<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Cult Sci-Fi Film Finds New Life In Comic Book Series&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Sizer</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550975</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550975</guid>
					<description>Also, making sure you don't post your comment THREE TIMES like an idiot will make people have more faith in you as a publisher... NICE ONE, SIZER!
(I swear, I only hit &quot;enter&quot; once; maybe my evil twin posted the other two...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, making sure you don&#8217;t post your comment THREE TIMES like an idiot will make people have more faith in you as a publisher&#8230; NICE ONE, SIZER!<br />
(I swear, I only hit &#8220;enter&#8221; once; maybe my evil twin posted the other two&#8230;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550789</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550789</guid>
					<description>I think I've seen enough in the last few weeks to know that it would be a waste of time to buy anything produced by Bluewater Productions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve seen enough in the last few weeks to know that it would be a waste of time to buy anything produced by Bluewater Productions.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stupid Publisher Tricks: Not Naming What You&#8217;re Promoting &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550740</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550740</guid>
					<description>[...] When I got a copy of Bluewater&amp;#8217;s latest press release, I thought that I&amp;#8217;ve picked on them enough, that I wasn&amp;#8217;t going to point out how badly written their latest marketing attempt was. And then Heidi stepped in and said it all for me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When I got a copy of Bluewater&#8217;s latest press release, I thought that I&#8217;ve picked on them enough, that I wasn&#8217;t going to point out how badly written their latest marketing attempt was. And then Heidi stepped in and said it all for me. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kurt Busiek</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550719</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2550719</guid>
					<description>My guess:

The flag has the wrong number of stripes.

kdb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess:</p>
<p>The flag has the wrong number of stripes.</p>
<p>kdb
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AERose</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547785</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547785</guid>
					<description>Jesus, what &lt;i&gt;isn't&lt;/i&gt; wrong with that press release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, what <i>isn&#8217;t</i> wrong with that press release?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Sizer</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547530</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547530</guid>
					<description>Well, even with &quot;hilarious&quot; press releases, the fact that 5 sentences into the thing I have NO idea what the name of the comic is, who's publishing it and what movie it's based on. I'd say they forgot the #1 rule of a press release; PEOPLE ARE @#$% LAZY, DON'T MAKE GETTING INFO ABOUT YOUR BOOK DIFFICULT!

All the yuks and guffaws can come once readers know what they are reading about, but even the picture has no info on what the book is named. If I saw this in my read pile, I'd pitch it, not knowing what it was supposed to be. On THIRD reading I figured out the title as being &quot;This January&quot; instead of that being WHEN it was coming out.

It may be boring to do this, but I think it's truthful that buyers and reviewers are very busy people, so why risk having them trash your piece because you didn't have it in a readable, simple to skim format?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even with &#8220;hilarious&#8221; press releases, the fact that 5 sentences into the thing I have NO idea what the name of the comic is, who&#8217;s publishing it and what movie it&#8217;s based on. I&#8217;d say they forgot the #1 rule of a press release; PEOPLE ARE @#$% LAZY, DON&#8217;T MAKE GETTING INFO ABOUT YOUR BOOK DIFFICULT!</p>
<p>All the yuks and guffaws can come once readers know what they are reading about, but even the picture has no info on what the book is named. If I saw this in my read pile, I&#8217;d pitch it, not knowing what it was supposed to be. On THIRD reading I figured out the title as being &#8220;This January&#8221; instead of that being WHEN it was coming out.</p>
<p>It may be boring to do this, but I think it&#8217;s truthful that buyers and reviewers are very busy people, so why risk having them trash your piece because you didn&#8217;t have it in a readable, simple to skim format?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Sizer</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547528</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547528</guid>
					<description>Well, even with &quot;hilarious&quot; press releases, the fact that 5 sentences into the thing I have NO idea what the name of the comic is, who's publishing it and what movie it's based on. I'd say they forgot the #1 rule of a press release; PEOPLE ARE @#$% LAZY, DON'T MAKE GETTING INFO ABOUT YOUR BOOK DIFFICULT!

All the yuks and guffaws can come once readers know what they are reading about, but even the picture has no info on what the book is named. If I saw this in my read pile, I'd pitch it, not knowing what it was supposed to be. On THIRD reading I figured out the title as being &quot;This January&quot; instead of that being WHEN it was coming out.

It may be boring to do this, but I think it's truthful that buyers and reviewers are very busy people, so why risk having them trash your piece because you didn't have it in a readable, simple to skim format?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even with &#8220;hilarious&#8221; press releases, the fact that 5 sentences into the thing I have NO idea what the name of the comic is, who&#8217;s publishing it and what movie it&#8217;s based on. I&#8217;d say they forgot the #1 rule of a press release; PEOPLE ARE @#$% LAZY, DON&#8217;T MAKE GETTING INFO ABOUT YOUR BOOK DIFFICULT!</p>
<p>All the yuks and guffaws can come once readers know what they are reading about, but even the picture has no info on what the book is named. If I saw this in my read pile, I&#8217;d pitch it, not knowing what it was supposed to be. On THIRD reading I figured out the title as being &#8220;This January&#8221; instead of that being WHEN it was coming out.</p>
<p>It may be boring to do this, but I think it&#8217;s truthful that buyers and reviewers are very busy people, so why risk having them trash your piece because you didn&#8217;t have it in a readable, simple to skim format?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul Sizer</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547526</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547526</guid>
					<description>Well, even with &quot;hilarious&quot; press releases, the fact that 5 sentences into the thing I have NO idea what the name of the comic is, who's publishing it and what movie it's based on. I'd say they forgot the #1 rule of a press release; PEOPLE ARE @#$% LAZY, DON'T MAKE GETTING INFO ABOUT YOU BOOK DIFFICULT!

All the yuks and guffaws can come once readers know what they are reading about, but even the picture has no info on what the book is named. If I saw this in my read pile, I'd pitch it, not knowing what it was supposed to be. On THIRD reading I figured out the title as being &quot;This January&quot; instead of that being WHEN it was coming out.

It may be boring to do this, but I think it's truthful that buyers and reviewers are very busy people, so why risk having them trash your piece because you didn't have it in a readable, simple to skim format?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even with &#8220;hilarious&#8221; press releases, the fact that 5 sentences into the thing I have NO idea what the name of the comic is, who&#8217;s publishing it and what movie it&#8217;s based on. I&#8217;d say they forgot the #1 rule of a press release; PEOPLE ARE @#$% LAZY, DON&#8217;T MAKE GETTING INFO ABOUT YOU BOOK DIFFICULT!</p>
<p>All the yuks and guffaws can come once readers know what they are reading about, but even the picture has no info on what the book is named. If I saw this in my read pile, I&#8217;d pitch it, not knowing what it was supposed to be. On THIRD reading I figured out the title as being &#8220;This January&#8221; instead of that being WHEN it was coming out.</p>
<p>It may be boring to do this, but I think it&#8217;s truthful that buyers and reviewers are very busy people, so why risk having them trash your piece because you didn&#8217;t have it in a readable, simple to skim format?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tommy Raiko</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547523</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547523</guid>
					<description>Setting aside questions of style and sticking with just plan old grammatical errors:

There's also the subject/verb agreement in the first sentence of the second paragraph (&quot;The film and comic series is described...&quot; should be &quot;...are described...&quot;) and the wayward comma after &quot;as&quot;

Depedning on whether &quot;attack&quot; is meant as a verb or a noun, the apostrophe in &quot;SEE terrifying rock creature’s attack!&quot; should either be removed (or the line rewritten as &quot;SEE the terrifying rock creatures' attack!&quot;

There should be a question mark after the rhetorical question &quot;what else could you ask for in a comic&quot;

I believe the comma should come inside the quotation mark in the quote that ends  &quot;...fun stuff to draw”, said John Polacek&quot; (But, admittedly, I've always been bad about comma placement with regard to parentheses and quotation marks.)

You know, for as much heat as Bluewater got for the numbers of stripes on their Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin covers, their error-ridden press-release writing style is in some ways even more disturbing.  I don't wish bad things for their projects, but seeing how unprofessional these releases are makes it difficult to wish them well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting aside questions of style and sticking with just plan old grammatical errors:</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the subject/verb agreement in the first sentence of the second paragraph (&#8221;The film and comic series is described&#8230;&#8221; should be &#8220;&#8230;are described&#8230;&#8221;) and the wayward comma after &#8220;as&#8221;</p>
<p>Depedning on whether &#8220;attack&#8221; is meant as a verb or a noun, the apostrophe in &#8220;SEE terrifying rock creature’s attack!&#8221; should either be removed (or the line rewritten as &#8220;SEE the terrifying rock creatures&#8217; attack!&#8221;</p>
<p>There should be a question mark after the rhetorical question &#8220;what else could you ask for in a comic&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe the comma should come inside the quotation mark in the quote that ends  &#8220;&#8230;fun stuff to draw”, said John Polacek&#8221; (But, admittedly, I&#8217;ve always been bad about comma placement with regard to parentheses and quotation marks.)</p>
<p>You know, for as much heat as Bluewater got for the numbers of stripes on their Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin covers, their error-ridden press-release writing style is in some ways even more disturbing.  I don&#8217;t wish bad things for their projects, but seeing how unprofessional these releases are makes it difficult to wish them well&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547150</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547150</guid>
					<description>According to the lede, the comic is titled &quot;This January&quot;.

Given the nature of the press release (drive-in sci-fi comics adapation), all sentences should end in exclamation points or question marks!  (This is the first rule Disney comics copy editors learn.)

I cheated and ran it through MS Word.  It didn't catch many mistakes, but says the last sentence (&quot;must be seen to be believed!&quot;) is in the passive voice.  Not an English major, but that sounds bad for an exciting press release.

Some of the &quot;its&quot; should be &quot;it's&quot;.  The first paragraph ends with a fragment, which kills the excitement theme that the PR is hoping to build.  For example: &quot;Written by Jason Schultz and Darren G. Davis and penciled by John Polacek, this comic blah blah blah...&quot;

“We have seen what they have done with the Ray Harryhausen brand and can’t wait to see what they do with some of our films.” 
Does this mean there are some films they want to prevent Bluewater from adapting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the lede, the comic is titled &#8220;This January&#8221;.</p>
<p>Given the nature of the press release (drive-in sci-fi comics adapation), all sentences should end in exclamation points or question marks!  (This is the first rule Disney comics copy editors learn.)</p>
<p>I cheated and ran it through MS Word.  It didn&#8217;t catch many mistakes, but says the last sentence (&#8221;must be seen to be believed!&#8221;) is in the passive voice.  Not an English major, but that sounds bad for an exciting press release.</p>
<p>Some of the &#8220;its&#8221; should be &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221;.  The first paragraph ends with a fragment, which kills the excitement theme that the PR is hoping to build.  For example: &#8220;Written by Jason Schultz and Darren G. Davis and penciled by John Polacek, this comic blah blah blah&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>“We have seen what they have done with the Ray Harryhausen brand and can’t wait to see what they do with some of our films.”<br />
Does this mean there are some films they want to prevent Bluewater from adapting?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Al</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547135</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2547135</guid>
					<description>Thinking that the woman's yellow shoes are not appropriate for the moon terrain, and that yellow is so passé. 

And that there is little mention of the &quot;team&quot; and how well the &quot;team&quot; is performing, and how each and every one of them had dreamed in Technicolor and Vistavision about working together in a boffo Todd-AO production like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking that the woman&#8217;s yellow shoes are not appropriate for the moon terrain, and that yellow is so passé. </p>
<p>And that there is little mention of the &#8220;team&#8221; and how well the &#8220;team&#8221; is performing, and how each and every one of them had dreamed in Technicolor and Vistavision about working together in a boffo Todd-AO production like this one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Darren J. Gendron</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546998</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546998</guid>
					<description>&quot;what else could you ask for in a comic?&quot;

Monkeys. You can always ask for more monkeys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what else could you ask for in a comic?&#8221;</p>
<p>Monkeys. You can always ask for more monkeys.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546942</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546942</guid>
					<description>No title...

Pretty lame artwork - I would have sent a lobbycard styled piece of art with the full title treatment. 

A pretentious press release...oh right, this is comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No title&#8230;</p>
<p>Pretty lame artwork - I would have sent a lobbycard styled piece of art with the full title treatment. </p>
<p>A pretentious press release&#8230;oh right, this is comics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher Moonlight @ Moonlight Art Magazine</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546868</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546868</guid>
					<description>Are you referring to it's repetitive use of words, it's self deprecating nature, the fact that they dare mess with anything with Rey Harryhausen's name on it, the whole sexy babe angle, or just the plane fact that comics can do better? I'm sure they're just trying to have some fun... while making a buck. Note to the artist: That kind of dress will not produce cleavage on a large breasted woman. 

HEY! Happy Halloween everybody! What are dressing up as? I'm playing up the whole Twilight angle for my students, and being a slowly paced, non-eventful, vampire. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you referring to it&#8217;s repetitive use of words, it&#8217;s self deprecating nature, the fact that they dare mess with anything with Rey Harryhausen&#8217;s name on it, the whole sexy babe angle, or just the plane fact that comics can do better? I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re just trying to have some fun&#8230; while making a buck. Note to the artist: That kind of dress will not produce cleavage on a large breasted woman. </p>
<p>HEY! Happy Halloween everybody! What are dressing up as? I&#8217;m playing up the whole Twilight angle for my students, and being a slowly paced, non-eventful, vampire. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546759</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/10/31/cult-sci-fi-film-finds-new-life-in-comic-book-series/#comment-2546759</guid>
					<description>So ... is it a comic adaptation of &quot;Cat-Women of the Moon&quot;, &quot;Missile to the Moon&quot;, or &quot;Manos: The Hands of Fate&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8230; is it a comic adaptation of &#8220;Cat-Women of the Moon&#8221;, &#8220;Missile to the Moon&#8221;, or &#8220;Manos: The Hands of Fate&#8221;?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
