<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marvel Month-to-Month Sales: November 2008</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Gil Jaysmith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2852549</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2852549</guid>
					<description>Wraith said:
&quot;Paul Cornell has written episodes of DOCTOR WHO and I think that he is also a popular novelist. For the editors at Marvel, that makes hime a “celebrity”. That is why Marvel always (when promoting the books he is writing) mentions and/or emphasis the fact that he wrote episodes of the DOCTOR WHO TV series. They think that this will be enough to get people to start buying his books. Hiring “celebrity” writers (from Hollywood and novels) to write their books is just another sales gimmick the Big 2 have been using (and milking) in order to sale their comics.&quot;


It's difficult to know how to take some people on the internet. I'll assume Wraith is being wholly serious, because it's always good exercise to try to believe six impossible things before breakfast. But wait. Let me essay another interpretation of these facts. If Paul Cornell has written episodes of a national TV show, and is a popular novelist, that might mean that he is not a 'celebrity' writer, but... possibly!... gasp!... that thing of which we hear rumour and sigh so often online, and yet are so rarely privileged to witness at work... could it be...? yes, it could...! ... he's a writer who possesses... duh duh DUHHHH... BASIC FUCKING STORYTELLING TALENT AND CRAFT! **.

In other words - I feel I need to repeat the point, on account of you evidently being a spatula - he's someone who might have a better grasp on telling a story, and better ideas for what to put in those stories, than some random who-are-you who's only ever written the same pop-geeky vampire / SF comic half a dozen times for EarnNothingButKeepYourCopyright Press Ltd before being desperately snapped up by the Big Two because he comes with a preloaded and mouthy 10K internet fanbase.

How many people know Paul Cornell is a good writer? Let me check the viewing figures for the brilliant and epic two-parter he did on Doctor Who last year. Oh look. Ten million. In the UK alone. Don't you wish comics had an audience like that?

Well, here's the thing. Apparently you don't, because your orbit is seeded with space junk like Wraith sitting there emitting their furious little numbered protests at the use of writers like Cornell, who, after all, only know how to cater for the tastes of a mere ten million people at once, and god knows, I hear Doctor Who fans will accept any old shit.

Whenever DC and Marvel hire a writer I've actually heard of, I tend to think (a) brave choice! perhaps this will lead to something new! something good! something fresh! something done well!... and (b) brave choice! because people like you will wibble on about them not being Comics People. And here you are. With friends like you, no wonder comics are sick. Your screen name should be Brutus, you honourable man.

Gil

(** OR HIGHER THAN BASIC, OBVIOUSLY, FOOL.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wraith said:<br />
&#8220;Paul Cornell has written episodes of DOCTOR WHO and I think that he is also a popular novelist. For the editors at Marvel, that makes hime a “celebrity”. That is why Marvel always (when promoting the books he is writing) mentions and/or emphasis the fact that he wrote episodes of the DOCTOR WHO TV series. They think that this will be enough to get people to start buying his books. Hiring “celebrity” writers (from Hollywood and novels) to write their books is just another sales gimmick the Big 2 have been using (and milking) in order to sale their comics.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s difficult to know how to take some people on the internet. I&#8217;ll assume Wraith is being wholly serious, because it&#8217;s always good exercise to try to believe six impossible things before breakfast. But wait. Let me essay another interpretation of these facts. If Paul Cornell has written episodes of a national TV show, and is a popular novelist, that might mean that he is not a &#8216;celebrity&#8217; writer, but&#8230; possibly!&#8230; gasp!&#8230; that thing of which we hear rumour and sigh so often online, and yet are so rarely privileged to witness at work&#8230; could it be&#8230;? yes, it could&#8230;! &#8230; he&#8217;s a writer who possesses&#8230; duh duh DUHHHH&#8230; BASIC FUCKING STORYTELLING TALENT AND CRAFT! **.</p>
<p>In other words - I feel I need to repeat the point, on account of you evidently being a spatula - he&#8217;s someone who might have a better grasp on telling a story, and better ideas for what to put in those stories, than some random who-are-you who&#8217;s only ever written the same pop-geeky vampire / SF comic half a dozen times for EarnNothingButKeepYourCopyright Press Ltd before being desperately snapped up by the Big Two because he comes with a preloaded and mouthy 10K internet fanbase.</p>
<p>How many people know Paul Cornell is a good writer? Let me check the viewing figures for the brilliant and epic two-parter he did on Doctor Who last year. Oh look. Ten million. In the UK alone. Don&#8217;t you wish comics had an audience like that?</p>
<p>Well, here&#8217;s the thing. Apparently you don&#8217;t, because your orbit is seeded with space junk like Wraith sitting there emitting their furious little numbered protests at the use of writers like Cornell, who, after all, only know how to cater for the tastes of a mere ten million people at once, and god knows, I hear Doctor Who fans will accept any old shit.</p>
<p>Whenever DC and Marvel hire a writer I&#8217;ve actually heard of, I tend to think (a) brave choice! perhaps this will lead to something new! something good! something fresh! something done well!&#8230; and (b) brave choice! because people like you will wibble on about them not being Comics People. And here you are. With friends like you, no wonder comics are sick. Your screen name should be Brutus, you honourable man.</p>
<p>Gil</p>
<p>(** OR HIGHER THAN BASIC, OBVIOUSLY, FOOL.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brandon Yates</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2845785</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2845785</guid>
					<description>I left PUNISHER MAX after Ennis left, lending credence to your comment about its declining readership, but I think, at least compared to other titles with similar month-to-month numbers, the book is holding pretty steady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left PUNISHER MAX after Ennis left, lending credence to your comment about its declining readership, but I think, at least compared to other titles with similar month-to-month numbers, the book is holding pretty steady.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tiger</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2842004</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2842004</guid>
					<description>nice year on year comparison for ASM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice year on year comparison for ASM
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stefano</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2838182</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2838182</guid>
					<description>Amazing Spider-Man in my view is doing much worse than &quot;fine&quot;: it reminds me of the man falling from a skyscraper who, when passing the tenth floor, says to himself, &quot;ok, everything fine for now&quot;. It is a pity to see that the flagship character of Marvel has effectively lost some 40% of its readers. I have tried to extrapolate a trend, and I expect it to land around 61,000 copies.

It is apparent to me that BND was a total wreck, and I wonder what else should happen to be declared as such. If I made a tenth of such a Mistake in my job, I'd been fired on the place...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing Spider-Man in my view is doing much worse than &#8220;fine&#8221;: it reminds me of the man falling from a skyscraper who, when passing the tenth floor, says to himself, &#8220;ok, everything fine for now&#8221;. It is a pity to see that the flagship character of Marvel has effectively lost some 40% of its readers. I have tried to extrapolate a trend, and I expect it to land around 61,000 copies.</p>
<p>It is apparent to me that BND was a total wreck, and I wonder what else should happen to be declared as such. If I made a tenth of such a Mistake in my job, I&#8217;d been fired on the place&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kentucky Fried Horse</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2835662</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2835662</guid>
					<description>I agree with Jessie, I was amazed at how jarring Larry Stroman's art has become since I last saw it. If he had stayed on as the artist on X-Factor, I very well might have dropped the book.

I buy Captain Britain and think its an enjoyable read, but then again lots of stuff I bought has been canned in the last year(the Order, Manhunter, Checkmate), so what do I know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jessie, I was amazed at how jarring Larry Stroman&#8217;s art has become since I last saw it. If he had stayed on as the artist on X-Factor, I very well might have dropped the book.</p>
<p>I buy Captain Britain and think its an enjoyable read, but then again lots of stuff I bought has been canned in the last year(the Order, Manhunter, Checkmate), so what do I know?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Reboot</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2833373</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2833373</guid>
					<description>&amp;#62; (can anyone tell me what actually happened to Meggan prior to this series, btw? I don’t recall.). 

Claremont pushed her through a hole in time or somesuch during the Uncanny X-Men &lt;em&gt;House of M&lt;/em&gt; tie-in because he wanted Captain Britain but not her in New Excalibur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; (can anyone tell me what actually happened to Meggan prior to this series, btw? I don’t recall.). </p>
<p>Claremont pushed her through a hole in time or somesuch during the Uncanny X-Men <em>House of M</em> tie-in because he wanted Captain Britain but not her in New Excalibur.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: volde</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2832948</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2832948</guid>
					<description>Submariner is out of continuity title just like Magneto`s testament. I see nothing wrong with it selling lower due to Magneto being bigger draw in general and having better creative team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Submariner is out of continuity title just like Magneto`s testament. I see nothing wrong with it selling lower due to Magneto being bigger draw in general and having better creative team.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2830465</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2830465</guid>
					<description>Chris Midweeker, I'm quite aware that UXM wouldn't be selling any better then it currently is if CC was still writing the book today. My original point was (and still is) that putting more popular and/or critically acclaimed writers on the X-book didn't do a damn thing to stop sales from falling on that book. I think that Marvel (and DC) are relying way too much on the popularity and/or critical reception of NAME writers to sell books instead of the actual final product. It's become all about the WHO and not about the characters and concepts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Midweeker, I&#8217;m quite aware that UXM wouldn&#8217;t be selling any better then it currently is if CC was still writing the book today. My original point was (and still is) that putting more popular and/or critically acclaimed writers on the X-book didn&#8217;t do a damn thing to stop sales from falling on that book. I think that Marvel (and DC) are relying way too much on the popularity and/or critical reception of NAME writers to sell books instead of the actual final product. It&#8217;s become all about the WHO and not about the characters and concepts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trav</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2828544</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2828544</guid>
					<description>It might help if Marvel actually promoted CBMI13 a little bit, but that never seems to be their thinking. Better to push the stuff that is going to sell, anyway.  Makes no sense to me. How about putting David Finch on CB for a three month stint or something? Anything to give the book a push.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might help if Marvel actually promoted CBMI13 a little bit, but that never seems to be their thinking. Better to push the stuff that is going to sell, anyway.  Makes no sense to me. How about putting David Finch on CB for a three month stint or something? Anything to give the book a push.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pedro Bouça</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2828050</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2828050</guid>
					<description>If the Captain Britain book was depending on the trade sales, I think the very high price point of the first TPB might have killed it.

I've heard it was a mistake, but since I preorder my comics I had to go with the announced price, which I refused to pay, so I didn't order it.

I guess it must have happened to many other people. Very bad for the series.

Best,
Hunter (Pedro Bouça)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Captain Britain book was depending on the trade sales, I think the very high price point of the first TPB might have killed it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard it was a mistake, but since I preorder my comics I had to go with the announced price, which I refused to pay, so I didn&#8217;t order it.</p>
<p>I guess it must have happened to many other people. Very bad for the series.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Hunter (Pedro Bouça)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ian</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827965</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827965</guid>
					<description>Is SUB-MARINER really a MU title?  I thought it was just another MK book in the mold in which they have been doing the MK books.

I had no idea about Young X-men, thats unfortunate.  I think the writer misfired with the whole mystery/murdering X-men idea at the beginning.  As it is now with the current arc and the current team?  I think he should have started there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is SUB-MARINER really a MU title?  I thought it was just another MK book in the mold in which they have been doing the MK books.</p>
<p>I had no idea about Young X-men, thats unfortunate.  I think the writer misfired with the whole mystery/murdering X-men idea at the beginning.  As it is now with the current arc and the current team?  I think he should have started there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827947</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827947</guid>
					<description>&quot;Paul announced on his blog that this column would be done “in a day or so” back on the 20th of December…&quot;

Which it was. I'm sure the delay was at least in part my fault, because I handed in my column about a week after Paul did.

That said, it was the holidays. Relax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Paul announced on his blog that this column would be done “in a day or so” back on the 20th of December…&#8221;</p>
<p>Which it was. I&#8217;m sure the delay was at least in part my fault, because I handed in my column about a week after Paul did.</p>
<p>That said, it was the holidays. Relax.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Louis Lane</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827908</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827908</guid>
					<description>Has Marvel announced the cancelation of Squadron Supreme yet?

LL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Marvel announced the cancelation of Squadron Supreme yet?</p>
<p>LL
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jan. 9, 2009: Sam Zittle&#8217;s crucifixion machine</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827898</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827898</guid>
					<description>[...] [Publishing] Marvel month-to-month sales Link: Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Publishing] Marvel month-to-month sales Link: Paul O&#8217;Brien [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jan. 9, 2009: Sam Zittle&#8217;s crucifixion machine</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827897</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827897</guid>
					<description>[...] [Publishing] Marvel month-to-month sales Link: Paul O&amp;#8217;Brien [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Publishing] Marvel month-to-month sales Link: Paul O&#8217;Brien [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Midweeker</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827872</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827872</guid>
					<description>Jessie - Stroman's art may be off-puting to some, but I suspect he may have attracted more readers than he lost, having been the artist back in the nineties when X-Factor was at it's creative peak. I suspect the fact that the book doesn't seem to have much direction at the moment may be more of a problem - snappy dialogue doesn't quite disguise the lack of narrative drive.

Wraith - Claremont may have sold more X-Men books a few years back, but everything was selling better then. You only have to look at Exiles, which Claremont's totally killed, to see that he probably wouldn't be doing any better than Fraction or Carey. As for CB&amp;#38;MI-13, again, it's just not terribly compelling. Cornell can be an okay writer (I quite liked the Wisdom mini), but FF: True Story was dreadful, and I'm finding it hard to care about anyone in CB (can anyone tell me what actually happened to Meggan prior to this series, btw? I don't recall.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessie - Stroman&#8217;s art may be off-puting to some, but I suspect he may have attracted more readers than he lost, having been the artist back in the nineties when X-Factor was at it&#8217;s creative peak. I suspect the fact that the book doesn&#8217;t seem to have much direction at the moment may be more of a problem - snappy dialogue doesn&#8217;t quite disguise the lack of narrative drive.</p>
<p>Wraith - Claremont may have sold more X-Men books a few years back, but everything was selling better then. You only have to look at Exiles, which Claremont&#8217;s totally killed, to see that he probably wouldn&#8217;t be doing any better than Fraction or Carey. As for CB&amp;MI-13, again, it&#8217;s just not terribly compelling. Cornell can be an okay writer (I quite liked the Wisdom mini), but FF: True Story was dreadful, and I&#8217;m finding it hard to care about anyone in CB (can anyone tell me what actually happened to Meggan prior to this series, btw? I don&#8217;t recall.).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827835</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827835</guid>
					<description>Man, that's a pretty embarrassing showing for Big Hero 6. I guess no one wants to see Claremont do anything not X-Men related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that&#8217;s a pretty embarrassing showing for Big Hero 6. I guess no one wants to see Claremont do anything not X-Men related.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mark coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827593</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827593</guid>
					<description>Shouldn't people just be buying Captain Britain because it's one of Marvel's best books right now, whether or not Cornell is &quot;a celebrity?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t people just be buying Captain Britain because it&#8217;s one of Marvel&#8217;s best books right now, whether or not Cornell is &#8220;a celebrity?&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827592</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827592</guid>
					<description>Paul Cornell has written episodes of DOCTOR WHO and I think that he is also a popular novelist. For the editors at Marvel, that makes hime a &quot;celebrity&quot;. That is why Marvel always (when promoting the books he is writing) mentions and/or emphasis the fact that he wrote episodes of the DOCTOR WHO TV series. They think that this will be enough to get people to start buying his books. 

Hiring &quot;celebrity&quot; writers (from Hollywood and novels) to write their books is just another sales gimmick the Big 2 have been using (and milking) in order to sale their comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Cornell has written episodes of DOCTOR WHO and I think that he is also a popular novelist. For the editors at Marvel, that makes hime a &#8220;celebrity&#8221;. That is why Marvel always (when promoting the books he is writing) mentions and/or emphasis the fact that he wrote episodes of the DOCTOR WHO TV series. They think that this will be enough to get people to start buying his books. </p>
<p>Hiring &#8220;celebrity&#8221; writers (from Hollywood and novels) to write their books is just another sales gimmick the Big 2 have been using (and milking) in order to sale their comics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827449</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827449</guid>
					<description>I'm only the helper monkey, but given that traffic was likely down during the holiday season, features like the sales charts and the prediction columns were likely held under more eyeballs would see them. 

but what I do know, I kept posting while H and FMB were in Maine or stuck trying to get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m only the helper monkey, but given that traffic was likely down during the holiday season, features like the sales charts and the prediction columns were likely held under more eyeballs would see them. </p>
<p>but what I do know, I kept posting while H and FMB were in Maine or stuck trying to get there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: K.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827446</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827446</guid>
					<description>Paul Cornell is a celebrity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Cornell is a celebrity?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wraith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827306</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827306</guid>
					<description>It's ironic that Marvel kicked Claremont off of UXM in favor of more &quot;popular&quot; and/or &quot;critically acclaimed&quot; writers, and the book is selling less then it was under CC.

Both DEADPOOL and CABLE would be selling much lower after the crossovers and gimmick covers stopped, if both series weren't newly relaunched. In other words, both those books would be selling around the same numbers (or even lower) if the books were around for about 2 years before the variant covers and crossovers started.

The reason why CB&amp;#38;MI-13 is not selling well is because (a) it is the unofficial 3rd relaunch of EXCALIBUR, and people have given up on the brand (b) because there are too many spin off books of other high profile comics and/or A-list characters taking many fans hard earned money (the completest fans) and (c) Marvel is more concerned with promoting the fact that a CELEBRITY writer like PC is writing the book instead of promoting the actual concept and characters in the book.

I have a feeling that ADAM:LEGEND OF THE BLUE MARVEL might become a low selling cult hit. I can't speak for other comic book stores, but we have sold out of the first 2 issues of the mini series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ironic that Marvel kicked Claremont off of UXM in favor of more &#8220;popular&#8221; and/or &#8220;critically acclaimed&#8221; writers, and the book is selling less then it was under CC.</p>
<p>Both DEADPOOL and CABLE would be selling much lower after the crossovers and gimmick covers stopped, if both series weren&#8217;t newly relaunched. In other words, both those books would be selling around the same numbers (or even lower) if the books were around for about 2 years before the variant covers and crossovers started.</p>
<p>The reason why CB&amp;MI-13 is not selling well is because (a) it is the unofficial 3rd relaunch of EXCALIBUR, and people have given up on the brand (b) because there are too many spin off books of other high profile comics and/or A-list characters taking many fans hard earned money (the completest fans) and (c) Marvel is more concerned with promoting the fact that a CELEBRITY writer like PC is writing the book instead of promoting the actual concept and characters in the book.</p>
<p>I have a feeling that ADAM:LEGEND OF THE BLUE MARVEL might become a low selling cult hit. I can&#8217;t speak for other comic book stores, but we have sold out of the first 2 issues of the mini series.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827240</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827240</guid>
					<description>&quot;[X-Factor is] another book which seems to be bleeding readers for no readily apparent reason&quot;

X-Factor is consistently one of my favorite books, but the Stroman art (in the last half-dozen or so issues) has been so incredibly off-putting that even I considered dropping it until Stroman departed. Fortunately, Stroman departed between pages four and five of the most recent issue, so maybe sales will now stabilize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[X-Factor is] another book which seems to be bleeding readers for no readily apparent reason&#8221;</p>
<p>X-Factor is consistently one of my favorite books, but the Stroman art (in the last half-dozen or so issues) has been so incredibly off-putting that even I considered dropping it until Stroman departed. Fortunately, Stroman departed between pages four and five of the most recent issue, so maybe sales will now stabilize.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Box of Comics: December 2008</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827200</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2827200</guid>
					<description>[...] You should also be buying this. It&amp;#8217;s Marvel&amp;#8217;s best book, but the sales are apparently slipping and I don&amp;#8217;t want you lot throwing banana peels in the way. If you read Comics Should Be Good on anything resembling a regular basis, you will almost certainly enjoy this series. Cornell improves every issue, the characterization is wonderful, and the plot developments are genuinely interesting and surprising. Spare an Avengers book for a month and grab this&amp;#8217;n. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] You should also be buying this. It&#8217;s Marvel&#8217;s best book, but the sales are apparently slipping and I don&#8217;t want you lot throwing banana peels in the way. If you read Comics Should Be Good on anything resembling a regular basis, you will almost certainly enjoy this series. Cornell improves every issue, the characterization is wonderful, and the plot developments are genuinely interesting and surprising. Spare an Avengers book for a month and grab this&#8217;n. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kirk Boxleitner, a.k.a. K-Box</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826822</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826822</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Conclusion: they’re doing fine for now.&lt;/i&gt;

That's kind of like saying that the Titanic was still seaworthy, immediately after it had been struck by the iceberg, just because it hadn't sunk yet.

As I recall, Paul, when you originally submitted your 63K &quot;magic number&quot; as a determiner of &lt;i&gt;Amazing Spider-Man&lt;/i&gt;'s relative success, you also said something to the effect of, &quot;But it's hard to imagine sales getting even CLOSE to that low.&quot;

Month to month, the last issue of November lost 3.4 percent of the sales of the last issue of October, even after it was immediately preceded by a variant cover issue.

A 3.4-percent loss in sales at this point is not a good sign, and anyone who thinks the book won't sink below 63K in 2009 is kidding themselves, even with variant covers every other issue.

Retcon backlash, mediocre stories, too many sales gimmicks and the new publishing schedule have broken many readers of their monthly ASM buying habit, to the point that PER-ISSUE sales are now the lowest they've been since the Byrne/Mackie era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Conclusion: they’re doing fine for now.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of like saying that the Titanic was still seaworthy, immediately after it had been struck by the iceberg, just because it hadn&#8217;t sunk yet.</p>
<p>As I recall, Paul, when you originally submitted your 63K &#8220;magic number&#8221; as a determiner of <i>Amazing Spider-Man</i>&#8217;s relative success, you also said something to the effect of, &#8220;But it&#8217;s hard to imagine sales getting even CLOSE to that low.&#8221;</p>
<p>Month to month, the last issue of November lost 3.4 percent of the sales of the last issue of October, even after it was immediately preceded by a variant cover issue.</p>
<p>A 3.4-percent loss in sales at this point is not a good sign, and anyone who thinks the book won&#8217;t sink below 63K in 2009 is kidding themselves, even with variant covers every other issue.</p>
<p>Retcon backlash, mediocre stories, too many sales gimmicks and the new publishing schedule have broken many readers of their monthly ASM buying habit, to the point that PER-ISSUE sales are now the lowest they&#8217;ve been since the Byrne/Mackie era.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826786</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826786</guid>
					<description>I have no control over when they get posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no control over when they get posted.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tucker Stone</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826754</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826754</guid>
					<description>Hey Somebody--are you paying for these columns?  Are you offering to take over?

Then shut the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Somebody&#8211;are you paying for these columns?  Are you offering to take over?</p>
<p>Then shut the fuck up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Somebody</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826460</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826460</guid>
					<description>Given that (a) there have been posts on this blog in the past fortnight, so it's clearly not been completely shut down for the holidays and (b) Paul announced on his blog that this column would be done &quot;in a day or so&quot; back on the 20th of December...

WTF is this getting posted when the DECEMBER charts are almost out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that (a) there have been posts on this blog in the past fortnight, so it&#8217;s clearly not been completely shut down for the holidays and (b) Paul announced on his blog that this column would be done &#8220;in a day or so&#8221; back on the 20th of December&#8230;</p>
<p>WTF is this getting posted when the DECEMBER charts are almost out?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826434</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826434</guid>
					<description>I heartily endorse Paul's podcast, which is very entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heartily endorse Paul&#8217;s podcast, which is very entertaining.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826418</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/08/marvel-month-to-month-sales-november-208/#comment-2826418</guid>
					<description>Daniel: Yes, YOUNG X-MEN has been cancelled.  But I wrote this one a while ago; it got delayed over Christmas, I believe.

And since there's no plug on the column itself, I'll take this opportunity to plug my blog at http://ifdestroyed.blogspot.com and my podcast at http://housetoastonish.podomatic.com, for those of you who might be interested...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel: Yes, YOUNG X-MEN has been cancelled.  But I wrote this one a while ago; it got delayed over Christmas, I believe.</p>
<p>And since there&#8217;s no plug on the column itself, I&#8217;ll take this opportunity to plug my blog at <a href='http://ifdestroyed.blogspot.com' rel='nofollow'>http://ifdestroyed.blogspot.com</a> and my podcast at <a href='http://housetoastonish.podomatic.com' rel='nofollow'>http://housetoastonish.podomatic.com</a>, for those of you who might be interested&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
