<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WATCHMEN talks &#8220;fruitful&#8221; and &#8220;productive&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: HonsSkisk</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2871940</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2871940</guid>
					<description>I am unable to understand this post. But well some points are useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unable to understand this post. But well some points are useful for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Antionestrife</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2850230</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2850230</guid>
					<description>When is this movie supposed to come out? This summer right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is this movie supposed to come out? This summer right?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cary Coatney</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2847964</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2847964</guid>
					<description>coincidence that they aired one during the first hour of 24 ? 

A little lite gloating? 

~

Coat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coincidence that they aired one during the first hour of 24 ? </p>
<p>A little lite gloating? </p>
<p>~</p>
<p>Coat
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James Patrick</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2837121</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2837121</guid>
					<description>coincidence i started seeing the TV spots today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coincidence i started seeing the TV spots today?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason A. Quest</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2836484</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2836484</guid>
					<description>I'm not worried about this.  Never have been.  There's so much money expected to be made from this film that both parties would be sued by their stockholders if they failed to make peace and release it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not worried about this.  Never have been.  There&#8217;s so much money expected to be made from this film that both parties would be sued by their stockholders if they failed to make peace and release it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Caged Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2836105</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2836105</guid>
					<description>Heidi, is that an &quot;Election&quot; quote you just slipped in?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi, is that an &#8220;Election&#8221; quote you just slipped in?  <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2835350</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2835350</guid>
					<description>sorry about the double posts...new phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about the double posts&#8230;new phone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SpyBoy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834936</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834936</guid>
					<description>Oh, if only it were that easy.  From what I've heard (and I think its safe to say that everything is unsubstantiated at this stage), the true complications are in relation to permissions necessary from so many guest stars or their estates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, if only it were that easy.  From what I&#8217;ve heard (and I think its safe to say that everything is unsubstantiated at this stage), the true complications are in relation to permissions necessary from so many guest stars or their estates.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shags</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834453</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834453</guid>
					<description>Torsten,

Fox owns the footage to the '60s Batman TV show, but Warners owns the characters. Neither has budged in giving the other anything on the issue, but rumor is that Fox is using this Watchmen case as a means to get the rights to release it on DVD. If this is the case, and it's solved as such, sounds like a win/win for fans!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torsten,</p>
<p>Fox owns the footage to the &#8217;60s Batman TV show, but Warners owns the characters. Neither has budged in giving the other anything on the issue, but rumor is that Fox is using this Watchmen case as a means to get the rights to release it on DVD. If this is the case, and it&#8217;s solved as such, sounds like a win/win for fans!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834316</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834316</guid>
					<description>So, Fox pulls a (Oswald the) rabbit out of its hat?   How do the Batman TV rights figure in all this?  What does Warners give Fox?  No satires of Fox properties in MAD Magazine?  Six cover articles a year on both Entertainment Weekly and People?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Fox pulls a (Oswald the) rabbit out of its hat?   How do the Batman TV rights figure in all this?  What does Warners give Fox?  No satires of Fox properties in MAD Magazine?  Six cover articles a year on both Entertainment Weekly and People?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834314</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/01/10/watchmen-talks-fruitful-and-productive/#comment-2834314</guid>
					<description>So, Fox pulls a (Oswald the) rabbit out of its hat?   How do the Batman TV rights figure in all this?  What does Warners give Fox?  No satires of Fox properties in MAD Magazine?  Six cover articles a year on both Entertainment Weekly and People?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Fox pulls a (Oswald the) rabbit out of its hat?   How do the Batman TV rights figure in all this?  What does Warners give Fox?  No satires of Fox properties in MAD Magazine?  Six cover articles a year on both Entertainment Weekly and People?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
