<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Month-to-Month Sales: February 2009</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Linkarama@Newsarama</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3188818</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3188818</guid>
					<description>[...] Yikes. I knew from flip-throughs and keeping an eye on the solicitations that the title has been creatively…chaotic, but I didn’t realize it had gotten that bad. Even more depressing? JLoA is one of DC’s best-sellers, sometimes the best-selling title, depending on what’s up with Batman during that particular month. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yikes. I knew from flip-throughs and keeping an eye on the solicitations that the title has been creatively…chaotic, but I didn’t realize it had gotten that bad. Even more depressing? JLoA is one of DC’s best-sellers, sometimes the best-selling title, depending on what’s up with Batman during that particular month. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: metalfanatic</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3178599</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3178599</guid>
					<description>and now, a pet peeve of mine:


QUIT CALLING THEM &quot;FLOPPIES!  QUIT CALLING THEM &quot;PAMPHLETS&quot;!

Floppies are DISKS, and pamphlets are wht you get at the free clinic!

Acceptable terms are: comics, comic books, issues, perodicals, monthlies, pubications, and &quot;overpriced collectibles&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and now, a pet peeve of mine:</p>
<p>QUIT CALLING THEM &#8220;FLOPPIES!  QUIT CALLING THEM &#8220;PAMPHLETS&#8221;!</p>
<p>Floppies are DISKS, and pamphlets are wht you get at the free clinic!</p>
<p>Acceptable terms are: comics, comic books, issues, perodicals, monthlies, pubications, and &#8220;overpriced collectibles&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc-Oliver Frisch</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3161614</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3161614</guid>
					<description>Gail:

&quot;The total story page counts per issue of participating “Origins and Omens” books went up by two pages each.&quot;

My bad. The solicitation copy gave the total page count as 32 pages, as usual, so I presumed the &quot;Origins and Omens&quot; backups were at the expense of the lead story. I should have double-checked that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gail:</p>
<p>&#8220;The total story page counts per issue of participating “Origins and Omens” books went up by two pages each.&#8221;</p>
<p>My bad. The solicitation copy gave the total page count as 32 pages, as usual, so I presumed the &#8220;Origins and Omens&#8221; backups were at the expense of the lead story. I should have double-checked that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dru</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3156171</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3156171</guid>
					<description>There may be hope for the Mighty yet... issue 3 was given the &quot;hot! hot! hot!&quot; placard at my LCS, and they only had one copy left. The checkout clerk said they'd had to reorder both 1 and 2. Good word of mouth? It is an interesting story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be hope for the Mighty yet&#8230; issue 3 was given the &#8220;hot! hot! hot!&#8221; placard at my LCS, and they only had one copy left. The checkout clerk said they&#8217;d had to reorder both 1 and 2. Good word of mouth? It is an interesting story.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TonyC</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3152311</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3152311</guid>
					<description>I do find it interesting that very few comments here mention trades as a major factor in sales declines, other than the Vertigo stuff. I can't even list the number of people I know that don't pick up floppies anymore because it's more economical to get the books, and, of course, the way they line up so pretty on the shelf has high appeal to our kind!

Dan D. - I'm sure he's a nice man and all, but as several have mentioned, the editorial direction at DC is just south of pathetic. There is NO excuse for all the delays and the constant 'events' (who really thought &quot;faces of evil&quot; would be a good idea or generate any sales, other than Dan? Is he running the ship solo there? Is there no one to stand up and say &quot;hey... maybe there are better ideas than this!&quot;

Jonah Hex - I've heard several times that the title pulls its weight with the trades... I don't think 'editorial favor' is the reason it's still going. I get all the trades, love them, and would not pay the outrageous price for the floppies. Same for Sgt. Rock and the Haunted Tank - I'm all over them when the books come out.

One other thing - I don't read too much about the Geoff Johns factor. I was really getting into Action/Superman, and then, OF COURSE, they get greedy as soon as they sniff something good going on and all of a sudden GJ is off to a mini-series chaos breaks out. ANOTHER good thing that was on the way that was blown by editorial... greed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do find it interesting that very few comments here mention trades as a major factor in sales declines, other than the Vertigo stuff. I can&#8217;t even list the number of people I know that don&#8217;t pick up floppies anymore because it&#8217;s more economical to get the books, and, of course, the way they line up so pretty on the shelf has high appeal to our kind!</p>
<p>Dan D. - I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s a nice man and all, but as several have mentioned, the editorial direction at DC is just south of pathetic. There is NO excuse for all the delays and the constant &#8216;events&#8217; (who really thought &#8220;faces of evil&#8221; would be a good idea or generate any sales, other than Dan? Is he running the ship solo there? Is there no one to stand up and say &#8220;hey&#8230; maybe there are better ideas than this!&#8221;</p>
<p>Jonah Hex - I&#8217;ve heard several times that the title pulls its weight with the trades&#8230; I don&#8217;t think &#8216;editorial favor&#8217; is the reason it&#8217;s still going. I get all the trades, love them, and would not pay the outrageous price for the floppies. Same for Sgt. Rock and the Haunted Tank - I&#8217;m all over them when the books come out.</p>
<p>One other thing - I don&#8217;t read too much about the Geoff Johns factor. I was really getting into Action/Superman, and then, OF COURSE, they get greedy as soon as they sniff something good going on and all of a sudden GJ is off to a mini-series chaos breaks out. ANOTHER good thing that was on the way that was blown by editorial&#8230; greed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: morganagrom</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150899</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150899</guid>
					<description>&quot;Well, as morganagrom mentioned, those huge discounts only seem to apply to each book’s first trade.&quot;

In many cases, the savings still add up over the life of a series.  For instance, when the final volume of 100 Bullets is published in July, the difference between buying the 100 pamphlets ($268) and the 13 paperbacks ($185) is $83, just over 30% savings.

&quot;Just think of the upcoming Fables crossover: surely it’s much more fun to pick up a new part of this almost every week than to read it in one huge chunk.&quot;

For some people, yes, if they don't mind spending the extra money.

Others will probably appreciate that the paperback will probably run about $20 vs. $27 for the 9 pamphlets.

It will be interesting to see whether Jack of Fables (and the Literals) rise to Fables numbers or whether they stay at expected levels, perhaps with a slight bump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Well, as morganagrom mentioned, those huge discounts only seem to apply to each book’s first trade.&#8221;</p>
<p>In many cases, the savings still add up over the life of a series.  For instance, when the final volume of 100 Bullets is published in July, the difference between buying the 100 pamphlets ($268) and the 13 paperbacks ($185) is $83, just over 30% savings.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just think of the upcoming Fables crossover: surely it’s much more fun to pick up a new part of this almost every week than to read it in one huge chunk.&#8221;</p>
<p>For some people, yes, if they don&#8217;t mind spending the extra money.</p>
<p>Others will probably appreciate that the paperback will probably run about $20 vs. $27 for the 9 pamphlets.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see whether Jack of Fables (and the Literals) rise to Fables numbers or whether they stay at expected levels, perhaps with a slight bump.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Callum</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150683</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150683</guid>
					<description>I like some of the Vertigo titles but most of the DCU comics other than Batman and Green Lantern-related ones are either not terribly good or I have no idea what's going on. They're too obtuse for me and remind me of Avenger comics in the 80s when half the characters spoke in stilted dialogue and they were always off fighting in space or fixing time continuum problems.  
I am glad that Scalped went up a bit after a few months of decline.  And I think Secret Six will probably start to have slight increases as time goes on through good word of mouth.  I hear it mentioned in a postive light fairly often.
Your analyses, while gloomily, seemed pretty dead on for the most part.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like some of the Vertigo titles but most of the DCU comics other than Batman and Green Lantern-related ones are either not terribly good or I have no idea what&#8217;s going on. They&#8217;re too obtuse for me and remind me of Avenger comics in the 80s when half the characters spoke in stilted dialogue and they were always off fighting in space or fixing time continuum problems.<br />
I am glad that Scalped went up a bit after a few months of decline.  And I think Secret Six will probably start to have slight increases as time goes on through good word of mouth.  I hear it mentioned in a postive light fairly often.<br />
Your analyses, while gloomily, seemed pretty dead on for the most part.  Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; April 14, 2009: T-minus one</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150286</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150286</guid>
					<description>[...] Marc-Oliver Frisch presents month-to-month comparisons for DC Comics&amp;#8217; sales to Direct Market retailers, now updated for February. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Marc-Oliver Frisch presents month-to-month comparisons for DC Comics&#8217; sales to Direct Market retailers, now updated for February. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heinz Hochkoepper</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150131</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3150131</guid>
					<description>&quot;Why in the world would anyone read Veritgo in single issues when the trades tend to be cheaper when they come out?&quot;

Well, as morganagrom mentioned, those huge discounts only seem to apply to each book's first trade. For this reason, I've decided to try out promising new series via trade. On the other hand, I still prefer the singles with long-running series, for the simple reason that I don't want to wait half a year or longer for each new installment. Just think of the upcoming Fables crossover: surely it's much more fun to pick up a new part of this almost every week than to read it in one huge chunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why in the world would anyone read Veritgo in single issues when the trades tend to be cheaper when they come out?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, as morganagrom mentioned, those huge discounts only seem to apply to each book&#8217;s first trade. For this reason, I&#8217;ve decided to try out promising new series via trade. On the other hand, I still prefer the singles with long-running series, for the simple reason that I don&#8217;t want to wait half a year or longer for each new installment. Just think of the upcoming Fables crossover: surely it&#8217;s much more fun to pick up a new part of this almost every week than to read it in one huge chunk.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: morganagrom</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3149242</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3149242</guid>
					<description>It wouldn't be surprising if lots of Vertigo readers feel that way.

House of Mystery paperback was a good deal?  Try Northlanders Vol. 1: Sven The Returned which costs 58% less than buying the ad-filled pamphlets.  Maybe some people prefer getting to read the story in advance over months and months, but a lot of people might prefer the extra $14 to put towards volume 2 (it's $15 and comes out this summer and costs $3 less than buying the same story as pamphlets).

DC's website also lists the first Madame Xanadu paperback as containing the first 10 pamphlets for only $13.  That's a 56% price break and an extra $17 in the wallet.

With deals like that, it's no wonder why the Vertigo numbers (as reflected in this column) appear to drop the way they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be surprising if lots of Vertigo readers feel that way.</p>
<p>House of Mystery paperback was a good deal?  Try Northlanders Vol. 1: Sven The Returned which costs 58% less than buying the ad-filled pamphlets.  Maybe some people prefer getting to read the story in advance over months and months, but a lot of people might prefer the extra $14 to put towards volume 2 (it&#8217;s $15 and comes out this summer and costs $3 less than buying the same story as pamphlets).</p>
<p>DC&#8217;s website also lists the first Madame Xanadu paperback as containing the first 10 pamphlets for only $13.  That&#8217;s a 56% price break and an extra $17 in the wallet.</p>
<p>With deals like that, it&#8217;s no wonder why the Vertigo numbers (as reflected in this column) appear to drop the way they do.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob McMonigal</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3149153</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3149153</guid>
					<description>Why in the world would anyone read Veritgo in single issues when the trades tend to be cheaper when they come out?

I was FURIOUS when the trade of House of Mystery was 30% less than what I paid for ad-laden singles.

Once the new arc finishes, I'm done with it.  Right now, my pull list is about 3-5 comics a month and shrinking regularly.  Trades all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in the world would anyone read Veritgo in single issues when the trades tend to be cheaper when they come out?</p>
<p>I was FURIOUS when the trade of House of Mystery was 30% less than what I paid for ad-laden singles.</p>
<p>Once the new arc finishes, I&#8217;m done with it.  Right now, my pull list is about 3-5 comics a month and shrinking regularly.  Trades all the way.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pedro Bouça</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3148597</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3148597</guid>
					<description>&quot;Wildstorm: By all available data, this imprint is indeed doing badly, though there is the not-quite-irrelevant fact that, according to Rich Johnston and others, it publishes the best-selling comics books in the western hemisphere (the licensed properties). The exact nature of this seems to be unknown, but it’s certainly food for thought. &quot;

Do I have to repeat this every time? NO US COMIC IS THE BEST-SELLING WESTERN COMIC NOWADAYS!

A new Asterix book sells about seven million copies. Italy's Topolino (Mickey) magazine sells over 300k a WEEK.

Comic sales on the US are incredibly low considering its enormous population and wealth. Not that long ago there were monthly US comics selling over half a million copies every month, but the US comics industry did a remarkable job alienating itself from its audience.

Best,
Hunter (Pedro Bouça)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wildstorm: By all available data, this imprint is indeed doing badly, though there is the not-quite-irrelevant fact that, according to Rich Johnston and others, it publishes the best-selling comics books in the western hemisphere (the licensed properties). The exact nature of this seems to be unknown, but it’s certainly food for thought. &#8221;</p>
<p>Do I have to repeat this every time? NO US COMIC IS THE BEST-SELLING WESTERN COMIC NOWADAYS!</p>
<p>A new Asterix book sells about seven million copies. Italy&#8217;s Topolino (Mickey) magazine sells over 300k a WEEK.</p>
<p>Comic sales on the US are incredibly low considering its enormous population and wealth. Not that long ago there were monthly US comics selling over half a million copies every month, but the US comics industry did a remarkable job alienating itself from its audience.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Hunter (Pedro Bouça)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147835</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147835</guid>
					<description>Mike said:

&quot;And that short-sighted approach is one of the reasons why comic sales are in the toilet.&quot;

Yes, it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike said:</p>
<p>&#8220;And that short-sighted approach is one of the reasons why comic sales are in the toilet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, it is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Louis Lane</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147544</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147544</guid>
					<description>This is the second time I've posted a comment, only to have most of what I've written fail to appear. I guess I'll just give up and lurk.

LL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second time I&#8217;ve posted a comment, only to have most of what I&#8217;ve written fail to appear. I guess I&#8217;ll just give up and lurk.</p>
<p>LL
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Louis Lane</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147527</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147527</guid>
					<description>Re: Adventure Comics and Entry-Level Books

&amp;#62;DC Comics is simply not interested in selling its comics to people who don’t already read them. I’m not making this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Adventure Comics and Entry-Level Books</p>
<p>&gt;DC Comics is simply not interested in selling its comics to people who don’t already read them. I’m not making this up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MBunge</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147458</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147458</guid>
					<description>&quot;Because there is no sense spending good money after bad. Vixen was never going to sell in huge numbers, no matter how well it was promoted or how much was spent promoting it. Flash will be a continuing series that will far outstrip Vixen in sales.&quot;
 

And that short-sighted approach is one of the reasons why comic sales are in the toilet.  The reasons why you promote a title like Vixen at least a bit instead of just throwing everything behind Flash are...

1.  Get the folks who are already going to be buying Flash to try Vixen.  Which is more likely, getting an extra 10 thousand people to buy Flash or getting 10 thousand people who are buying Flash to also buy Vixen?

2.  People who might never buy Flash, no matter what, might buy Vixen.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Because there is no sense spending good money after bad. Vixen was never going to sell in huge numbers, no matter how well it was promoted or how much was spent promoting it. Flash will be a continuing series that will far outstrip Vixen in sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that short-sighted approach is one of the reasons why comic sales are in the toilet.  The reasons why you promote a title like Vixen at least a bit instead of just throwing everything behind Flash are&#8230;</p>
<p>1.  Get the folks who are already going to be buying Flash to try Vixen.  Which is more likely, getting an extra 10 thousand people to buy Flash or getting 10 thousand people who are buying Flash to also buy Vixen?</p>
<p>2.  People who might never buy Flash, no matter what, might buy Vixen.</p>
<p>Mike
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Comics Should Be Good! @ Comic Book Resources &#187; Easter Sunday Brunch: 4/12/09</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147233</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3147233</guid>
					<description>[...] ICEBERG, DEAD AHEAD! The Beat has posted the respective month-to-month sales-and-commentary charts for Marvel and DC. This particular comment, from Mark Clapham in the DC thread, caused me to laugh the laugh of the damned: Towards the bottom end of the chart it would be cheaper to phone the remaining readers individually and tell them the story than go through the expense of producing actual issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ICEBERG, DEAD AHEAD! The Beat has posted the respective month-to-month sales-and-commentary charts for Marvel and DC. This particular comment, from Mark Clapham in the DC thread, caused me to laugh the laugh of the damned: Towards the bottom end of the chart it would be cheaper to phone the remaining readers individually and tell them the story than go through the expense of producing actual issues. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Micah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3146172</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3146172</guid>
					<description>Scalped numbers are completely stable!  HUZZAH!  The other shocker is that REBELS launched so poorly.  Great story and great art!  I don't even follow LEGION, never read any of the previous volumes, and found the story interesting and easy to follow.  I am surprised by the line-wide direction of the Superman titles; I was initially off-put about it, but continued picking up Supes and Action.  The new direction is really interesting and well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scalped numbers are completely stable!  HUZZAH!  The other shocker is that REBELS launched so poorly.  Great story and great art!  I don&#8217;t even follow LEGION, never read any of the previous volumes, and found the story interesting and easy to follow.  I am surprised by the line-wide direction of the Superman titles; I was initially off-put about it, but continued picking up Supes and Action.  The new direction is really interesting and well done.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daily News Report</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3146171</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3146171</guid>
					<description>[...] THE BEAT » Blog Archive » DC Month-to-Month Sales: February 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] THE BEAT » Blog Archive » DC Month-to-Month Sales: February 2009 [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145865</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145865</guid>
					<description>The hardcover collection of Gaiman's Batman stories is due to ship in early July, to coincide with Moore's collection of Superman stories.  How does the delay affect production?  Extra cost to airfreight the books?

As for variants, I wait for the trade, since they are usually placed in the appendix of the collection.  

The only DC periodical I buy is the Johnny DC Supergirl miniseries.  I'l give the Vertigo Noir titles a chance.  Wish Wildstorm would produce more Pushing Daisies comics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hardcover collection of Gaiman&#8217;s Batman stories is due to ship in early July, to coincide with Moore&#8217;s collection of Superman stories.  How does the delay affect production?  Extra cost to airfreight the books?</p>
<p>As for variants, I wait for the trade, since they are usually placed in the appendix of the collection.  </p>
<p>The only DC periodical I buy is the Johnny DC Supergirl miniseries.  I&#8217;l give the Vertigo Noir titles a chance.  Wish Wildstorm would produce more Pushing Daisies comics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon in Austin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145572</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145572</guid>
					<description>The Mighty is really good - I picked it up for the artist and like what I see - but I don't expect it to last beyond six issues due to zero promotion.  What's the point of even bringing a product to market if you aren't going to make an effort to sell it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mighty is really good - I picked it up for the artist and like what I see - but I don&#8217;t expect it to last beyond six issues due to zero promotion.  What&#8217;s the point of even bringing a product to market if you aren&#8217;t going to make an effort to sell it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: not mike carlin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145441</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145441</guid>
					<description>The only 'late' artist i have any sympathy for is George Perez.  Most others are still young and haven't really earned the benefit of the doubt.

In the 'real world' people lose family (or whatever) all the time and are still somehow expected to show up to work once in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only &#8216;late&#8217; artist i have any sympathy for is George Perez.  Most others are still young and haven&#8217;t really earned the benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>In the &#8216;real world&#8217; people lose family (or whatever) all the time and are still somehow expected to show up to work once in a while.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ralph Mathieu</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145160</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3145160</guid>
					<description>Sonic2nd, just because a date is listed by Westfield and Amazon doesn't mean it's set in stone. The internet is full of misinformation and not all of it is intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonic2nd, just because a date is listed by Westfield and Amazon doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s set in stone. The internet is full of misinformation and not all of it is intended.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sonic2nd</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144820</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144820</guid>
					<description>&quot;and Jeebus only knows when part 2 of the Gaiman Batman thing will see the light of day.&quot;

That's odd.  I have a Westfield Comics catalog that has a listing for a hardcover graphic novel of the &quot;Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader&quot; by Gaiman.  It's also listed on Amazon.

http://www.amazon.com/Batman-Whatever-Happened-Crusader-Hardcover/dp/1401223036</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and Jeebus only knows when part 2 of the Gaiman Batman thing will see the light of day.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s odd.  I have a Westfield Comics catalog that has a listing for a hardcover graphic novel of the &#8220;Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader&#8221; by Gaiman.  It&#8217;s also listed on Amazon.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.amazon.com/Batman-Whatever-Happened-Crusader-Hardcover/dp/1401223036' rel='nofollow'>http://www.amazon.com/Batman-Whatever-Happened-Crusader-Hardcover/dp/1401223036</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Evan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144679</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144679</guid>
					<description>Alan, Adam Kubert is back with Marvel, though no idea if he signed an exclusive with them or not.

He said in a Newsarama interview that when he went to DC, all he wanted to do was Superman, and after he did the six issues, he really didn't want to do much else.

So DC REALLY paid well for 3 years exclusivity there!

Andy however is not through with DC yet and still has other work planeed with them at least according to Didio.

And Heidi, I'm one who believes that least when extenuating circumstances cause delays like what the Kuberts have gone through (exeption of course for the passing of their mother), more info should be given out to the retailers/fans so at least we don't sit around complaining on message boards.

We're an understanding bunch when we're treated like adults.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, Adam Kubert is back with Marvel, though no idea if he signed an exclusive with them or not.</p>
<p>He said in a Newsarama interview that when he went to DC, all he wanted to do was Superman, and after he did the six issues, he really didn&#8217;t want to do much else.</p>
<p>So DC REALLY paid well for 3 years exclusivity there!</p>
<p>Andy however is not through with DC yet and still has other work planeed with them at least according to Didio.</p>
<p>And Heidi, I&#8217;m one who believes that least when extenuating circumstances cause delays like what the Kuberts have gone through (exeption of course for the passing of their mother), more info should be given out to the retailers/fans so at least we don&#8217;t sit around complaining on message boards.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re an understanding bunch when we&#8217;re treated like adults.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heinz Hochkoepper</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144522</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144522</guid>
					<description>I'll never understand why people feel the need to post these doom and gloom, &quot;sales are in the toilet&quot; comments. Let's look at the three imprints seperately:

DCU: Average periodical sales are almost exactly at the same level as 5 years ago (5 years : - 1.3%). Of course there were lots of sales bumps inbetween, and another one is surely coming up, as there is no doubt that Blackest Night will do pretty well. No reason for concern here.

Vertigo: Average periodical sales have declined as TPB sales have risen. I just wish more people would read (and remember!) Brian Wood's incredibly frank statements on this subject (he gives another one in the Millarworld thread about this very post) so they might get the simple fact that Vertigo is doing just fine into their thick skulls.

Wildstorm: By all available data, this imprint is indeed doing badly, though there is the not-quite-irrelevant fact that, according to Rich Johnston and others, it publishes the best-selling comics books in the western hemisphere (the licensed properties). The exact nature of this seems to be unknown, but it's certainly food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll never understand why people feel the need to post these doom and gloom, &#8220;sales are in the toilet&#8221; comments. Let&#8217;s look at the three imprints seperately:</p>
<p>DCU: Average periodical sales are almost exactly at the same level as 5 years ago (5 years : - 1.3%). Of course there were lots of sales bumps inbetween, and another one is surely coming up, as there is no doubt that Blackest Night will do pretty well. No reason for concern here.</p>
<p>Vertigo: Average periodical sales have declined as TPB sales have risen. I just wish more people would read (and remember!) Brian Wood&#8217;s incredibly frank statements on this subject (he gives another one in the Millarworld thread about this very post) so they might get the simple fact that Vertigo is doing just fine into their thick skulls.</p>
<p>Wildstorm: By all available data, this imprint is indeed doing badly, though there is the not-quite-irrelevant fact that, according to Rich Johnston and others, it publishes the best-selling comics books in the western hemisphere (the licensed properties). The exact nature of this seems to be unknown, but it&#8217;s certainly food for thought.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis V.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144140</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144140</guid>
					<description>Alan Coil  wrote: &quot;So to sum up: All sales are in the toilet.&quot;

Maybe... but some seem to be in the process of being pulled to the bottom of the bowl (DC) while others are still managing to float at the top (Marvel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Coil  wrote: &#8220;So to sum up: All sales are in the toilet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe&#8230; but some seem to be in the process of being pulled to the bottom of the bowl (DC) while others are still managing to float at the top (Marvel).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis V.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144108</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3144108</guid>
					<description>&quot;Detective Comics #853, the second part of the story, was originally scheduled for February as well, but the book is late and, as I’m writing this, is delayed until April 22.&quot;

Two months late (at least)?  What a bunch of bullshit.  When will these publishers stand up to these creators who can't seem to meet a deadline (continually)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Detective Comics #853, the second part of the story, was originally scheduled for February as well, but the book is late and, as I’m writing this, is delayed until April 22.&#8221;</p>
<p>Two months late (at least)?  What a bunch of bullshit.  When will these publishers stand up to these creators who can&#8217;t seem to meet a deadline (continually)?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3143819</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3143819</guid>
					<description>So to sum up: All sales are in the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So to sum up: All sales are in the toilet.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Harkness</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3143564</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/04/10/dc-month-to-month-sales-febroary-2009/#comment-3143564</guid>
					<description>So to sum up: DC's sales are in the toilet or declining on everything not called &quot;Green Lantern,&quot; the writer of JLA is publicly unhappy, no one is writing Titans, and Jeebus only knows when part 2 of the Gaiman Batman thing will see the light of day.

Well, gee, how DARE those unwashed fanboys criticize DC's editorial direction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So to sum up: DC&#8217;s sales are in the toilet or declining on everything not called &#8220;Green Lantern,&#8221; the writer of JLA is publicly unhappy, no one is writing Titans, and Jeebus only knows when part 2 of the Gaiman Batman thing will see the light of day.</p>
<p>Well, gee, how DARE those unwashed fanboys criticize DC&#8217;s editorial direction!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
