<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indiana Jones: Child molester?</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: repowers</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3057543</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3057543</guid>
					<description>To bring up the novelization again.... Marion implies pretty strongly that she did indeed survive as a prostitute for a time after her dad died.  &quot;I worked here, and i wasn't exactly the barmaid, you know what I'm saying?&quot; or something like that.  

Yay for useless trivia floating around in my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bring up the novelization again&#8230;. Marion implies pretty strongly that she did indeed survive as a prostitute for a time after her dad died.  &#8220;I worked here, and i wasn&#8217;t exactly the barmaid, you know what I&#8217;m saying?&#8221; or something like that.  </p>
<p>Yay for useless trivia floating around in my head.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scrr</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3050519</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3050519</guid>
					<description>Hero or anti-hero, the fact remains that Indiana Jones was portrayed as the charming protagonist of the films, and as such would have a role model function to an audience consisting mainly of teenage men. 

Sending out the message that it's not more than naughty to have a relationship with an underage girl is irresponsible, and further proof that GL's emotional side is  severely stunted. If an underage girl (or boy) consents in sex, or is the instigator, it's up to the adult to say &quot;no&quot;. That's why adults are adults and kids are kids. 

To even argue this on a theoretical level shows a big level of immaturity and naivity (at best)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hero or anti-hero, the fact remains that Indiana Jones was portrayed as the charming protagonist of the films, and as such would have a role model function to an audience consisting mainly of teenage men. </p>
<p>Sending out the message that it&#8217;s not more than naughty to have a relationship with an underage girl is irresponsible, and further proof that GL&#8217;s emotional side is  severely stunted. If an underage girl (or boy) consents in sex, or is the instigator, it&#8217;s up to the adult to say &#8220;no&#8221;. That&#8217;s why adults are adults and kids are kids. </p>
<p>To even argue this on a theoretical level shows a big level of immaturity and naivity (at best)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rich</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3047336</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3047336</guid>
					<description>&quot;We clearly see him fooling around with his students in the films and books.&quot;

I always figured Marion was 17-22, and then when RAIDERS takes place she was 27-32.  And I don't recall him messing around with his students, although the students are attracted to him.

&quot;Given all the young girls in Lucas’s oeuvre and the lack of mature women of any kind, this whole element is…interesting.&quot;

Maybe ... maybe not ... despite what some amateur psychologists think, you can't always tell very much about an author by their works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We clearly see him fooling around with his students in the films and books.&#8221;</p>
<p>I always figured Marion was 17-22, and then when RAIDERS takes place she was 27-32.  And I don&#8217;t recall him messing around with his students, although the students are attracted to him.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given all the young girls in Lucas’s oeuvre and the lack of mature women of any kind, this whole element is…interesting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe &#8230; maybe not &#8230; despite what some amateur psychologists think, you can&#8217;t always tell very much about an author by their works.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Spurgeon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3047013</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3047013</guid>
					<description>I somehow managed to get by all these years enjoying Raiders without once thinking on Marion's criteria for choosing a man or Indiana Jones' moral enlightenment. I still liked it, though. There was punching and running and snakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I somehow managed to get by all these years enjoying Raiders without once thinking on Marion&#8217;s criteria for choosing a man or Indiana Jones&#8217; moral enlightenment. I still liked it, though. There was punching and running and snakes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Schweizer</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3045504</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3045504</guid>
					<description>Did nobody think about this before?  Why the shock?  He's obviously older.  I always assumed he was mid-twenties, and that she was mid teens.  The whole point of all the Raiders backstory stuff at the beginning is to establish that Indiana Jones ISN'T a white knight hero, that he's a grave-robbing, opportunistic, womanizing scoundrel, which is why his shifting to do good for the sake of good makes for such a worthwhile viewing experience.  The fact that he's so casual about it makes it all the more hard to take, and it SHOULD - that's the point of the scene.

Lucas, Spielberg, Kasdan - all of them are pretty whitebread these days, but if you think back to this late seventies period, and the crowd they ran/worked with (Coppola, Scorsese, etc), pushing the uncomfortability envelope was standard to them.  That they toned down the age difference shows their burgeoning maturity by the time the early eighties rolled around - less the young Turks out to shake things up, more the great storytellers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did nobody think about this before?  Why the shock?  He&#8217;s obviously older.  I always assumed he was mid-twenties, and that she was mid teens.  The whole point of all the Raiders backstory stuff at the beginning is to establish that Indiana Jones ISN&#8217;T a white knight hero, that he&#8217;s a grave-robbing, opportunistic, womanizing scoundrel, which is why his shifting to do good for the sake of good makes for such a worthwhile viewing experience.  The fact that he&#8217;s so casual about it makes it all the more hard to take, and it SHOULD - that&#8217;s the point of the scene.</p>
<p>Lucas, Spielberg, Kasdan - all of them are pretty whitebread these days, but if you think back to this late seventies period, and the crowd they ran/worked with (Coppola, Scorsese, etc), pushing the uncomfortability envelope was standard to them.  That they toned down the age difference shows their burgeoning maturity by the time the early eighties rolled around - less the young Turks out to shake things up, more the great storytellers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Figures</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3045182</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3045182</guid>
					<description>George is my hero in some ways, but on the other hand that is criminally sick and I'm not surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George is my hero in some ways, but on the other hand that is criminally sick and I&#8217;m not surprised.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason A. Quest</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3045029</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3045029</guid>
					<description>Michael, you do realize that we're talking about characters in a work of fiction, right?  It isn't a question of &quot;is this moral?&quot; but &quot;is this dramatically interesting?&quot;  I wouldn't defend a &lt;i&gt;person&lt;/i&gt; who leaves a handcuffed man in a burning building with a hacksaw, but it's a great idea for a &lt;i&gt;character&lt;/i&gt;.

Evidently Lucas, Spelberg, et al. decided that Indiana Jones should &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; be that kind of character, and I think Raiders was a lot more enjoyable popcorn flick as a result of that decision.  But there's a world of difference between considering whether he should be that kind of &lt;i&gt;character&lt;/i&gt;... and endorsing that type of &lt;i&gt;person&lt;/i&gt; as a role model.

As for social norms of the period the movie was referring to, I just did a little research. (gasp!)  In 1880, the age of consent for sex in most US states was 10 or 12; in Europe the limits were generally 12-15.  By 1920 most US states had raised it to 16 or 18, to more effectively ban teenage prostitution (the women's suffrage, christian temperance, and anti-child-labor movements all played a hand in this); most European countries ranged from 12-16.  Since then the US has trended back a little toward 16; Europe has edged upward to mostly 14-16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you do realize that we&#8217;re talking about characters in a work of fiction, right?  It isn&#8217;t a question of &#8220;is this moral?&#8221; but &#8220;is this dramatically interesting?&#8221;  I wouldn&#8217;t defend a <i>person</i> who leaves a handcuffed man in a burning building with a hacksaw, but it&#8217;s a great idea for a <i>character</i>.</p>
<p>Evidently Lucas, Spelberg, et al. decided that Indiana Jones should <i>not</i> be that kind of character, and I think Raiders was a lot more enjoyable popcorn flick as a result of that decision.  But there&#8217;s a world of difference between considering whether he should be that kind of <i>character</i>&#8230; and endorsing that type of <i>person</i> as a role model.</p>
<p>As for social norms of the period the movie was referring to, I just did a little research. (gasp!)  In 1880, the age of consent for sex in most US states was 10 or 12; in Europe the limits were generally 12-15.  By 1920 most US states had raised it to 16 or 18, to more effectively ban teenage prostitution (the women&#8217;s suffrage, christian temperance, and anti-child-labor movements all played a hand in this); most European countries ranged from 12-16.  Since then the US has trended back a little toward 16; Europe has edged upward to mostly 14-16.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexa</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044991</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044991</guid>
					<description>@Scott - The fact that George Lucas thought it was even appropriate to talk about an ELEVEN-year-old having sex with a man a DECADE her senior shows a profound disturbance in the Force.  Second of all, do some of your own research-- age of consent laws have existed for centuries, and have generally been above 15 since the 1800s.  Did more 15/16-year-olds get married back then than do today?  Of course, but a) it was far from universal and b) that does not make it appropriate material for a family adventure film made in the 1980s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott - The fact that George Lucas thought it was even appropriate to talk about an ELEVEN-year-old having sex with a man a DECADE her senior shows a profound disturbance in the Force.  Second of all, do some of your own research&#8211; age of consent laws have existed for centuries, and have generally been above 15 since the 1800s.  Did more 15/16-year-olds get married back then than do today?  Of course, but a) it was far from universal and b) that does not make it appropriate material for a family adventure film made in the 1980s.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044933</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044933</guid>
					<description>As always, I'm rather aghast at number of men who will leap to defend the idea of older men fucking teenage girls once the subject is broached on the Internet.

And no one's even brought up the abuse of the teacher/student dynamic yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, I&#8217;m rather aghast at number of men who will leap to defend the idea of older men fucking teenage girls once the subject is broached on the Internet.</p>
<p>And no one&#8217;s even brought up the abuse of the teacher/student dynamic yet&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044760</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044760</guid>
					<description>NEWSFLASH: Older guys love young pussy. 

Who'da thunk it?!? 

Seriously, the only one on these comments who makes ANY sense AND knows history was James who said it was a different era and women did get married younger. Back then there were none of the laws that they have today and it was considered ok. Women married earlier and going even further back, when life spans were much shorter to due a wide variety of reasons, they were married off even earlier.

Put down the comic books and read some real history books, dopes.

Also, the early stages of any movie are all about throwing ideas around and trying to hone the material down. Don't read too much into these transcripts as they are just written words and you don't know the context in which they were actually saying them. It sounds more like normal guys sitting at a table with a few beers and throwing out ideas for the initial script and having a laugh. The script was also rewritten between Harrison Ford and Spielberg on the plane ride over to start filming since Harrison wanted input. Any movie novelizations or comic adaptations are done so far in advance and sometime have to use earlier scripts to get it done on time hence the problems with having a different ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEWSFLASH: Older guys love young pussy. </p>
<p>Who&#8217;da thunk it?!? </p>
<p>Seriously, the only one on these comments who makes ANY sense AND knows history was James who said it was a different era and women did get married younger. Back then there were none of the laws that they have today and it was considered ok. Women married earlier and going even further back, when life spans were much shorter to due a wide variety of reasons, they were married off even earlier.</p>
<p>Put down the comic books and read some real history books, dopes.</p>
<p>Also, the early stages of any movie are all about throwing ideas around and trying to hone the material down. Don&#8217;t read too much into these transcripts as they are just written words and you don&#8217;t know the context in which they were actually saying them. It sounds more like normal guys sitting at a table with a few beers and throwing out ideas for the initial script and having a laugh. The script was also rewritten between Harrison Ford and Spielberg on the plane ride over to start filming since Harrison wanted input. Any movie novelizations or comic adaptations are done so far in advance and sometime have to use earlier scripts to get it done on time hence the problems with having a different ending.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Abhay</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044680</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044680</guid>
					<description>The Raiders story transcript is an interesting and unique document, and it's sad that one page out of 126 is being used as yet another excuse for boring people on the internet to be judgmental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Raiders story transcript is an interesting and unique document, and it&#8217;s sad that one page out of 126 is being used as yet another excuse for boring people on the internet to be judgmental.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Annie Social</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044675</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044675</guid>
					<description>Does this explain why I have heard so many fans complain that Lucas raped their childhood? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this explain why I have heard so many fans complain that Lucas raped their childhood? <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044603</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044603</guid>
					<description>Alexa, actually the low median does reflect the fact that a lot more teenaged girls got married in the 20s and 30s. 

One thing that comes clear from reading the whole transcript is that Indy was supposed to be an ANTI-hero from the start. We clearly see him fooling around with his students in the films and books. A 25-year-old Indy messing around with his mentor's 17 year old daughter is naughty and inadvisable but well within the realm of stupid stuff that people do. 

Messing around with an 11 or 12 year old, however...is a bit weird and skeevy, even if she was a promiscuous ho who threw herself at you. 

As I mentioned in my post, Lucas put just this kind of story into American Graffiti, where Carol's crush on Milner is charming and quite innocent. At one point Milner does come onto her, after which she decides she'd rather go home after all. 

Given all the young girls in Lucas's oeuvre and the lack of mature women of any kind, this whole element is...interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa, actually the low median does reflect the fact that a lot more teenaged girls got married in the 20s and 30s. </p>
<p>One thing that comes clear from reading the whole transcript is that Indy was supposed to be an ANTI-hero from the start. We clearly see him fooling around with his students in the films and books. A 25-year-old Indy messing around with his mentor&#8217;s 17 year old daughter is naughty and inadvisable but well within the realm of stupid stuff that people do. </p>
<p>Messing around with an 11 or 12 year old, however&#8230;is a bit weird and skeevy, even if she was a promiscuous ho who threw herself at you. </p>
<p>As I mentioned in my post, Lucas put just this kind of story into American Graffiti, where Carol&#8217;s crush on Milner is charming and quite innocent. At one point Milner does come onto her, after which she decides she&#8217;d rather go home after all. </p>
<p>Given all the young girls in Lucas&#8217;s oeuvre and the lack of mature women of any kind, this whole element is&#8230;interesting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexa</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044582</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044582</guid>
					<description>@James - According to the US census, the median age of marriage for women in 1920 was 21.2, and 21.3 in 1930.  In 2003, it was 25.3.  It was lowest in 1956, when the median age was 20.1.  So no, your grandmother was not the norm then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James - According to the US census, the median age of marriage for women in 1920 was 21.2, and 21.3 in 1930.  In 2003, it was 25.3.  It was lowest in 1956, when the median age was 20.1.  So no, your grandmother was not the norm then.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: James</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044526</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044526</guid>
					<description>Sheesh. Hello, different era?

The whole 11-year-old Marion yeah, there's something seriously wrong with that. But 15 or 16? Give me a break! That would have been 1926. Check your history, people, perhaps even your own personal history... Lots of &quot;girls&quot; age 15 or 16 were marrying men 10 and sometimes even 20 years their senior in those days. My grandmother was 15 when she married my grandfather, age 25. Those were the marrying ages back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh. Hello, different era?</p>
<p>The whole 11-year-old Marion yeah, there&#8217;s something seriously wrong with that. But 15 or 16? Give me a break! That would have been 1926. Check your history, people, perhaps even your own personal history&#8230; Lots of &#8220;girls&#8221; age 15 or 16 were marrying men 10 and sometimes even 20 years their senior in those days. My grandmother was 15 when she married my grandfather, age 25. Those were the marrying ages back then.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rivkah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044440</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044440</guid>
					<description>Half plus seven rule, Lucas! Half plus seven!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half plus seven rule, Lucas! Half plus seven!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ed</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044369</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044369</guid>
					<description>This underage thing sounds like Lucas and Spielberg's attempt to 'sex up' their archeologist/hero--- a la James Bond or Captain Kirk, a backstory gloss to make Indy that more interesting &quot;bad boy&quot; lead? 


And I wouldn't underestimate Spielberg's input into all this: he did design the Mothership from CLOSE ENCOUNTERS to resemble a giant breast, 
AND inserted that quite bizarre &quot;Space Bukkake&quot; scene after Dreyfuss' Neary entered the craft in the Special Edition version of the film...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This underage thing sounds like Lucas and Spielberg&#8217;s attempt to &#8217;sex up&#8217; their archeologist/hero&#8212; a la James Bond or Captain Kirk, a backstory gloss to make Indy that more interesting &#8220;bad boy&#8221; lead? </p>
<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t underestimate Spielberg&#8217;s input into all this: he did design the Mothership from CLOSE ENCOUNTERS to resemble a giant breast,<br />
AND inserted that quite bizarre &#8220;Space Bukkake&#8221; scene after Dreyfuss&#8217; Neary entered the craft in the Special Edition version of the film&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: michael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044358</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044358</guid>
					<description>suddenly, I don't feel so good.

Lucas is....craaazy!!! O.O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>suddenly, I don&#8217;t feel so good.</p>
<p>Lucas is&#8230;.craaazy!!! O.O
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Calm Down, Fellas&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044239</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044239</guid>
					<description>[...] They just learned that they could have had some company had Lucas, Spielberg and Kasdan&amp;#8217;s original Raiders of the Lost Ark script gone their way&amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] They just learned that they could have had some company had Lucas, Spielberg and Kasdan&#8217;s original Raiders of the Lost Ark script gone their way&#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gene phillips</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044229</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044229</guid>
					<description>&quot;[…] Their comments about the inappropriateness of a romance between Amethyst and Prince Topaz are rather timely, given this revelation from the Raiders of the Lost Ark story-conference transcripts. […] &quot;

Arguably Golden Age Captain Marvel went there before either of them, even if the &quot;romance&quot; was unconsummated back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[…] Their comments about the inappropriateness of a romance between Amethyst and Prince Topaz are rather timely, given this revelation from the Raiders of the Lost Ark story-conference transcripts. […] &#8221;</p>
<p>Arguably Golden Age Captain Marvel went there before either of them, even if the &#8220;romance&#8221; was unconsummated back then.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason A. Quest</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044203</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044203</guid>
					<description>'&quot;...Marion’s birthyear was revealed to be 1909, making her age about 27 at the time of Raiders instead.” No matter what version, she was still underage.'

Point of fact: 10 years before that, she would have been 17.  Under current law in the vast majority of countries (including all but a dozen US states) that's at or above the age of consent for sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;&#8221;&#8230;Marion’s birthyear was revealed to be 1909, making her age about 27 at the time of Raiders instead.” No matter what version, she was still underage.&#8217;</p>
<p>Point of fact: 10 years before that, she would have been 17.  Under current law in the vast majority of countries (including all but a dozen US states) that&#8217;s at or above the age of consent for sex.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jennifer Kesler</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044003</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3044003</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the link!

I think what's disturbing here is not so much the idea - they were, at this point, trying to create an anti-hero, after all - but the conversation itself. Lucas seems to be looking at a grown man having sex with an 11 year old as a bad idea rather than child molestation. If Indy has a thing for his college students - or even for 15 year olds - that says fairly icky things about his psychology, which is appropriate for an anti-hero. But if he has a thing for 11 year olds, that makes him a child molestor, which is NOT an anti-hero - that's just a criminal, period. Lucas doesn't seem to grasp the distinction.

I wouldn't be surprised if having raised a couple of daughters changed his perspective on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
<p>I think what&#8217;s disturbing here is not so much the idea - they were, at this point, trying to create an anti-hero, after all - but the conversation itself. Lucas seems to be looking at a grown man having sex with an 11 year old as a bad idea rather than child molestation. If Indy has a thing for his college students - or even for 15 year olds - that says fairly icky things about his psychology, which is appropriate for an anti-hero. But if he has a thing for 11 year olds, that makes him a child molestor, which is NOT an anti-hero - that&#8217;s just a criminal, period. Lucas doesn&#8217;t seem to grasp the distinction.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if having raised a couple of daughters changed his perspective on this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Higgins</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043979</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043979</guid>
					<description>&quot;He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.&quot;

I can't believe that there is even a debate here.  Lucas suggests Indy had an affair with her when she was eleven.  Grown man has sex with 11 year old = sexual abuse.  Period.  So it's bad and insane that Lucas wanted to have him be a child molester.  Adults don't have &quot;affairs&quot; with children -- they engage in criminal sexual behavior.  Yes, it's fiction, Mr. Phillips, fantasy.  And it would have been fiction about child sexual abuse.  Anybody still not get that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He could have known this little girl when she was just a kid. Had an affair with her when she was eleven.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe that there is even a debate here.  Lucas suggests Indy had an affair with her when she was eleven.  Grown man has sex with 11 year old = sexual abuse.  Period.  So it&#8217;s bad and insane that Lucas wanted to have him be a child molester.  Adults don&#8217;t have &#8220;affairs&#8221; with children &#8212; they engage in criminal sexual behavior.  Yes, it&#8217;s fiction, Mr. Phillips, fantasy.  And it would have been fiction about child sexual abuse.  Anybody still not get that?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; &#8216;I don’t know that Amethyst could come out fresh today&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043947</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043947</guid>
					<description>[...] Their comments about the inappropriateness of a romance between Amethyst and Prince Topaz are rather timely, given this revelation from the Raiders of the Lost Ark story-conference transcripts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Their comments about the inappropriateness of a romance between Amethyst and Prince Topaz are rather timely, given this revelation from the Raiders of the Lost Ark story-conference transcripts. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043937</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043937</guid>
					<description>I added the next three lines of the transcript because...IT'S JUST SO DAMNED FUNNY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added the next three lines of the transcript because&#8230;IT&#8217;S JUST SO DAMNED FUNNY!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alexa</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043940</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043940</guid>
					<description>@HLR- Except later in the exchange, Lucas describes Marion as &quot;promiscuous&quot;.  What else are we supposed to think happened?

@gene phillips - ELEVEN-years-old is NOT statutory rape.  Eleven-years-old is pedophilia and a FELONY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HLR- Except later in the exchange, Lucas describes Marion as &#8220;promiscuous&#8221;.  What else are we supposed to think happened?</p>
<p>@gene phillips - ELEVEN-years-old is NOT statutory rape.  Eleven-years-old is pedophilia and a FELONY.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Sanderson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043932</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043932</guid>
					<description>Since Karen Allen was 30 when &quot;Raiders&quot; came out, I had assumned that Marion would have been 20 when she had her initial affair with Indiana Jines.  But I see from this website (http://indianajones.wikia.com/wiki/Marion_Ravenwood) that &quot;the script states that Marion's age in Raiders is 25 years old, making her around 15 at the time of the affair with a 27-year-old Indy. With the release of Indiana Jones: The Ultimate Guide in 2008, this was changed when Marion's birthyear was revealed to be 1909, making her age about 27 at the time of Raiders instead.&quot; No matter what version, she was still underage. It gets worse: according to this same site, Karen Allen came up with her own backstory for Marion, including a stint as a prostitute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Karen Allen was 30 when &#8220;Raiders&#8221; came out, I had assumned that Marion would have been 20 when she had her initial affair with Indiana Jines.  But I see from this website (http://indianajones.wikia.com/wiki/Marion_Ravenwood) that &#8220;the script states that Marion&#8217;s age in Raiders is 25 years old, making her around 15 at the time of the affair with a 27-year-old Indy. With the release of Indiana Jones: The Ultimate Guide in 2008, this was changed when Marion&#8217;s birthyear was revealed to be 1909, making her age about 27 at the time of Raiders instead.&#8221; No matter what version, she was still underage. It gets worse: according to this same site, Karen Allen came up with her own backstory for Marion, including a stint as a prostitute.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043923</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043923</guid>
					<description>If you go to the link you'll see Spielberg actually says the kid was &quot;promiscuous&quot; so they had sex on the mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go to the link you&#8217;ll see Spielberg actually says the kid was &#8220;promiscuous&#8221; so they had sex on the mind.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Sanderson</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043926</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043926</guid>
					<description>Since Karen Allen was30 when &quot;Raiders&quot; came out, I had assumned that Marion would have been 20 when she had her initial affair with Indiana Jines.  But I see 
from this website (http://indianajones.wikia.com/wiki/Marion_Ravenwood) that &quot;the script states that Marion's age in Raiders is 25 years old, making her around 15 at the time of the affair with a 27-year-old Indy. With the release of Indiana Jones: The Ultimate Guide in 2008, this was changed when Marion's birthyear was revealed to be 1909, making her age about 27 at the time of Raiders instead.&quot; No matter what version, she was still underage. It gets worse: according to this same site, Karen Allen came up with her own backstory for Marion, including a stint as a prostitute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Karen Allen was30 when &#8220;Raiders&#8221; came out, I had assumned that Marion would have been 20 when she had her initial affair with Indiana Jines.  But I see<br />
from this website (http://indianajones.wikia.com/wiki/Marion_Ravenwood) that &#8220;the script states that Marion&#8217;s age in Raiders is 25 years old, making her around 15 at the time of the affair with a 27-year-old Indy. With the release of Indiana Jones: The Ultimate Guide in 2008, this was changed when Marion&#8217;s birthyear was revealed to be 1909, making her age about 27 at the time of Raiders instead.&#8221; No matter what version, she was still underage. It gets worse: according to this same site, Karen Allen came up with her own backstory for Marion, including a stint as a prostitute.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HLR</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043888</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/03/16/indiana-jones-child-molester/#comment-3043888</guid>
					<description>Is everyone assuming that it was of a sexual nature?  It only mentions an 'affair' which is defined as an 'intense amorous relationship, usually of short duration'.  Affair, and indeed amorous doesn't necesarily imply anything sexual went on...  I'm not saying that the idea is right or wrong, just that it seems interesting that people have automatically assumed that sex was involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is everyone assuming that it was of a sexual nature?  It only mentions an &#8216;affair&#8217; which is defined as an &#8216;intense amorous relationship, usually of short duration&#8217;.  Affair, and indeed amorous doesn&#8217;t necesarily imply anything sexual went on&#8230;  I&#8217;m not saying that the idea is right or wrong, just that it seems interesting that people have automatically assumed that sex was involved.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
