<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Month-to-Month Sales: March 2009</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Paladin35</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3345882</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3345882</guid>
					<description>I think these are just the &quot;recession&quot; numbers post-Crisis and crossovers. People with less money are going to be more choosy about what they are buying.....so Batman, JLA, and Green Lantern/GL Corps are selling.....and all the others will just keep the die-hard fans but not add much more. 

As a side-note, DC should just close Wildstorm and move any title which is selling (are there any?) to Vertigo. Having just one which ISN'T a crappy version of the DC Universe will probably save money in the long run.

I am somewhat surprised Batman Confidential (the only Batman title with Bruce Wayne still in it) &amp;#38; Superman/Batman aren't doing better. I love them both! I also love Superman.....but I want to read Superman stories, NOT 2nd-rate characters with His name on the cover!

Green Arrow and Black Canary need to divorce! The title is horrible since the &quot;re-tooling&quot;.......Outsiders &amp;#38; Booster Gold need cancelled, it will save ink and show DC is trying to go &quot;green&quot;..... 

Kevin Smith is such a Great Writer, and I'm elated that he was on time (for him) with Batman Cacophony!!! They should have him take over Green Arrow and make it great like he did before!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are just the &#8220;recession&#8221; numbers post-Crisis and crossovers. People with less money are going to be more choosy about what they are buying&#8230;..so Batman, JLA, and Green Lantern/GL Corps are selling&#8230;..and all the others will just keep the die-hard fans but not add much more. </p>
<p>As a side-note, DC should just close Wildstorm and move any title which is selling (are there any?) to Vertigo. Having just one which ISN&#8217;T a crappy version of the DC Universe will probably save money in the long run.</p>
<p>I am somewhat surprised Batman Confidential (the only Batman title with Bruce Wayne still in it) &amp; Superman/Batman aren&#8217;t doing better. I love them both! I also love Superman&#8230;..but I want to read Superman stories, NOT 2nd-rate characters with His name on the cover!</p>
<p>Green Arrow and Black Canary need to divorce! The title is horrible since the &#8220;re-tooling&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;.Outsiders &amp; Booster Gold need cancelled, it will save ink and show DC is trying to go &#8220;green&#8221;&#8230;.. </p>
<p>Kevin Smith is such a Great Writer, and I&#8217;m elated that he was on time (for him) with Batman Cacophony!!! They should have him take over Green Arrow and make it great like he did before!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Comic-Reader Lad</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3265143</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3265143</guid>
					<description>For the &quot;Superman&quot; sales (position #32), the 1 year sales should be +7.8%, not -7.8%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the &#8220;Superman&#8221; sales (position #32), the 1 year sales should be +7.8%, not -7.8%.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Callum</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3255164</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3255164</guid>
					<description>Thanks Marc-Oliver for getting this out even though you were out and about.
I hope there will be another indie sales chart breakdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Marc-Oliver for getting this out even though you were out and about.<br />
I hope there will be another indie sales chart breakdown.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: not mike carlin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3254865</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3254865</guid>
					<description>Are we expecting another installment of the Indie comics breakdown by Steve Horton (thanks again) or not?  Did all the indie creators/publishers complain too much about the incompleteness of the data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we expecting another installment of the Indie comics breakdown by Steve Horton (thanks again) or not?  Did all the indie creators/publishers complain too much about the incompleteness of the data?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Billy Bissette</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3253089</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 03:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3253089</guid>
					<description>Mark Sullivan said: &quot;I’m a Vertigo trade waiter, and I question the decision to collect 10 issues in the first Madame Xanadu trade.&quot;

Question instead the decision to make the *set up* story arc run 10 issues.

  Honestly, it feels like the book was expected to last less than a year, and was plotted accordingly.  Rather than bothering to invest in a second and continuing storyline that might be cut short, it spent that first year as one long episodic character set up that could be ended with a month's notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Sullivan said: &#8220;I’m a Vertigo trade waiter, and I question the decision to collect 10 issues in the first Madame Xanadu trade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Question instead the decision to make the *set up* story arc run 10 issues.</p>
<p>  Honestly, it feels like the book was expected to last less than a year, and was plotted accordingly.  Rather than bothering to invest in a second and continuing storyline that might be cut short, it spent that first year as one long episodic character set up that could be ended with a month&#8217;s notice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brendan T</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3252115</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3252115</guid>
					<description>I wish so very much that Grant Morrison had finished his Authority run.

The real problem with Wildstorm at this point isn't so much that it's *bad* as it's &quot;More of the same&quot; It's not altogether distinguishable from some random mid-range DCU title. And when DC is putting out stuff like Final Crisis, which feels more Wildstorm than Wildstorm while also working within the DCU and being incredibly well written...well, Wildstorm just starts to feel superfluous.

Basically, Wildstorm used to be about cutting edge superhero books. Now it's just about superhero books. No wonder people stopped caring, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish so very much that Grant Morrison had finished his Authority run.</p>
<p>The real problem with Wildstorm at this point isn&#8217;t so much that it&#8217;s *bad* as it&#8217;s &#8220;More of the same&#8221; It&#8217;s not altogether distinguishable from some random mid-range DCU title. And when DC is putting out stuff like Final Crisis, which feels more Wildstorm than Wildstorm while also working within the DCU and being incredibly well written&#8230;well, Wildstorm just starts to feel superfluous.</p>
<p>Basically, Wildstorm used to be about cutting edge superhero books. Now it&#8217;s just about superhero books. No wonder people stopped caring, really.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marvel vs. DC, solo books vs. team books</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3252013</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3252013</guid>
					<description>[...] In the process of looking what sold how much and conjecturing the whys and wherefores of those sales, Marc-Oliver Frisch assembles a list of everything DC and its imprints published that month. In this case, March of this year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In the process of looking what sold how much and conjecturing the whys and wherefores of those sales, Marc-Oliver Frisch assembles a list of everything DC and its imprints published that month. In this case, March of this year. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kerry</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3251204</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3251204</guid>
					<description>It's really a sad state of affairs Wildstorm's in.  I think the &quot;soft reboot&quot; in Captain Atom: Armageddon was a mistake and unnecessary, and sent the imprint into a tailspin that it's yet to recover from.  It's baffling: tons of great creators are doing these books, but the stories are moribund and inspire little beyond apathy.  Doing the post-apocalyptic thing didn't save Marvel's 2099 line and it's not working here.  I think they're hoping they're going to hit on some nascent Warren Ellis who will rejuvenate the line (as Ellis did with Authority/Planetary those years ago) but for whatever reason, talented people just can't seem to do anything compelling with these characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really a sad state of affairs Wildstorm&#8217;s in.  I think the &#8220;soft reboot&#8221; in Captain Atom: Armageddon was a mistake and unnecessary, and sent the imprint into a tailspin that it&#8217;s yet to recover from.  It&#8217;s baffling: tons of great creators are doing these books, but the stories are moribund and inspire little beyond apathy.  Doing the post-apocalyptic thing didn&#8217;t save Marvel&#8217;s 2099 line and it&#8217;s not working here.  I think they&#8217;re hoping they&#8217;re going to hit on some nascent Warren Ellis who will rejuvenate the line (as Ellis did with Authority/Planetary those years ago) but for whatever reason, talented people just can&#8217;t seem to do anything compelling with these characters.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250940</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250940</guid>
					<description>So where are the Independant sales figures now? &quot;

Independence, Ohio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where are the Independant sales figures now? &#8221;</p>
<p>Independence, Ohio?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles Knight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250750</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250750</guid>
					<description>andy said: &quot;Mighty is 12 issues limited series.&quot;

You should tell DC they seem to think it's an on-going:

http://www.dccomics.com/dcu/comics/?cm=11139

As for Wildstorm it's done - the Mad Max direction was a mistake as was running back-up stories across titles. If you only pick up (for example) The Authority, you get a confusing mish-mash of the start or end of some story but nothing complete - which is as much use as a chocolate teapot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andy said: &#8220;Mighty is 12 issues limited series.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should tell DC they seem to think it&#8217;s an on-going:</p>
<p><a href='http://www.dccomics.com/dcu/comics/?cm=11139' rel='nofollow'>http://www.dccomics.com/dcu/comics/?cm=11139</a></p>
<p>As for Wildstorm it&#8217;s done - the Mad Max direction was a mistake as was running back-up stories across titles. If you only pick up (for example) The Authority, you get a confusing mish-mash of the start or end of some story but nothing complete - which is as much use as a chocolate teapot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GregC</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250609</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250609</guid>
					<description>The sales contest with Marvel nonsense aside, this sliude has to stop.   DC needs to start publishing quality books that are accessable to a wider audience than the hard core post Crisis continuity niche and they need to make sure these books are on time.  

They need to hire editors who aren't afraid to shut down stories that are little more than continuity exposition.  

They need to stop having a new creative vision every three months and they need to stop having one or two minds responsible for the creative vision of every book.

They need to make sure that the primary Batman and Superman books are in the top 20, as well as the Justice League and SupermanBatman.   If your flagship titles are not your best sellers, you are not doing things right.

They need to give interesting, but offbeat characters to interesting but offbeat creators.   The Creeper, Metamorpho, Plastic Man, the Demon, Ragman (the way Kanigher envisioned him) need to offered up to folks like Ellis, Ennis, Niles, Milligan, Allred etc  

They need to get Darwyn Cooke back to DC.

They need to leave Grant Morrison alone and stop trying to market him.   Grant's output markets itself.  Sales numbers do not lie.



They need a new E-I-C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sales contest with Marvel nonsense aside, this sliude has to stop.   DC needs to start publishing quality books that are accessable to a wider audience than the hard core post Crisis continuity niche and they need to make sure these books are on time.  </p>
<p>They need to hire editors who aren&#8217;t afraid to shut down stories that are little more than continuity exposition.  </p>
<p>They need to stop having a new creative vision every three months and they need to stop having one or two minds responsible for the creative vision of every book.</p>
<p>They need to make sure that the primary Batman and Superman books are in the top 20, as well as the Justice League and SupermanBatman.   If your flagship titles are not your best sellers, you are not doing things right.</p>
<p>They need to give interesting, but offbeat characters to interesting but offbeat creators.   The Creeper, Metamorpho, Plastic Man, the Demon, Ragman (the way Kanigher envisioned him) need to offered up to folks like Ellis, Ennis, Niles, Milligan, Allred etc  </p>
<p>They need to get Darwyn Cooke back to DC.</p>
<p>They need to leave Grant Morrison alone and stop trying to market him.   Grant&#8217;s output markets itself.  Sales numbers do not lie.</p>
<p>They need a new E-I-C.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Colin McMahon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250533</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250533</guid>
					<description>&quot;Just hand me over wildstorm as is…&quot;

That's about the only way to save it.  Give it over to a big name, like you and Justin Gage or Abnett and Lanning and give them time to completely rebuild the line.

I recently reread the early Authority books.  Recapture that vibe and it would be hugely successful.  At his point they have little to lose.  They are on life support anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just hand me over wildstorm as is…&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s about the only way to save it.  Give it over to a big name, like you and Justin Gage or Abnett and Lanning and give them time to completely rebuild the line.</p>
<p>I recently reread the early Authority books.  Recapture that vibe and it would be hugely successful.  At his point they have little to lose.  They are on life support anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; May 14, 2009: Reprieve</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250424</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3250424</guid>
					<description>[...] Marc-Oliver Frisch looks at DC Comics&amp;#8217; month-to-month sales to Direct Market retailers, now updated for March. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Marc-Oliver Frisch looks at DC Comics&#8217; month-to-month sales to Direct Market retailers, now updated for March. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Samy Merchi</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3249902</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3249902</guid>
					<description>&quot;only released 36 new periodicals&quot;

I've been feeling for a while now that they haven't been launching books at the same pace as they've been cancelling them. It's interesting to know my gut feeling was right.

I never thought I'd see the day when GREEN LANTERN CORPS is DC's top third selling title in a month, outselling Kevin Smith Batman. Brings a happy tear to my eye. With the increasing revenue, can we finally get a better artist than Gleason? I've been waiting for so long. :(

@Cat - there's no constant $profit that DC makes per 10k issues. It all depends on whether it's a 10k title or a 100k title (bigger titles have cheaper printing costs per page), how much they're paying the talent doing the book (which varies widely book to book) and so on. Every single comic book's economics are different and there's no universal answer.

&quot;Wonder Woman sales go up for the third month in a row. Looks like I underestimated the drawing power of a villain with green spikes for eyes. The last three issues were promoted through variant-cover editions.&quot;

As Jason said, I should be inclined to think that the sales have gone up due to the variant-cover editions.

Re: REBELS -- it was doomed from the start. No matter how much I might enjoy Bedard's work, his name simply isn't a selling brand yet and, much as I might have wished otherwise, Dox doesn't appear to be a selling brand either. So the book's got nothing. Lobo might have helped, but now it would be too little, too late. I'll be surprised if the book makes it to #12. The smart money might be to cancel the book asap and let Bedard finish the story with a four-issue LOBO LS, which might at least sell a little better.

Re: Superman - I agree with Matt in that DC's clearly thinking long-term here in pushing new IPs. If they can use the ACTION run to later spin-off Nightwing and Flamebird into their own series when Superman returns to ACTION, there's much to be said for building new IPs. And preboot Mon-El starring in SUPERMAN may be bringing a boost to the new Legion book when it launches. So it's overly simplistic to consider the numbers in a vacuum when DC's clearly thinking more along marketing/promotional lines.

Re: Wildstorm - the only thing I'm interested in over there is seeing what Threshold, Bliss and the DV8 have been up to in the last 10 years or so since I looked in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;only released 36 new periodicals&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been feeling for a while now that they haven&#8217;t been launching books at the same pace as they&#8217;ve been cancelling them. It&#8217;s interesting to know my gut feeling was right.</p>
<p>I never thought I&#8217;d see the day when GREEN LANTERN CORPS is DC&#8217;s top third selling title in a month, outselling Kevin Smith Batman. Brings a happy tear to my eye. With the increasing revenue, can we finally get a better artist than Gleason? I&#8217;ve been waiting for so long. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Cat - there&#8217;s no constant $profit that DC makes per 10k issues. It all depends on whether it&#8217;s a 10k title or a 100k title (bigger titles have cheaper printing costs per page), how much they&#8217;re paying the talent doing the book (which varies widely book to book) and so on. Every single comic book&#8217;s economics are different and there&#8217;s no universal answer.</p>
<p>&#8220;Wonder Woman sales go up for the third month in a row. Looks like I underestimated the drawing power of a villain with green spikes for eyes. The last three issues were promoted through variant-cover editions.&#8221;</p>
<p>As Jason said, I should be inclined to think that the sales have gone up due to the variant-cover editions.</p>
<p>Re: REBELS &#8212; it was doomed from the start. No matter how much I might enjoy Bedard&#8217;s work, his name simply isn&#8217;t a selling brand yet and, much as I might have wished otherwise, Dox doesn&#8217;t appear to be a selling brand either. So the book&#8217;s got nothing. Lobo might have helped, but now it would be too little, too late. I&#8217;ll be surprised if the book makes it to #12. The smart money might be to cancel the book asap and let Bedard finish the story with a four-issue LOBO LS, which might at least sell a little better.</p>
<p>Re: Superman - I agree with Matt in that DC&#8217;s clearly thinking long-term here in pushing new IPs. If they can use the ACTION run to later spin-off Nightwing and Flamebird into their own series when Superman returns to ACTION, there&#8217;s much to be said for building new IPs. And preboot Mon-El starring in SUPERMAN may be bringing a boost to the new Legion book when it launches. So it&#8217;s overly simplistic to consider the numbers in a vacuum when DC&#8217;s clearly thinking more along marketing/promotional lines.</p>
<p>Re: Wildstorm - the only thing I&#8217;m interested in over there is seeing what Threshold, Bliss and the DV8 have been up to in the last 10 years or so since I looked in.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: .: Glamazonia presenta: LEGIONE DEI SUPER-EROI :.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3249724</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3249724</guid>
					<description>[...] L&amp;#8217;ultima analisi mensile delle vendite &amp;#8220;all&amp;#8217;ingrosso&amp;#8221; dei comics DC, pubblicata come d&amp;#8217;abitudine da Marc-Oliver Frisch sulle pagine del blog The Beat, è impietosa nei confronti della neonata collana &amp;#8220;R.E.B.E.L.S&amp;#8221; (vol.II). L&amp;#8217;esordio dello spin-off legionatio di Tony Bedard e Andy Clarke è stato bagnato da una quasi totale indifferenza da parte dei rivenditori e del pubblico, e langue già in un&amp;#8217;area pericolosa della classifica. Scrive il giornalista teutonico: 112 - R.E.B.E.L.S. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] L&#8217;ultima analisi mensile delle vendite &#8220;all&#8217;ingrosso&#8221; dei comics DC, pubblicata come d&#8217;abitudine da Marc-Oliver Frisch sulle pagine del blog The Beat, è impietosa nei confronti della neonata collana &#8220;R.E.B.E.L.S&#8221; (vol.II). L&#8217;esordio dello spin-off legionatio di Tony Bedard e Andy Clarke è stato bagnato da una quasi totale indifferenza da parte dei rivenditori e del pubblico, e langue già in un&#8217;area pericolosa della classifica. Scrive il giornalista teutonico: 112 - R.E.B.E.L.S. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3249617</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3249617</guid>
					<description>&quot;I agree, I don’t read books because they are popular but as a child of the 70’s I’ve been burned by way too many books dying and leaving me hanging…with The Mighty and it’s lack of any sort of promotion by DC I feel like I’m gonna be right back there, loving a book that’s doomed to never be finished!&quot;

Mighty is 12 issues limited series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree, I don’t read books because they are popular but as a child of the 70’s I’ve been burned by way too many books dying and leaving me hanging…with The Mighty and it’s lack of any sort of promotion by DC I feel like I’m gonna be right back there, loving a book that’s doomed to never be finished!&#8221;</p>
<p>Mighty is 12 issues limited series.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh Sinhspar</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248973</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248973</guid>
					<description>So where are the Independant sales figures now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where are the Independant sales figures now?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jimmy palmiotti</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248905</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248905</guid>
					<description>Just hand me over wildstorm as is...

then give me 8 months. you know its the only thing they can do at this point.


its not that the books arent good, its just the focus, branding, design and grouping need help.  

but what do i know...i wish well for everyone. really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just hand me over wildstorm as is&#8230;</p>
<p>then give me 8 months. you know its the only thing they can do at this point.</p>
<p>its not that the books arent good, its just the focus, branding, design and grouping need help.  </p>
<p>but what do i know&#8230;i wish well for everyone. really.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alwaysoptimistic</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248879</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248879</guid>
					<description>I expected to see great new titles like REBELS and The Mighty selling poorly due to DC's non-existent promotional push, but it still hurts to actually see the numbers. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expected to see great new titles like REBELS and The Mighty selling poorly due to DC&#8217;s non-existent promotional push, but it still hurts to actually see the numbers. <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BiffordMichael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248628</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248628</guid>
					<description>I agree, I don't read books because they are popular but as a child of the 70's I've been burned by way too many books dying and leaving me hanging...with The Mighty and it's lack of any sort of promotion by DC I feel like I'm gonna be right back there, loving a book that's doomed to never be finished! :(

As for Madame Xanadu I am hoping that the trades can keep it going...

Biff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I don&#8217;t read books because they are popular but as a child of the 70&#8217;s I&#8217;ve been burned by way too many books dying and leaving me hanging&#8230;with The Mighty and it&#8217;s lack of any sort of promotion by DC I feel like I&#8217;m gonna be right back there, loving a book that&#8217;s doomed to never be finished! <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for Madame Xanadu I am hoping that the trades can keep it going&#8230;</p>
<p>Biff
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BiffordMichael</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248623</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248623</guid>
					<description>I agree, I don't read books because they are popular but as a child of the 70's I've been burned by way too many books dying and leaving me hanging...with The Mighty and it's lack of any sort of promotion by DC I feel like I'm gonna be right back there, loving a book that's doomed to never be finished! :(

As for Madame Xanadu I am hoping that the trades can keep it going...

Biff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I don&#8217;t read books because they are popular but as a child of the 70&#8217;s I&#8217;ve been burned by way too many books dying and leaving me hanging&#8230;with The Mighty and it&#8217;s lack of any sort of promotion by DC I feel like I&#8217;m gonna be right back there, loving a book that&#8217;s doomed to never be finished! <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for Madame Xanadu I am hoping that the trades can keep it going&#8230;</p>
<p>Biff
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MushroomJones</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248302</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3248302</guid>
					<description>Forget rebranding.  The name/characters are doing nothing for them, sales wise.  The back catalog (Planetary, original Authority, et al) is worth something.  Scrap all the current WS universe books, keep stuff in print under the DC title as trades and make the best of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget rebranding.  The name/characters are doing nothing for them, sales wise.  The back catalog (Planetary, original Authority, et al) is worth something.  Scrap all the current WS universe books, keep stuff in print under the DC title as trades and make the best of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Frank</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3247708</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3247708</guid>
					<description>&quot;Wildstorm should just be scrapped and the only half-way decent selling titles (Ex Machina and the video game tie ins) be moved to either DC or Vertigo imprints. What a travesty.&quot;

&quot;Face it, Wildstorm is a dead imprint.&quot;

With sales so low it's hard to argue... but what about rebranding as &quot;DC West&quot; and realigning the company in a different direction? I could see that working...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wildstorm should just be scrapped and the only half-way decent selling titles (Ex Machina and the video game tie ins) be moved to either DC or Vertigo imprints. What a travesty.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Face it, Wildstorm is a dead imprint.&#8221;</p>
<p>With sales so low it&#8217;s hard to argue&#8230; but what about rebranding as &#8220;DC West&#8221; and realigning the company in a different direction? I could see that working&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ryan Higgins</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246951</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246951</guid>
					<description>@Cat Eldridge

Rough estimates I've read is that Marvel and DC probably make about $.80-$1.00 per $2.99 book sold. After printing, shipping, advertising, and paying creators and editors, who knows, maybe $.10 per book goes into the bank? Less?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cat Eldridge</p>
<p>Rough estimates I&#8217;ve read is that Marvel and DC probably make about $.80-$1.00 per $2.99 book sold. After printing, shipping, advertising, and paying creators and editors, who knows, maybe $.10 per book goes into the bank? Less?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate Horn</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246633</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246633</guid>
					<description>I didn't like the way you phrase this, Marc-Oliver:

&quot;Air #7 had a cover price of $ 1.00 to encourage potential readers, resulting in a couple thousand more sales. It’ll be interesting to see if any of them stick.&quot;

It implies the increase in reorders were then sold through to people who may or may not purchase more issues when in actuality it was just retailers ordering more. I mean, don't get me wrong, I love Air, but I'm not getting my hopes up anyone else bought it! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t like the way you phrase this, Marc-Oliver:</p>
<p>&#8220;Air #7 had a cover price of $ 1.00 to encourage potential readers, resulting in a couple thousand more sales. It’ll be interesting to see if any of them stick.&#8221;</p>
<p>It implies the increase in reorders were then sold through to people who may or may not purchase more issues when in actuality it was just retailers ordering more. I mean, don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love Air, but I&#8217;m not getting my hopes up anyone else bought it! lol
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cat Eldridge</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246387</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246387</guid>
					<description>Ok, I have a question.

Just how much does DC make off say 10,000 units selling? Do they make money on sales oda WIldstorm totle even at say 7,000 units? Hell, I know major publishers who make a fat profit on hardcover sales of genre fiction when their epecting sales of less than 1,000 units! So what does DC need to make a title viable? And do they factor in anticipated trade paper sales? 

I rarely buy single issues but follow a number of titles by buying the trades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I have a question.</p>
<p>Just how much does DC make off say 10,000 units selling? Do they make money on sales oda WIldstorm totle even at say 7,000 units? Hell, I know major publishers who make a fat profit on hardcover sales of genre fiction when their epecting sales of less than 1,000 units! So what does DC need to make a title viable? And do they factor in anticipated trade paper sales? </p>
<p>I rarely buy single issues but follow a number of titles by buying the trades.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Micah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246324</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246324</guid>
					<description>With Vertigo's trade policy, I've stopped buying the new books from the line waiting for the $10 trade.  I supported Northlanders but felt burned when I dropped $24 and then the cheapie trade came out.  Lesson learned.  So I'm looking forward to Unknown Soldier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Vertigo&#8217;s trade policy, I&#8217;ve stopped buying the new books from the line waiting for the $10 trade.  I supported Northlanders but felt burned when I dropped $24 and then the cheapie trade came out.  Lesson learned.  So I&#8217;m looking forward to Unknown Soldier.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246169</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246169</guid>
					<description>&quot;,,,I question the decision to collect 10 issues in the first Madame Xanadu trade.&quot;

Would you suggest they split the initial story into 2 trades?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;,,,I question the decision to collect 10 issues in the first Madame Xanadu trade.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you suggest they split the initial story into 2 trades?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246050</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3246050</guid>
					<description>R.E.B.E.L.S. was just thrown out there berift of what made the comic successful the last time (mainly Lobo, who might have been used subversively by Giffen but still appealed to huge swarths of fans who didn't see that), with no chance in hell other than having the promise of, you know, being good, having a hot, upcoming artist, and having the potential of a relaunch at issue 12 or whatever. Oh and Didio was really behind the premise.

The launch frustrated me to no end because I KNEW it was going to be a massive, brutal, hopeless failure and I've wanted to see Bedard on this one, single property since I read Negation. Ah well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.E.B.E.L.S. was just thrown out there berift of what made the comic successful the last time (mainly Lobo, who might have been used subversively by Giffen but still appealed to huge swarths of fans who didn&#8217;t see that), with no chance in hell other than having the promise of, you know, being good, having a hot, upcoming artist, and having the potential of a relaunch at issue 12 or whatever. Oh and Didio was really behind the premise.</p>
<p>The launch frustrated me to no end because I KNEW it was going to be a massive, brutal, hopeless failure and I&#8217;ve wanted to see Bedard on this one, single property since I read Negation. Ah well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Micah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3245940</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/05/13/dc-motnh-to-month-sales-march-2009/#comment-3245940</guid>
					<description>Scalped is rock-solid over the WHOLE YEAR!  No cross-overs and no creative team changes, just a solid, gripping story.

Those numbers for R.E.B.E.L.S. are terrible.  I guess this title falls into the same category that Agents of Atlas is in.  Great story, great art, but no recognizable characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scalped is rock-solid over the WHOLE YEAR!  No cross-overs and no creative team changes, just a solid, gripping story.</p>
<p>Those numbers for R.E.B.E.L.S. are terrible.  I guess this title falls into the same category that Agents of Atlas is in.  Great story, great art, but no recognizable characters.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
