Archive for the 'Sales Charts' Category

This week’s NY Times bestseller list

04/17/09

This week’s list contains few of the oddities that have filled previous lists…it’s kind of what you’d expect — lots of Alan Moore, Robert Kirkman, Y: THE LAST MAN, and NARUTO.

RELATED: David Welsh doesn’t see what all the nattering is about.

ALSO: Todd Allen “reverse engineers” the list, and compares things that were on Diamond’s list that weren’t on the NYTGB list and so on. Allen concludes that the NYT list is heavily weighted toward DM store sales:

All this leads me to conclude what we’re looking at with the New York Times Graphic Books Best Seller Lists is a sell-through chart for the direct market, where the bookstore market really only shows strong influence on weeks when the DM’s new releases are lower-powered.

That darned New York Times bestseller list!

04/16/09

Now that the New York Times‘ online-only Graphic Books Chart has been around for a month or so, people are beginning to wonder just how the heck it works. It’s almost like one of those steampunk automatons — shiny and mysterious at the same time, and no one quite knows where it came from.

200904161412Kevin Melrose kicked things off by wondering how come a TWO YEAR OLD book (DARK TOWER) could suddenly unseat WATCHMEN and then slink back into obscurity the very next week. Chris Butcher jumped in and declared the list broken, and suspected that the NYT was using Diamond sell-in numbers. To back that up, he had pretty powerful evidence:

So how did we end up with Dark Tower: Gunslinger Born on the list? That’s tricky. Marvel is a very litigious company, and has all sorts of warnings about reproducing their private personal information in public. Blah blah blah. So, let’s talk about me instead, because I doubt even Marvel would be able to argue that retailers aren’t allowed to talk about their own businesses. So: There was a time period last month where I ordered Dark Tower: Gunslinger Born and received a higher-than-average discount on that book, and for every copy I ordered, I got another copy of the book for free. I did this, it happened, and I am talking about my actions as a retailer (litigious!). So the week that all of those discounted copies and free copies of Dark Tower that I ordered shipped to me, the book ALSO appeared on The New York Times Graphic Novel Bestseller list. Do you see the correlation there?


A lively comment section ensued, and Tommy Raiko chimed in with a kind of Occam’s Razor observation:
(more…)

March comics sales down but not out

04/16/09

ICv2’s monthly sales analysis for March went up yesterday, and it was something of a grim milestone:

For the first time since March of 2001, the month that ICv2 began tracking sales of periodical comics through Diamond Comic Book Distributors, no comic sold more than 100,000 copies in March of 2009. While sales of periodical comics were down 7% in dollars for the month, the decline in units sold was greater, considering the rise in cover prices of key titles versus their cost in March, 2008.


In assessing the dollars for the month, ICv2 spins down as “Not bad, considering.”

With the U.S. in the grips of the deepest economic downturn in 80 years, sales of periodical comics and graphic novels were down just 5% in the first quarter of 2009 versus Q1 of 2008. In a quarter that has been described as the “worst retail environment in memory,” as an era when “flat is the new up,” a five percent decline is a drop that most retail sectors in the American economy can only dream about. Sales of periodical comics were down 6% for the quarter, but graphic novel sales were up enough to trim the overall drop in comic and graphic novel sales to just 5%.


Considering that bookstore sales were down 10.8 percent in February, and the wholesale slaughter in magazine and newspaper revenues, comics’ drop does seem petite. But we’re far from out of the desert. Let’s just say that Obama and WATCHMEN were well timed.

More: Top 300 Comics Actual–March 2009
Top 300 Graphic Novels Actual–March 2009

DC Month-to-Month Sales: February 2009

04/10/09

by Marc-Oliver Frisch

[Please note that Marc-Oliver Frisch is offline for a few weeks, so he will not be able to answer any questions in the comments immediately.]

DC Comics’ average periodical sales in the direct market declined further in February 2009. They dropped to just above 23,000 units, yet another new low since Diamond Comic Distributors began releasing data on sales to retailers in March 2003.

The average periodical of the publisher’s mainstream DC Universe line sold an estimated 30,000 units, which is 4.9 percent down from January, and the lowest point for the line since January 2005.

DC’s Vertigo and WildStorm sublabels slightly recovered from their January slump. The average Vertigo title sold an estimated 11,353 units, up by 3.4 percent from January. The average WildStorm title sold 8,019 units, up 17.1 percent from January; however, it remains the second-lowest number in the imprint’s history by a wide margin.

The publisher’s only high-profile periodical release in February was Batman #686, the first half of a two-parter by Neil Gaiman and Andy Kubert. Although there were a number of new series launches from the DC Universe and Vertigo imprints, none of them managed to crack 25K.

See below for the analysis, and please consider the small print at the end of the column.

Thanks to Milton Griepp and ICv2.com for the permission to use their figures. An overview of ICv2.com’s estimates can be found here.

—–

2 - BATMAN
02/2004: Batman #624 —  84,081
02/2005: Batman #637 —  58,034 [60,246]
02/2006: Batman #650 —  66,447
02/2007: Batman #663 —  83,167
——————————-
02/2008: Batman #674 —  68,208 (- 1.5%)
03/2008: –
04/2008: Batman #675 —  71,138 (+ 4.3%)
05/2008: Batman #676 — 105,039 (+47.9%) [122,877]
05/2008: Batman #677 —  96,116 (- 8.5%) [111,065]
06/2008: –
07/2008: Batman #678 — 103,213 (+ 7.4%)
08/2008: Batman #679 — 103,588 (+ 0.4%)
09/2008: –
10/2008: Batman #680 — 103,941 (+ 0.3%)
11/2008: Batman #681 — 103,151 (- 0.8%) [114,657]
12/2008: Batman #682 —  93,469 (- 9.4%)
12/2008: Batman #683 —  90,272 (- 3.4%) [ 91,885]
12/2008: Batman #684 —  79,953 (-11.4%) [ 82,903]
01/2009: Batman #685 —  72,654 (- 9.1%)
02/2009: Batman #686 — 111,353 (+53.3%)
—————-
6 months: + 7.5%
1 year  : +63.3%
2 years : +33.9%
5 years : +32.4%

The first chapter of Neil Gaiman and Andy Kubert’s “Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader?” was supported with a 50/50 variant-cover edition, but obviously it’s a big commercial success by any standard. In terms of first-month numbers, it outsells May’s Batman #676, for instance, which was the beginning of the much-promoted “Batman R.I.P.”

Detective Comics #853, the second part of the story, was originally scheduled for February as well, but the book is late and, as I’m writing this, is delayed until April 22.
(more…)

Marvel Month-to-Month Sales: February 2009

04/8/09

By Paul O’Brien

Lots going on this month. The Dark Reign books are mounting up, the War of Kings crossover has begun, and Obama is back. There are also a lot of new releases, with the first issues of SECRET WARRIORS, ASTONISHING TALES and AGENTS OF ATLAS, as well as the relaunched BLACK PANTHER.

As usual, Marvel had the largest share of the North American direct market by a comfortable margin, beating DC by 48% to 28% in unit share, and 45% to 27% in dollar terms.

Thanks as always to Milton Griepp and ICV2.com for permission to use these figures.

1,16,17,18. AMAZING SPIDER-MAN
02/04  Amazing Spider-Man #504 -  84,064
02/05  Amazing Spider-Man #517 -  78,584
02/06  Amazing Spider-Man #529 -  90,414
02/07  Amazing Spider-Man #538 - 142,956
=====
02/08  Amazing Spider-Man #549 - 101,112  ( +3.2%)
02/08  Amazing Spider-Man #550 -  90,874  (-10.1%)
02/08  Amazing Spider-Man #551 -  88,084  ( -3.1%)
03/08  Amazing Spider-Man #552 -  89,835  ( +2.0%)
03/08  Amazing Spider-Man #553 -  82,648  ( -8.0%)
03/08  Amazing Spider-Man #554 -  81,072  ( -1.9%)
04/08  Amazing Spider-Man #555 -  86,902  ( +7.2%)
04/08  Amazing Spider-Man #556 -  78,458  ( -9.7%)
04/08  Amazing Spider-Man #557 -  77,057  ( -1.8%)
05/08  Amazing Spider-Man #558 -  76,966  ( -0.1%)
05/08  Amazing Spider-Man #559 -  74,206  ( -3.6%)
05/08  Amazing Spider-Man #560 -  74,012  ( -0.3%)
06/08  Amazing Spider-Man #561 -  72,372  ( -2.2%)
06/08  Amazing Spider-Man #562 -  71,409  ( -1.3%)
06/08  Amazing Spider-Man #563 -  70,792  ( -0.9%)
07/08  Amazing Spider-Man #564 -  68,882  ( -2.7%)
07/08  Amazing Spider-Man #565 -  69,182  ( +0.4%)
07/08  Amazing Spider-Man #566 -  68,912  ( -0.4%)
08/08  Amazing Spider-Man #567 -  68,130  ( -1.1%)
08/08  Amazing Spider-Man #568 - 105,324  (+54.6%)
08/08  Amazing Spider-Man #569 -  86,432  (-17.9%)
09/08  Amazing Spider-Man #570 -  89,516  ( +3.6%)
09/08  Amazing Spider-Man #571 -  80,178  (-10.4%)
09/08  Amazing Spider-Man #572 -  80,220  ( +0.1%)
10/08  Amazing Spider-Man #573 -  82,550  ( +2.9%)
10/08  Amazing Spider-Man #574 -  69,069  (-16.3%)
10/08  Amazing Spider-Man #575 -  68,913  ( -0.2%)
11/08  Amazing Spider-Man #576 -  68,956  ( +0.1%)
11/08  Amazing Spider-Man #577 -  76,625  (+11.1%)
11/08  Amazing Spider-Man #578 -  66,564  (-13.1%)
12/08  Amazing Spider-Man #579 -  69,784  ( +4.8%)
12/08  Amazing Spider-Man #580 -  62,979  ( -9.8%)
12/08  Amazing Spider-Man #581 -  68,905  ( +9.4%)
01/09  Amazing Spider-Man #582 -  59,932  (-13.0%)
01/09  Amazing Spider-Man #583 - 501,758 (+737.2%)
01/09  Amazing Spider-Man #584 -  63,754  (-87.3%)
02/09  Amazing Spider-Man #585 -  60,286  ( -5.4%)
02/09  Amazing Spider-Man #586 -  59,521  ( -1.3%)
02/09  Amazing Spider-Man #587 -  60,118  ( +1.0%)
                                  6 mnth  (-30.4%)
                                  1 year  (-40.5%)
                                  2 year  (-57.9%)
                                  3 year  (-33.5%)
                                  4 year  (-23.5%)
                                  5 year  (-28.5%)

The Obama phenomenon continues. Issue #583 was the top-selling book for the second month running, with the fourth and fifth printings shifting 148,805 copies. That takes the total estimated sales to over half a million.

None of this has any discernible effect on the book’s regular sales. Variant covers never do, of course, but then this isn’t a typical variant cover. A case can be made that when you’re bringing in 450,000 extra readers, you’d hope for some of them to come back. As it is, the “Character Assassination” storyline continues to hover around the 60K mark.

Incidentally, I had the sales for issues #582 and #584 reversed last month - so there was actually an uptick for the first issue of the storyline, albeit not much of one.

(more…)

Indie Comics Month-to-Month Sales: February 2009

03/27/09

by Steve Horton

[Ed’s note: We’re running this column as something of an experiment. Let us know what you think, publicly…or privately.]

Welcome to a monthly column on indie comics sales, a companion to the long-running Marvel and DC columns by Paul O’Brien and Marc-Oliver Frisch, respectively.

What are indie comics? I define them strictly as comics not from Marvel or DC. I’m including both creator-owned and licensed books. That means any Icon, Vertigo or Wildstorm books will still be discussed in the Marvel & DC columns.

What is creator-owned and what is licensed? I define creator-owned as a title whose original creator is still in control of the property and owns or co-owns the copyright, even though said creator may not be working on the title at the moment. Licensed titles are usually television and movie tie-ins.

You’ll notice that I don’t cover the entire top 300. I’m discussing books which have consistent top 300 data from month to month. Titles that debut in the top 300 and quickly fall off simply don’t have enough data points. Likewise titles that appear toward the bottom in slow months only to get knocked off when the latest Marvel & DC summer event kicks off won’t appear here. Therefore, we’ve cut things off this month at #273, Shrapnel, with sales of 3,653. That ranking and sales cutoff will change from month to month. Unfortunately, that excludes many fine creator-owned books, including personal favorites of mine such as Proof. Nothing much I can do about that.

The biggest news in February’s chart is that sales dropped almost across the board. Three reasons for that: the economy continues to tank, several comic shops closed in the new year, and Diamond moved warehouses, goofing up the supply chain. You’ll see a lot of weird sales aberrations as a result; these figures may or may not correct themselves by March, depending on how the U.S. and Diamond recovery goes.

Thanks to Milton Griepp and ICv2.com for the permission to use their figures.

12 - BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER (Dark Horse)
Licensed
-
02/2008: Season Eight #11 88070
03/2008: Season Eight #12 88930  +0.98%
04/2008: Season Eight #13 83580  -6.02%
05/2008: Season Eight #14 82069  -1.81%
06/2008: Season Eight #15 80464  -1.96%
07/2008: Season Eight #16 82031  +1.95%
08/2008: Season Eight #17 79307  -3.32%
09/2008: Season Eight #18 77589  -2.17%
10/2008: -
11/2008: Season Eight #19 74202  -4.37%
12/2008: Season Eight #20 71896  -3.11%
01/2009: Season Eight #21 69980  -2.66%
02/2009: Season Eight #22 67575  -3.44%
-
6 months:    -14.79%
1 year:      -23.27%

The #1 licensed title in comics since Joss Whedon took a personal hand, Buffy’s sales have plummeted from the six figures early in its run to just over 67K. The drop doesn’t seem to be slowing any just yet, either. However, the trades are monsters. The third volume of Buffy took #9 on the 03/04 New York Times Graphic Books bestseller list. Whether in comic or book form, fans can’t get enough of the continuing adventures of the vampire slayer.
(more…)

This week’s Graphic Books chart

03/20/09

Graphic Books Best Seller Lists: March 14 is up for the week, and HUMBUG, JESSE MARSH, and WORMWOOD: GENTLEMAN CORPSE can now all add “NY Times bestseller” to their marketing campaigns. WATCHMEN and NARUTO claim their usual spots at the top, however.

Diamond Tops for February

03/13/09

Diamond has released its preliminary charts for February, and incredibly, the Spidey-Obama issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN topped the charts for the second straight month. WATCHMEN, BATMAN RIP and SCOTT PILGRIM top the book list.

TOP COMIC BOOK PUBLISHERS

Publisher

Unit Market Share

Retail Dollar Market Share

MARVEL COMICS

47.83%

44.70%

DC COMICS

28.27%

26.83%

DARK HORSE COMICS

4.66%

5.16%

IDW PUBLISHING

4.43%

4.93%

IMAGE COMICS

3.95%

3.71%

DYNAMITE ENTERTAINMENT

2.28%

2.07%

VIZ MEDIA

0.89%

1.85%

EAGLEMOSS PUBLICATIONS LTD

0.40%

1.32%

WIZARD ENTERTAINMENT

0.89%

1.20%

BOOM! STUDIOS

0.69%

0.77%

OTHER NON-TOP 10

5.70%

7.47%

TOP 10 COMICS

Quantity Rank

Description

Price

Item Code

Vendor

1

AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #583

$3.99

MARVEL COMICS

2

BATMAN #686

$3.99

DC COMICS

3

NEW AVENGERS #50 (DARK REIGN)

$4.99

MARVEL COMICS

4

THOR #600

$4.99

MARVEL COMICS

5

DARK AVENGERS #2 (DARK REIGN)

$3.99

MARVEL COMICS

6

HULK #10

$3.99

MARVEL COMICS

7

MIGHTY AVENGERS #21 (DARK REIGN) CORRECTED COPY

$3.99

MARVEL COMICS

8

MIGHTY AVENGERS #22 (DARK REIGN)

$2.99

MARVEL COMICS

9

UNCANNY X-MEN #506

$2.99

MARVEL COMICS

10

JUSTICE LEAGUE OF AMERICA #30 (ORIGINS)

$2.99

DC COMICS

TOP 10 GRAPHIC NOVELS & TRADE PAPERBACKS

Quantity Rank

Description

Price


Vendor

1

WATCHMEN TP

$19.99

DC COMICS

2

BATMAN RIP DELUXE EDITION HC

$24.99

DC COMICS

3

SCOTT PILGRIM VOLUME 5: SCOTT PILGRIM VS. THE UNIVERSE GN

$11.95

ONI PRESS

4

ALL STAR SUPERMAN VOLUME 2 HC

$19.99

DC COMICS

5

DMZ VOLUME 6: BLOOD IN THE GAME TP (MR)

$12.99

DC COMICS

6

THE DARKNESS: ACCURSED VOLUME 1 TP

$4.99

IMAGE COMICS

7

NARUTO VOLUME 34 TP

$7.95

VIZ MEDIA

8

HULK VOLUME 1: RED HULK TP

$19.99

MARVEL COMICS

9

MINI-MARVELS: SECRET INVASION DIGEST TP

$9.99

MARVEL COMICS

10

CAPTAIN AMERICA VOLUME 3: THE DEATH OF CAPTAIN AMERICA TP

$14.99

MARVEL COMICS


Best Seller roundups: WATCHMEN!

03/13/09

The WATCHMEN rampage continues with a #2 appearance on USA Today’s overall list, behind only Steve Harvey. It remains #1 on Amazon, and has now topped both hardcover and paperback on the NY Times Graphic Books Best Seller lists:

Now that the big-screen version of Watchmen has been realized, the most eagerly awaited adaptation of a comic book is probably “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World.” The film is about a 20something slacker battling the evil exes of his current love, Ramona Flowers, and its cast includes Michael Cera as the titular hero, along with Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Chris Evans and Brandon Routh. The penultimate volume, Scott Pilgrim vs. the Universe, hits our paperback list at no. 10. Check out scottpilgrim.com to sample pages.

The rest of the lists are filled with stories that would make great fodder for animated films, television series or big-screen blockbusters: Superman: Brainiac features a fierce battle with one of his deadliest alien foes, but it’s the Man of Steel’s human side that really comes through; Wolverine: Origin delves deeper into the sometimes-confusing backstory of one of Marvel’s most popular characters; and Walking Dead reveals what life is like for human survivors in a world overrun by zombies.

BTW, for everyone who hates analyzing the BookScan and Diamond charts, you had better embrace the Graphic Books chart to your bosom like a long-lost lover, because it’s an endearing return to the old school method of charting — an esoteric, never-to-revealed formula. Frankly, the more bestsellers we have, the better.

“Graphic books” bestseller list reax

03/9/09

Last week’s inauguration of a “graphic books” best seller list from the august New York Times drew much response, naturally. ICv2 answered the burning, itching question of why “graphic books,” when men commonly call them comics:

We asked the Times why it’s calling the books its ranking “graphic books,” rather than “graphic novels,” and heard back from Bestseller List Editor Deborah Hofmann. “We decided to call these Graphic Books in order to begin our endeavor with the elbow room to evolve,” she said. There are graphic memoirs, graphic diaries, nonfiction as well as fiction — and legions of new forms of this collaborative media that combine art with text. “We felt that Books made it clear to readers that our intent is to be inclusive and expansive. These rankings will grow, as we see more of the sorts of migrations you described at the [ICv2 Conference] — adaptations from other name brand bestselling authors, and so forth. Sci-Fi, Romance, procedurals, and many others, over time.


SLJ’s Good Comics for Kids blog has a roundtable discussion on What It Means:

Robin Brenner:

I’m now curious to see how this affects what I see in the library. Are my patrons going to be coming in and requesting MPD-Psycho in droves, as they do with the other bestsellers lists? If that doesn’t happen right away, how long will it take to start happening?


Anticipation that the phrase “New York Times Best Seller!” will be a selling point was echoed in a Marvel press release.

Brigid Alverson reflects some of the surprise at the first listings:

The real head-scratcher, though, is the two books that aren’t Naruto: vol. 8 of MPD-Psycho and vol. 11 of Eden. Both books carry an 18+ rating and come shrink-wrapped, which means that bookstores are less likely to carry them and the potential audience is somewhat limited. The direct market is the logical home for these books, but according to Diamond’s numbers, the last volume of MPD-Psycho, which was released in mid-December, sold fewer than 2,000 copies through them. The last volume of Eden didn’t chart at all in May or June 2008, which means it must have sold fewer than about 1,100 copies. Even Nana does better than that, and we all know the DM is a boys’ club. By contrast, volumes of Naruto sell in the 5,000-copy range in the direct market and probably do much better in chain bookstores (BookScan doesn’t make public the number of copies sold, so it’s hard to tell).


But perhaps the happiest reaction to the new lists was a Twitter from DC editor Jann Jones, fiancée of STARMAN’s James Robinson:

Who has two thumbs and is engaged to a NYT best selling writer? This gal….

DC Comics Month-to-Month Sales: January 2009

03/6/09

by Marc-Oliver Frisch

The big news on the January sales chart is a catastrophic crash of WildStorm’s average periodical sales. The monthly direct-market numbers of the DC Comics sub-label hovered around the 10K mark for most of the past twelve months, but in the new year, the bottom dropped out: WildStorm’s average sales nosedived by 27.2 percent compared to the previous month, to an estimated 6,851 units.

Compared to January sales from 2004 through 2008, the loss ranges from 51 to 62 percent. Compared to six months ago, one of the weakest months for WildStorm periodicals last year, it’s still a 30.6-percent decline.

The reason for the dramatic decline of WildStorm periodical sales is simple: The imprint currently stands on three pillars, none of which seems able to support its own weight. The traditional WildStorm Universe superhero properties, based on characters created by WildStorm founder Jim Lee, have been waning for years commercially; none of the more recent creator-owned properties have been remotely able to recapture the early success of Astro City or Ex Machina (the one notable exception being The Boys, which was promptly taken elsewhere by its creators due to creative differences with the management); and the vast majority of WildStorm’s licensed titles adapting videogame, television or film properties fail miserably.

As a result of the WildStorm plunge, average DC Comics sales dropped to their lowest point since industry website ICv2.com started publishing actual-sales estimates in March 2003. Across all three major imprints, the publisher’s average periodical sales declined by 9.4 percent in January.

January marked a decline for the DC Universe and Vertigo imprints, as well. Sales of the average DC Universe periodical dropped by 6.7 percent in January, sales of the average Vertigo periodical by 5.4 percent. The January 2009 numbers are not the lowest estimated sales for either the DC Universe or Vertigo lines in the context of the last five years, but they’re still far down in the spectrum.

See below for the analysis, and please consider the small print at the end of the column.

Thanks to Milton Griepp and ICv2.com for the permission to use their figures. An overview of ICv2.com’s estimates can be found here.

—–

3/4 - FINAL CRISIS
05/2008: Final Crisis #1 of 7 — 144,826          [166,641]
06/2008: Final Crisis #2 of 7 — 126,082 (-12.9%) [134,116]
07/2008: –
08/2008: Final Crisis #3 of 7 — 123,881 (- 1.8%)
09/2008: –
10/2008: Final Crisis #4 of 7 — 115,666 (- 6.6%)
11/2008: –
12/2008: Final Crisis #5 of 7 — 109,181 (- 5.6%)
01/2009: Final Crisis #6 of 7 — 123,345 (+13.0%)
01/2009: Final Crisis #7 of 7 — 103,292 (-16.3%)
—————-
6 months: n.a.

Final Crisis #6, in case you missed it, was the issue where Batman finally died (well, kind of), after emphatically not perishing at the end the “Batman R.I.P.” storyline in his own title back in November. It was easy to miss, certainly, since the mainstream media largely ignored the story in favor of the Barack Obama issue of Marvel’s The Amazing Spider-Man that came out on the same day — see Paul O’Brien’s column on that.

Still, DC evidently got a solid sales boost out of the event. The number shown above actually includes the 12,453 units of a second printing that also came out in January but was listed separately on the chart. If Diamond had combined the two listings, Final Crisis #6 would have taken the No. 2 spot on the Top 300 chart, outselling the debut of Marvel’s Dark Avengers by 5,000 units.

Sales of both issues were increased through the usual 50/50 variant-cover editions.

(more…)

Marvel Month-to-Month Sales: January 2009

03/6/09

By Paul O’Brien

The new year begins with a relatively quiet month on the charts. The big news, of course, is Barack Obama’s unexpectedly popular appearance in AMAZING SPIDER-MAN. Ironically, the other significant new releases for January are part of the “Dark Reign” event, with the launch of DARK AVENGERS and the relaunch of PUNISHER. The two don’t entirely fit together - if he’s putting Norman Osborn in charge of vital government departments, then Obama-616 evidently takes bipartisanship to new extremes - but Marvel have managed to get away with having their cake and eating it.

Otherwise… not much going on, to be honest. A lot of titles failed to ship in January - HULK, MIGHTY AVENGERS, ULTIMATUM, WOLVERINE, UNCANNY X-MEN, THOR, ULTIMATE X-MEN, ULTIMATE FANTASTIC FOUR and even IMMORTAL IRON FIST are all missing. You can tell it’s quiet when all the Marvel Adventures books reappear on the top 300. In December, MARVEL ADVENTURES AVENGERS missed the chart altogether; this time, it’s at number 227 with roughly the same sales.

Marvel beat DC by 46% to 33% in unit share, and 43% to 31% in dollar share.

Thanks as always to Milton Griepp and ICV2.com for permission to use these figures.

1,12,15.  AMAZING SPIDER-MAN
01/04  Amazing Spider-Man #503 -  87,341
01/05  Amazing Spider-Man #516 -  79,842
01/06  Amazing Spider-Man #528 -  95,415
01/07  Amazing Spider-Man #537 - 114,802
=====
01/08  Amazing Spider-Man #546 - 127,958  ( -0.9%)
01/08  Amazing Spider-Man #547 - 101,213  (-20.9%)
01/08  Amazing Spider-Man #548 -  97,959  ( -3.2%)
02/08  Amazing Spider-Man #549 - 101,112  ( +3.2%)
02/08  Amazing Spider-Man #550 -  90,874  (-10.1%)
02/08  Amazing Spider-Man #551 -  88,084  ( -3.1%)
03/08  Amazing Spider-Man #552 -  89,835  ( +2.0%)
03/08  Amazing Spider-Man #553 -  82,648  ( -8.0%)
03/08  Amazing Spider-Man #554 -  81,072  ( -1.9%)
04/08  Amazing Spider-Man #555 -  86,902  ( +7.2%)
04/08  Amazing Spider-Man #556 -  78,458  ( -9.7%)
04/08  Amazing Spider-Man #557 -  77,057  ( -1.8%)
05/08  Amazing Spider-Man #558 -  76,966  ( -0.1%)
05/08  Amazing Spider-Man #559 -  74,206  ( -3.6%)
05/08  Amazing Spider-Man #560 -  74,012  ( -0.3%)
06/08  Amazing Spider-Man #561 -  72,372  ( -2.2%)
06/08  Amazing Spider-Man #562 -  71,409  ( -1.3%)
06/08  Amazing Spider-Man #563 -  70,792  ( -0.9%)
07/08  Amazing Spider-Man #564 -  68,882  ( -2.7%)
07/08  Amazing Spider-Man #565 -  69,182  ( +0.4%)
07/08  Amazing Spider-Man #566 -  68,912  ( -0.4%)
08/08  Amazing Spider-Man #567 -  68,130  ( -1.1%)
08/08  Amazing Spider-Man #568 - 105,324  (+54.6%)
08/08  Amazing Spider-Man #569 -  86,432  (-17.9%)
09/08  Amazing Spider-Man #570 -  89,516  ( +3.6%)
09/08  Amazing Spider-Man #571 -  80,178  (-10.4%)
09/08  Amazing Spider-Man #572 -  80,220  ( +0.1%)
10/08  Amazing Spider-Man #573 -  82,550  ( +2.9%)
10/08  Amazing Spider-Man #574 -  69,069  (-16.3%)
10/08  Amazing Spider-Man #575 -  68,913  ( -0.2%)
11/08  Amazing Spider-Man #576 -  68,956  ( +0.1%)
11/08  Amazing Spider-Man #577 -  76,625  (+11.1%)
11/08  Amazing Spider-Man #578 -  66,564  (-13.1%)
12/08  Amazing Spider-Man #579 -  69,784  ( +4.8%)
12/08  Amazing Spider-Man #580 -  62,979  ( -9.8%)
12/08  Amazing Spider-Man #581 -  68,905  ( +9.4%)
01/09  Amazing Spider-Man #582 -  63,754  ( -7.5%)
01/09  Amazing Spider-Man #583 - 352,953 (+453.6%)
01/09  Amazing Spider-Man #584 -  59,932  (-83.0%)
                                  6 mnth  (-13.0%)
                                  1 year  (-53.2%)
                                  2 year  (-47.8%)
                                  3 year  (-37.2%)
                                  4 year  (-24.9%)
                                  5 year  (-31.4%)

Can you spot the Obama issue? That’s right, it’s issue #583, which shifted over 350K in the direct market in a single month. And there’s still another two printings to come on the February chart. Not counting giveaway issues, this is the biggest number since DARKNESS #11 back in 1998 - and that had eleven variant covers.

Of course, this is all very impressive, but issue #583 is more a piece of Obama merchandise than a Spider-Man comic, and it has no bearing on the wider trends for the title - as the sales for issue #584 demonstrate.

Overall, AMAZING is still going down. Issue #582 is actually up slightly compared to the previous issue without a variant cover, but issue #584 is dropping again as normal. And that’s cause for concern, because #584 is the first part of “Character Assassination”, a storyline which they’ve been building up for months, with art by John Romita Jr. The last time they hyped up a story in this way, there was a noticeable sales bump. This time, not so much.
(more…)

NY Times adds online Graphic Novel Bestseller list

03/5/09

For over a year, there’s been some consternation among comics publishing types that the prestigious New York Times bestseller list did not include graphic novels any more. There had been rumblings that a separate list was in the works, and indeed, THREE separate lists debuted online today. There are a hardcover list, a paperback list, and a manga list. As George Gene Gustines writes:

We’ll update those lists weekly in this space, and offer a few observations along the way.

Here’s the first: Notwithstanding Terry & the Pirates, Green Lantern, and a trippy ecological romance called “Beanworld,” there is going to be a lot of Alan Moore on these lists for the first couple of months. Moore is the author of the “Watchmen” series, first published in 1986 (and collected into a 12-issue edition that is No. 3 on our hardcover list). On the softcover side, he is comfortably seated at No. 1 for “Watchmen” and No. 7 for “The Courtyard,” about an F.B.I. agent investigating gruesome murders.


The lists are NOT what we expected to see, but they give multiple publishers the chance to crow “A NYTimes bestseller!” on blurbs from here on out.

Doubtless developing.

BookScan redux

02/25/09

Okay, just a few after dinner cordials as we close the books on the annual Imbolc rituals:

§ Peerless Peggy Burns of D&Q has the last word on the indie sales matter, by pointing out that comparing apples to sea scallops makes no sense whatsoever:

Bookscan doesn’t provide an accurate report, but it can be helpful in gauging where our sales lie in relation to other publishers. I use it the same way I use an Amazon ranking — very loosely. I admit to logging in every Wednesday to see our previous week’s numbers. I don’t look to see how our books are performing against Naruto or Wimpy Kid, I look to see how our books perform among our distributor FSG’s titles, and I look to see how our books perform compared to our closest publishing peer, McSweeneys, and to make sure our books perform as well as the majority of Pantheon’s graphic novels (Maus and Persepolis are in their own league, of course.) When I see that Bookscan says that Lynda Barry’s What It Is has comparable numbers to Pulitzer Prize winning author Michael Chabon’s Maps and Legends for McSweeneys, I am happy.


Anyone who has read the entire debate here should click on the link, as it’s must reading from a very informed viewpoint.

§ Marc-Oliver Frisch looks at the intertwined economic fortunes of trades and periodicals:

The question of Vertigo’s paperback sales is a classic absence-of-proof case for most series. There is no proof in the available numbers that (a) Vertigo series sell better in the book market than in the direct market or that (b) most current Vertigo series sell well anywhere at all. But just because the limited numbers we know don’t show it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not there, of course, which makes Hibbs’ statement problematic.


§ And finally, Dick Hyacinth has the most accurate assessment of all:

Note #1 about recent Bookscan conversations: I think the current debates reveal more about the rivalries and relationships between prominent comics bloggers than anything useful about the numbers themselves. This probably would have amused me more a few years ago.

BookScan Debate Goes to Hell: The Final Monday

02/23/09


As the swallows return to Capistrano, as the bats return to Colossal Caves, as the wildebeest migrate across the Serengeti, and the alewives return to Lake Damariscotta, so we celebrate the season with the annual Hibbs/MacDonald/Deppey BookScan debate. Here’s last year’s bout from The Beat, with many of the same competitors taking part in this Soap Box Derby of sales figures. TRADITION!

Today, over at Journalista, Dirk offers his annual disclaimer and you can tell he’s serious because he uses words like “proffered.” He also tweaks Hibbs a bit by quoting very, very similar passages by Hibbs vis-à-vis indie/art comic sales from every year since 2003. Dirk finds the smoking gun of Hibbs’s ulterior motives right here in the Beat comment section:

Actually, I’d characterize my argument as “the argument that ‘oh but if only we could get “lit comics” out of the stinky dirty backwards Direct Market, then everything would be light and honey forever and ever, amen!’ is pretty demonstrably wrong”

and then spends a good few paragraphs circling, stabbing, stamping, yelling “Ugga! Bugga” and while still failing to refute anything.

Look, I don’t want to live in a world where L&R #1 sells only 719 copies in bookstores. But before anyone goes any further with all this “It’s a guess, it’s wrong, it doesn’t add up” stuff, let’s look at one fact about the BookScan numbers. While they DO NOT measure all book sales across all channels, they do measure 100% of sales in approximately 70 percent of bookstore channels. So by any standard, it is a metric for comparison, analysis and debate.

In order to prove that BookScan is wrong, Dirk dons his sleuth hat:

Hibbs’ claim that Love and Rockets: New Stories #1 sold just 719 copies, however, motivated me to e-mail Fantagraphics’ Gary Groth, Kim Thompson and Eric Reynolds to find out if they could add some light to all the heat. While I suppose it’s possible that Hibbs’ BookScan reportage might turn out to be true, it struck me as being unlikely. Still, one must investigate, and the resulting email exchanges seemed to produce light and heat in equal amounts: Not because the Fanta staffers were dissembling or in any way less than forthcoming, but because the nature of the mass market essentially makes even the vague sort of instant tallying one expects from the Direct Market to be impossible in the short term. Short of absolute disaster, any attempt to figure out how a given title has done in the returnable booksellers’ market within its first year of release inevitably turns out to be little more than guesswork.


So is that dissembling or not? Sounds like it to me. Dirk goes on to present the Internet version of a school film on the publishing business, explaining how mighty catalogs roll out and orders are placed, and books are sold and returns are made, and it’s all a great unknowable system of terror and awe, but just to reiterate, BookScan sales are via UPC scans, so they are not guesswork at all They are sell through in a certain percentage of the retail market.

That said, of course there are other channels and other markets. It would be interesting to see what Reynolds, Groth, and Thompson all had to say on the topic in a neutral ground, but unfortunately Dirk just quotes them in random bits so it’s hard to see context.

And in the end, what’s sauce for the autobio cartoonist is sauce for the spandex superhero. Groth suggests that

It doesn’t make any sense to differentiate libraries from bookstores; they both buy books from the same wholesaler(s) at the same price. It’s like differentiating chain stores, indies, PXes, big box stores or any other particularized sales destination.

That’s certainly true, but that means you also have to count SUPERHERO and MANGA sales to libraries, and no one wants to do THAT do they?

Another place where I think Dirk gets fuzzy is here:

According to Groth, there are currently over 10,000 copies of Willie & Joe in play outside the Direct Market, while the figure that Hibbs quotes BookScan as giving for it is just 5485 copies. While more returns are likely, we’re nonetheless talking about a title that’s been in the marketplace for nine months and counting. At this point, one could be justified in assuming that it’s a good way over the hump. And if that number winds up holding steady, we’re talking about not a 10% difference, not a 30% difference, but somewhere near a 100% difference between BookScan and the real world. What will the end figure wind up being, do you think? 90% off the mark? 80%? 70%?

That is categoricaly not true. Once again, Bookscan measures sell-through, the number of books that have been purchased by consumers, whether via a bookstore or an online retailer. 10,000 is the sell-in number. It’s the reason why you will walk into a bookstore and SEE a copy of Willie and Joe on the shelf while browsing. That sell-in has not yet been converted to sell-through. Later in the piece, Groth mentions that publishers can expect a third of books sold-in to be returned, which is indeed about industry average. (20 percent returns is considered a very good number.) It is quite likely that many of the FBI books that are on shelves but not sold to consumers are at indie bookstores where the publisher is a favorite and the individual owners believe in the titles. Heroes and visionaries, you might say.

Where I do agree with Dirk is that if selling graphic novels into bookstores wasn’t profitable for Fantagraphics and D&Q, they probably would have gone out of business some time ago. Or as I wrote the other day, 

I can also attest that sometimes selling only 2000 copies on BookScan is perfectly okay. Anything in five figures is probably very profitable, and numbers far lower than that could also make money or break even. I have no idea what the golden number is — it undoubtedly varies from book to book and publisher to publisher.

To me the question is still how to get sell copies of the good stuff to people who would enjoy it? L&R #1 may have sold-in 4000 copies, but can it sell-through more? Can Bill Mauldin sell more copies? Can Tatsumi?  Can Tezuka?

Every year when these numbers come out, there is some bristling from the indie community (probably partially brought on by Hibbs’ taunting on the subject) on the fact that superhero comics appear to sell more in the stores measured by BookScan than indie/art comix do. On the surface it seems bad, but I assure you, there are lots and lots of books from Marvel, DC and book publishers that sell in numbers just as “bad” or worse. As mentioned above, everyone’s magic number of profitability is different. I’m not going to embarrass anyone, but you know who you are.

What needs to be understood by a lot of people (and this is something I myself have only begrudgingly accepted) is that not every comics “classic” is really a timeless classic that speaks to generation after generation. All of the reissues that come out in 2008 really proved that, but this is a subject I hope to return to shortly in a more focused manner.

And this hopefully concludes this year’s installment of The BookScan Debates. Until next time!

Hibbs on BookScan 2008

02/20/09

200902201314It’s the mother of all sales charts! Today’s must reading — and I do mean MUST — is retailer Brian Hibbs’s annual analysis of the year-end BookScan numbers for graphic novels sold in bookstores. The general trends show pieces down a tad, dollars up a bit, manga down but still ruling the roost, and DC’s distribution deal with Random House yielding SPECTACULAR results. It isn’t just the 300,000+ copies of WATCHMEN sold — it’s improvements all the way down the list of proven items. Looking at the numbers, it’s clear that Random House can’t save weak or misguided books, but it can significantly boost the sales of books with proven audiences.

Beyond that, you should just go read the whole thing, but a few caveats on the accuracy. Hibbs writes:

(more…)

January sales: down

02/18/09

ICv2’s January number have been posted, and although they aren’t horrific, they ain’t great. AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #583 set a sales record, but overall periodical sales were down nine percent.

DC’s Final Crisis was one of only four titles that picked up circulation in January, and absent ASM #583, it would have finished a close second to Marvel’s Dark Avengers #1, the key book in Marvel’s Dark Reign event in which Norman Osborne takes over the Avengers (aka his Thunderbolts playing Avengers). After the Dark Reign-aided New Avengers #49, sales of subsequent titles dropped off quickly and remained weak down the list (see “Comic Sales Drop in January” for an analysis how the #10, #20, #50, #100, and #300 titles dropped versus similarly positioned comics in January of 2008). How long will it be before someone notices that the top five titles all have a $3.99 cover price, and start blaming the higher cost of the top tier of titles for the drop-off of the downlist books?

BUT, according to the dollar analysis:

Sales of the top 100 graphic novels were up 4%, an increase that brought the overall decline in sales of both the top 300 comics and top 100 graphic novels down to 7%.


Not good times for the pamphlet, as collections seem to be making up more and more of stores’ bread and butter.

Just how these figures jibe with retailers who had their best Januarys ever we shall leave to the comment thread to decode.

More:
ICv2 - Top 300 Comics Actual–January 2009
ICv2 - Top 300 Graphic Novels Actual–January 2009

Top GNs in bookstores

02/17/09

200902170335And in our final chart based item for the morning, ICv2 has released an adjusted list of the top-selling graphic novels of 2008, according to BookScan:

The top nine titles remained the same, but beginning with #10, five new titles made the top 20. Two of the Scholastic color Bone volumes, Bone Volume 1: Out from Boneville and Bone Volume 7: Ghost Circles, hit the list at #10 and #12, respectively.

Dark Tower: The Long Road Home, which was given a single ranking for the combined sales of all its covers, is #13 on this more comprehensive list.

Tokyopop’s Warrior’s Refuge, the OEL manga based on the works by Erin Hunter, is #15 on the combined list.

And Pokemon Diamond and Pearl Adventures Vol. 1 from Viz is #16.


A couple of very important things here: When factored into the list, kids comics actually dominate this list by a wide margin. NARUTO, BONE, WARRIORS, FRUITS BASKET.

Also, we can’t help but call out those WARRIORS books from Harper: They are packaged by Toykopop and concern a kitty cat fantasy along the lines of Watership Down, except with kitties. The stories are original. The art, from what we’ve seen, is not that great, but kids seem to be eating it up. We’ll note that Disney has also had success with their Artemis Fowl kids GNs and other properties. This is what the future of mainstream graphic novel publishing is going to look like, like it or lump it.

Meanwhile, in Occidental comics news

02/17/09

The January numbers are out, and while the sales estimates have yet to be tallied. John Jackson Miller suspects that January comics sales will not be the kind of thing that makes people click their heels:

I have only done some thumbnail estimates — and while they are too preliminary to post, my belief is that, the contribution of the Barack Obama Amazing Spider-Man aside, this appears to be a good-old-fashioned Bad January. Unit sales in the Top 300 could be off in the double-digits — with Top 300 dollars off by much less, but still off. It’s looking more like January 2006 than either of the past two years — and reminiscent of the older “Dead Quarter” years where the number or releases dropped in the winter. Marvel, which had placed 119 books in the Top 300 in December 2008, only had 92 entries this month, one less than DC. That drop of 27 entries tells the tale, I’d expect.


Brace yourselves.

Looking at Diamond’s backlist charts

02/13/09

cournetcrumrin.JPG
Oh no, not more charts? Yes! This time it’s something we haven’t seen much talked about before: Diamond’s BACKlist charts. As all publishing watchers know, the backlist is where you live and die; it’s the retirement fund; it’s the guarantee. Diamond released their January Star System best sellers, and it’s quite interesting to look at, especially with all the changes coming to the distribution system. Let’s have a looksee, shall we?

JANUARY STAR SYSTEM BACKLIST TOP SELLERS

TOP 10 COMICS


VENDOR

DOLLAR SHARE
VENDOR UNIT SHARE
DC Comics 40.75% DC Comics 36.83%
Marvel Comics 22.16% Marvel Comics 20.03%
Dark Horse Comics 8.86% Dark Horse Comics 9.89%
Image Comics 5.97% VIZ LLC 9.30%
VIZ LLC 4.69% Image Comics 6.06%
IDW Publishing 1.31% TOKYOPOP 2.04%
TOKYOPOP 1.20% Random House 1.54%
Dynamite Entertainment -Dynamic Forces 1.20% IDW Publishing 1.16%
Random House 1.17% Dynamite Entertainment- Dynamic Forces 1.07%
Fantagraphics Books 1.15% Fantagraphics Books 0.98%
Other 11.54% Other 11.10%
TOTAL 100.00% TOTAL 100.00%






By contrast, here’s the January frontlist publishers chart. As you can see, it’s a complete reverse from the regular monthly chart, with DC dominating Marvel quite handily, and non-superhero publishers like Viz, Tokyopop, Random House, and Fantagraphics making their presence known. Here’s the Top Ten comics:


(more…)

DC Month to Month Sales: December 2008

02/6/09

by Marc-Oliver Frisch

The question whether the economy has any effect on DC Comics’ periodical output is increasingly difficult to answer. On the one hand, many titles not right at the center of the publisher’s big superhero line are losing units by the truckload, and new series debut with abysmal numbers — case in point in December: Vigilante. Then again, these are trends which have been visible for a while, so what we’re seeing may as well be a continuation of what’s been happening anyway, rather than the result of the current crisis. Of course, it could also be both.

That said, DC’s average periodical sales in the direct market recovered slightly in December, mostly thanks to an issue of Final Crisis and multiple entries by three high-ticket series: There were three issues of Batman and two issues each of Justice League of America and Justice Society of America. Average sales didn’t recover as much as you might have expected, however. One reason for this is the increasing decline mentioned above, another is that a number of series returned to a much lower level, now that the “Batman R.I.P.” event is over.

Vertigo and WildStorm’s average periodical sales were in decline again in December. Whereas the average Vertigo title remains in the 11-12K area, the average WildStorm periodical dropped to yet another historical low point, selling fewer than 9,415 units. We don’t know the exact number because multiple new WildStorm releases again failed to make the Top 300 chart — a rather more recent trend. Their number rose to four in December.

On a technical note, I should mention that the December chart includes books which shipped on January 2, 2009 — not because any of them were late, but because Diamond evidently felt more comfortable with that date. Originally, those titles were expected on December 31, which is presumably why they ended up on the December chart.

See below for the details, and please mind the small print at the end of the column. Thanks to Milton Griepp and ICv2.com for the permission to use their figures. An overview of ICv2.com’s estimates can be found here.

—–

2 - FINAL CRISIS
05/2008: Final Crisis #1 of 7 — 144,826          [166,641]
06/2008: Final Crisis #2 of 7 — 126,082 (-12.9%) [134,116]
07/2008: –
08/2008: Final Crisis #3 of 7 — 123,881 (- 1.8%)
09/2008: –
10/2008: Final Crisis #4 of 7 — 115,666 (- 6.6%)
11/2008: –
12/2008: Final Crisis #5 of 7 — 109,181 (- 5.6%)
—————-
6 months: -13.4%

Final Crisis is continuing a fairly smooth drop-off for a blockbuster miniseries. As usual, the book was promoted through a 50/50 variant-cover edition.

For comparison, Marvel’s Secret Invasion #8, which topped the December chart, sold an estimated 152,429 units, which is more than even the debut issue of Final Crisis managed in its first month. That’s quite another ballpark, obviously.

(more…)

Marvel Month-to-Month Sales - December ‘08

02/4/09

by Paul O’Brien
After nine long months - the final issue was slightly late - SECRET INVASION finally wrapped up in December, and “Dark Reign” immediately began. Not quite a crossover as such, “Dark Reign” is more akin to the “Initiative”-bannered books that appeared in the aftermath of CIVIL WAR. Those titles did well, even though the links between them were often tenuous, and it looks like the pattern will be repeated with “Dark Reign.”

Outside that promotion, the big new releases of the month include the launch of the heavily-promoted Noir titles; a couple of X-Men minis; the new WAR MACHINE title; and INCOGNITO, the new series from Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips.

As usual, Marvel had the biggest share of the North American direct market. In dollar share, they took 45% to DC’s 29%, and in unit share,they took a shade under 50% against DC’s 31.%

Thanks as always to ICV2.com for permission to use these figures.

1.  SECRET INVASION
04/08  Secret Invasion #1 of 8 - 272,195
05/08  Secret Invasion #2 of 8 - 197,685  (-27.4%)
06/08  Secret Invasion #3 of 8 - 186,533  ( -5.6%)
07/08  Secret Invasion #4 of 8 - 175,469  ( -5.9%)
08/08  Secret Invasion #5 of 8 - 165,958  ( -5.4%)
09/08  Secret Invasion #6 of 8 - 169,440  ( +2.1%)
10/08  Secret Invasion #7 of 8 - 154,675  ( -8.7%)
11/08  —
12/08  Secret Invasion #8 of 8 - 152,429  ( -1.5%)
                                  6 mnth  (-18.3%)

The big crossover wraps up, miles ahead of its nearest competition - whether you judge that to be Marvel’s top ongoing series (some 60,000 behind), the “Dark Reign” prelude (50,000 behind) or DC’s FINAL CRISIS (over 40,000 behind). And this is the final issue of eight, remember.

Granted, it’s not in the same league as CIVIL WAR, whose final issue sold 266K. But it’s bigger than last year’s WORLD WAR HULK, which finished up at 146K. A clear hit, proving that the audience still hasn’t tired of the big crossovers.

(more…)

John Jackson Miller analyzes 2008 year-end comics sales

01/27/09

Number cruncher John Jackson Miller looks at Diamond’s yearend figures and concludes that in 2008, the industry moved sideways:

Now, to 2008: As noted, the industry didn’t so much grow or slip as move sideways. Top 300 Comics Unit and Dollar Sales were down 5% and 3% respectively, and the top 100 trades were up 4%. The overall figure is up 1.5% in my aggregated month-by month calculations, a process explained here (along with the caveats it entails).

That would make this the eighth straight year with an overall increase, but I am approaching this observation with some caution given statements out of Diamond that sales were off last year — three different sources there have stated sales declined slightly, with one referring to a 4% drop.


There’s a lot more to digest at Jackson’s site, but we’re too shell-shocked this week to absorb the numbers.

One thing that has emerged from a number of conversations we’ve had over the last few days: In 2008, comics slipped only a few percentage points, but this year, publishers expect to slip a little bit more. It’s just that margin that is killing everyone.

Diamond’s Top Ten for 2008

01/13/09

Topten08

Diamond sent out a press release with their top ten comics and GNs of ‘08, along with a publisher chart. We know you LOVE the charts, so here we go:

Marvel Comics’ Secret Invasion #1 was the best-selling comic book title for 2008 based on total unit sales to comic book specialty shops, according to Diamond Comic Distributors, the world’s largest distributor of comics, graphic novels, and pop-culture products. All eight issues of the limited series crossover event placed in the top ten comics of 2008, and were joined by Uncanny X-men #500 (#6) and DC Comics’ first issue of its 2008 mega-event, Final Crisis #1 (#10).

In addition, Marvel Comics closed out 2008 as the top publisher, leading both Retail Dollar and Unit Market Shares, with a 46% Unit Market Share, and a 41% Retail Dollar Market Share. DC Comic’s was the comic book industry’s second leading publisher with 32% Unit Market Share, and a 30% Retail Dollar Market Share.

2008’s top-selling graphic novel was the perennial best-seller, DC Comics’ Watchmen TP, which enjoyed renewed success in the wake of the upcoming feature film in 2009. DC Comics also dominated graphic novel sales by taking seven of the top ten spots.

“Comic book and graphic novel sales through comic book specialty shops remained strong in 2008, with graphic novel sales increasing five-percent over 2007” remarked Diamond CEO Steve Geppi. “Our publishers did a tremendous job of creating compelling storylines that comic fans wanted to see, and we remain optimistic about the comic book industry heading into 2009.”

2008 TOP COMIC BOOK PUBLISHERS

QUANTITY SHARE

RETAIL SHARE

MARVEL COMICS

45.82%

40.81%

DC COMICS

31.67%

29.94%

DARK HORSE COMICS

5.05%

6.49%

IMAGE COMICS

3.32%

3.73%

IDW PUBLISHING

2.92%

3.08%

OTHERS

11.22%

15.95%

2008 TOP 10 COMIC BOOKS

Quantity Rank

Description

Price

Publisher

1

SECRET INVASION #1

$3.99

Marvel Comics

2

SECRET INVASION #2

$3.99

Marvel Comics

3

SECRET INVASION #3

$3.99

Marvel Comics

4

SECRET INVASION #4

$3.99

Marvel Comics

5

SECRET INVASION #5

$3.99

Marvel Comics

6

SECRET INVASION #6

$3.99

Marvel Comics

7

UNCANNY X-MEN #500

$3.99

Marvel Comics

8

SECRET INVASION #7

$3.99

Marvel Comics

9

FINAL CRISIS #1

$3.99

DC Comics

10

SECRET INVASION #8

$3.99

Marvel Comics

2008 TOP 10 GRAPHIC NOVELS & TRADE PAPERBACKS

Quantity Rank

Description

Price

Publisher

1

WATCHMEN TP

$19.99

DC Comics

2

BATMAN THE KILLING JOKE SPECIAL ED HC

$17.99

DC Comics

3

JOKER HC

$19.99

DC Comics

4

Y THE LAST MAN TP VOL 10 WHYS AND WHEREFORES

$14.99

DC Comics

5

WALKING DEAD TP VOL 08 MADE TO SUFFER

$14.99

Image Comics

6

BATMAN DARK KNIGHT RETURNS TP

$14.99

DC Comics

7

FABLES TP VOL 10: THE GOOD PRINCE

$17.99

DC Comics

8

WANTED GN

$19.99

Image Comics

9

BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER SEASON 8 TP VOL 02:

NO FUTURE FOR YOU

$15.95

Dark Horse Comics

10

Y THE LAST MAN TP VOL 01 UNMANNED

$12.99

DC Comics


While Marvel slayed on the pamphlet chart, DC’s strong graphic novel showing is notable, especially the success of THE JOKER, which managed to extend DARK KNIGHT’s popularity. (That the book was extremely well done didn’t hurt.) Batman, Alan Moore, Y, FABLES, WALKING DEAD, and BUFFY continue to be the blockbusters.

Chart watcher John Jackson Miller has some commentary here. He also notes that all the best selling periodicals were $3.99.

DC Comics Month-to-Month Sales: November 2008

01/9/09

by Marc-Oliver Frisch

While the economic crisis still didn’t seem to have any noticeable effect on the periodical comics direct market in November, the unplanned absence of several major titles certainly did. In the case of DC Comics, the offenders were - take a deep breath - Final Crisis, All Star Batman, Justice League of America, Green Lantern, Final Crisis: Revelations and Superman/Batman; and Batman, which was meant to have two issues out, instead of just one. Consequently, in a drop that mirrors the one back in September, the average DC Comics periodical sold a whopping 13% fewer units than it did in October. With the crossover storylines “New Krypton” and “JSA: Kingdom Come” and the debut of the Kevin Smith vehicle Batman: Cacophony, DC had a few potential new top-sellers out in November, but none of them did especially well.

At DC’s Vertigo sublabel, P. Craig Russell’s new comics adaptation of an old Sandman prose story by Neil Gaiman was moderately successful, but not successful enough to noticeably affect the imprint’s flagging average sales. WildStorm tried to tap into two more Hollywood franchises with new comics adaptations of The X-Files and something called Push, meanwhile. Like most of their recent avalanche of licensed properties, however, they were given the cold shoulder by comics retailers.

See below for the details, and please mind the small print at the end of the column. Thanks to Milton Griepp and ICv2.com for the permission to use their figures. An overview of ICv2.com’s estimates can be found here.

—–

2 - BATMAN
11/2001: Batman #597 —  40,682*
11/2002: Batman #609 —  95,065*
11/2003: Batman #621 —  96,784 [100,754]
11/2004: Batman #634 —  63,769
11/2005: Batman #647 —  69,718
11/2006: Batman #658 —  94,349
11/2006: Batman #659 —  90,651
——————————-
11/2007: Batman #671 —  76,764 (- 0.2%) [ 80,440]
12/2007: Batman #672 —  71,189 (- 7.3%)
01/2008: Batman #673 —  69,234 (- 2.8%)
02/2008: Batman #674 —  68,208 (- 1.5%)
03/2008: –
04/2008: Batman #675 —  71,138 (+ 4.3%)
05/2008: Batman #676 — 105,039 (+47.9%) [122,877]
05/2008: Batman #677 —  96,116 (- 8.5%) [111,065]
06/2008: –
07/2008: Batman #678 — 103,213 (+ 7.4%)
08/2008: Batman #679 — 103,588 (+ 0.4%)
09/2008: –
10/2008: Batman #680 — 103,941 (+ 0.3%)
11/2008: Batman #681 — 103,151 (- 0.8%)
—————-
6 months: + 2.6%
1 year  : +34.4%
2 years : +11.5%
5 years : + 6.6%

Well, this is very unusual.

All throughout the “Batman RIP” story, Batman managed to sell well above 100K. For the last four issues, it seems like somebody nailed it to 103,000 copies and went away for an extended vacation. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a blockbuster storyline hold on to its audience as consistently well as this one.

In theory, now, this should be very good news for DC. In practice, of course, it’s nothing of the sort. Because, as you may have heard by now, they rather blew it. The solicitation copy for Batman #681, a story titled “Batman RIP: Conclusion,” promised, among other things, “the final fate” of Batman, “the horrifying and shocking truth” about the big villain of the piece and - brace yourself - “an ending you’ll never see coming.” Well, I guess they did deliver on the latter. In case you missed the grand finale: It consisted of a helicopter crash; both Batman and the villain, whose identity remains obscure, were aboard the helicopter when it crashed. And they disappeared.

And that was it. No “final fate” in sight. “Shocking truth” cancelled.

And so, when two hundred thousand eyebrows raised in unison caused a minor earthquake at the DC Comics offices in New York, DC Universe editor Dan DiDio went on Newsarama to defend the lack of a payoff. According to Mr. DiDio, the real ending to “Batman RIP” will, in fact, appear in the delayed Final Crisis #6, currently scheduled for January. But because the eventual “Batman RIP” paperback collection - which, of course, won’t include Final Crisis #6 - will require some closure of its own, Mr. DiDio explains, an inconclusive faux ending was needed for Batman #681. Because, evidently, DC Comics’ extensive probing of the market has revealed that the only people who crave inconclusive faux endings more than the followers of monthly periodicals are those who prefer paperback collections. (The latter is pure conjecture on my part, I should add. DC didn’t share their market research concerning inconclusive faux endings with me.)

So, all in all, whether the great commercial success of “Batman RIP” is a blessing or a curse for DC remains to be seen. Clearly, a lot of people liked this story while it was going on. And clearly, DC utterly and blatantly botched what should have been a big payoff. Who knows, maybe those 100,000 folks who turned up at the store every month will just shrug and move on to Final Crisis #6, as DC would like them to.

I’m rather skeptical, though.

As usual for the duration of the “Batman RIP” story, there was a 1-for-25 variant-cover edition boosting the book’s sales.


(more…)