<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miller: October comics sales set record</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2635572</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2635572</guid>
					<description>You're probably right -- but &quot;October sets comics shipped record&quot; sounds pretty odd. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably right &#8212; but &#8220;October sets comics shipped record&#8221; sounds pretty odd. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Hibbs</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2635408</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2635408</guid>
					<description>&quot;These are, in all categories, comics ordered, not sold&quot;

I'd probably state that as &quot;These are, in all categories, comics SHIPPED, not sold&quot; if only because books that shipped in weeks #1 &amp;#38; 2 (at least) are also showing reorder velocity in tandem with initials, which is (maybe) a stronger indicator of &quot;sales&quot; (or maybe not)

I'm splitting hairs, I know!

Also: these are all, of course, &quot;sold&quot;... just not necessarily to CONSUMERS...

-B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These are, in all categories, comics ordered, not sold&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d probably state that as &#8220;These are, in all categories, comics SHIPPED, not sold&#8221; if only because books that shipped in weeks #1 &amp; 2 (at least) are also showing reorder velocity in tandem with initials, which is (maybe) a stronger indicator of &#8220;sales&#8221; (or maybe not)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m splitting hairs, I know!</p>
<p>Also: these are all, of course, &#8220;sold&#8221;&#8230; just not necessarily to CONSUMERS&#8230;</p>
<p>-B
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634460</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634460</guid>
					<description>These are, in all categories, comics ordered, not sold -- but there are several factors that could be at work this month in particular. It is the case that a number of high-profile books slated for September shipping pushed into October. It was also a five-week month, which means we capture more late books (though 2007 was also a five-ship week October).

When sales increases are mostly at the wider macro levels, as they are this year, they could be practically invisible just looking at the shelf. A flat year overall, as 2008 is beginning to look (just $6 million more in orders this year over the first 10 months), finds the same dollars spread across more items -- since the number of backlist items increases every year. And this year, we're seeing the number of comics offered going up, too.  

When we had the years when we were up overall around 8% or 10%, we were seeing unit sales increases, too. I tend to think we need to get into that range or higher before the overall picture and the more local pictures start to square up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are, in all categories, comics ordered, not sold &#8212; but there are several factors that could be at work this month in particular. It is the case that a number of high-profile books slated for September shipping pushed into October. It was also a five-week month, which means we capture more late books (though 2007 was also a five-ship week October).</p>
<p>When sales increases are mostly at the wider macro levels, as they are this year, they could be practically invisible just looking at the shelf. A flat year overall, as 2008 is beginning to look (just $6 million more in orders this year over the first 10 months), finds the same dollars spread across more items &#8212; since the number of backlist items increases every year. And this year, we&#8217;re seeing the number of comics offered going up, too.  </p>
<p>When we had the years when we were up overall around 8% or 10%, we were seeing unit sales increases, too. I tend to think we need to get into that range or higher before the overall picture and the more local pictures start to square up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joenfuture</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634390</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634390</guid>
					<description>Miller: October comics sales set record

&amp;#62;&amp;#62;

This doesn't line up with what I'm hearing (from people who handle ordering at large stores).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miller: October comics sales set record</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t line up with what I&#8217;m hearing (from people who handle ordering at large stores).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634366</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634366</guid>
					<description>I'll be adding a pricing section to the main site soon, but temporarily I have the Diamond-era pricing track here:

http://blog.comichron.com/2008/11/average-retail-prices-for-comic-books.html

I agree with Mark that many of the orders were placed in August -- although with the changes to the order-cutoff model, it's hard to say how much came from August. If, say, distress in later weeks caused a slackening in late orders, that'd require the initial orders to have been stronger still to give us the figures we've got. It's possible, but that would be a bigger jump from where things were this summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be adding a pricing section to the main site soon, but temporarily I have the Diamond-era pricing track here:</p>
<p><a href='http://blog.comichron.com/2008/11/average-retail-prices-for-comic-books.html' rel='nofollow'>http://blog.comichron.com/2008/11/average-retail-prices-for-comic-books.html</a></p>
<p>I agree with Mark that many of the orders were placed in August &#8212; although with the changes to the order-cutoff model, it&#8217;s hard to say how much came from August. If, say, distress in later weeks caused a slackening in late orders, that&#8217;d require the initial orders to have been stronger still to give us the figures we&#8217;ve got. It&#8217;s possible, but that would be a bigger jump from where things were this summer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634291</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634291</guid>
					<description>Perhaps, even at $3.99 a copy, comics are still considered cheap entertainment? I mean, just how many times will you play that Xbox video game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, even at $3.99 a copy, comics are still considered cheap entertainment? I mean, just how many times will you play that Xbox video game?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634068</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2008/11/20/miller-october-comics-sales-set-record/#comment-2634068</guid>
					<description>It seems to me that October sales were based on orders made in August. I'll be more interested to see December/January numbers based on orders made in October/November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that October sales were based on orders made in August. I&#8217;ll be more interested to see December/January numbers based on orders made in October/November.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
