<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Los puñetazos de Gil Kane</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; The Top 15 Best Team-Up Book Runs: # 15-14</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/#comment-3557670</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/#comment-3557670</guid>
					<description>[...] Why So Low On the List? The relatively low Marvel production values and highly inconsistent inking - SweartoGod, issue # 17 is credited to &quot;EVERYBODY!!!&quot; - stop this from ranking up there with Blackmark or the Atom as the best of Kane's work. And while the writing is BETTER than the DCCP run listed above it's still a far cry from Shakespearean. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Why So Low On the List? The relatively low Marvel production values and highly inconsistent inking - SweartoGod, issue # 17 is credited to &#8220;EVERYBODY!!!&#8221; - stop this from ranking up there with Blackmark or the Atom as the best of Kane&#8217;s work. And while the writing is BETTER than the DCCP run listed above it&#8217;s still a far cry from Shakespearean. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cricut electronics</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/#comment-3488593</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/#comment-3488593</guid>
					<description>Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Al</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/#comment-2400961</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/los-punetazos-de-gil-kane/#comment-2400961</guid>
					<description>Kane really knew human anatomy, but did tend to use a lot of similar poses. 

My least favourite was his ubiquitous &quot;looking up someone's nose&quot; low angle. A head as drawn from below, fully detailing the inside of the nostrils. There was the straight-on low version and the three quarter angle variations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kane really knew human anatomy, but did tend to use a lot of similar poses. </p>
<p>My least favourite was his ubiquitous &#8220;looking up someone&#8217;s nose&#8221; low angle. A head as drawn from below, fully detailing the inside of the nostrils. There was the straight-on low version and the three quarter angle variations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
