<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel month-to-month sales: August 2008</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 12:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Igo</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3668051</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3668051</guid>
					<description>Lovely post! brilliant... keep it up.... 



Wanna know abt the latest on Manchester United? http://theredevilspot.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely post! brilliant&#8230; keep it up&#8230;. </p>
<p>Wanna know abt the latest on Manchester United? <a href='http://theredevilspot.blogspot.com' rel='nofollow'>http://theredevilspot.blogspot.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kesley</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3473358</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3473358</guid>
					<description>hey guys i found this site that has free movies music games apps and more! there is hcking tools too, like a program that automaticly comments on random blogs :P visit the site renegadewarez.com its really cool http://renegadewarez.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys i found this site that has free movies music games apps and more! there is hcking tools too, like a program that automaticly comments on random blogs <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  visit the site renegadewarez.com its really cool <a href='http://renegadewarez.com/' rel='nofollow'>http://renegadewarez.com/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bissegger</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3389870</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3389870</guid>
					<description>Thank you very much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: StartWorkingFromHome</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3193908</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3193908</guid>
					<description>Hello. Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. Great job.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Slugger</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3178072</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-3178072</guid>
					<description>I couldn't agree with you more, hope to read your other posts on this topic sometime tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more, hope to read your other posts on this topic sometime tomorrow.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brandon Yates</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2514720</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2514720</guid>
					<description>Paul, your description of the Invincible Iron Man relaunch as &quot;fairly successful&quot; is baffling. After a successful movie, with the mild star power of Fraction and Larocca, the book hasn't even filled a six-issue tpb yet without dropping below 60k. Looks pretty bad to me. But you've been doing this longer, maybe I've much to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, your description of the Invincible Iron Man relaunch as &#8220;fairly successful&#8221; is baffling. After a successful movie, with the mild star power of Fraction and Larocca, the book hasn&#8217;t even filled a six-issue tpb yet without dropping below 60k. Looks pretty bad to me. But you&#8217;ve been doing this longer, maybe I&#8217;ve much to learn.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey O. Gustafson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2467924</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2467924</guid>
					<description>Thanks, JD.  Quite consistent indeed.  Interesting to see how Suadade, Annual #2 line up (not to mention Original Sin, which - quite arguably - could fit into that column as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, JD.  Quite consistent indeed.  Interesting to see how Suadade, Annual #2 line up (not to mention Original Sin, which - quite arguably - could fit into that column as well).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JD</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2436358</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2436358</guid>
					<description>For those who care : a synthesis of the random Wolverine one-shots for the last year or so :

10/07  Annual #1 - Deathsong - 55,041
12/07  Firebreak - 37,218
05/08  Amazing Immortal - 32,280
06/08  Dangerous Game - 31,940
08/08  Killing Made Simple - 33,645

Except for the annual, that's quite consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who care : a synthesis of the random Wolverine one-shots for the last year or so :</p>
<p>10/07  Annual #1 - Deathsong - 55,041<br />
12/07  Firebreak - 37,218<br />
05/08  Amazing Immortal - 32,280<br />
06/08  Dangerous Game - 31,940<br />
08/08  Killing Made Simple - 33,645</p>
<p>Except for the annual, that&#8217;s quite consistent.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JD</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2436290</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2436290</guid>
					<description>MS. MARVEL #30 was late and didn't ship in August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS. MARVEL #30 was late and didn&#8217;t ship in August.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quote, Unquote</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2426659</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2426659</guid>
					<description>[...] &amp;#8220;There was a time when comics used to be relatively recession-proof, but then in those days, Marvel weren’t charging four dollars for an issue of a miniseries.&amp;#8221; - Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien tossing out the economic r-word in the introductory section of his Marvel/August 2008 numbers crunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;There was a time when comics used to be relatively recession-proof, but then in those days, Marvel weren’t charging four dollars for an issue of a miniseries.&#8221; - Paul O&#8217;Brien tossing out the economic r-word in the introductory section of his Marvel/August 2008 numbers crunch. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Carl</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2417472</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2417472</guid>
					<description>Do you know the numbers for Ms. Marvel? I don't see it on this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know the numbers for Ms. Marvel? I don&#8217;t see it on this list.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeffrey O. Gustafson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2415291</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2415291</guid>
					<description>I should probably read the comments more often to see if this has been suggested in the past, but... what about grouping the various Wolverine one-shots together to get maybe some historical perspective on their performance?  They are not connected to each other by content or creative team, sure, but it just seems practical: to me, the nigh-monthly frequency of the releases seriously constitutes a third Wolverine ongoing, in practice if not in title.  Naturally, there would be an added caveat that the numbers are (likely) unrelated from month to month based on creative team and/or solicited content, but it would still be very interesting to see the trends in ordering over time.  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should probably read the comments more often to see if this has been suggested in the past, but&#8230; what about grouping the various Wolverine one-shots together to get maybe some historical perspective on their performance?  They are not connected to each other by content or creative team, sure, but it just seems practical: to me, the nigh-monthly frequency of the releases seriously constitutes a third Wolverine ongoing, in practice if not in title.  Naturally, there would be an added caveat that the numbers are (likely) unrelated from month to month based on creative team and/or solicited content, but it would still be very interesting to see the trends in ordering over time.  Thoughts?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul C</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2414087</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2414087</guid>
					<description>Ultimate Fantastic Four actually is getting cancelled as one of Jeph Loeb's Heroes buddies is finishing the book up. It will presumably be relaunched soon enough though.

Funny to see that Fantastic Four was missing last month after Millar &amp;#38; Hitch telling us all that they were miles ahead and everything would ship on time, I made the right call by dropping it and not giving them the benefit after the Ultimates delays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimate Fantastic Four actually is getting cancelled as one of Jeph Loeb&#8217;s Heroes buddies is finishing the book up. It will presumably be relaunched soon enough though.</p>
<p>Funny to see that Fantastic Four was missing last month after Millar &amp; Hitch telling us all that they were miles ahead and everything would ship on time, I made the right call by dropping it and not giving them the benefit after the Ultimates delays.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael R.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2410413</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2410413</guid>
					<description>Just a thought: doesn't price factor into these numbers at all? A book that sells 25,000 at $2.99 produces approximately the same dollar amount as a book that sells 18,734 copies at $3.99. By that scale, something like the X-Factor one shots, which are low in actual copies ordered, may bring in equivalent or even better money than the parent title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a thought: doesn&#8217;t price factor into these numbers at all? A book that sells 25,000 at $2.99 produces approximately the same dollar amount as a book that sells 18,734 copies at $3.99. By that scale, something like the X-Factor one shots, which are low in actual copies ordered, may bring in equivalent or even better money than the parent title.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Moore</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2410411</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2410411</guid>
					<description>Long-running titles that haven't made gains in any of the comparisons:

6.  ASTONISHING X-MEN
10. UNCANNY X-MEN
22. X-MEN: LEGACY
34. ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN
45. ULTIMATE X-MEN
68. ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR
79,87. PUNISHER  [Max]
94. IMMORTAL IRON FIST
95. GHOST RIDER
99. PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL
103,104. NEW EXILES
132. AMAZING SPIDER-GIRL
143. X-MEN: FIRST CLASS  [All ages]
219. MARVEL ADVENTURES SPIDER-MAN  [All ages]
226. MARVEL ADVENTURES AVENGERS  [All ages]
255. MARVEL ADVENTURES FANTASTIC FOUR [All ages]

It seems the X, Ultimate, and Punisher titles just can't hold onto their audiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long-running titles that haven&#8217;t made gains in any of the comparisons:</p>
<p>6.  ASTONISHING X-MEN<br />
10. UNCANNY X-MEN<br />
22. X-MEN: LEGACY<br />
34. ULTIMATE SPIDER-MAN<br />
45. ULTIMATE X-MEN<br />
68. ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR<br />
79,87. PUNISHER  [Max]<br />
94. IMMORTAL IRON FIST<br />
95. GHOST RIDER<br />
99. PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL<br />
103,104. NEW EXILES<br />
132. AMAZING SPIDER-GIRL<br />
143. X-MEN: FIRST CLASS  [All ages]<br />
219. MARVEL ADVENTURES SPIDER-MAN  [All ages]<br />
226. MARVEL ADVENTURES AVENGERS  [All ages]<br />
255. MARVEL ADVENTURES FANTASTIC FOUR [All ages]</p>
<p>It seems the X, Ultimate, and Punisher titles just can&#8217;t hold onto their audiences.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt Fuerst</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2407522</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2407522</guid>
					<description>Oh and I dropped Punisher War Zone this month, fairly dreadful.

New Punisher team exceeded my expectations quality-wise on Punisher #61.

I am trimming some of the lower end stuff off my pull list these days. I am not in any particular financial trouble at the moment, but figure it's wise to be at least a little smarter. Stuff like PWZ, the Foolkiller Mini, Detective Comics, etc.. that were the &quot;last books I read&quot; from my pile are getting cut. I have a search set up on eBay, once a year I'll go there and swoop up a 10 or so issue run for cents on the dollar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I dropped Punisher War Zone this month, fairly dreadful.</p>
<p>New Punisher team exceeded my expectations quality-wise on Punisher #61.</p>
<p>I am trimming some of the lower end stuff off my pull list these days. I am not in any particular financial trouble at the moment, but figure it&#8217;s wise to be at least a little smarter. Stuff like PWZ, the Foolkiller Mini, Detective Comics, etc.. that were the &#8220;last books I read&#8221; from my pile are getting cut. I have a search set up on eBay, once a year I&#8217;ll go there and swoop up a 10 or so issue run for cents on the dollar&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt Fuerst</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2407507</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2407507</guid>
					<description>The Layla Miller one shot was $3.99, so there's that extra dollar bonus for Marvel. While I had wondered what was happening with her, I didn't find the one shot all that &quot;appetizing&quot; for me. 

Peter David might like doing these one issue looks into characters. In the main X-Factor he's usually (successfully) juggling several storylines at once. Trying to work something like the Layla Miller storyline, where she's thrown into the future, might not really be appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Layla Miller one shot was $3.99, so there&#8217;s that extra dollar bonus for Marvel. While I had wondered what was happening with her, I didn&#8217;t find the one shot all that &#8220;appetizing&#8221; for me. </p>
<p>Peter David might like doing these one issue looks into characters. In the main X-Factor he&#8217;s usually (successfully) juggling several storylines at once. Trying to work something like the Layla Miller storyline, where she&#8217;s thrown into the future, might not really be appropriate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Callum</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2406659</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2406659</guid>
					<description>Nothing to correct or add really, just wanted to reinstate how much I look forward to this month to month sales column.  I'm at work right now and this is a much appreciated break from excel spreadsheet # 136.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to correct or add really, just wanted to reinstate how much I look forward to this month to month sales column.  I&#8217;m at work right now and this is a much appreciated break from excel spreadsheet # 136.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2406607</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2406607</guid>
					<description>Well, everything's in continuity in the &quot;you-can-get-there-from-here&quot; sense.  Even the DC Universe.  That doesn't mean much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, everything&#8217;s in continuity in the &#8220;you-can-get-there-from-here&#8221; sense.  Even the DC Universe.  That doesn&#8217;t mean much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Jacoby from Secret Headquarters Tallahassee, Florida</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2406579</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2406579</guid>
					<description>&quot;Old Man Logan&quot; is being touted as actually being *in* continuity, with some (unknown at this point) connection to both Marvel 1985 and Millar's Fantastic Four run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Old Man Logan&#8221; is being touted as actually being *in* continuity, with some (unknown at this point) connection to both Marvel 1985 and Millar&#8217;s Fantastic Four run.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oct. 2, 2008: Are we marketing ancilliary products yet?</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2405812</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2405812</guid>
					<description>[...] [Publishing] Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien presents month-to-month estimates for Marvel&amp;#8217;s comics sales to Direct-Market retailers, now updated for August. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Publishing] Paul O&#8217;Brien presents month-to-month estimates for Marvel&#8217;s comics sales to Direct-Market retailers, now updated for August. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: errolmorris</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2404459</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2404459</guid>
					<description>To all those people buying additional copies of comics because they feature regular characters depicted as monkeys on the cover: you're buying additional copies of comics because they feature regular characters depicted as monkeys on the cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all those people buying additional copies of comics because they feature regular characters depicted as monkeys on the cover: you&#8217;re buying additional copies of comics because they feature regular characters depicted as monkeys on the cover.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2403510</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2403510</guid>
					<description>&quot; So… genuinely levelling out? Unusual level of interest in apes? Who can tell?&quot;

&quot;...the sales boost is presumably thanks to Frank Cho’s variant monkey cover.&quot;
&quot;Another monkey cover.&quot;
&quot;...this time also featuring a variant cover with a monkey.&quot;
&quot;Another monkey variant.&quot;


To repeat the query of the Barenakedladies, haven't you always wanted a monkey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; So… genuinely levelling out? Unusual level of interest in apes? Who can tell?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the sales boost is presumably thanks to Frank Cho’s variant monkey cover.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Another monkey cover.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;&#8230;this time also featuring a variant cover with a monkey.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Another monkey variant.&#8221;</p>
<p>To repeat the query of the Barenakedladies, haven&#8217;t you always wanted a monkey?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: cookylamoo</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2403447</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2403447</guid>
					<description>Regarding AD revenues....not to worry, the armed services look upon comic readers as an abundant source of fresh meat.   And we'll still have those homoerotic Ballpark Frank ads every summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding AD revenues&#8230;.not to worry, the armed services look upon comic readers as an abundant source of fresh meat.   And we&#8217;ll still have those homoerotic Ballpark Frank ads every summer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Frank Rook</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2403366</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2403366</guid>
					<description>&quot;- 52.6% - Moby Dick&quot;

There's a Viagra joke in there, somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- 52.6% - Moby Dick&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Viagra joke in there, somewhere.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2402965</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2402965</guid>
					<description>95 issues from Marvel. What is this, the 90s all over again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>95 issues from Marvel. What is this, the 90s all over again?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean W</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2402142</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2402142</guid>
					<description>BLACK PANTHER is apparently being relaunched with a new series, with Reggie Hudlin remaining as writer. The issue that just shipped, #41 IIRC, is the final issue.

NEW EXILES has shed 10K since Claremont took over. Unfortunate, since the book sold consistently in the 30K range for a good 2-3 years before him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BLACK PANTHER is apparently being relaunched with a new series, with Reggie Hudlin remaining as writer. The issue that just shipped, #41 IIRC, is the final issue.</p>
<p>NEW EXILES has shed 10K since Claremont took over. Unfortunate, since the book sold consistently in the 30K range for a good 2-3 years before him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2402111</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2402111</guid>
					<description>Hi, Paul. Contrary to your write-up, #60 is Garth Ennis' last PUNISHER MAX issue for the foreseeable future. #61 is, in fact, the new team's first issue. Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Paul. Contrary to your write-up, #60 is Garth Ennis&#8217; last PUNISHER MAX issue for the foreseeable future. #61 is, in fact, the new team&#8217;s first issue. Cheers!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2401953</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2401953</guid>
					<description>And, for Hulk &amp;#38; Herc, #112 should definitely be put in with the Hercules issues (it's part one of a five-issue story), and there's a strong case that #106-111 should be too (they barely feature Hulk, and were TPBed as WWH: Incredible Herc - the story from Planet Hulk continued into the main WWH mini).

I think the Hulk comparisons should go up to Incredible Hulk #105, then WWH: World Breaker, then WWH #1-5, then Hulk #1-...

&amp;#62; This is a sequel to Joe Quesada and Josh Middleton’s largely-forgotten NYX series, which took forever to ship eight issues before the project was abandoned.

Seven issues, IIRC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, for Hulk &amp; Herc, #112 should definitely be put in with the Hercules issues (it&#8217;s part one of a five-issue story), and there&#8217;s a strong case that #106-111 should be too (they barely feature Hulk, and were TPBed as WWH: Incredible Herc - the story from Planet Hulk continued into the main WWH mini).</p>
<p>I think the Hulk comparisons should go up to Incredible Hulk #105, then WWH: World Breaker, then WWH #1-5, then Hulk #1-&#8230;</p>
<p>&gt; This is a sequel to Joe Quesada and Josh Middleton’s largely-forgotten NYX series, which took forever to ship eight issues before the project was abandoned.</p>
<p>Seven issues, IIRC.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2401865</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/01/marvel-month-to-month-sales-august-2008/#comment-2401865</guid>
					<description>&amp;#62; Issue #568 has a variant cover, and there’s also a sketch variant lurking at number 231 on the charts. The sales above are cumulative.

Actually, #568 had four covers. #569 had two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Issue #568 has a variant cover, and there’s also a sketch variant lurking at number 231 on the charts. The sales above are cumulative.</p>
<p>Actually, #568 had four covers. #569 had two.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
