made it on its own terms, given less ambitious sales expectations. Sincere writing, which it had, always finds an audience. It might not be a huge audience, though, and comics are mass products as books often are not. And it takes time to find the readers and for the readers to be willing to try what for them would be a new medium. As others have pointed out, to hook the teenage crowd, you have to hang around for a while. Too bad they pulled the plug so soon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kat Kan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2377379</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2377379</guid>
					<description>Y'all haven't been talking to too many librarians.  At a library listserv, quite a few librarians posted that the Minx titles were indeed popular with the teens, that the books were circulating (i.e. checked out) all the time.  The library market takes time to grow; the bureaucracy in some systems doesn't allow for &quot;impulse buying&quot; of popular titles.  By giving the line less than 2 years to prove itself, DC shows its lack of understanding of one of the major components of the market for this line of books.  Quite a lot of the libraries out here can't purchase books that don't have at least one positive review in the library media - that means comics blogs don't count.  Reviews have to appear in Library Journal, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, VOYA, School Library Journal, Library Media Connections, Teacher Librarian, and other such library media.  As much as I personally value the comics blogs, they're not official.  And getting reviews into library media takes time.  Now, we did do our part - Booklist has reviewed a number of the Minx titles, as has VOYA and School Library Journal.  But it all takes time.  And DC didn't give Minx enough of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;all haven&#8217;t been talking to too many librarians.  At a library listserv, quite a few librarians posted that the Minx titles were indeed popular with the teens, that the books were circulating (i.e. checked out) all the time.  The library market takes time to grow; the bureaucracy in some systems doesn&#8217;t allow for &#8220;impulse buying&#8221; of popular titles.  By giving the line less than 2 years to prove itself, DC shows its lack of understanding of one of the major components of the market for this line of books.  Quite a lot of the libraries out here can&#8217;t purchase books that don&#8217;t have at least one positive review in the library media - that means comics blogs don&#8217;t count.  Reviews have to appear in Library Journal, Publishers Weekly, Booklist, VOYA, School Library Journal, Library Media Connections, Teacher Librarian, and other such library media.  As much as I personally value the comics blogs, they&#8217;re not official.  And getting reviews into library media takes time.  Now, we did do our part - Booklist has reviewed a number of the Minx titles, as has VOYA and School Library Journal.  But it all takes time.  And DC didn&#8217;t give Minx enough of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mc</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376656</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376656</guid>
					<description>One piece of news missing from the press release:
Clubbing In Tokyo was written by Andi Watson, inked by Josh howard but DRAWN by Grazia Lobaccaro (seen on Silent Dance by Slave Labor).

I think it's sad the line got canceled so early, really... a lot of effort went into production (I was not personally involved but saw it happen) and it's just bad to see it go like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One piece of news missing from the press release:<br />
Clubbing In Tokyo was written by Andi Watson, inked by Josh howard but DRAWN by Grazia Lobaccaro (seen on Silent Dance by Slave Labor).</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s sad the line got canceled so early, really&#8230; a lot of effort went into production (I was not personally involved but saw it happen) and it&#8217;s just bad to see it go like this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: comics212 - never safe for work. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Very Minxy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376621</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376621</guid>
					<description>[...] But that said, DC really were behind this line and these books. Yesterday Heidi had &amp;#8220;I know from many conversations that the Minx line wasn’t very popular with the rank and file of DC,&amp;#8221; and that&amp;#8217;s my experience as well, but so what? Everyone at DC in the sales department was (in my observation) entirely professional in my dealings with them in regards to the Minx line. They pushed the books like they should; they gave the Direct Market a really, really great ordering incentive on the books, offering full returnability on unsold copies&amp;#8230; They got behind each release every week in the same way they did with everything else, and the worst thing I ever heard someone from DC say about the books is &amp;#8220;They&amp;#8217;re not really my thing&amp;#8230;&amp;#8221; which is actually kind of refreshing to hear, coming from a twenty- or thirty-something man. AND they were quick to follow-up with &amp;#8220;But I&amp;#8217;ve read them and I some of them are strong, I think there&amp;#8217;s an audience,&amp;#8221; because in the end they&amp;#8217;re sales reps and that&amp;#8217;s their job, to sell stuff. I never felt, as a retailer or as a book-industry observer, that the publisher wasn&amp;#8217;t 100% behind these books. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] But that said, DC really were behind this line and these books. Yesterday Heidi had &#8220;I know from many conversations that the Minx line wasn’t very popular with the rank and file of DC,&#8221; and that&#8217;s my experience as well, but so what? Everyone at DC in the sales department was (in my observation) entirely professional in my dealings with them in regards to the Minx line. They pushed the books like they should; they gave the Direct Market a really, really great ordering incentive on the books, offering full returnability on unsold copies&#8230; They got behind each release every week in the same way they did with everything else, and the worst thing I ever heard someone from DC say about the books is &#8220;They&#8217;re not really my thing&#8230;&#8221; which is actually kind of refreshing to hear, coming from a twenty- or thirty-something man. AND they were quick to follow-up with &#8220;But I&#8217;ve read them and I some of them are strong, I think there&#8217;s an audience,&#8221; because in the end they&#8217;re sales reps and that&#8217;s their job, to sell stuff. I never felt, as a retailer or as a book-industry observer, that the publisher wasn&#8217;t 100% behind these books. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven R. Stahl</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376145</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376145</guid>
					<description>Reading comics and viewing videos intended for teenage girls raise fewer questions about sexuality, IMO, than the actions do about the psychology of reading. I doubt that those readers would pick up a “Traveling Pants” paperback by Brashares, a “Princess Diaries” book by Cabot, or any of the other thousands of prose fiction books for girls out there, because the content isn’t visual. They’re valuing the format over the content, and acting like someone who’ll watch whatever is on TV at any given moment because he wants the visual stimulation, or needs the distraction. Reading prose and getting into the story, conversely, requires concentration.

I suspect that a significant number of comics readers tolerate out-and-out junk in the material they buy because it’s visually diverting, and even a few enjoyable panels amidst the muck can justify the price and time, whereas trying to make it through an incompetently written prose story would make such a reader stop within a few minutes, if he ever started.

SRS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading comics and viewing videos intended for teenage girls raise fewer questions about sexuality, IMO, than the actions do about the psychology of reading. I doubt that those readers would pick up a “Traveling Pants” paperback by Brashares, a “Princess Diaries” book by Cabot, or any of the other thousands of prose fiction books for girls out there, because the content isn’t visual. They’re valuing the format over the content, and acting like someone who’ll watch whatever is on TV at any given moment because he wants the visual stimulation, or needs the distraction. Reading prose and getting into the story, conversely, requires concentration.</p>
<p>I suspect that a significant number of comics readers tolerate out-and-out junk in the material they buy because it’s visually diverting, and even a few enjoyable panels amidst the muck can justify the price and time, whereas trying to make it through an incompetently written prose story would make such a reader stop within a few minutes, if he ever started.</p>
<p>SRS
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Good Comics for Kids &#187; That touch of Minx</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376116</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376116</guid>
					<description>[...] Heidi MacDonald at The Beat (1) Heidi MacDonald at The Beat (2) Heidi MacDonald at The Beat (3) This last post has lots of links to other discussions. I hope you weren&amp;#8217;t planning on doing anything else today. Also, read the comments on all three of Heidi&amp;#8217;s posts as they are fascinating freewheeling discussions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Heidi MacDonald at The Beat (1) Heidi MacDonald at The Beat (2) Heidi MacDonald at The Beat (3) This last post has lots of links to other discussions. I hope you weren&#8217;t planning on doing anything else today. Also, read the comments on all three of Heidi&#8217;s posts as they are fascinating freewheeling discussions. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Faith Hicks</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376102</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2376102</guid>
					<description>I'd be extra-horrified at DC's lack of commitment to the Minx line if the reason my project wasn't picked up was that they were already planning to disband Minx.  I started working with Shelly on the pitch just as The Plain Janes was released (in the summer of 2007), so right when Minx started out. My pitch was supposed to be for the third year of Minx (2009). 

As I look at the line, I probably wasn't right for it as a creator, so while I was at first really disappointed that nothing came of the pitch, it worked out okay in the end. Still trying to get rid of that student loan, though! It haunts me.

Like many, I'm very sad to see the line go. I think it had a lot of potential. I think better covers could have really helped the books, personally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be extra-horrified at DC&#8217;s lack of commitment to the Minx line if the reason my project wasn&#8217;t picked up was that they were already planning to disband Minx.  I started working with Shelly on the pitch just as The Plain Janes was released (in the summer of 2007), so right when Minx started out. My pitch was supposed to be for the third year of Minx (2009). </p>
<p>As I look at the line, I probably wasn&#8217;t right for it as a creator, so while I was at first really disappointed that nothing came of the pitch, it worked out okay in the end. Still trying to get rid of that student loan, though! It haunts me.</p>
<p>Like many, I&#8217;m very sad to see the line go. I think it had a lot of potential. I think better covers could have really helped the books, personally&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shannon Smith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375999</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375999</guid>
					<description>The skinny spines do make the books hard to pick out in graphic novels and even with the manga but I think the books were formated exactly right for the YA section.  However, even in the YA section, these things don't usually stand out until you have about three volumes of the series on the shelf.  This is also just a matter of how book retail works.  You have one title in a series, big deal.  Join the other 70,000 titles we have in the store.  But volume three or four show up and hey, we've got enough books for a display.  Enough books for face-outs.  Enough books for endcaps.  Of course Naruto sells well.  Bookstores want their customers to feel like they stock everything.  Naruto has 20 plus volumes, you can display the crap out of that stuff.  Same with Gossip Girl, Harry Potter, Lemmony Snickett, Junnie B Jones, Captain Underpants etc. etc.  I know I keep blabbing on and on but I guess my point is that DC did not have realistic expectations based on how YA series books have had success in the past or, simply put, they gave up too early.  And of course having a lot of volumes is not everything.  A bad book won't be a hit no matter how many volumes you have but these books were pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The skinny spines do make the books hard to pick out in graphic novels and even with the manga but I think the books were formated exactly right for the YA section.  However, even in the YA section, these things don&#8217;t usually stand out until you have about three volumes of the series on the shelf.  This is also just a matter of how book retail works.  You have one title in a series, big deal.  Join the other 70,000 titles we have in the store.  But volume three or four show up and hey, we&#8217;ve got enough books for a display.  Enough books for face-outs.  Enough books for endcaps.  Of course Naruto sells well.  Bookstores want their customers to feel like they stock everything.  Naruto has 20 plus volumes, you can display the crap out of that stuff.  Same with Gossip Girl, Harry Potter, Lemmony Snickett, Junnie B Jones, Captain Underpants etc. etc.  I know I keep blabbing on and on but I guess my point is that DC did not have realistic expectations based on how YA series books have had success in the past or, simply put, they gave up too early.  And of course having a lot of volumes is not everything.  A bad book won&#8217;t be a hit no matter how many volumes you have but these books were pretty good.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Vichus Smith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375569</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375569</guid>
					<description>As a man with money in his budget for comics, I think I'm free to buy pantyhose if I want to. Yes, we are not the target audience, the 20-45 male, but as long as money's in the cash register, who gives a toss? 

I do enjoy some &quot;girl stuff,&quot; such as the more girly genres of anime and some CW dramas past and present, but the majority of the entertainment I'm into is &quot;guy stuff.&quot;

MINX RIP. I hope that DC puts out a better effort in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a man with money in his budget for comics, I think I&#8217;m free to buy pantyhose if I want to. Yes, we are not the target audience, the 20-45 male, but as long as money&#8217;s in the cash register, who gives a toss? </p>
<p>I do enjoy some &#8220;girl stuff,&#8221; such as the more girly genres of anime and some CW dramas past and present, but the majority of the entertainment I&#8217;m into is &#8220;guy stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>MINX RIP. I hope that DC puts out a better effort in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sonic2nd</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375471</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375471</guid>
					<description>As a young woman I never had any interested in the Minx titles. Here's why:
 1. I saw a Minx display in a comic book store that had the titles arranged so that you can see the covers facing outward. None of the covers looked appealing enough to warrant any interest in them. 

2. When the Minx line started there weren't any women working on the titles.  

3. I was very unhappy with DC  when Spoiler (A long running female character from the Robin comic.) was killed, discarded &amp;#38; forgetten about during that whole terrible War Games arc.  That said to me as a reader that DC didn't care or respect my gender one bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a young woman I never had any interested in the Minx titles. Here&#8217;s why:<br />
 1. I saw a Minx display in a comic book store that had the titles arranged so that you can see the covers facing outward. None of the covers looked appealing enough to warrant any interest in them. </p>
<p>2. When the Minx line started there weren&#8217;t any women working on the titles.  </p>
<p>3. I was very unhappy with DC  when Spoiler (A long running female character from the Robin comic.) was killed, discarded &amp; forgetten about during that whole terrible War Games arc.  That said to me as a reader that DC didn&#8217;t care or respect my gender one bit.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tucker Stone</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375421</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375421</guid>
					<description>For the life of me, I can't spot the aesthetic difference between Hannah Montana, Gossip Girl and Sex In The City.  I'd assumed it was the penis thing, but apparently there is a more subtle distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the life of me, I can&#8217;t spot the aesthetic difference between Hannah Montana, Gossip Girl and Sex In The City.  I&#8217;d assumed it was the penis thing, but apparently there is a more subtle distinction.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben Morse</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375350</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375350</guid>
					<description>I don't have anywhere near the informed and intelligent type of response that Kiel gave, but I do have to back him up that I not only like Gossip Girl, but plenty of other stuff seemingly targeted at girls, YA or otherwise, and I like to think this isn't disturbing, vaguely or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have anywhere near the informed and intelligent type of response that Kiel gave, but I do have to back him up that I not only like Gossip Girl, but plenty of other stuff seemingly targeted at girls, YA or otherwise, and I like to think this isn&#8217;t disturbing, vaguely or otherwise.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rod ESpinosa</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2375000</guid>
					<description>The intended market:
a) likes reading REAL manga FROM Japan, done by Japanese creators.
b) sees manga non-Japanese manga as &quot;fake&quot; (sadly, with some justification, though not in all cases). 
c) reads actual teen prose novels and won't cross over in huge numbers to a comic book &quot;just because&quot;.
d) is already reading Seventeen where there are articles about make-up, fashion, romance advice, etc.... 
e) is extremely savvy and discerning of products that actually appeal to them.

Unless you show that your alternative product is superior to, or comparable with that of Kodansha or Seventeen's you're toast. 
Simple as that.

I wrote a similar piece to this on my reply to the Tokyopop OEL thing.

You know why girls like the original Japanese manga?
The meticulous details the artists put into the comics themselves. You have to know your hemlines, skirt lenths and cuts, jewelry, eyelash makeup... You are competing against artists who are not only artists. they are also highly knowledgable or may even possess DEGREES in fashion trends and product design. 
This isn't a weekend hobby for those people. It's not fun and games.  They take this as seriously as a doctor sees his practice.

Over here, I lament at the abysmally low standards of what we consider today's &quot;comic book professionals&quot;. 
While we do have plenty of talented individuals, it seems nowadays that any monkey with Photoshop knowledge and a few thousand dollars to burn on print on demand can be a &quot;pro&quot; over here.
Those comics industry over there has a system and a level of standards that I don't see mirrored in the industry here.

Every little detail down to the print in the dress, the manicured fingernails, gestures... you cannot fake that stuff.
You're up against a culture of artists who can draw anything from a lawnmower complete with all the rivets and fixtures to a well-proportioned Orangutan. 
This is an industry that succeeds well in making and marketing comics about firemen, athletes, cooks and doctors.
If a soda can is in the shot, it's REAL soda can complete with brand name, TM and all the ingredients and nutritional information. 
The doctor stories... well researched with REAL medical terms and procedures (not to mention real hospital equipment).

Customers are extremely savvy about this. 
They can smell if it isn't right.
It's not enough your characters wear jeans. It's got to be... is it jeans from the 80's or today? 
Is the girl calling on a fashionable NOKIA or just a squiggly box in her hands?
If you're in Russia, what kind of trees would you draw there?

The proper images evoke emotions and response. If they aren't there...
well, the experience isn't complete.

You have got to be on that level or surpass it, that's the bottom line.

I am sure given the right opportunity, the girls' market will eventually grow. But it cannot be forced or it cannot happen overnight. (Japanese have had a head start of about 40 years on girls' manga)
It's not enough to hire writers from other fields and write comics. You have to know comic book storytelling inside out.

We can start by growing the talent. But will they stick around to learn enough or will they move to other lines of entertainment? That's the long term question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intended market:<br />
a) likes reading REAL manga FROM Japan, done by Japanese creators.<br />
b) sees manga non-Japanese manga as &#8220;fake&#8221; (sadly, with some justification, though not in all cases).<br />
c) reads actual teen prose novels and won&#8217;t cross over in huge numbers to a comic book &#8220;just because&#8221;.<br />
d) is already reading Seventeen where there are articles about make-up, fashion, romance advice, etc&#8230;.<br />
e) is extremely savvy and discerning of products that actually appeal to them.</p>
<p>Unless you show that your alternative product is superior to, or comparable with that of Kodansha or Seventeen&#8217;s you&#8217;re toast.<br />
Simple as that.</p>
<p>I wrote a similar piece to this on my reply to the Tokyopop OEL thing.</p>
<p>You know why girls like the original Japanese manga?<br />
The meticulous details the artists put into the comics themselves. You have to know your hemlines, skirt lenths and cuts, jewelry, eyelash makeup&#8230; You are competing against artists who are not only artists. they are also highly knowledgable or may even possess DEGREES in fashion trends and product design.<br />
This isn&#8217;t a weekend hobby for those people. It&#8217;s not fun and games.  They take this as seriously as a doctor sees his practice.</p>
<p>Over here, I lament at the abysmally low standards of what we consider today&#8217;s &#8220;comic book professionals&#8221;.<br />
While we do have plenty of talented individuals, it seems nowadays that any monkey with Photoshop knowledge and a few thousand dollars to burn on print on demand can be a &#8220;pro&#8221; over here.<br />
Those comics industry over there has a system and a level of standards that I don&#8217;t see mirrored in the industry here.</p>
<p>Every little detail down to the print in the dress, the manicured fingernails, gestures&#8230; you cannot fake that stuff.<br />
You&#8217;re up against a culture of artists who can draw anything from a lawnmower complete with all the rivets and fixtures to a well-proportioned Orangutan.<br />
This is an industry that succeeds well in making and marketing comics about firemen, athletes, cooks and doctors.<br />
If a soda can is in the shot, it&#8217;s REAL soda can complete with brand name, TM and all the ingredients and nutritional information.<br />
The doctor stories&#8230; well researched with REAL medical terms and procedures (not to mention real hospital equipment).</p>
<p>Customers are extremely savvy about this.<br />
They can smell if it isn&#8217;t right.<br />
It&#8217;s not enough your characters wear jeans. It&#8217;s got to be&#8230; is it jeans from the 80&#8217;s or today?<br />
Is the girl calling on a fashionable NOKIA or just a squiggly box in her hands?<br />
If you&#8217;re in Russia, what kind of trees would you draw there?</p>
<p>The proper images evoke emotions and response. If they aren&#8217;t there&#8230;<br />
well, the experience isn&#8217;t complete.</p>
<p>You have got to be on that level or surpass it, that&#8217;s the bottom line.</p>
<p>I am sure given the right opportunity, the girls&#8217; market will eventually grow. But it cannot be forced or it cannot happen overnight. (Japanese have had a head start of about 40 years on girls&#8217; manga)<br />
It&#8217;s not enough to hire writers from other fields and write comics. You have to know comic book storytelling inside out.</p>
<p>We can start by growing the talent. But will they stick around to learn enough or will they move to other lines of entertainment? That&#8217;s the long term question.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe S. Walker</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2374935</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2374935</guid>
					<description>Perhaps male bloggers in general gave the venture a respectful treatment which its target audience didn't think it deserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps male bloggers in general gave the venture a respectful treatment which its target audience didn&#8217;t think it deserved.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kiel Phegley</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2374538</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/09/25/more-minx/#comment-2374538</guid>
					<description>I agree with Leigh that the main issue with the cancellation is that the books did not get into the hands of the intended audience, but since I have absolutely zero factual evidence to support any kind of theory as to why that was, I'm going to jump on the &quot;whether men can enjoy writing centered around teenage girls&quot; because, well...just because I wanna.

Heidi, I think that comparing the Minx line to something like Hanna Montana or even Gossip Girl is an apples and oranges type of thing. Hanna Montana is a cornball show created purely to sell product to pre-teen girls by way of lowest common denominator pandering. Gossip Girl is a slightly more sophisticated enterprise, but the books have still earned a lot of their popularity by trafficking in what are viewed as traditional &quot;girly&quot; areas of interest like fashion and soap opera-style romance. Say what you will about the quality of the Minx books in a general sense, but none of them ever tried to capture their market by grafting plotlines involving how awesome some shoes are or two-dimensional characterization revolving around if that hunky guy looked my way or not.

If anything, Minx strived to be centered on story first and market considerations second, which is a pretty great thing about how comic publishers approach a lot of their product in general. Given that, I think there are plenty of comparisons that you can make to similar media that is made firstly to appeal to teenage girls but has also been enjoyed by a wide range of other folks, including grown men. Mean Girls comes to mind, as does Veronica Mars. To reverse the situation, I wouldn't find it odd for a grown woman to like Rushmore or The Perks of Being A Wallflower or for someone who is straight to enjoy a book like Boy Meets Boy. Mostly it comes down to whether or not those kinds of stories come across your reading desk/TV set and whether or not they leave a strong impression. Like a lot of the men commenting here, I read PLAIN Janes as a matter of professional curiosity and liked it, and so I read a few more Minx titles after it (of course, it didn't hurt that DC sent free copies of every new Minx book to Wizard).

But even beyond that, I enjoy YA fiction for both young men and women in general, and I don't think that's any weirder than someone who's way into legal potboilers or playing Call of Duty. They're entertaining reads in general -- often really funny and with situations and characters that are easily relatable to anyone who was ever a teenager. And the best YA lit goes way beyond being just an entertaining distraction. I'd put any of M.T. Anderson's recent novels up against just about any novel in any genre. Those are some well written books.

Plus, for what it's worth, I know plenty of guys who watch Sex &amp;#38; the City and like it. They may not love it like a lot of the women who made it a huge success, but then again, my mom and I watched Entourage together for the first time last night, and even though she wasn't super into it, she laughed when Johnny Drama threw up on that birthday cake.

Plus plus, there is a strong cabal of guys in the comics world who love the Gossip Girl TV show that includes me, Ben Morse, Mel Caylo and Arune Singh, and I think we're about to count Sean T. Collins in our number as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Leigh that the main issue with the cancellation is that the books did not get into the hands of the intended audience, but since I have absolutely zero factual evidence to support any kind of theory as to why that was, I&#8217;m going to jump on the &#8220;whether men can enjoy writing centered around teenage girls&#8221; because, well&#8230;just because I wanna.</p>
<p>Heidi, I think that comparing the Minx line to something like Hanna Montana or even Gossip Girl is an apples and oranges type of thing. Hanna Montana is a cornball show created purely to sell product to pre-teen girls by way of lowest common denominator pandering. Gossip Girl is a slightly more sophisticated enterprise, but the books have still earned a lot of their popularity by trafficking in what are viewed as traditional &#8220;girly&#8221; areas of interest like fashion and soap opera-style romance. Say what you will about the quality of the Minx books in a general sense, but none of them ever tried to capture their market by grafting plotlines involving how awesome some shoes are or two-dimensional characterization revolving around if that hunky guy looked my way or not.</p>
<p>If anything, Minx strived to be centered on story first and market considerations second, which is a pretty great thing about how comic publishers approach a lot of their product in general. Given that, I think there are plenty of comparisons that you can make to similar media that is made firstly to appeal to teenage girls but has also been enjoyed by a wide range of other folks, including grown men. Mean Girls comes to mind, as does Veronica Mars. To reverse the situation, I wouldn&#8217;t find it odd for a grown woman to like Rushmore or The Perks of Being A Wallflower or for someone who is straight to enjoy a book like Boy Meets Boy. Mostly it comes down to whether or not those kinds of stories come across your reading desk/TV set and whether or not they leave a strong impression. Like a lot of the men commenting here, I read PLAIN Janes as a matter of professional curiosity and liked it, and so I read a few more Minx titles after it (of course, it didn&#8217;t hurt that DC sent free copies of every new Minx book to Wizard).</p>
<p>But even beyond that, I enjoy YA fiction for both young men and women in general, and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s any weirder than someone who&#8217;s way into legal potboilers or playing Call of Duty. They&#8217;re entertaining reads in general &#8212; often really funny and with situations and characters that are easily relatable to anyone who was ever a teenager. And the best YA lit goes way beyond being just an entertaining distraction. I&#8217;d put any of M.T. Anderson&#8217;s recent novels up against just about any novel in any genre. Those are some well written books.</p>
<p>Plus, for what it&#8217;s worth, I know plenty of guys who watch Sex &amp; the City and like it. They may not love it like a lot of the women who made it a huge success, but then again, my mom and I watched Entourage together for the first time last night, and even though she wasn&#8217;t super into it, she laughed when Johnny Drama threw up on that birthday cake.</p>
<p>Plus plus, there is a strong cabal of guys in the comics world who love the Gossip Girl TV show that includes me, Ben Morse, Mel Caylo and Arune Singh, and I think we&#8217;re about to count Sean T. Collins in our number as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
