<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Month-to-Month Sales: April 2009</title>
	<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/</link>
	<description>The News Blog of Comics Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: .: Glamazonia presenta: LEGIONE DEI SUPER-EROI :.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3424169</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3424169</guid>
					<description>[...] Marc-Olivier Frisch, attento osservatore del mercato dei comic books, ha pubblicato su The Beat un&amp;#8217;analisi delle vendite DC dello scorso mese di aprile. La cosa è di particolare interesse per gli aficionados di Brainiac 5 e soci, in quanto è stato proprio in quel periodo che i comics shop d&amp;#8217;oltreoceano hanno ricevuto il penultimo capitolo di &amp;#8220;Final Crisis: Legion of 3 Worlds&amp;#8221;. Questa appassionante miniserie, realizzata con esasperante lentezza da Geoff Johns e George Pérez, è infatti al momento l&amp;#8217;unico titolo direttamente dedicato al gruppo di eroi del XXXI° secolo. Sigh. Ecco dunque i dati raccolti da Frisch, seguiti dalle sue considerazioni: 28 - FINAL CRISIS: LEGION OF 3 WORLDS 08/2008: Legion of 3 Worlds #1 of 5 — 68,306 [73,914] 09/2008: – 10/2008: Legion of 3 Worlds #2 of 5 — 64,412 (-5.7%) 11/2008: – 12/2008: – 01/2009: – 02/2009: Legion of 3 Worlds #3 of 5 — 61,358 (-4.7%) 03/2009: – 04/2009: Legion of 3 Worlds #4 of 5 — 56,888 (-7.3%) —————- 6 months: -11.7% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Marc-Olivier Frisch, attento osservatore del mercato dei comic books, ha pubblicato su The Beat un&#8217;analisi delle vendite DC dello scorso mese di aprile. La cosa è di particolare interesse per gli aficionados di Brainiac 5 e soci, in quanto è stato proprio in quel periodo che i comics shop d&#8217;oltreoceano hanno ricevuto il penultimo capitolo di &#8220;Final Crisis: Legion of 3 Worlds&#8221;. Questa appassionante miniserie, realizzata con esasperante lentezza da Geoff Johns e George Pérez, è infatti al momento l&#8217;unico titolo direttamente dedicato al gruppo di eroi del XXXI° secolo. Sigh. Ecco dunque i dati raccolti da Frisch, seguiti dalle sue considerazioni: 28 - FINAL CRISIS: LEGION OF 3 WORLDS 08/2008: Legion of 3 Worlds #1 of 5 — 68,306 [73,914] 09/2008: – 10/2008: Legion of 3 Worlds #2 of 5 — 64,412 (-5.7%) 11/2008: – 12/2008: – 01/2009: – 02/2009: Legion of 3 Worlds #3 of 5 — 61,358 (-4.7%) 03/2009: – 04/2009: Legion of 3 Worlds #4 of 5 — 56,888 (-7.3%) —————- 6 months: -11.7% [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Speed Reading: Resurrection Poll, Happy, Dorky, Launch Sales and Photos &#171; Speed Force</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3358787</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3358787</guid>
					<description>[...] The Beat looks at DC&amp;#8217;s April sales, putting the success of Flash: Rebirth #1 (102K) in context with the last two Flash relaunches: Flash: The Fastest Man Alive #1 (120K) and All-Flash #1 (98K), noting that &amp;#8220;neither one of them had the benefit of the company’s most popular creator, as Rebirth arguably does.&amp;#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Beat looks at DC&#8217;s April sales, putting the success of Flash: Rebirth #1 (102K) in context with the last two Flash relaunches: Flash: The Fastest Man Alive #1 (120K) and All-Flash #1 (98K), noting that &#8220;neither one of them had the benefit of the company’s most popular creator, as Rebirth arguably does.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tijmen</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3357695</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3357695</guid>
					<description>Another month, another good job, Marc-Oliver. Was that John Byrne crack a sly reference to the Marv Wolfman-esque writer of the Teen Titans Year One mini, or am I genuinely missing something (wouldn't be the first time, so hey, surprise me)?

Also: SCALPED! (it bears repeating)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another month, another good job, Marc-Oliver. Was that John Byrne crack a sly reference to the Marv Wolfman-esque writer of the Teen Titans Year One mini, or am I genuinely missing something (wouldn&#8217;t be the first time, so hey, surprise me)?</p>
<p>Also: SCALPED! (it bears repeating)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: majorjoe23</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3357650</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3357650</guid>
					<description>&quot;What ever happend with the Indie Comics Month-to-Month Sales by Steve Horton? &quot;

I was wondering the same thing. Is that experiment over? If so, could Marc start adding them back to his analysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What ever happend with the Indie Comics Month-to-Month Sales by Steve Horton? &#8221;</p>
<p>I was wondering the same thing. Is that experiment over? If so, could Marc start adding them back to his analysis?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sean McClenahan</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3354797</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3354797</guid>
					<description>I too thought Childrens Crusade was a very good story. The Books of Magic story particulary stood out. I can't recall the Doom Patrol contribution to the story though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too thought Childrens Crusade was a very good story. The Books of Magic story particulary stood out. I can&#8217;t recall the Doom Patrol contribution to the story though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Javier Maidana</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3352529</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3352529</guid>
					<description>What ever happend with the Indie Comics Month-to-Month Sales by Steve Horton?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happend with the Indie Comics Month-to-Month Sales by Steve Horton?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Keith</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3352213</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3352213</guid>
					<description>Well, now that 100 Bullets has ended, hopefully some* of its readers who are itching for something new will give the other younger Vertigo titles a try (Air, Madame Xanadu). *Of course I say &quot;some&quot; because I don't know how much interested the average 100 Bullets reader would be interested in the aforementioned titles, but you never know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now that 100 Bullets has ended, hopefully some* of its readers who are itching for something new will give the other younger Vertigo titles a try (Air, Madame Xanadu). *Of course I say &#8220;some&#8221; because I don&#8217;t know how much interested the average 100 Bullets reader would be interested in the aforementioned titles, but you never know&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Clapham</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3352064</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3352064</guid>
					<description>DC must be pleased with those Battle for the Cowl minis and one-shots, as the last issue of Azrael teased an ongoing starting later in the year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC must be pleased with those Battle for the Cowl minis and one-shots, as the last issue of Azrael teased an ongoing starting later in the year.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3350808</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3350808</guid>
					<description>I still say that the Superman titles are pushing/developing secondary characters and new IPs right now and that's worth a hell of a lot more to DC than a few thousand sales here or there, especially counterbalanced by World of New Krypton and Superman: Secret Origin basically being Action Comics and Superman (aka the books with Clark Kent/Superman in them).

Action Comics and Superman right now are really Nightwing and Flamebird and Mon-El &amp;#38; Friends, just with different names. And there's no way that they'd sell nearly as well as they're selling now with those names. 

We'll see how Superman: Secret Origin debuts, I guess, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say that the Superman titles are pushing/developing secondary characters and new IPs right now and that&#8217;s worth a hell of a lot more to DC than a few thousand sales here or there, especially counterbalanced by World of New Krypton and Superman: Secret Origin basically being Action Comics and Superman (aka the books with Clark Kent/Superman in them).</p>
<p>Action Comics and Superman right now are really Nightwing and Flamebird and Mon-El &amp; Friends, just with different names. And there&#8217;s no way that they&#8217;d sell nearly as well as they&#8217;re selling now with those names. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how Superman: Secret Origin debuts, I guess, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: brandon</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349786</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349786</guid>
					<description>Seems to me that in recent years the plan to revamp the Flash is to add more speedsters to the roster. Which solves nothing.

When Bart failed they brought back Wally plus his kids. Now we have Barry and Bart back in the mix. That's five - depending on how you factor in the kid's powers.

Instead of mapping out a plan with any ONE Flash they just keep throwing more characters at the problem. It's not exactly an idea that looks like a good one at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that in recent years the plan to revamp the Flash is to add more speedsters to the roster. Which solves nothing.</p>
<p>When Bart failed they brought back Wally plus his kids. Now we have Barry and Bart back in the mix. That&#8217;s five - depending on how you factor in the kid&#8217;s powers.</p>
<p>Instead of mapping out a plan with any ONE Flash they just keep throwing more characters at the problem. It&#8217;s not exactly an idea that looks like a good one at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles Skaggs</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349624</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349624</guid>
					<description>Concerning THE FLASH: REBIRTH #1, I think there may have been some small hesitation on the part of retailers but considering it came in at #2, I believe that's more of a statement on the sales of all titles right now.

The main problem DC has had with the Flash relaunches is simply executing bad ideas with poor creativity.  Someone thought it would be a good idea to follow Geoff Johns' well-received run with a lackluster final arc and then take Wally West out of the equation and replace him with an aged Bart Allen.  They hyped the relaunched THE FLASH: THE FASTEST MAN ALIVE well enough, but gave it to Danny Bilson and Paul DeMeo, presumably only because they happened to be the producers of the 1990-91 FLASH TV series.  Fans were less than impressed, which forced DC to kill off Bart (albeit temporarily) a year later and cancel FLASH: TFMA.

ALL FLASH #1 seemed promising, but the return of Wally West and his series featured an unimpressive initial arc by Mark Waid that was soon followed by another unimpressive arc by Tom Peyer and then a final arc by Alan Burnett that quietly ended Wally's series...again.

So now DC is trying to bring back Barry Allen after their success at bringing back Hal Jordan.  And unless the same formula is used of following a REBIRTH series written by Geoff Johns with a monthly ongoing series written by Geoff Johns, it may be hard for DC to finally get a Flash relaunch right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning THE FLASH: REBIRTH #1, I think there may have been some small hesitation on the part of retailers but considering it came in at #2, I believe that&#8217;s more of a statement on the sales of all titles right now.</p>
<p>The main problem DC has had with the Flash relaunches is simply executing bad ideas with poor creativity.  Someone thought it would be a good idea to follow Geoff Johns&#8217; well-received run with a lackluster final arc and then take Wally West out of the equation and replace him with an aged Bart Allen.  They hyped the relaunched THE FLASH: THE FASTEST MAN ALIVE well enough, but gave it to Danny Bilson and Paul DeMeo, presumably only because they happened to be the producers of the 1990-91 FLASH TV series.  Fans were less than impressed, which forced DC to kill off Bart (albeit temporarily) a year later and cancel FLASH: TFMA.</p>
<p>ALL FLASH #1 seemed promising, but the return of Wally West and his series featured an unimpressive initial arc by Mark Waid that was soon followed by another unimpressive arc by Tom Peyer and then a final arc by Alan Burnett that quietly ended Wally&#8217;s series&#8230;again.</p>
<p>So now DC is trying to bring back Barry Allen after their success at bringing back Hal Jordan.  And unless the same formula is used of following a REBIRTH series written by Geoff Johns with a monthly ongoing series written by Geoff Johns, it may be hard for DC to finally get a Flash relaunch right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heinz Hochkoepper</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349270</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349270</guid>
					<description>Mark: That was just a one-shot (Totems). Children's Crusade was the only real Vertigo crossover, and I liked it just fine. I skipped the Doom Patrol annual since I didn't read that book post-Morrisson, but some of the others were great (Animal Man and Books of Magic especially). The book-ends by Gaiman were fine too, though I think the ending was somewhat disappointing. Just talking about this makes me feel nostalgic about early Vertigo, I don't think I ever enjoyed their books more than in those first few years.

Really interesting to see the rather small gap in numbers (both periodical and TPB) between Air/Scalped on the one hand and Young Liars on the other hand. Are we able to pinpoint the current Vertigo cancellation point from this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: That was just a one-shot (Totems). Children&#8217;s Crusade was the only real Vertigo crossover, and I liked it just fine. I skipped the Doom Patrol annual since I didn&#8217;t read that book post-Morrisson, but some of the others were great (Animal Man and Books of Magic especially). The book-ends by Gaiman were fine too, though I think the ending was somewhat disappointing. Just talking about this makes me feel nostalgic about early Vertigo, I don&#8217;t think I ever enjoyed their books more than in those first few years.</p>
<p>Really interesting to see the rather small gap in numbers (both periodical and TPB) between Air/Scalped on the one hand and Young Liars on the other hand. Are we able to pinpoint the current Vertigo cancellation point from this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Evan Meadow</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349047</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3349047</guid>
					<description>To Charles Knight:

The Mighty was always talked about as a 12 part story with hopes it woudl progress past that if sales were worthy. Hence why they listed it as an ongoing.

I would think DC's going to be willing to let it run to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Charles Knight:</p>
<p>The Mighty was always talked about as a 12 part story with hopes it woudl progress past that if sales were worthy. Hence why they listed it as an ongoing.</p>
<p>I would think DC&#8217;s going to be willing to let it run to that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Coale</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348178</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348178</guid>
					<description>Was there a Y2K vertigo cross-over or just that one-shot that had all the classic vertigo characters (animal man, swamp thing, doom patrol, shade, ...) in it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there a Y2K vertigo cross-over or just that one-shot that had all the classic vertigo characters (animal man, swamp thing, doom patrol, shade, &#8230;) in it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mathieu Doublet</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348168</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348168</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the huge work ! :)

And can we have indie sales for April, please, please, please ? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the huge work ! <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And can we have indie sales for April, please, please, please ? <img src='http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alwaysoptimistic</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348154</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348154</guid>
					<description>&quot;Blocking “Children’s Crusade” from your memory, eh&quot;?

I had mercifully forgotten that mess.  The Doom Patrol Annual especially was jaw droppingly awful.  

I have read somewhere in the vicinity of 60,000 comics in my life and I would have no hesitation in placing that amongst the absolute worst ever imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blocking “Children’s Crusade” from your memory, eh&#8221;?</p>
<p>I had mercifully forgotten that mess.  The Doom Patrol Annual especially was jaw droppingly awful.  </p>
<p>I have read somewhere in the vicinity of 60,000 comics in my life and I would have no hesitation in placing that amongst the absolute worst ever imo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: alwaysoptimistic</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348151</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3348151</guid>
					<description>Wonder Woman actually has had Variant covers for every recent issue beginning with #26.  #27 was by Frank Quitely, #29 was by Marcos Martin and #31 was by Scott Kolins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder Woman actually has had Variant covers for every recent issue beginning with #26.  #27 was by Frank Quitely, #29 was by Marcos Martin and #31 was by Scott Kolins.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ykw</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347876</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347876</guid>
					<description>&quot;The War That Time Forgot counts as another example of what happens with fringe DC Universe books that receive no promotion.&quot;

And are written by the 21st C. iteration of Bruce Jones. Following the spectacular collapses (in terms of both sales and general reception) of every single one of his DC titles in the past few years, I suspect his number may finally be up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The War That Time Forgot counts as another example of what happens with fringe DC Universe books that receive no promotion.&#8221;</p>
<p>And are written by the 21st C. iteration of Bruce Jones. Following the spectacular collapses (in terms of both sales and general reception) of every single one of his DC titles in the past few years, I suspect his number may finally be up.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave Hackett</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347874</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347874</guid>
					<description>I agree with Alex, that the Johnny DC books might be interesting to watch, despite the traditional inclination to disregard their numbers in the direct market.  Tiny Titans in particular is getting a pretty big push and I know my retailer moves it pretty well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Alex, that the Johnny DC books might be interesting to watch, despite the traditional inclination to disregard their numbers in the direct market.  Tiny Titans in particular is getting a pretty big push and I know my retailer moves it pretty well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Michael Hoskin</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347832</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347832</guid>
					<description>&quot;It’s also worth noting that a crossover, like the variant-cover editions and low-priced introductory issues we’ve seen recently, is another marketing approach that’s new to Vertigo’s periodical line.&quot;

Blocking &quot;Children's Crusade&quot; from your memory, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s also worth noting that a crossover, like the variant-cover editions and low-priced introductory issues we’ve seen recently, is another marketing approach that’s new to Vertigo’s periodical line.&#8221;</p>
<p>Blocking &#8220;Children&#8217;s Crusade&#8221; from your memory, eh?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob S.</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347826</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347826</guid>
					<description>The $1 issue of Air worked to bring me on board -- I bought the trade the next week, and every issue since (with plans to go back to trades with volume 3).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $1 issue of Air worked to bring me on board &#8212; I bought the trade the next week, and every issue since (with plans to go back to trades with volume 3).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Beat</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347779</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347779</guid>
					<description>Ert, sorry about all the posting problems, people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ert, sorry about all the posting problems, people.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347758</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347758</guid>
					<description>Wow, my pingbacker is really stupid.  Sorry.  Feel free to prune that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, my pingbacker is really stupid.  Sorry.  Feel free to prune that one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Highway 62 &#187; SCALPED - trades versus monthlies</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347755</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347755</guid>
					<description>[...] The original numbers are here. I&amp;#8217;m going to reproduce the relevant portion. 232/235 - SCALPED (Vertigo) 04/2007: Scalped #4  —  9,163 —————————— 04/2008: Scalped #16 —  7,071 (+ 1.0%) 05/2008: Scalped #17 —  6,927 (- 2.0%) 06/2008: Scalped #18 —  7,020 (+ 1.3%) 07/2008: Scalped #19 —  7,221 (+ 2.9%) 08/2008: Scalped #20 —  7,034 (- 2.6%) 09/2008: Scalped #21 —  7,029 (- 0.1%) 10/2008: Scalped #22 —  6,964 (- 0.9%) 11/2008: Scalped #23 —  6,910 (- 0.8%) 12/2008: Scalped #24 —  6,777 (- 1.9%) 01/2009: – 02/2009: Scalped #25 —  6,887 (+ 1.6%) 03/2009: Scalped #26 —  6,866 (- 0.3%) 04/2009: Scalped #27 —  6,950 (+ 1.2%) 04/2009: Scalped #28 —  6,860 (- 1.3%) —————- 6 months: - 0.9% 1 year  : - 2.4% 2 years : -24.6% Scalped sales stick to their established mark. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The original numbers are here. I&#8217;m going to reproduce the relevant portion. 232/235 - SCALPED (Vertigo) 04/2007: Scalped #4  —  9,163 —————————— 04/2008: Scalped #16 —  7,071 (+ 1.0%) 05/2008: Scalped #17 —  6,927 (- 2.0%) 06/2008: Scalped #18 —  7,020 (+ 1.3%) 07/2008: Scalped #19 —  7,221 (+ 2.9%) 08/2008: Scalped #20 —  7,034 (- 2.6%) 09/2008: Scalped #21 —  7,029 (- 0.1%) 10/2008: Scalped #22 —  6,964 (- 0.9%) 11/2008: Scalped #23 —  6,910 (- 0.8%) 12/2008: Scalped #24 —  6,777 (- 1.9%) 01/2009: – 02/2009: Scalped #25 —  6,887 (+ 1.6%) 03/2009: Scalped #26 —  6,866 (- 0.3%) 04/2009: Scalped #27 —  6,950 (+ 1.2%) 04/2009: Scalped #28 —  6,860 (- 1.3%) —————- 6 months: - 0.9% 1 year  : - 2.4% 2 years : -24.6% Scalped sales stick to their established mark. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347721</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347721</guid>
					<description>Regarding the Johnny DC titles.  Almost all of them had increases.  I think this might have to do with the strengh of the DC Kids Free Comic Book Day Book.  The only one showing a decline is the Shazam book, which has schedule problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Johnny DC titles.  Almost all of them had increases.  I think this might have to do with the strengh of the DC Kids Free Comic Book Day Book.  The only one showing a decline is the Shazam book, which has schedule problems.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Micah</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347620</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347620</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the numbers and write-up Paul.  SCALPED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the numbers and write-up Paul.  SCALPED!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: EJ</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347586</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347586</guid>
					<description>The numbers for the GL titles continue to be unbelievable impressive after all this time. Though you forgot to add the resale numbers for GL #38 it sold 3,807 in March putting the final number over 72,000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers for the GL titles continue to be unbelievable impressive after all this time. Though you forgot to add the resale numbers for GL #38 it sold 3,807 in March putting the final number over 72,000.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Charles Knight</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347567</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347567</guid>
					<description>Some of the code needs fixing? 

In regards to the sales - Is &quot;The Mighty&quot; even going to get to finish off it's current storyline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the code needs fixing? </p>
<p>In regards to the sales - Is &#8220;The Mighty&#8221; even going to get to finish off it&#8217;s current storyline?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347545</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347545</guid>
					<description>If you mean their confidence relative to the market as a whole, then yes, I suppose so.

But I think the real point is that previous FLASH relaunches had very strong starts, only to fall off a cliff almost immediately.  So it would be premature to call this relaunch a success (even provisionally).  Given the book's track record, it needs to show a bit more staying power before that conclusion would be justified.  

In other words, for all we can tell so far, this relaunch might be on track to do the same as the previous ones.  Or it might not - perhaps this time it'll stick.  All we can really say for now is that it didn't crash straight away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you mean their confidence relative to the market as a whole, then yes, I suppose so.</p>
<p>But I think the real point is that previous FLASH relaunches had very strong starts, only to fall off a cliff almost immediately.  So it would be premature to call this relaunch a success (even provisionally).  Given the book&#8217;s track record, it needs to show a bit more staying power before that conclusion would be justified.  </p>
<p>In other words, for all we can tell so far, this relaunch might be on track to do the same as the previous ones.  Or it might not - perhaps this time it&#8217;ll stick.  All we can really say for now is that it didn&#8217;t crash straight away.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347523</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pwbeat.publishersweekly.com/blog/2009/06/10/dc-month-to_month-sales-april-2009/#comment-3347523</guid>
					<description>In regards to sales of Flash:Rebirth - Aren't average sales down drastically from when the last few relaunches occurred?  Since it placed higher on the charts than the other relaunches (pretty sure they didn't snare the #1 or #2 spot) wouldn't that say that retailers have more confidence with Geoff John's story than the other two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to sales of Flash:Rebirth - Aren&#8217;t average sales down drastically from when the last few relaunches occurred?  Since it placed higher on the charts than the other relaunches (pretty sure they didn&#8217;t snare the #1 or #2 spot) wouldn&#8217;t that say that retailers have more confidence with Geoff John&#8217;s story than the other two?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
